9 Amendments of Hannu TAKKULA related to 2013/0012(COD)
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) This Directive is not intended to place any additional direct or indirect financial burden on Member States or local and regional authorities. Member States may implement this Directive in a cost-neutral way as regards their national budgets, making use of a wide range of regulatory and non-regulatory incentives, in close cooperation with private-sector actors, who should play a leading role in supporting the development of alternative fuels infrastructure.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1
Article 1
This Directive establishes a common framework of measures for the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure in the Union in order to break the oil dependence of transport and sets out minimum requirements on alternative fuels infrastructure build-up and common technical specifications, including recharging points for electric vehicles and refuelling points for natural gas (LNG and CNG) and hydrogen. The Directive also establishes measures through national policy frameworks which will help promote fungible fuels that do not require new infrastructure.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 1 – indent 4
Article 2 – point 1 – indent 4
– synthetic and paraffinic fuels,
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – point 1 – indent 4 a (new)
Article 2 – point 1 – indent 4 a (new)
- renewable fuels,
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 1
– a regional level assessment of the state and future development of alternative fuels;
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. National policy frameworks shall consider high quality drop-in fuels which do not demand any new infrastructure as preferred options.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Member States may depart from the requirement in paragraph 1 if: - regional circumstances, such as climate, sparse population, geographical location, distances and traffic flows, indicate the requirement is not reasonable compared to its benefits; -the requirement cannot be achieved in a cost-effective way; -the objective of this Directive can be reached otherwise by prioritising some other alternative fuel, infrastructure or technology; - the technical development of fuels, vehicles or transportation methods indicate that the requirement becomes unreasonable compared to its benefits; - other regional circumstances indicate the requirement is clearly not suitable for a specific region.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Member States can depart from the requirement in paragraph 1 if: - regional circumstances, such as climate, sparse population, geographical location, distances and traffic flows, indicate the requirement is not reasonable compared to its benefits; -the requirement cannot be achieved in a cost-effective way; -the objective of this Directive can be reached otherwise by prioritising some other alternative fuel, infrastructure or technology; - the technical development of fuels, vehicles or transportation methods indicate that the requirement becomes unreasonable compared to its benefits; - other regional circumstances indicate the requirement is clearly not suitable for a specific region.
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 9 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 9 a (new)