1215 Amendments of Tokia SAÏFI
Amendment 26 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Arab uprisings that affected the MENA region in 2011 constituted a moment of mass upheavals against authoritarian regimes; whereas a large segment of the protesters was composed of young women and men aspiring to a better and more inclusive future, recognition of their dignity, greater respect for democratic principles and the rule of law, and better social inclusion; whereas the overthrow of most of the regimes and the introduction of liberal reforms gave rise to great hope and expectations;
Amendment 55 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the capacity of Member States to exert a positive influence in the Maghreb and Mashreq regions is very unequal and has often been marred by fragmentation; whereas individual Member States’ action in the region needs to be in synergy with the EU’s objectives; whereas the Union’s external policies must be consistent with each other and with other policies with an external dimension; whereas the Union must pursue the objectives set out in Articles 8 and 21 of the Treaty on European Union; whereas the EU needs to increase its political leverage; whereas long-term political and economic stability in the Maghreb and Mashreq regions is of fundamental strategic importance to the EU, and as such requires a longer-term approach as regards the policy framework and its objectives;
Amendment 64 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the EU should play a central role in promoting conflict resolution and both democratic, social and economic governance in the Maghreb and Mashreq regions;
Amendment 84 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes with concern that, eight years after the upheavals, most of the expectations have still not been met; condemns the persistent and continuing violations of human rights, the rule of law and fundamental freedoms in several cases; is worried about the socio-economic situation in the region, which continues to be dire and, in particular, about the high levels of youth unemployment, particularly among women and qualified young people, and social exclusion, which cause disillusionment and disenfranchisement on a large scale;
Amendment 111 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Expresses concern about the fact that, in spite of its considerable political and budgetary investments and continuous political and economic outreach, the EU has not been able to gain realstill lacks political and economic leverage, and is no longertherefore not fully perceived as a game changer by the countries in the region; points to the dissatisfaction felt bycalls for the EU to engage in more dialogue with local NGOs and civil -society and local NGOs at how the EU translates its vision into actionorganisations in order to pursue a policy that better meets the expectations of stakeholders on the ground; is concerned about the increasingly complex political situation in the Maghreb and Mashreq regions, and the emergence of new political and economic regional players such as Russia and China, in addition to the competing narratives and financing from the Gulf countries and Iran;
Amendment 135 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the EU and the Member States, taking into account the EU anti- corruption acquis, to strengthen their judicial cooperation programmes with partner countries in the region in order to promote the exchange of best practices and an effective legal arsenal to fight corruption;
Amendment 140 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Acknowledges the initial efforts by the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the Commission, in cooperation and dialogue with the European Parliament, to substantially reform the EU policy framework for post- Arab Spring countries in the hope of attaining realorder to increase its democratic and political leverage in the Maghreb and Mashreq regions; points to the Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy and its added value as regards the potential for achieving synergies in actions at EU level, building on political and economic dialogue and securing adequate support and implementation through the Financial Instruments for the external action of the EU; takes note of the 2015 revision of the European Neighbourhood Policy aimed at taking into account the changing scenarios in the region;
Amendment 157 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Is concerned, however, that the complexity of managing the migration and refugee flows from and through the Maghreb and Mashreq regions, the nexus between security and migration, the challenge of terrorism and the legitimate concerns about the fragility of certain countries in the region, as well as the lack of a cohesive approach by the Member States, is encouraging the EU’s action towards the region to rely excessively on an ideology of stability; takes the view that when stability and security become the predominant objectives, they lead to a shorter-term policy vision and deprive EU action directed at reaffirmingare objectives which go hand in hand with inclusive and beneficial economic and social development and the strengthening of human rights and fundamental freedoms of the required intensity; is convinced that stability and security can only be achieved through longer-term objectives;
Amendment 218 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Stresses that strengthening local authorities contributes to the spread of democracy and the principles of the rule of law; calls therefore for the process of decentralisation to be encouraged and for empowerment of the regions through the development of local autonomies; encourages and supports partnerships with EU Member States and decentralised cooperation projects carried out by local authorities of the Member States in order to develop municipal and regional governance in the countries of the region;
