Activities of Antonio LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE related to 2013/2117(INI)
Legal basis opinions (0)
Amendments (5)
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomesHas considered the EU Justice Scoreboard, and congratulates the Commission thereon; calls on the Commission to takecarry out this exercise forwardevery two years, in line with the Treaties and in consultation with Member States;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Supports the aim of the exchange of best practices with a view to ensuring an efficient and independent justice system that can contribute to economic growth in Europe and boost competitiveness; stresses that an effective and trustworthy justice system gives businesses incentives to develop and invest at national and cross- border level; considers, consequently, that the EU Justice Scoreboard should focus only on those aspects of the justice system closely linked with economic recovery in the framework of the European Semester.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that the comparison of national justice systems, especially in relation to their previous situation, must be based on objective criteria and on evidence which is objectively compiled, compared and analysed; points out the importance of assessing the functioning of the justice system as a whole, without separating it from the social, historical and economic situation of the Member States or from the constitutional tradition that ithe justice system stems from; stresses the importance of treating Member States impartially, thus ensuring equality of treatment between all Member States when assessing their justice systems;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. LaudsTakes note of the efforts of the Commission to provide measurable data, but considers that some goals, such as the impartiality and the quality of justice, cannot be measured easily;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. States its interest in receiving data on cross-border cases, which often involve a greater degree of complexity than purely domestic cases and demonstrate the obstacles that EU citizens face when exercising their rights deriving from the EU single market, particularly in the application of EU law;