BETA

5 Amendments of Eija-Riitta KORHOLA related to 2008/2015(INI)

Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls on the Member States to step up still further, in line with local or regional capabilities, the share in the energy mix of wind energy – which thanks to intensive promotion has already become an established means of energy generation – and of waterhydro and geothermical power, and to make further use of existing development potential, inter alia through European research initiatives and coordination via networks of excellence; (Linguistic amendment – only affects the English version)
2008/10/10
Committee: CLIM
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that any future low-carbon energy policy must also investigate the possible contribution of nuclear power to the energy mix of the future, focusing on not only the possible reduction in carbon dioxide emissions but also on the investment required, the security of uranium supply, the operation of the plants, technological and international safety issues and also the unresolved question of the disposal of waste, in comparison to renewable energy sources;
2008/10/10
Committee: CLIM
Amendment 433 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital X
X. whereas the use of nuclear energy – irrespective of the availability of uranium – still raises the unresolved issue of the safe final storage of nuclear waste and the spread of the technology to undemocratic states,deleted
2008/10/13
Committee: CLIM
Amendment 476 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital AZ
AZ. whereas the European Emission Trading Scheme is a unique instrument for achieving emissions reductions with maximum efficiency and may act as a model for similar schemes, though the compatibility of such schemes would have to be guaranteed,
2008/10/13
Committee: CLIM
Amendment 491 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital BF
BF. whereas the technology for CO2 capture and storage (CCS), as a bridging technology on the way to the decarbonisation of the energy system, may make contribute to resolving the issue of sinking CO2 emissions from power stations and could serve to complement renewable and other low-carbon technologies, but whereas CCS is an end- of-pipe technology,
2008/10/13
Committee: CLIM