Activities of Ioannis KASOULIDES related to 2008/2236(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
The review of the European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument (debate)
Amendments (5)
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that sectoral and general budget support under the ENPI should be made available only to countriegovernments which are able to implement it in a transparent, effective and accountable manner; calls on the Commission to review the appropriateness of budget support in countries which have problems with budgetary management and control procedures and high levels of corruption;establish alternative mechanisms of payment to civil society or programmes under the direct control of Commission's agents
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the need for a country-specific approach with regard to political conditionality; emphasises the importance of the independence of the judiciary as a factor underlying conditionality as far as possible;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines the importance of enhancing the coordination and complementarityimpact comparison of the ENP initiatives, such as the Black Sea Synergy, the UfM and the future Eastern Partnership, and of the different Community assistance instruments; calls for improved synchronisation between ENPI programmes and the financial cooperation provided by the Member States;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15, first indent
Paragraph 15, first indent
– the ENPI financing to the UfM mustof each ENP initiative South or East should not be providused to the detriment of other regional programmes, particularly in the social field;each other,
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Endorses the Economic Recovery and Stability package under the Community budget, which will provide up to EUR 500 million over the years 2008-2010 to rebuild Georgia after a damaging war and to ensure the reintegreconomic rehabilitation of internally displaced people until their return to their homes and properties; underlines that, in order to guarantee that the assistance is allocated to the most urgent needs of Georgia, proper conditionality and monitoring mechanisms should be attached to the EU financing; emphasises that the aid should be targeted to supporting the reform agenda as defined in the ENP action plan and the ENPI programming documents, which remain highly appropriate;