Amendment 236 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Believes that inclusive economic and social development that promotes job creation and the employability of young people contributes to meeting the demands for social inclusion which are also at the root of the Arab Spring events; stresses the importance of promoting social inclusion, combating unemployment, especially among young graduates, and undertaking fundamental reforms to promote growth and employment, by introducing training better tailored to the labour market or reforms to labour rights; calls on all parties to preserve their spirit of cooperation in order to focus their actions on reforms for sustainable and inclusive economic and social development which will be beneficial to all;
Amendment 260 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls once again on the Commission to act on Parliament’s proposal for the creation of an ambitious Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus programme separate fromunder Erasmus+, with dedicated funds and an ambitious dimension in terms of scope and with a focus not only on primary, secondary and higher education cycles, but also on learning, and available resources; calls for the Commission and Parliament to increase the scope and participation of their European Union Visitors programme and to facilitate the participation of young people and of women political leaders;
Amendment 265 #
2018/2160(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Maintains that, eight years after the events of the Arab Spring, the issue of combating climate change has become more important and crucial for the future of our relations with the Maghreb and Mashreq countries; calls, therefore, for the EU to step up its cooperation with partner countries on energy security, promoting renewable energy, sustainable energy and energy efficiency targets, in order to contribute to the implementation of the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 4 #
2018/2109(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that a fully functional customs union is essential in order to guarantee the credibility and strength of the EU when negotiating trade agreements; emphasises that an efficient EU customs union should facilitate trade and reduce administrative burdens for legitimate traders as well as ensuring effective controls, inter alia by fostering cooperation between the customs authorities of Member States and third countries; calls on the Commission to improve and step up cooperation among its directorates- general on customs matters, given the wide range of areas which have a bearing on customs;
Amendment 9 #
2018/2109(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises that the harmonisation of training for customs agents in Europe will contribute to the effective implementation of the Union Customs Code and customs controls;
Amendment 15 #
2018/2109(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that efficient and harmonised customs controls on goods entering the EU make it possible to enhance consumer safety and tackle counterfeiting and unfair competition; encourages the Commission to set targets and develop performance indicators for customs authorities;
Amendment 3 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas EU trade policy must help to promote the values for which the Union stands, set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union, and contribute to the pursuit of the aims listed in Article 21, including the consolidation of democracy and the rule of law, respect for human rights, fundamental rights and freedoms, equality, respect for human dignity and the protection of the environment and of social rights;
Amendment 6 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the GSP, GSP+ and EBA systems can be essential tools which enable these values to be upheld and whereas it is important for them to be effectively implemented and monitored;
Amendment 21 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the full potential of the GSP+ scheme to improve the situation with regard to human rights, workers’ rights, sustainable development, promotion of gender equality and abolition of child labour and forced labour can only be fulfilled if monitoring of effective implementation of obligations under the 27 conventions is improved and the incentive of trade preferences is accompanied by other support measures; stresses that the GSP and GSP+ systems, which are part of EU trade policy, must contribute to the pursuit of the Sustainable Development Goals;
Amendment 25 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to work harder with beneficiary countries, the EEAS, Union delegations, Member States' diplomatic missions, international organisations, businesses, the social partners and civil society in order to improve its information gathering and provide more in-depth analysis of the monitoring exercise so that the implementation of all aspects of the system can be clearly evaluated;
Amendment 31 #
2018/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas EU trade policy must help to promote the values for which the Union stands, set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union, and contribute to the pursuit of the aims listed in Article 21, including the consolidation of democracy and the rule of law, respect for human rights, fundamental rights and freedoms, equality, respect for human dignity and the protection of the environment and of social rights;
