BETA

Activities of Matthias GROOTE related to 2013/2079(INI)

Plenary speeches (2)

Carbon capture and storage technology (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2079(INI)
Carbon capture and storage technology (debate)
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2013/2079(INI)

Amendments (20)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a proven technology that can significantly reduce CO2 emissions from industrial sources and fossil fuel power plants but requires industrial- scale demonstration to promote innovation and secure cost reductions;
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas in many Member States there is public opposition to CCS deployment and therefore promoting energy savings and increasing the share of renewables are better ways to decarbonise the power sector;
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas CCS is not necessary to decarbonise the power sector while industrial sectors like steel and cement have more limited potential to reduce CO2 emissions without the application of CCS;
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A c (new)
Ac. whereas, especially in times of austerity, public money should be spent wisely and directed to those climate- friendly technologies that are safe and sustainable, and have public support;
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recognises that CCS deployment in some energy intensive industrial sectors is needed for the EU to meet its 2050 low- carbon aspirations at least cost; affirms the urgent need to develop a range of full- chain CCS flagship projects; appreciates that instruments in addition to the EU ETS are needed to drive forward their development in the steel and cement sector;
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to propose a 2020 target for CCS deployment that should include coal and gas power generation and a range of industrial sectors; suggests an ambition of having sufficient projects in operation and under construction jointly to capture and store 10 Mt of CO2 per annum;deleted
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Recognises that CCS development canwill not take place without support from Member States; regrets that application of the technology has been encouraged by so fewa significantly higher carbon price;
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that Member States have the key role in providing a transparent revenue stream, such as feed-in tariffs, to support the construction and operation of flagship projects while enabling operators to secure a return on their investment, and in introducing regulatory requirements such as guarantees that first-mover CCS power plants provide baseload electricity generation;deleted
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Emphasises that the current low carbon price does not enable CCS operators to secure a return on their investment, and that measures are needed to improve the ETS; calls on the Commission to make proposals before the end of this year for structural measures to strengthen the ETS by increasing the linear reduction factor and cancelling surplus allowances;
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to propose creating an EU Industrial Innovation Fund from the sale of 600m allowances from the EU ETS to support the development of CCS flagship projects, other innovative low-carbon technologies, and measuresinnovative climate-friendly technologies, like CCS flagship projects, to reduce CO2 emissions from energy- intensive industries;
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that longer-term CCS support should be derived principally from the production and import of the fossil fuels responsible for the release of CO2; calls on the Commission to propose the introduction from 2020 of a system requiring the purchase of CCS certificates proving the storage of CO2 in proportion to that embedded within their products;deleted
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the decision of the European Investment Bank to prohibit lending for construction of coal power plants that will emit more than 550g CO2/kWh; emphasises that without financial support to develop CCS, the introduction of stringent emissions performance standards will be essential;deleted
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Acknowledges that significant financial savings can be made by prioritising CCS clusters of industrial installations served by shared pipelines; suggests that plant operators cannot be expected to take into account the future requirements of other installations, so trunk pipelines that may eventually carry CO2 from numerous sources should often be developed through public-private sector partnerships; emphasises that Member States have a direct role to play in ensuring the provision of CCS transport and determining the availability of storage infrastructure;
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes claims that a North Sea hub could provide storage for 100m tonnes of CO2 pa by 2030 and 500m tonnes pa by 2050; supports the use of EU funds to establish a common definition of a storage site's character, identify the geological potential of storage locations across Europe, develop pilot projects and prepare sites for commercial-scale storage;deleted
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to promote and finance production of a European atlas of CO2 storage sites;deleted
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Recognises the concern of potential CCS developers that the requirements of the CCS Directive appear one-sided, may require private companies to accept excessive liability for CO2 storage despite their work being approved by a Member State’s competent authority, and could pose a significant deterrent to investment;deleted
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Fully accepts that any accidental release of CO2 from a storage site must be prevented, but believes that Member States must share the liability once they have authorised a storage site and approved the conditions for its use; insists that the details of such liability should be a matter for negotiation between potential operators and the competent authority;deleted
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Points out that the CCS Directive gives Member States wide flexibility to determine the financial security to be provided by CCS operators and the period before responsibility for a closed storage site is transferred to the competent authority; suggests that Member States that seek to promote CCS development will have to play a more entrepreneurial role and accept a greater share of the responsibilities than presently understood;deleted
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Insists that it is no longer acceptable to invest in power plants or industrial installations likely to emit large quantities of CO2 without regard to how this will be reduced in future;deleted
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the various initiatives to make use of CO2 in ways that reduce overall emissions into the atmosphere; calls in particular for the Commission urgently to assess the potential for the use of CO2 to enhance oil and gas recovery within the EU;
2013/10/09
Committee: ENVI