68 Amendments of Jean-Pierre AUDY related to 2013/0309(COD)
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) the national, European and regional authorities have to work together to ensure that citizens have access to electronic communications services that are secure, reliable and competitively priced, wherever they may be based in the European Union.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. This Regulation establishes in particular regulatory principles pursuant to which the Commission, the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the national and regional competent authorities shall act, each within its own competences, in conjunction with the provisions of Directives 2002/19/EC, 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/22/EC:
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) to favour investment and innovation in new and enhanced high-capacity infrastructures whichand to ensure that they reach throughout the Union and which can cater for evolving end-user demand, wherever they may be located in the European Union;
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) The application of various national policies creates inconsistencies and fragmentation of the internal market which hamper the roll-out of Union-wide services and the completion of the internal market for wireless broadband communications. It could in particular create unequal conditions for access to such services, hamper competition between undertakings established in different Member States and stifle investments in more advanced networks and technologies and the emergence of innovative services, thereby depriving citizens and businesses of ubiquitous integrated high-quality services and wireless broadband operators of increased efficiency gains from large-scale more integrated operations. Therefore, action at Union level regarding certain aspects of radio spectrum assignment should accompany the development of wide integrated coverage of advanced wireless broadband communications services throughout the Union. At the same time, Member States should retain the right to adopt measures to organise their radio spectrum for public order, public security purposes and defence and to pursue general interest objectives, in particular in the context of audiovisual and media policies.
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) Coordination and consistency of rights of use for radio spectrum should be improved, at least for the bands which have been harmonised for wireless fixed, nomadic and mobile broadband communications. This includes the bands identified at ITU level for International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT) Advanced systems, as well as bands used for radio local area networks (RLAN) such as 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. It shouldmay also extend to bands that may be harmonised in the future for wireless broadband communications, as envisaged in Article 3(b) of the RSPP and in the RSPG Opinion on "Strategic challenges facing Europe in addressing the growing radio spectrum demand for wireless broadband" adopted on 13 June 2013, such as, in the near future, the 700 MHz, 1.5 GHz and 3.8-4.2 GHz bands in accordance with Articles 8a and 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC.
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Considering the massive growth in radio spectrum demand for wireless broadband, solutions for alternative spectrally efficient access to wireless broadband should be promoted. This includes the use of low-power wireless access systems with a small- area operating range such as so called ‘'hotspots’' of radio local area networks (RLAN, also known as ‘Wi-Fi’), as well as networks of low-power small size cellular access points (also called femto-, pico- or metrocells).
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 45
Recital 45
(45) The internet has developed over the past decades as an open platform for innovation with low access barriers for end-users, content and application providers and internet service providers. The open and non-discriminatory nature of the internet plays a key driving role in innovation and economic efficiency, but also in safeguarding the freedom and pluralism of the media, as well as cultural diversity. The existing regulatory framework aims at promoting the ability of end-users to access and distribute information or run applications and services of their choice. Recently, however, the report of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) on traffic management practices published in May 2012 and a study, commissioned by the Executive Agency for Consumers and Health and published in December 2012, on the functioning of the market of internet access and provision from a consumer perspective, showed that a significant number of end-users are affected by traffic management practices which block or slow down specific applications. These tendencies require clear rules at the Union level to maintain the open internet and to avoid fragmentation of the single market resulting from individual Member States' measures. The development of specialised services or of traffic offering a guaranteed quality of service should not undermine the open internet based on the ‘best effort’ principle. The open internet must remain the standard and not become the exception.
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
Recital 47
(47) In an open internet, providers of electronic communications to the public should, within contractually agreed limits on data volumes and speeds for internet access services, not block, slow down, degrade or discriminate against specific content, applications or services or specific classes thereof except for a limited number of reasonable traffic management measures. SuchAny price discrimination or discriminatory conditions relating to data volumes and speeds in respect of specific content, applications or services should be prohibited. Reasonable traffic management measures should be transparent, proportionate and non- discriminatory. Reasonable traffic management encompasses prevention or impediment of serious crimes, including voluntary actions of providers to prevent access to and distribution of child pornography. Minimising the effects of network congestion should be considered reasonable provided that network congestion occurs only temporarily or in exceptional circumstances. As soon as they implement such measures, providers of electronic communications to the public must notify the providers of content, applications or services.