Amendment 66 #
2018/2107(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on the Commission to intensify and develop its cooperation with international organisations such as, among others, the United Nations, the ILO and the OECD in the context of the monitoring and implementation of the GSP and GSP+ systems;
Amendment 91 #
2018/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to work harder with beneficiary countries, the EEAS, Union delegations, Member States’ diplomatic missions, international organisations, businesses, social partners and civil society in order to improve its information gathering and provide more in-depth analysis of the monitoring exercise so that the implementation of all aspects of the system can be clearly evaluated;
Amendment 114 #
2018/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Takes note ofWelcomes the first safeguard investigation under the regulation and considers that this clause should ensure that the EU’s financial and economic interests are protected while being able to offer preferences for; stresses the need for special treatment of sensitive EU products to avoid putting certain sectors at risk;
Amendment 127 #
2018/2107(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls on the Commission to intensify and develop its cooperation with international organisations such as, among others, the United Nations, the ILO and the OECD in the context of the monitoring and implementation of the GSP system;
Amendment 61 #
2018/2106(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Recalls thatNotes that in September 2018, Nicaragua and Guatemala achieved 349% and 102% respectively of the thresholds established under the Stabilisation Mechanism for Bananas, annexed to the Agreement and applicable until 2020, should not be exceeded, and that once it expires parties should; recalls that the thresholds established under this mechanism should not be exceeded, and is therefore seriously concerned that the thresholds have been repeatedly exceeded and that this has consequences for European banana producers; recalls the Commission’s commitment to assess the situation of EU bananas producers by 1 January 2019 at the latest and that, in the event of a serious deterioration of the market or the situation of EU banana producers, an extension of the validity of the mechanism may be envisaged; calls on the parties to continue to provide statistics, including on Fair Trade and organic produce;
Amendment 7 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
- having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child;
Amendment 73 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the arrival in Europe of migrants and asylum seekers continued in 2017; whereas this reality requires real EU solidarity to put in place adequate reception structures for those most in need and most vulnerable; whereas many migrants place their lives in the hands of smugglers and criminals and are vulnerable to violations of their rights, including violence, abuse and exploitation; whereas women and children are at higher risk of being trafficked and sexually abused at the hands of traffickers and there is therefore a need to build and strengthen child protection systems to prevent and respond to violence, abuse, neglect and the exploitation of children, in line with the commitments set out in the Valletta Action Plan, as well as the European Parliament Resolution on the protection of children in migration of 3 May 2018;
Amendment 76 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. Whereas grooming, cyberbullying or revenge pornography represent growing concerns for our societies especially among young people;
Amendment 139 #
Amendment 140 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 b (new)–Paragraph 5 a (new)
Subheading 1 b (new)–Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Member States to work out a national plan to combat any form of violence against children, such as physical and sexual abuse, forced marriages, child labour, sexual exploitation, honour killing, FGM and child soldiers; stresses on the importance of including formal provisions to prohibit and sanction corporal punishment against children;
Amendment 141 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 b (new)–Paragraph 5 a (new)
Subheading 1 b (new)–Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Reiterates its call on the Commission to renew its commitment to set out a new EU Agenda for the Rights of the Child, as well a new strategy for the Rights of the Child;
Amendment 142 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 b (new)–Paragraph 5 b (new)
Subheading 1 b (new)–Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls on the EU Member States and the Commission to explicitly consider children’s rights as a priority when programming and implementing regional and cohesion policies;
Amendment 143 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 b (new)–Paragraph 5 c (new)
Subheading 1 b (new)–Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Calls on the Commission to ensure coordination within its different services with the aim of effectively mainstreaming children’s rights in all EU legislative proposals, policies and financial decisions;
Amendment 144 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 b (new)–Paragraph 5 d (new)
Subheading 1 b (new)–Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Reiterates that cyberbullying and revenge pornography are new forms of crime online and can have extremely serious impact especially among young people and children. Encourages all Member States to set up future-proofed legislation to address this alarming phenomenon including provisions for removal from social media of harmful content for human dignity within well- defined deadlines in line with the European Parliament resolution of 14 December 2017 on the implementation of Directive 2011/93/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography;
