5 Amendments of Sebastian Valentin BODU related to 2010/2006(INI)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Believes that dismantling a banking group should also be an option at the initial stage (early intervention);
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Takes the view that the purpose of a European legislative framework for crisis resolution is to empower the authorities to adopt measures that include intervention in the management of banking groups, when this is necessary (and especially, but not exclusively, in deposit-taking banks, where there is a possibility of systemic risk);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Considers, similarly, that the purpose of a European legislative framework for crisis resolution is also to regulate both cross-border banking groups and individual banks conducting cross-border operations solely through branches; believes also that there should be uniform regulation of the first of these categories;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Expresses the opinion that derogations should nevertheless be made from certain of the requirements imposed by EU company law, to permit intervention by an authority in banking activities where this is justified in the public interest (interest of shareholders, creditors and the business environment concerned);
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Believes that cooperation and communication between authorities and administrators responsible for the resolution and insolvency of cross-border banking groups can be improved by establishing a set of ex-ante guidelines;