7 Amendments of Olle SCHMIDT related to 2011/2024(INI)
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Urges the Commission to make it clear that a declaration for the purposes of temporary mobility should be valid throughout the territory of a Member State and that competent authorities of different regions of the same Member State should not be allowed to ask for separate declarations for the same professional;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Highlights that the declaration system and the requirement of two-years’ professional experience should not apply in cases of temporary mobility where a professional accompanies consumers crossing borders; points out that in such cases professionals don’t enter into contact with local consumers and therefore consumer protection is not at stake;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Welcomes the phase approach to the modernisation of the automatic recognition system; stresses however, that the process could be sped up by conducting the update of the existing minimum training periods and the development of a set of required competences for each profession concerned simultaneously; supports a future shift towards minimum training requirements based on the European Credit Transfer System;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to encourage the cooperation between Member States and professional bodies in order to move towards a common practice in the area of continuous professional development;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses that, in order to protect patients, practitioners providing e-Health services should ensure the same quality and safety standards as for the provision of non-electronic healthcare services; it should therefore be clarified that the requirements of this directive, and, if necessary, additional ones, should apply to e-Health service providers;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission and Member States to revise the language requirements regime for the healthcare professions by providing competent authorities with the necessary flexibility to ascertain and, only if necessary, test the language skills of professionals as part of the recognition process; considers that the principle of proportionality should be thoroughly applied in this regard so that such tests do not become an additional burden;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls for the enhanced mobility of graduates and compliance with the judgment in the Morgenbesser case6 ; argues that Member States should not, as a matter of principle, prevent graduates from pursuing remunerated supervised practice if they offer such a possibility to their own nationals; stresses moreover, that the professional experience acquired during the supervised practice should be recognized in the home Member State;