Amendment 165 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Member States to invest adequate financial resources to integrate media and information literacy into national education systems and more generally in order to empower children and young people with the tools to use the internet responsibly and avoid possible risks;
Amendment 205 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Points out that EU Member States should address adequately discriminatory or violent reactions against the schooling of migrant and refugee children, both through law enforcement and by promoting mutual understanding and social cohesion; calls on Member States to structurally address respect for diversity, intercultural understanding and human rights, including children’s rights, in regular school curricula; to that end, calls on EU Member States to promote inclusive education from an early age in schools;
Amendment 362 #
2018/2103(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Emphasises that the EU and the Member States should develop credible and effective systems that would make it unnecessary to detain children for asylum or return purpoCalls on the Member States to accommodate all children and families with children in non-custodial, community-based placements while their immigration status is processesd; stresses the importance of taking the principle of the best interests of the child into consideration in all aspects concerning children as well as of the practical implementation of the right to be heard as called for in the European Parliament Resolution on the protection of migrant children of 3 May 2018; recalls that Article 14 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 28 of the United Nations Conventions on the Rights of the Child guarantee the right to education to every child, including migrant and refugee children, both unaccompanied and accompanied and avoiding separated schooling and segregation, and calls therefore on the Member States to ensure migrant and refugee children are granted access to formal and informal education swiftly after their arrival; stresses that Member States should ensure that migrant and refugee children are effectively supported through linguistic, social and psychological support based on individual assessment of their needs;
Amendment 118 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Underlines the need for the EU to maintain the commitment it has made to its partners, especially in its neighbourhood, to support economic, social and political reform, to protect human rights and to help establish the rule of law, as the best means of strengthening the international order and ensuring the stability of its neighbourhood;
Amendment 123 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Highlights the need to further inter-parliamentary relations between the EU and its partner countries, in a framework of honest dialogue underpinned by mutual understanding and trust, with the aim of promoting human rights effectively;
Amendment 194 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Strongly condemns all heinous crimes and human rights violations committed by state and non-state actors; urges the EU and its Member States to fight crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, and to ensure that their perpetrators are brought to justice; calls for the EU to provide support for organisations that collect, keep and protect evidence – digital or otherwise – of the crimes committed by any parties to these conflicts, in order to facilitate their prosecution at an international level; supports the key role played by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in cases where the states concerned are unable or unwilling to exercise their jurisdiction; calls on the Union and the Member States to encourage all UN member states to ratify and implement the Rome Statute of the ICC; calls also on all the signatories of the Rome Statute to coordinate and cooperate with the ICC; reiterates its call for the VP/HR to appoint an EUSR on International Humanitarian Law and International Justice with a mandate to promote, mainstream and represent the EU’s commitment to the fight against impunity;
Amendment 211 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses that corruption undermines the rule of law, democracy and the competitiveness of economies, and puts human rights at risk; calls for improvements to anti-corruption mechanisms and practices, such as the imposition of sanctions on those individuals and countries that commit serious corruption offences; calls on the EEAS and the Commission to devise joint programming on human rights and the fight against corruption, in particular initiatives for improving transparency, fighting impunity and strengthening anti- corruption agencies; calls on the EU to pledge, in line with the European anti- corruption acquis, to promote anti- corruption measures and push for these to be further integrated in United Nations programmes; also calls on the Commission to negotiate provisions on combating corruption in all future trade agreements;
Amendment 298 #