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47 a (new)
Recital 47 a (new)
(47 a) The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union requires that limitations to the respect for private life, right of confidentiality of communications, right to data protection or freedom to receive or impart information must be provided for by law and respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. In the context of traffic management measures, the CJEU in Case C-70/10, SABAM v. Tiscali (Scarlet), with respect to general monitoring of electronic communications, states that an imposition of an obligation on an Internet service provider of electronic communications or services to indiscriminately monitor communications would constitutes not only a serious infringement on the freedom of the provider to conduct its business, but may also infringe the fundamental rights of the customers of the provider. Any scheme involving general monitoring of communications by providers of electronic communications or services should therefore be specifically provided for by Union law, or national law adopted in conformity with Union law;
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 48
Recital 48
(48) Volume-based tariffs should be considered compatible with the principle of an open internet as long as they allow end- users to choose the tariff corresponding to their normal data consumption based on transparent information about the conditions and implications of such choice. At the same time, such tariffs should enable providers of electronic communications to the public to better adapt network capacities to expected data volumes. In order to customize their offers to meet end-user demand for specific content, services or applications, providers of electronic communications may provide offers where the conveyance of data for such content, services or applications is not deducted from the customers data allowance. It is essential that end-users are fully informed before agreeing to any data volume or speed limitations and the tariffs applicable, that they can continuously monitor their consumption and easily acquire extensions of the available data volumes if desired.
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 49
Recital 49
(49) There is also end-user demand for services and applications requiring an enhanced level of assured service quality offered by providers of electronic communications to the public or by content, applications or service providers. Such services may comprise inter alia broadcasting via Internet Protocol (IP-TV), video-conferencing and certain health applications. End-users should therefore also be free to conclude agreements on the provision of specialised services with an enhanced quality of service with either providers of electronic communications to the public or providers of content, applications or services.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50
Recital 50
(50) In addition, there is demand on the part of content, applications and services providers, for the provision of transmission services based on flexible quality parameters, including lower levels of priority for traffic which is not time- sensitive. The possibility for content, applications and service providers to negotiate such flexible quality of service levels with providers of electronic communications to the public is necessary for the provision of specialised services and is expected to play an important role in the development of new services such as machine-to-machine (M2M) communications. At the same time such arrangements should allow providers of electronic communications to the public to better balance traffic and prevent network congestion. Providers of content, applications and services and providers of electronic communications to the public should therefore be free to conclude specialised services agreements on defined levels of quality of service as long as such agreements do not substantially impair the general quality of internet access services. In that respect, the dymanic allocation of the capacity not used for specialised services, when they are switched off, to the internet access service contributes to its overall quality;
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 72
Recital 72
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 73
Recital 73
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 74
Recital 74
(74) The Digital Agenda for Europe and Regulation No 531/2012 establish the policy objective that the difference between roaming and domestic tariffs should approach zero. In practical terms, this requires that consumers falling into any of the broad observable categories of domestic consumption, identified by reference to a party's various domestic retail packages, should be in a position to confidently replicate the typical domestic consumption pattern associated with their respective domestic retail packages while periodically travelling within the Union, without additional costs to those incurred in a domestic setting. Such broad categories may be identified from current commercial practice by reference, for example, to the differentiation in domestic retail packages between pre-paid and post- paid customers; GSM-only packages (i.e. voice, SMS); packages adapted for different volumes of consumption; packages for business and consumer use respectively; retail packages with prices per unit consumed and those which provide ‘buckets’ of units (e.g. voice minutes, megabytes of data) for a standard fee, irrespective of actual consumption. The diversity of retail tariff plans and packages available to customers in domestic mobile markets across the Union accommodates varying user demands associated with a competitive market. That flexibility in domestic markets should also be reflected in the intra-Union roaming environment, while bearing in mind that the need of roaming providers for wholesale inputs from independent network operators in different Member States may still justify the imposition of limits by reference to reasonable use if domestic tariffs are applied to such roaming consumption. This is to prevent anomalous or fraudulent usage as well as arbitrage scenarios which could have an impact on competitive domestic markets.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 75
Recital 75
(75) While it is in the first place for roaming providers to assess themselves the reasonable character of the volumes of roaming voice calls, SMS and data to be covered at domestic rates under their various retail packages, national regulatory authorities should supervise the application by roaming providers of such reasonable use limits and ensure that they are specifically defined by reference to detailed quantified information in the contracts in terms which are clear and transparent to customers. In so doing, national regulatory authorities should take utmost account of relevant guidance from BEREC. In its guidance, BEREC should – based on the results of a prior public consultation - identify various usage patterns substantiated by the underlying voice, data and SMS usage trends at the Union level, and the evolution of expectations as regards in particular wireless data consumption.
