BETA

4 Amendments of Sajjad KARIM related to 2013/0185(COD)

Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) When applying for leniency or settlement procedure, an undertaking needs to have an unequivocal upfront legal certainty that its self-incriminating corporate statements are not revealed to third parties. Victims should be given access to any other information useful to prove their claims. The protection of self- incriminating corporate statements ensures undertakings continue cooperating with public authorities, thus enabling them to pursue more cartels and therefore empowering victims to gain redress.
2013/12/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2. ‘national competition law’ means provisions of national law that predominantly pursue the same objective as Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty and that are applied to the same case and in parallel to Union competition law pursuant to Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003; This definition does not apply to national laws which impose criminal sanctions on natural persons except to the extent that such sanctions are the means whereby competition rules applying to undertakings are enforced.
2013/12/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. Member States shall take the necessary measures to give full effect to legal privileges and other rights not to be compelled to disclose evidence in accordance to national law.
2013/12/20
Committee: JURI
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 7
7. Evidence shall include all types of evidence admissible before the national court seiszed, in particular documents and all other objects containing information, irrespective of the medium on which the information is storedwith the exception of leniency corporate statements.
2013/12/20
Committee: JURI