6 Amendments of Marian-Jean MARINESCU related to 2012/2087(DEC)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Is concerned about the Commission's different requirements with regard to the implementation of first-level checks, as this can potentially result in the, alongside low coverage of expenditure or insufficient quality of the aforementioned first-level checks can generate high risks of non-detection of irregular expenses; asks the Commission to apply a coherent approach to demands for first-level checks and to provide information for the programming periods after 2000-2006 (point 28);
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Asks the Commission to disseminate even more extensively elaborated checklists and best practice manuals (with special focus on eligibility rules) to be followed by the Member States and to strengthen its supervision on how these elements are taken into account;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Believes the first-level checks to be of utmost importance in ensuring a robust error rate from the onset of the implementation process; believes therefore, that the management authority should either be accredited by the Commission or the Commission should assist and supervise the management authority in exercising the aforementioned first-level checks;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Believes that an even higher degree of efficiency can stem from harmonising the various methods used to obtain assurance related to financial corrections accuracy; is of the opinion that, in order to avoid further correction, the accent should be placed on the Commission's carrying out the verification audits rather than issuing follow-up audits in case of defective statements and results received from the Member States;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Asks the Commission to make efforts to ensure that Member States do not affect the continuity of programmes by changing entities, systems and personnel responsible for Structural Funds control, that had already been certified as effective by the Commission;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Believes strongly that the Commission should deepen its involvement in the Structural Funds scrutiny process by further assisting and supervising Member States' management and certifying authorities as well as the winding-up bodies, throughout all phases of implementation and verification, in order to ensure an even more efficient and less time and resource consuming process;