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point a
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
b) to promote sustainable competition within the single market and the global competitiveness of the Union, and to reduce sector-specific market regulation accordingly as and when these objectives are achieved;with respect to the achievement of sustainable competition within the single market.
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
d a) to promote sustainable competition within the single market and to ensure a level playing field for all the actors in competition on this market with respect to rules and regulation
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new)
d b) to secure simplified, predictable and convergent regulatory conditions regarding key administrative and commercial parameters, including as regards the proportionality of individual obligations which may be imposed pursuant to market analysis;
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 8
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 8
(8) "harmonised radio spectrum for wireless broadband communications" means radio spectrum for which the conditions of availability and, efficientcy and primary use are harmonised at Union level, in particular pursuant toaccordance with Directive 2002/21/EC and Decision 676/2002/EC of the European Parliament and the Council,27 and which serves for electronic communications services other than broadcasting; __________________ 27 Decision 676/2002/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 7 March 2002 on a regulatory framework for radio spectrum policy in the European Community (Radio Spectrum Decision) (OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p. 1).
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 9
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 9
(9) ‘"small-area wireless access point’" means a low power wireless network access equipment of small size operating within a small range, using licensed spectrum or a combination of licensed and license-exempt spectrum, which may or may not be part of a public terrestrial mobile communications network, and be equipped with one or more low visual impact antennas, which allows wireless access by the public to electronic communications networks regardless of the underlying network topology;
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 10
(10) ‘"radio local area network’" (RLAN) means a low power wireless access system, operating within a small range, with a low risk of interference to other such systems deployed in close proximity by other users, using on a non-exclusivelicense-exempt basis spectrum for which the conditions of availability and efficient use for this purpose are harmonised at Union level;, without prejudice to the license-exempt regime which includes no regulatory protection rights, nor rights to cause harmful interferences to licensed radio systems in band or in adjacent bands.
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 14
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 14
(14) "internet access service" means a publicly available electronic communications service that provides connectivity to the internet, and thereby connectivity between virtually all end points connected to the internet, irrespective of the network technology used. It allows end-users to run any application using an electronic communications network on the basis of the ‘best effort’ principle;
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 15
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point 15
(15) ‘"specialised service’" means an electronic communications service or any other service that provides the capability to access specific content, applications or services, or a combination thereof, that is subject to admission control and whose technical characteristics are controlled from end-using traffic management in order to- endsure adequate service characteristics or provides the capability to send or receive data to or from a determined number of parties or endpoints; and that is not marketed or widely used as a substitute for internet access service;
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. This section shall apply to harmonised radio spectrum for wireless broadband communications, in accordance with Articles 8a and 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC.
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. This section shall be without prejudice to the right of the Member States to benefit from fees imposed to ensure the optimal use of radio spectrum resources in accordance with Article 13 of Directive 2002/20/EC and to organise and use their radio spectrum for public order, public security and defence, as well as to pursue general interest objectives, in particular in the context of audiovisual and media policies.