2018/2098(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Denounces and explicitly rejects trafficking in human beings; underlines the fact that trafficking in human beings is a modern kind of slavery, and a serious crime which constitutes one of the worst forms of human rights violations; emphasises, in this respect, the importance of a consistent approach to the internal and external dimensions of the EU’s policies for combating trafficking in human beings; calls for the EU and the Member States to increase cooperation with third countries in order to investigate all stages of trafficking in human beings; calls on the EU also to step up its efforts to bring to a conclusion the negotiations and seek the adoption by the UN Member States of the future United Nations global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration, as well as the future United Nations global compact on refugees;
Amendment 109 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls the need for the EU’s external policies to be consistent with each other and with other policies with an external dimension, and to pursue the objectives set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union;
Amendment 179 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the EEAS to invest in collective leadership and develop ‘issue- based coalitions’ with like-minded countries, to support a rules-based international order, multilateralism and free trade, and to pursue cooperative solutions to global challenges; emphasises in this context that the EU is committed to promoting and developing international law and to strengthening the international role of the United Nations; calls on the EEAS to engage with emerging powers in the provision of global public goods such as peace and security, including by working together on crisis management operations around the world, climate change mitigation, financial stability, and clean air and water;
Amendment 184 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Reiterates the need to further inter-parliamentary relations between the Union and its partner countries, in a framework of honest dialogue underpinned by mutual understanding and trust;
Amendment 220 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights that transatlantic relations are indispensable for the security and prosperity of both sides of the Atlantic; regrets the US’s progressive retreat from the multilateral, rules-based world order, namely its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement; calls on the EU to show unity, firmness and proportionality in its responses to such decisions;
Amendment 226 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Reaffirms the EU’s commitment to the Paris Agreement and calls on the EU to play a leading role in acting on climate change, ramping up efforts in climate change diplomacy, and establishing strong alliances between countries and actors so as to actually fulfil the commitments agreed to at COP21; stresses the importance of including adherence to the Paris Agreement and the precautionary principle as laid down in the EU Treaties in any trade and investment agreement and in Partnership and Cooperation Agreements;
Amendment 272 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Points out that the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) provides mechanisms so as to involve third countries that are neighbours of the neighbourhood partner countries, particularly in the context of extended cooperation frameworks; urges, therefore, the EU to use these mechanisms to set up thematic frameworks to offer cooperation between the Union, the Southern neighbourhood partner countries and key regional players, especially in Africa, on regional issues such as security, energy and even the fight against climate change;
Amendment 278 #
2018/2097(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Condemns the unilateral decision taken by President Trump to recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, thus creating a real obstacle to peacebuilding; recalls that the EU supports the recovery of a real peace process in the Middle East that aims for a two-state solution and calls on the EU to be a driving force in recovering this process;
Amendment 17 #
2018/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates its full commitment to the enduring value of multilateralism and calls for a trade agenda based on free, fair and rule-based trade for the benefit of all, which supports the sustainable development agenda by including social, environmental and human rights, and ensuring that multilaterally agreed and harmonised rules are uniformly applied to all; stresses that the WTO must also contribute to promoting fair trade and combating unfair practices;
Amendment 37 #
2018/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Shares the view that, as a way to address the root causes of the current crisis, it is necessary for the WTO to develop new rules to address current gaps in the rulebook in order to level the playing as regards subsidies and state-owned enterprises, investment market access and regulatory barriers to services and investment; believes that in order to remain relevant, the WTO also needs to address new challenges in areas such as: e- commerce; digital trade; global value chains; public procurement; domestic regulation for services; micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs); and greater compatibility between trade, labour and environmental agendas; welcomes, in this regard, the joint statements that were adopted in Buenos Aires on e-commerce, domestic regulation, investment facilitation and women’s economic empowerment, as well as the work that has been done on these issues since then; stresses how important it is for its members to abide by and properly enforce the rules laid down by the WTO;
Amendment 43 #
