BETA

4 Amendments of Antonio MASIP HIDALGO related to 2009/2140(INI)

Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the grounds on which exception may be taken to enforcement must be no fewermore than those set out in Arts 34 and 35 of the Regulation and encourages the Commission to initiate a public debate on the question of public policy in connection with private international law instruments;
2010/05/12
Committee: JURI
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that, in order to save costs, the translation of the decision to be enforced could be limited to the final order (operative part and summary grounds), but that a full translation should be required in the event that an application is made for review or if the court considers it appropriate in order to enforce the decision with full respect to its content;
2010/05/12
Committee: JURI
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Strongly opposes the (even partial) abolition of the exclusion of arbitration from the scope; any change whatsoever that could hinder the effectiveness of arbitration agreements and, in general, the proper functioning of arbitration in civil and commercial matters;
2010/05/12
Committee: JURI
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Considers that the question whether the rules of the Regulation should be given reflexive effect has not been sufficiently considered and that it would be premature to take this step without much study, wide- ranging consultations and political debate, in which Parliament should play a leading role; further considers that, in view of the existing of large numbers of bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries, questions of reciprocity and international comity, the problem is a global one and a solution should be sought in the Hague Conference through the resumption of negotiations on an international judgments convention; mandates the Commission to use its best endeavours to revive this project, the Holy Grail of private international lawto be sufficiently considered;
2010/05/12
Committee: JURI