11 Amendments of Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN related to 2013/0443(COD)
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Member States should comply with the emission reduction commitments set out in this Directive for 2020, 2025 and 2030. So as to ensure demonstrable progress towards the 2030 commitments, Member States should meet intermediate emission levels in 2025, set on the basis of a linear trajectory between their emission levels for 2020 and those defined by the emission reduction commitments for 2030, unless this would entail disproportionate costs. Where the 2025 emissions cannot be so limited, Member States should explain the reasons in their reports under this Directive.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) In order to promote cost-effective achievement of the national emission reduction commitments and of the intermediate emission levels, Member States should be entitled to account for emission reductions from international maritime traffic if emissions from that sector are lower than the levels of emissions that would result from compliance with Union law standards, including the sulphur limits for fuels set in Directive 1999/32/EC of the Council.21 Member States should also have the possibility to jointly meet their commitments and intermediate emission levels regarding methane (CH4) and of making use of Decision n°406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council for so doing.22 For the purpose of checking compliance with their national emission ceilings, emission reduction commitments and intermediate emission levels, Member States could adjust their national emission inventories in view of improved scientific understanding and methodologies regarding emissions. The Commission could object to the use of any of these flexibilities by a Member State, should the conditions set out in this Directive not be met. __________________ 21 have the possibility to jointly meet their commitments and intermediate emission levels regarding methane (CH4) and of making use of Decision n°406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council for so doing.22 __________________ 21 Council Directive 1999/32/EC of 26 Council Directive 1999/32/EC of 26 April 1999 relating to a reduction in the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels and amending Directive 93/12/EEC (OJ L 121, 11.5.1999, p. 13). 22 Decision n°406/2009/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community’s greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020 (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 136).
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall, as a minimum, limit their annual anthropogenic emissions of sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds other than methane (NMVOC), ammonia (NH3), particulate matter (PM2,5) and, methane (CH4) and mercury (Hg) in accordance with the national emission reduction commitments applicable from 2020, 2025 and 2030, as laid down in Annex II.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 6
Article 5 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission may adopt implementing acts specifying the detailed rules for the use of thesuch flexibilitiesy as referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 14.
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table a
Annex II – table a
Member State SO2 reduction compared NOx reduction compared NMVOC reduction State compared with 2005 with 2005 compared with 2005 For For For any For For For any For For For For any any any year any any year any any year year year from year year from year fromyear from from from 2030 from from 2030 from from 2030 2020 2020 to 2025 2020 to 2025 2020 to 2025 to to to 2024 to 2024 to 2024 to 2029 2029 2029 2029 Belgium 43% 68 69% 41% 63% 70% 41% 61% 67% 21% 45% 44%6% Bulgaria 78% 93% 94% 41% 65% 64% 68% 21% 61% 624% Czech Czech Republic 45% 72 70% 74% 35% 66 63% 70% 18% 55% 578% Denmark 35% 58% 58% 64% 56% 669% 72% 35% 58% 59%60% Germany 21% 53% 39% 69% 48% 54% 39% 65% 71% 13% 42% 434% Estonia 32% 70% 71% 18% 57% 61%3% 10% 35% 37%65% Greece 74% 92% 31% 72% 91% 93% 31% 69% 74% 54% 68% 67%70% Spain 67% 89% 89% 89% 41% 752% 78% 22% 48% 489% France 55% 78% 50% 70% 80% 50% 68% 74% 43% 49% 50%2% Croatia 55% 86% 87% 31% 66 65% 70% 34% 52% 48%56% Ireland 65% 83% 49% 75% 84% 86% 49% 67% 79% 25% 34% 329% Italy 35% 75% 40% 69% 76% 77% 40% 67% 72% 35% 54% 546% Cyprus 83% 95% 44% 70% 97% 97% 44% 69% 73% 45% 54% 546% Latvia 8% 46% 32% 44%50% 50% 32% 38% 49% 27% 58% 49%60% Lithuania 55% 72% 74% 75% 48% 55%3% 60% 32% 60% 57% Luxemburg 34% 44% 43% 79%64% Luxembur g 34% 46% 48% 43% 76% 82% 29% 58% 58%9% Hungary 46% 87% 88% 34% 69% 68% 74% 30% 57% 59%60% Malta 77% 98% 42% 89% 99% 42% 86% 90% 23% 32% 31%32% Netherland s 28% 59% 28% 57% 61% 45% 687% 8 72% 8% 34%5% 37% Austria 26% 50% 53% 57% 37% 721% 21 77% 21% 48% 50% Poland 59% 78% 76% 81% 30% 55%2% 625% 25% 565% 59% Portugal 63% 77% 79% 80% 36% 71%0% 75% 18% 47% 46%7% Romania 77% 92% 93% 45% 67%5% 71% 25% 64% 64%6% Slovenia 63% 89% 39% 71% 90% 90% 39% 68% 75% 23% 64% 635% Slovakia 57% 79% 80% 36% 59%7% 18 63% 18% 40% 42% Finland 30% 30% 35% 51% 32% 36% 35% 47% 54% 35% 47% 46%54% Sweden 22% 22% 18% 20% 36% 65%3% 67% 25% 35% 38%39% United Kingdom 59% 84% 83% 85% 55% 73%1% 32 75% 32% 4950% 51% EU 28 59% 80% 813% 42% 66% 69% 72% 28% 50% 50% 3%
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – table b a (new)
Annex II – table b a (new)
Amendment 497 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – section 2 – point 1 – point d
Annex III – section 2 – point 1 – point d
(d) where relevant, an explanation of the reasons why the intermediate emission levels for 2025 cannot be met without measures entailing disproportionate costmethodology used to ensure that measures to achieve national reduction commitments for PM2.5 prioritize reduction of black carbon emissions;