BETA

13 Amendments of Béatrice PATRIE

Amendment 23 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the importance of the remittance of savings by migrants from Southern Mediterranean countries to their countries of origin, viewing this as an excellent and to date under-used lever for development; takes the view that the future Euro-Mediterranean Bank should centre its operations around those savings, inter alia, with a view to underpinning structural development projects;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 30 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the decisions on the arrangements concerning the institutional set-up of this initiative to reflect the role played by EMPA and the European Parliament; invites the EMPA to involve civil society in the Northern and Southern Mediterranean countries more closely in its work;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 72 #

2008/2231(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Invites the partner Southern Mediterranean countries to develop south-south trade, following the example of the Agadir Economic Agreement signed by Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia, and stresses that the European Union institutions must respond positively to requests for technical support to promote such south-south economic integration;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 1 #

2008/2201(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas respect for, and the promotion and safeguarding of, the universality of human rights is part of the European Union’s ethical and legal acquis and one of the cornerstones of European unity and integrityfundamental principles of the EU,
2008/10/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2008/2201(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the regrettable absence of the United States from the UNHRC has led to the need for the EU to strengthen its role as a leader of democratic countries on human rights issues, and at the same time to build further on its more natural role as a "soft power" and a "bridge-builder",
2008/10/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2008/2201(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. NWelcomes the work carried out by the UNHRC so far and notes that the UNHRC has the potential to develop into a valuable framework for the European Union's multilateral human rights efforts; regrets the fact that, during the first two years of its activities, the new body has not achieved substantial progress in improving the United Nations' human rights record;
2008/10/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 62 #

2008/2201(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. Encourages the EU to continue to press for the establishment of membership criteria for election to the UNHRC, including the issuing of permanent invitations to Special Procedures mandate-holders, as well as for monitoring of the actual implementation of the UN Member States’ election pledges; also calls for this rule to be applied in determining whether the EU should support candidate countries;deleted
2008/10/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 1 #

2008/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that fighting illegal immigration is a high priority for the European Union, and considers it crucial in this connection that Frontex should conclude operational cooperation agreements with the border control authorities ofRecalls that the aim of Frontex is to facilitate the integrated management of the external borders of the European Union, including with regard to combating clandestine immigration; stresses in this countries which have common borders with the European Union and with those of countries which, according to a wide range of risk analyses, are regarded as transit countries for illegal immigext that, in addition to interception at sea, it would be desirable to add to Frontex's mandate sea rescue operations;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 8 #

2008/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Considers it very important that Frontex should provide extensive assistance to the competent authorities of such States in order to ensure that both the training and technical expertise of border control personnel of such countries andcontinue its operations to improve the training and technical expertise of border control personnel of the EU Member States and considers it desirable to provide training on issues relating to the protection of refugees and the fundamental rights of migrants; considers also that their actual border control systems must comply with EU standards, norms and requirements; advocates that the necessary financial and technical resources be made available for States which cooperate fully with Frontexnd with international law;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2008/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that Libya is a veryn important transit country for illegal immigrants on their way from North Africa to Italy and Malta, and that it is important to establish a systematic form of cooperation in controlling borders with the States on the southern side of the Mediterranean Sea region, in which Libya plays a leading role and must be fully involved; calls, therefore, fornotes the mandate which the Council has given to the Commission to resume negotiations with Libya on controlling borders and asks to be kept fully informed about the progress of these negotiations between Frontex and the Libyan authorities to be reinvigorated;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 19 #

2008/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Considers it necessary that Frontex should, as soon as possible, reach an agreement with the authorities of Turkey and that the Turkish national police, the gendarmerie and the Coast Guard Command should all be involved in this future cooperation; advocates systematic and thorough evaluation of the implementation of a future agreement between Frontex and the Turkish authorities; notes in this connection that the last round of negotiations on a repatriation agreement between the European Union and Turkey dates back to December 2006 and that the European Commission even openly acknowledges that the negotiations have reached a complete impasse;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 25 #

2008/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that negotiations on an agreement between Frontex and the border control authorities of a third State, and more particularly a candidate Member State, are conducted against the background of the political and economic relations which exist between the European Union as a whole and the State in question and that active refusal by a State to cooperate with Frontex must have direct consequences for those relationre of a nature to strengthen political relations between the European Union and these countries and to bring about coordinated management of borders in a manner which respects individual rights;
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 32 #

2008/2157(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls upon the Commission and Council to investigate howpositive synergies between Frontex and Eurosur can be integrated with efforts to combat terrorism, arms trafficking, drugs trafficking and international crimed calls for the European Parliament to be kept fully informed about future decisions.
2008/10/16
Committee: AFET