2018/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that the regulation of e- commerce represents a real challenge at international level and that digital technology must, therefore, be an integral part of the work carried out by the WTO, including during the process of modernising it; stresses that the European Union should emphasise its rules on privacy and data protection so that they may be promoted at international level and become a benchmark for the development of international and multilateral standards;
Amendment 45 #
2018/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Recalls that access to public procurement is one of the European Union’s priorities in its trade negotiations and that, as such, the fulfilment of WTO members’ commitments to sign up to the agreement on government procurement, to improve the functioning of the agreement and compliance with its provisions is expected in a spirit of reciprocity and mutual benefit; notes that for any potential improvements in the oversight of state aid and the role of public companies to be fully effective, progress must be made in this area;
Amendment 59 #
2018/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out that SMEs are the driving force of the global economy and calls on the WTO to pay particular attention to SMEs and to include specific provisions for them at all stages of its work and in the drafting of multilateral and plurilateral rules;
Amendment 78 #
2018/2084(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses how important it is that the European Union and the WTO continue and redouble their international cooperation efforts with other international organisations such as the United Nations, the OECD, the World Customs Organisation and the ILO, given the wide variety of subjects and sectors that international trade currently encompasses;
Amendment 176 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point l a (new)
(la) to maintain its commitment with the UN to monitor and effectively implement the Spotlight initiative, the aim of which is to put an end to all forms of violence against women and girls;
Amendment 232 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point t b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point t b (new)
(tb) to encourage all the UN member states to ratify and apply the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court;
Amendment 234 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point t c (new)
Paragraph 1 – point t c (new)
(tc) to pledge, in line with the European anti-corruption acquis, to promote anti-corruption measures and push for them to be further integrated in United Nations programmes;
Amendment 303 #
2018/2040(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point z
Paragraph 1 – point z
z) to reaffirm the EU’s commitment to the Paris Agreement, to encourage all the UN member states to ratify it and implement it effectively, and to stress the need to implement the Paris Agreement globally to preserve our habitat for future generations;
Amendment 22 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission, in the context of ongoing and future bilateral trade negotiations with third countries, to approach with the utmost care the liberalisation of market access in sensitive agricultural sectors and to consider transition periods, tariff-rate quotas, appropriate safeguarding measures and the exclusion of the most sensitive products; notes that this predominantly concerns beef, other meat, rice, wheat, other cereals, sugar, and dairy productssome products from the outermost regions; stresses that the maximum cumulative amounts of the agricultural concessions granted by the EU in the context of all its international undertakings must be fixed for sensitive products and for each sector;
Amendment 32 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Reiterates the importance of incorporating into trade agreements effective safeguard clauses which can quickly be implemented in order temporarily to suspend preferences in the event of market disruption which penalises sensitive sectors;
Amendment 41 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets the lack of progress on domestic support in agriculture at the 11th WTO Ministerial Conference; reiterates that any future EU position on this topic must not take precedence over discussions on the future and the revision of the CAP and must duly respect the framework of the reformed CAP; invites EU trading partners, in this regard, to make commitments to reducing trade-distorting domestic support; calls on the WTO members that continue to grant export subsidies to implement the Ministerial Decision on Export Competition adopted in Nairobi on 19 December 2015;
Amendment 47 #
2018/2037(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to anticipate and take account of the implications of Brexit when preparing the exchange of offers and calculating quotas;
Amendment 50 #
2018/2017(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) to establish a strategy of the European Union and its Member States for Libya which must be implemented in a way that is consistent with the UN Action Plan for Libya, with the aims of establishing a lasting and inclusive peace and stabilising and rebuilding the country;
Amendment 52 #
2018/2017(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to intensify their diplomatic efforts to support and help create the conditions for a new dialogue between the parties and to consolidate the Libyan Government of National Accord in its efforts to create political consent, guarantee security and extend its authority to the whole territory of Libya, as the necessary precondition for an inclusive political solution that promotes the stabilisation, reconstruction and reconciliation of the country, for state building and any peacekeeping operation;
Amendment 97 #