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The national competent authorities shall apply a transparent process and apply the least onerous authorisation system possible for allowingoffering all actors equal access conditions to the use of radio spectrum, on the basis of objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria, in such a way as to maximise flexibility and efficiency in radio spectrum use and to promote comparable conditions throughout the Union for integrated multi-territorial investments and operations by European electronic communications providers.
Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. When establishing authorisation conditions and procedures for the use of radio spectrum, national competent authorities shall have regard in particular to equalobjective, transparent and non- discriminatory treatment between existing and potential operators and between European electronic communications providers and other undertakings.
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point e a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point e a (new)
(ea) preventing any harmful interference, including the possibility of imposing obligations to resolve interference with other radio spectrum users and to cover the costs incurred;
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. National competent authorities shall ensure that timely information is available on authorisation conditions and procedures for the use of radio spectrum, and allow interested parties to submit their views in the process.
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. When determining the amount and type of radio spectrum to be assigned in a given procedure for granting rights of use for radio spectrum, the national competent authorities shall have regard to the following:technical characteristics of different available radio spectrum bands.
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) the most efficient use of the radio spectrum in accordance with Article 9(4)(b), taking into account the characteristics and current and planned use of the band or bands concerned;
Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
National competent authorities shall ensure that the fees for rights of use for radio sSpectrum of all types, if any:
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) appropriately reflect the social, cultural and economic value of the radio spectrum, including beneficial externalities, and do not exceed market value;
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) take into account the costs entailed in evicting current radio spectrum users, where applicable;
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
When determining whether to impose any mobile access obligations, competent national authorities shall justify their decision by a thorough assessment of the market conditions showing a market failure and an impact assessment on investment made by network operators. They shall review any obligations imposed regularly.
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13a Coverage obligation The European Union and the Member States shall adopt measures guaranteeing access for European citizens and entities, public or private, to the single market for electronic communications, as regards both quality of service and market prices, wherever they are within the European Union;
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. National competent authorities shall allow the provision of access through radio local area networks to the network of a provider of electronic communications to the public as well as the use of the harmonised radio spectrum for such provision, subject only to general authorisation, and compliance with rules applied to license exempt spectrum especially regarding interferences and competition rules.
Amendment 538 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
For the purposes of the uniform implementation of the general authorisation regime for the deployment, connection and operation of small-area wireless access points pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission may, by means of an implementing act, specify technical characteristics for the design, deployment and operation of small-area wireless access points, compliance with which shall ensure their unobtrusive character when in use in different local contexts. The Commission shall specify those technical characteristics by reference to the maximum size, power and electromagnetic characteristics, as well as the visual impact, of the deployed small- area wireless access points. Those technical characteristics for use of small- area wireless access points shall at a minimum comply with the requirements of Directive 2013/35/EU30 and withDirective 1999/5/EC, taking into account the thresholds defined in Council Recommendation No 1999/519/EC.31 __________________ 30 Directive 2013/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (20th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) and repealing Directive 2004/40/EC (OJ L 179, 29.6.2013, p. 1). 31 Recommendation 1999/519/EC of the Council of 12 July 1999 on the limitation of exposure of the general public to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 GHz) (OJ L 1999, 30.7.1999, p. 59).
Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter 3 – section 2
Chapter 3 – section 2
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2
Article 21 – paragraph 2
2. Providers of electronic communications to the public shall not apply any discriminatory requirements or conditions of access or use to end-users based on the end-user's nationality or placMember State of residence unless such differences are objectively justified.
Amendment 573 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 3
Article 21 – paragraph 3
Amendment 606 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
End-users shall also be free to agree with either providers of electronic communications to the public or with providers of content, applications and services on the provision ofccess specialised services with an enhanced quality of service.
