6 Amendments of Antonio MASIP HIDALGO related to 2013/2117(INI)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas a non-binding comparative exercise has the merits of identifying successes and shortcomings and enablingimprovements and backward steps and of striving towards the exchange of best practices across the Union while leaving the autonomy of national legal and judicial systems untouched;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomesTakes note of the EU Justice Scoreboard, and congratulates the Commission thereon; calls on the Commission to take this exercise forward in line with the Treaties and in consultation with Member States;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. LaudsTakes note of the efforts of the Commission to provide measurable data, but considers that some goals, such as the impartiality and the quality of justice, cannot be measured easily;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Member States to examine the results of the 2013 Justice Scoreboard closely and to determine whether any consequences need to be drawn therefrom for the organisation and progress of their respective civil, commercial and administrative justice systems;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. States its interest in receiving data on cross-border cases, which often involve a greater degree of complexity than purely domestic cases and demonstrate the obstacles that EU citizens face when exercising their rights deriving from the EU single market, particularly in the application of EU law;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Recalls the role of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) in gathering the relevant data at regional level, and the leading role of the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters in facilitating access to knowledge on EU and national law in this field;