2018/2017(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) to ensure that EU funds are effectively deployed in projects that help the Libyan population and civil society and that adequate support is provided to municipalities in their provision of essential services and in building local governance, so as to ensure basic living standards for the population; to ensure coordination between central authorities and local municipalities in order to identify the priorities to invest in; to promote projects that fosterand initiatives that foster reconciliation and locally embedded dialogue and conflict-resolution mechanisms, involving young people and women in particular; to promote the implementation of representative governance at local and national levels to better respond to the challenges linked to reconciliation, stabilisation and the re- establishment of security; to ensure the money under the EU Emergency Trust Fund is only granted when accompanied by a sound analysis of local authorities and recipients;
Amendment 110 #
2018/2017(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
Paragraph 1 – point h
(h) to further encourage the Libyan authorities and institutions to work towards improving the living conditions of all Libyans by, among other things, reinstating priority public services and rebuilding public infrastructure, and to implement the necessary financial and economic reforms requested by the international financial institutions to help economic recovery and stabilisation; to urge the Libyan authorities to ensure that natural resources are exploited for the benefit of the whole population, including at the local level; to help the Libyan authorities to fight against the criminalisation of the economy;
Amendment 1 #
2018/2005(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard its resolution of 30 May 2018 on the Annual Report on the implementation of the Common Commercial Policy,
Amendment 107 #
2018/2005(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Asks the Commission to create a European trade strategy for SMEs in order to integrate SMEs into international value chains and overcome trade-specific hurdles such as non-tariff barriers; points out that access to information is one of the biggest obstacles to the market participation of SMEs, meaning that transparency and support need to increase; recalls the importance of specific provisions for SMEs in the common commercial policy and of negotiating specific chapters for SMEs in EU trade agreements;
Amendment 129 #
2018/2005(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that, as a reply to globalisation-induced job losses and to enhance its effectiveness, a reform of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund is needed;
Amendment 195 #
2018/2005(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Notes that, in view of attacks on the multilateral world economic order, it is vitally important to preserve this order since any backsliding into protectionism would be damaging and would lead to trade war; calls on the European Union to play an active role in unblocking the replacement of the judges in the WTO Appellate Body; calls on the Commission to step up international and multilateral cooperation in the fight against unfair competition and protectionist practices by third countries;
Amendment 209 #
2018/2005(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Recalls the importance for the European Union to continue and step up cooperation with international organisations such as, inter alia, the United Nations, the ILO, the OECD and the World Bank, in the conduct of its trade policy to address the challenges of globalisation;
Amendment 131 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) That European return policy should be based on common standards, for persons to be returned in a humane manner and with full respect for their fundamental rights and dignity, as well as international law, including the UN Convention of the rights of the Child, refugee protection and other human rights obligations. Clear, transparent and fair rules need to be established to provide for an effective return policy which serves as a deterrent to irregular migration and ensures coherence with and contributes to the integrity of the Common European Asylum System and the legal migration system.
Amendment 147 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) It is recognised that it is legitimate for Member States to return illegally staying third-country nationals, provided that fair and efficient asylum systems are in place which fully respect the principle of non-refoulement, international law and Union law.
Amendment 159 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) To reinforce the effectiveness of the return procedure, clear responsibilities for third-country nationals should be established, and in particular the obligation to cooperate with the authorities at all stages of the return procedure, including by providing the information and elements that are necessary in order to assess their individual situation or remaining present and available at all stages of the return procedure.. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure that third-country nationals are informed of the consequences of not complying with those obligations, in relation to the determination of the risk of absconding, the granting of a period for voluntary departure and the possibility to impose detention, and in relation to the access to programmes providing logistical, financial and other material or in-kind assistance. Member States should ensure that the consequences of non-complying are not excessive or disproportionate. The obligation to cooperate should not affect children.
