4 Amendments of Hans-Peter MARTIN related to 2013/2079(INI)
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Acknowledges that significant financial savings can be made by prioritising CCS clusters of industrial installations served by shared pipelines; suggests that plant operators cannot be expected to take into account the future requirements of other installations, so trunk pipelines that may eventually carry CO2 from numerous sources should often be developed through public-private sector partnerships; emphasises that Member States have a direct role to play in ensuring the provision of CCS transport and determining the availability of storage infrastructure;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Fully accepts that any accidental release of CO2 from a storage site must be prevented, but believes that Member States must share the liability once they have authorised a storage site and approved the conditions for its use; insists that the details of such liability should be a matter for negotiation between potential operators and the competent authority;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to propose that it be a condition of construction that adequate preparation for CCSthe implementation of CCS, or of other measures to reduce CO2 emissions significantly, is made for all new fossil fuel power plants and high-emission industrial installations above an agreed size, except in the case of electricity demand peak shavers or when a Member State has complied with a legislative requirement to publish a roadmap indicating how it will meet its 2050 CO2 reduction goals without the use of CCS;