9 Amendments of Sajjad KARIM related to 2013/2117(INI)
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomesTakes note of the EU Justice Scoreboard, and congratulates the Commission thereon; calls on the Commission to take this exercise forward in line with the Treaties, bearing in mind the need to avoid the unnecessary duplication of work with other bodies, including the Council of Europe;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that the comparison of national justice systems must be based on objective criteria and on evidence which is objectively compiled, compared and analysed; points out the importance of assessing the functioning of the justice system as a whole, without separating it from the constitutional tradition that it stems from; stresses the importance of treating Member States impartially, thus ensuring equality of treatment between all Member States when assessing their justice systems ; recalls that these principles underpin the work of the Council of Europe's Commission on the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ);
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Lauds the efforts of the Commission to provide measurable data, but cConsiders that some goals, such as impartial justice, cannot be measured easily or objectively;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on theDraws the attention of Member States to examine the results of the 2013 Justice Scoreboard closely and to determine whether any consequences need to be drawn therefrom for the organisation of their respective civil, commercial and administrative justice systems;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Encourages the Member States to collect relevant data on issues such as the cost of proceedings, mediation cases and enforcement procedures; regrets that no data have been provided by some Member States for certain categories indicated in the Justice Scoreboard; believes, however, that the Commission should have drawn a distinction between instances where data was not available and instances where indicators were not relevant or applicable to individual Member States;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Asks the Commission to consider cross-border mediation procedures in its next such exercise; eEncourages Member States to actively promote mediation procedures with special regard to family matters regulated at EU level, such as Rome III and Brussels II;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. RecallUnderlines the role of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) in gathering and presenting the relevant data, and the leading role of the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters in facilitating access to knowledge on EU and national law in this field;