2 Amendments of Antonyia PARVANOVA related to 2010/0067(CNS)
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) Where no applicable law is chosen, and with a view to guaranteeing legal certainty and predictability and preventing a situation from arising in which one of the spouses applies for divorce before the other one does in order to ensure that the proceeding is governed by a given law which he or she considers more favourable to his or her own interests, this Regulation should introduce harmonised conflict-of- laws rules on the basis of a scale of successive connecting factors based on the existence of a close connection between the spouses and the law concerned. These connecting factors haveshould been chosen so that the divorce or legal separation proceeding is governed by a law with which the spouses have a close connection, and they are based first and foremost on the law of the spouses' habitual residence.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) In certain situations, such as where the applicable law makes no provision for divorce or where it does not grant one of the spouses equal access to divorce or legal separation on grounds of their sex, the law of the court seised should nevertheless apply, without prejudice to the public policy clause.