4 Amendments of Sebastian Valentin BODU related to 2013/2077(INI)
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges the Commission and Council to engage with Parliament in negotiations on the criteria for the appropriate application of Article 290 and 291 TFEU; considers that this can be achieved in the frame of the revision of the Interinstitutional Agreement of Better Lawmaking that would inter-alia include such criteria;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that the pressure on time and resources faced by national parliaments when responding to draft legislation might contributes to the perceived ‘democratic deficit’ within the EU;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Believes that moves to strengthenfacilitate this mechanism would be welcome, for example by introducing a stronger ‘red card’ procedure; suggests that consideration should be given to whata more detailed examination of the appropriate number ofblems national parliament responses should be in order to trigger such a procedure, whether it should be limited to subsidiarity or proportionality grounds alone, and what its effect should be;s encounter in order to improve the functioning of the existing system; introducing views such a discussion as a useful stage in the evolution of the power given to national parliaments, aligning incentives to exercise scrutiny with effects at European level;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Recalls the commitment made by Parliament and the Council in the 2005 Interinstitutional Common Approach to Impact Assessment to carry out impact assessments, when they consider this to be appropriate and necessary for the legislative process, prior to the adoption of any substantive amendments, and calls on the committees to make use of the Impact Assessment Unit in implementing this commitment;.