12 Amendments of Marian-Jean MARINESCU related to 2011/2019(BUD)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the Commission's Communication COM(2010) 673 of 22 November 2010 on Internal Security Strategy in Action sets out steps for an effective implementation of EU objectives regarding the fight and prevention of serious and organised crime, terrorism and cybercrime, the improvement of the management of EU external borders and building resilience to natural and man- made disasters,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas every possible change of the EU external borders in the future as a result of possible EU enlargement should be taken into account in the budgetary planning,
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls on the Commission to examine in a study the possibility of simplifying management rules of the funds and avoiding duplications, bureaucracy and delays because of the different levels involved (European and national) focusing on rationalisation of spending and a more cost-efficient implementation of policy priorities;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Stresses the importance to redefine the EU budget around EU added value and maximise the efficiency of national funding in areas of common EU interest such as: border management, the implementation of policies on asylum and migration, crisis management, development of a common EU platform of information and data as means for the practical cooperation in the areas of police and judicial cooperation, prevention of terrorism and crime;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Considers that increased EU funding is needed in areas where burden sharing is important (external borders, asylum) and areas where cooperation between Member States is crucial (security and safeguarding liberties);
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that it is necessary to dedicate funding to international protection and integration and not to focus primarily only on countering irregular migration; countering irregular migrationnsiders that funding under the European Return Fund, which is an important tool for an efficient management of migration flows, must be substantial and contribute to the implementation of the EU legislation in this area in the Member States;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Reiterates that securing the external EU border should be complemented by programmes and the necessary funding for strengthening the third country borders neighbouring the EU, included in the current framework of the negotiations with the Western Balkans countries and the European Neighbourhood Policy (EUROMED, Eastern Partnership);
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Is concerned by the proposal to decrease by 3,4 % the funding for the programme “Prevention, Preparedness and Consequence Management of Terrorism”; considers that the budget for critical infrastructure protection, cybersecurity, fighting terrorism, protection against chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) risks should match the objectives they have to support and at least no change with regard to the 2011 budget should be envisaged;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Highlights the fact that the revision of the FRONTEX mandate should be taken into consideration when deciding on the budget for the Agency for 2012; emphasises the importance of funding for supporting activities, such as training, and reiterates its support for the creation of a European system of border guards;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Reiterates the need for programmes and funding which would allow rapid and substantial action in case of emergency situations; considers that, in the future, the emergency response mechanism should be made available quickly and be allocated according to the evolving situations;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Reiterates that the Commission should think in terms of necessity and cost of the border equipment when considering the architecture of the EU’s border management strategy, therefore, in order to estimate the opportunity to more effectively allocate new funding for SIS II, calls on the Commission to carry out a thorough assessment which would clearly state the necessary funding for SIS II and a realistic timetable envisaged for the operability of SIS II;