BETA

Activities of Zuzana ROITHOVÁ related to 2010/0282(COD)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the detailed rules for access to the public regulated service offered by the global navigation satellite system established under the Galileo programme
2016/11/22
Committee: AFET
Dossiers: 2010/0282(COD)
Documents: PDF(226 KB) DOC(538 KB)

Amendments (17)

Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
(9) It is important in this connection that the Member StatesCommission determines the system of penaltiadministrative measures applicable in the event of non- compliance with the obligations stemming from this Decision, and that they ensure that those penalties are applied. The penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasivewhile the member states shall determine what penalties are applicable when national provisions enacted pursuant to this Decision are infringed. The member states ensure that those penalties and administrative measures are applied. In all cases, the administrative measures and the penalties must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. When administrative measures or penalties are imposed, the right of appeal for the accused individual or entity should be guaranteed.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 2 – paragraph 7 – indent 2 a (new)
- The non-member country or international organisation respects the democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, protection of religious faith, respect for human dignity, the principles of equality and solidarity, and respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter and international law.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – title
Penalties and administrative measures
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Member States shall determine what penalties and administrative measures are applicable when national provisions enacted pursuant to this Decision are infringed. The penalties shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
The Commission shall determine what administrative measures are applicable when the provisions of the present Decision are infringed by any of the PRS participants.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1 b (new)
In the case of non-member countries or international organisations, the agreement mentioned in Article 2(7) will provide for penalties and administrative measures in case of infringement.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 1 c (new)
The penalties and administrative measures shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Endangering the security of the system can lead to the lift of access authorisation. When penalties or administrative measures are imposed, the right of appeal for the accused individual or entity shall be guaranteed.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 4
4. As the operator of the security centre referred to in Article 16(a)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 (hereinafter ‘Security Centre’), the European GNSS Agency may be designated as a Competent PRS Authority by a PRS participant. The European GNSS Agency acts as the designated Competent PRS Authority for the Council, the Commission and the European Union agencies.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. The Competent PRS Authorities shall regularly report about the compliance with the minimum common standards to the Commission and to the European GNSS Agency.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. The Commission shall, with the help of the European GNSS Agency, annually report on the compliance of the Competent PRS Authorities with the minimum common standards to the Parliament and the Council.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 6 – paragraph 8
8. Where a Competent PRS Authority does not comply with the minimum common standards, the Commission may require that authority to use the technical resources of the European GNSS Agency.(Does not affect the English version)
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. The authority responsible for approving the security of European satellite navigation systems may at any time withdraw from a body referred to in paragraph 1 the authorisation it has granted to that body to manufacture PRS receivers and the associated security modules if it appears that the measures provided for in paragraph 3 have not been complied with. The decision on withdrawal of authorisation shall be subject to appeal. In the case of endangering the security of system based on the previous, current or potential acts of body referred to in paragraph 1 the appeal procedure has no suspensive effect.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 10 – paragraph 1
A non-member country on whose territory a reference station housing PRS equipment and forming part of the system derived from the Galileo programme is installed shall not be considered merely by virtue of that fact to be a PRS participant. The Commission shall lay down in conjunction with the non-member country the detailed rules for hosting and operating the reference station housing PRS equipment. These detailed rules shall include the possibility of access to the reference station for control purposes for the appropriate European bodies.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11a Financing The Commission, with the help of the Member States, shall propose the proper financing model of the PRS. The Commission shall report the financial framework to the European Parliament and the Council. This report shall detail the exact costs of how the PRS will be covered.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 11 b (new)
Article 11b Consultations and Transfer of Powers The Commission shall establish the conditions, that the European GNSS Agency can be in the shortest possible time involved in the decision-making processes on the PRS. The Commission shall consult, when it is necessary, the European GNSS Agency on all matters related to the PRS and the Commission shall transfer the powers linked to the PRS to the European GNSS Agency as soon as it is feasible, however, only in the case that these powers can be effectively exercised in that way.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex – point 6
6. Since any incidevent affecting the security of the PRS (such as the loss or theft of a receiver) must be notified, each Competent PRS Authority shall implement methods of detecting and rectifying the incidevent and of reporting it to the Security Centre.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex 1 – point 6
6. Since any incidevent affecting the security of the PRS (such as the loss or theft of a receiver) must be notified, each Competent PRS Authority shall implement methods of detecting and rectifying the incidevent and of reporting it to the Security Centre.
2011/02/15
Committee: AFET