BETA

Activities of Sajjad KARIM related to 2014/2253(INI)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on the 30th and 31st annual reports on monitoring the application of EU Law (2012-2013) PDF (226 KB) DOC (151 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2014/2253(INI)
Documents: PDF(226 KB) DOC(151 KB)

Amendments (18)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas, according to Article 6(1) TEU, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFREU) has the same legal value as the Treaties, and is addressed to the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union and the Member States when they are implementing Union law (Article 51(1) CFREU);deleted
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas, in the context of the recent financial crisis in the euro area, EU institutions have imposed on Member States, and subsequently incorporated in acts of secondary EU law, measures which violate directly the CFREU;deleted
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the Commission's 30th and 31st annual reports on the application of EU law, and notes that, according to these reports, the main fields in which Member States have failed to correctly implement EU law during the year 2012 were transport, protection of health and consumers, protection of the environment, and issues related to the internal market and services, whereas in 2013 the most problematic areas wereis concerned laws on the environment, protection of health and consumers, the Sinternalgle market and services, and transport;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses the importance of strengthening the effectiveness of implementation and infringement proceedings, in particular with regard to the Single Market, and the Single Market for services, due to its huge potential to deliver jobs, growth and competitiveness to the EU;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Notes the importance of monitoring the impact on competitiveness, economic growth and job creation when assessing the application of EU law;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2 c. Notes that the Parliament could assist in reviewing the implementation of legislation and through its scrutiny of the Commission by stepping up dialogue on implementation and enforcement and by means of implementation reports ;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the decrease in late transposition infringements in 2012 compared to the previous year was mainly due to the fact that there were less directives to transpose in 2012 compared to the previous years; recognises, however, that the statistics for the year 2013 show a real decrease in late transposition infringements, with the number of such infringements reaching a 5-year low at the end of that year, which could be seen as a positive outcome of the introduction in Article 260(3) TFEU of the ‘fast-track' procedure for penalties in cases of non- transposition;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that thean increase in the number of new EU Pilot files during the period under examination and the decrease in the number of open infringement cases; show that enforcement of EU law is neither sufficiently transparent nor subject to any real control by the complainants and the interested parties, and regrets that, despite its repeated requests, Parliament still has inadequate access to information about the EU Pilot procedure and pending casestresses that this may demonstrate that enforcement of EU law is not sufficiently transparent;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that the EU has been set up as a Union based on the rule of law and respect of human rights (Article 2 TEU), reiterates that careful monitoring of Member States' and EU institutions' acts and omissions is of utmost importance, and expresses its concern at the number of petitions to Parliament and complaints to the Commission concerning problems supposedly resolved byxpresses concern regarding the number of petitions to Parliament and complaints to the Commission;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recognises that the primary responsibility for the correct implementation and application of EU law lies with Member States, but points out that this does not absolve EU institutions of their duty to respect primary EU law when; notes, therefore, the importance of enhancing transposition to avoid 'gold plating', while fully respecting they produce secondary EU law, or decide, implement and imposeinciple of subsidiarity and the prerogatives onf Member States social, economic or other policiesin this regard;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Expresses its concern that the strict austerity measures which EU institutions imposed on over-indebted EU Member States, and which were subsequently incorporated in acts of secondary EU law before being transposed to domestic legislation, during the period covered by the two annual reports under examination, in particular the drastic cuts on public spending, have had the effect of reducing significantly the capacity of Member States' administration and judiciary to assume their responsibility to implement correctly EU law; further points out that some policies imposed on Member States, such as privatisation of public assets, constitute direct violation of principles on which the EU is founded (Article 345 TFEU provides that Member States retain sovereign competence as regards their choice of systems of property ownership);deleted
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Is thus particularly concerned at the fact that, in the context of the ‘Memoranda of Understanding' establishing economic adjustment programmes, Member States have been required to act in contravention of their obligation to respect fundamental rights, and considers that this development severely jeopardises the legitimacy of the EU as a whole;deleted
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Questions the oft-expressed view of the Commission that the Memoranda of Understanding are not EU acts and that the CFREU is therefore not applicable to them,4 and wishes to point out that all EU institutions, even when they act as members of groups of international lenders (‘troikas'), are bound by the Treaties and the CFREU; regrets that the annual reviews by the Commission, the ECB and the Council of economic adjustment programmes for members of the euro area have imposed on EU Member States obligations which run contrary to the objectives and values of the Union as expressed in the Treaties and the CFREU; __________________ 4See, for instance, the Commission’s answers to written questions by Members of the European Parliament: E- 7535/2014, E-7778/2014 and E- 10616/2014.deleted
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes, therefore, with regret that the Council, the Commission and the ECB do not always themselves respect the Treaties, nor do they assist Member States with the correct implementation of EU law, thus by their practice severely undermining popular support for the EU and belief in its legitimacyStresses the importance of Commission assisting Member States with the correct implementation of EU law and in identifying problems encountered when transposing EU legislation; calls for the Commission to publish concerns raised by Member States during the implementation process so that they can be fully addressed;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Highlights that inserting a review clause into each legislative proposal may serve to ensure the monitoring of existing laws but would also give the possibility to cross-check the initial policy objective and achieved results through ex-post impact assessments and thereby identify any necessary corrective measures or the case for withdrawals;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10 b. Notes the role that the introduction of sunset clauses may play in monitoring the application of EU law;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10 c. Stresses that the support of national parliaments in transposing legislation is essential in improving the application EU law and therefore calls for dialogue with national parliaments to be stepped up, including when subsidiarity concerns have been expressed; notes the crucial role of regular ex-post assessments and the importance of seeking the views of national parliaments to address concerns or complexities of legislation that may not have previously been apparent;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Encourages the EU institutions to assume their duty to respect primary EU law when they create rules of secondary EU law or decide policies in a number of areas, and also to assume their duty to assist, by all means available, EU Member States in their efforts to respect the values and the principles of the Union in times of austerity and budgetary constraintsist Member States in their efforts to transpose EU legislation;
2015/05/28
Committee: JURI