7 Amendments of Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN related to 2020/2012(INL)
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Recital F
Recital F
F. Whereas AI solutions may benefit society in the area of food safety and Farming 2.0, where the Union holds leadership in AI applications; whereas more generally AI solutions embedded in Digital Twins of the Earth may release the potential of data, where the Union holds a leadership with the Copernicus programme, in support of the Green Deal priority actions on climate change, circular economy, zero-pollution, biodiversity, deforestation and compliance assurance;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that Europe’s AI’s strategy should be consistent with SDGs and the objective of the 7th EAP to “live well within planetary boundaries”; stresses also that the environmental footprint of the deployment of AI, and its direct and indirect positive and negative impacts on energy and material consumption in Europe should be assessed vis-à-vis Europe’s commitment to the Paris Agreement, to carbon neutrality by 2050 and to a circular economy which aims to reducing Europe’s current material footprint;
Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Notes that, with the rapid development of AI and the uncertainty that lies ahead, a common Union AI ethical framework will expand an ecosystem of trust as defined in the Commission White Paper, whether in environment protection, healthcare or food safety applications, thus supporting the ecosystem of excellence in legal certainty and providing effective response to the challenges yet not defined in courtrooms, management meetings or scientific laboratories; points out that the Copernicus programme can serve as a best practice in developing high quality large datasets as input to AI models;
Amendment 154 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls for the creation of shared European databases analysed by AI in healthcare for using anonymised medical data for faster, earlier and more precise diagnosis, as AI and robotics bring massive opportunities and can process enormous amounts of data in no time; considers that these systems need enough comparable data to function efficiently and at the same time they need to be GDPR compliant and protect personal data;
Amendment 157 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Calls for a Union standardised inter-operability of eHealth applications and a creation of common European data access for prescriptions, diagnosis and medical reports, simply accessible for all Union citizens and in all Member States;
Amendment 159 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Considers that AI and robotics can provide considerable improvements in the control of medical devices and facilitate the everyday work of health professionals; considers that for critical medical devices, there needs to be a back-up system in place to monitor and secure the functionality of the device in any possible situation of interference and that possible cyber threats in the control of such devices need to be taken into consideration and mitigated; stresses that apart from hackers and outside threats, cyber threats can also originate from human mistakes or system errors and that it is necessary to have adequate back-up systems in place and operational; considers furthermore that the Union should create an AI backup development roadmap to address the possible issues of AI system controls making an error;
Amendment 161 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 d (new)
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Considers it important to make sure no one is left behind in an AI system or a domain design, especially in consumer use; stresses that systems should be user-centric and AI products and services designed accessible for all people to use regardless of their age, gender, abilities or characteristics and that AI systems should not have a one- size-fits-all approach and should consider Universal Design principles addressing the widest possible range of users, following relevant accessibility standards;