Amendment 620 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
In order to enable the provision of specialised services to end-users, providers of content, applications and services and providers of electronic communications to the public shall be free to enter into agreements with each other to transmit the related data volumes or traffic as specialised services with a defined quality of service or dedicated capacity. The provision of specialised services shall not impair in a recurring or continuous manner the generalthe quality of internet access services.
Amendment 623 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Vertically integrated providers of electronic communications to the public shall not discriminate in any way against traffic from providers of content, applications or services offering content, services or applications competing with their own services or with services provided under exclusive arrangements;
Amendment 635 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 23 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Amendment 640 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 23 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Within the limits of any contractually agreed data volumes or speeds for internet access services, providers of internet access services shall not restrict the freedoms provided for in paragraph 1 by blocking, slowing down, degrading or discriminating against specific content, applications or services, or specific classes thereof, except in cases where it is necessary to apply reasonable traffic management measures. Reasonable traffic management measures shall be transparent, non-discriminatory, proportionate and necessaryefficient. Reasonable traffic management includes the processing of data to:
Amendment 660 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 23 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) prevent the transmission of unsolicited communications to end-users who have given their prior consent to such restrictive measures;
Amendment 675 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 23 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) minimise the effects of any recorded temporary or exceptional network congestion provided that equivalent types of traffic are treated equally.
Amendment 695 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1
Article 24 – paragraph 1
1. National regulatory authorities shall closely monitor and ensure the effective ability of end-users to benefit from the freedoms provided for in Article 23 (1) and (2), compliance with Article 23 (5), and the continued availability of non- discriminatory internet access services at levels of quality that reflect advances in technology and that are not impaired by specialised services. They shall, in cooperation with other competent national authorities, also monitor the effects of specialised services on cultural diversand linguistic diversity, media freedom and plurality and innovation. National regulatory authorities shall report on an annual basis to the Commission and BEREC on their monitoring and findings.
Amendment 700 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 24 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
National regulatory authorities shall, in good time before imposing any such requirements, provideconsult with providers of electronic communications to the public before providing the Commission with a summary of the grounds for action, the envisaged requirements and the proposed course of action. This information shall also be made available to BEREC. The Commission may, having examined such information, make comments or recommendations thereupon, in particular to ensure that the envisaged requirements do not adversely affect the functioning of the internal market. The envisaged requirements shall not be adopted during a period of two months from the receipt of complete information by the Commission unless otherwise agreed between the Commission and the national regulatory authority, or the Commission has informed the national regulatory authority of a shortened examination period, or the Commission has made comments or recommendations. National regulatory authorities shall take the utmost account of the Commission's comments or recommendations and shall communicate the adopted requirements to the Commission and BEREC.
Amendment 708 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e – point i
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e – point i
(i) actually available data speed for download and upload in the end-user’'s Member State of residence, including at peak-hours; and the means made available to the end-user to check, at any time, the actual data speed for download and upload, together with a breakdown of the data speed actually available during the period covered by the contract;
Amendment 712 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e – point iv
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e – point iv
(iv) information on any procedures put in place by the provider to measure and shape traffic so as to avoid congestion of a network, and on how those procedures could affect service quality and the protection of personal data; and the means made available to the end-user to ensure that traffic orientation measures are applied effectively;
Amendment 761 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – point 1
Article 37 – point 1
Regulation (UE) n° 531/2012
Article 1
Article 1
This Regulation shall apply to regulated roaming services provided in the Union to end users whose domestic provider is a provider of electronic communications to the public in a Member State.
Amendment 783 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – point 4 a (new)
Article 37 – point 4 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 531/2012
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6 a (new)
Amendment 793 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – point 8
Article 37 – point 8
Amendment 820 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 a (new)
Article 39 a (new)
Article 39a European regulatory and supervisory authority for the European single market for electronic communications An independent European regulatory and supervisory authority for the European single market for electronic communications shall be established to regulate and supervise the functioning of the European electronic communications market. The operating costs of this independent authority shall be met through a compulsory levy on electronic communications.
Amendment 821 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1
Annex 1
Amendment 827 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2
Annex 2