Amendment 205 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The necessary legal aid should be made available , upon request, to those who lack sufficient resources. National legislation should establish a list of instances where legal aid is to be considered necessary. Member States should ensure that children receive legal aid and information on their rights and procedures by qualified child protection authorities in a child-friendly manner and in a language that children understand.
Amendment 217 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) The use of detention for the purpose of removal should be a measure of last resort and subject to the principle of proportionality with regard to the means used and objectives pursued. Detention is justified only to prepare the return or carry out the removal process and if the application of less coercive measures would not be sufficient. Member States should develop alternatives to detention, such as community-based facilities for families with children and ensure that unaccompanied minors are not detained.
Amendment 307 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 9
9. ‘vulnerable persons’ means minors, unaccompanied minors, disabled people, elderly people, pregnant women, single parents with minor children and persons who have been subjected to torture, rape or other serious forms of psychological, physical or sexual violence and exploitation.
Amendment 312 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
When adopting a return decision and implementing this Directive, Member States shall take due account of:
Amendment 314 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the best interests of the child in all cases where children are affected;
Amendment 405 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Member States shall ensure that the consequences of non-complying are proportionate and not excessive and that they are not imposed on children.
Amendment 476 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) completion of schooling for children;
Amendment 482 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. Before deciding to issue a return decision in respect of an unaccompanied minor, Member States shall carry out a best interests assessment, taking into account the specific circumstances of the child, to identify durable solutions for the child. If a return decision is issued based on a best interests assessment, assistance by appropriate bodies other than the authorities enforcing return shall be granted with due consideration being given to the best interests of the child.
Amendment 485 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 2
2. Before removing an unaccompanied minor from the territory of a Member State, the authorities of that Member State shall be satisfied that he or she will be returned to a member of his or her family, a nominated guardian or adequate reception facilities in the State of return. Authorities shall ensure that there is a handover from child protection authorities of the Member States to child protection authorities of the State of return.
Amendment 488 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Unaccompanied minors shall be assisted and represented by a qualified guardian throughout the whole return procedure.
Amendment 493 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
In other cases return decisions may be accompanied by an entry ban based on an individual assessment of the case. In cases involving children and in cases of voluntary departure, return decisions shall not be accompanied by an entry ban.
Amendment 607 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 20
Article 20
Amendment 631 #
2018/0329(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20 a Unaccompanied minors shall not be detained. Families with children shall be placed in alternative facilities, such as non-custodial community-based facilities. Minors shall not be separated from their parents during the procedure, unless it is in their best interest.
Amendment 21 #
2018/0299(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In order to avoid the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor being separated into two distinct and unconnected parts and to ensure connectivity of Ireland with mainland Europe, the North Sea – Mediterranean Core Network Corridor should include maritime links between the Irish core ports and core ports of France, Belgium and the Netherlands.
Amendment 40 #
2018/0299(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2
Article 2 – paragraph 2
It shall apply from the day following that on which Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013 ceases to apply to the United Kingdomafter the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union.
Amendment 50 #
2018/0299(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1
Annex I – paragraph 1
Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013
Annex I — Part I — point 2 — section “North Sea — Mediterranean”
Annex I — Part I — point 2 — section “North Sea — Mediterranean”
«Baile Átha Cliath/Dublin/Corcaigh/Cork – Le Havre/Calais/Dunkerque – Zeebrugge/Antwerpen/Rotterdam.
Amendment 54 #
2018/0299(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – paragraph 1 a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013
Annex I – Part I – point 2 – section ‘Atlantic’ – line 4a (new)
Annex I – Part I – point 2 – section ‘Atlantic’ – line 4a (new)
In Part I of the Annex, point 2 (‘Core network corridors’), in the ‘Atlantic’ section, after the line ‘Aveiro – Valladolid – Vitoria – Bergara – Bilbao/Bordeaux – Paris – Le Havre/Metz – Mannheim/Strasbourg’, the following lines are inserted: “Shannon Foynes – Dublin – Rosslare – Waterford – Cork – Brest – Roscoff – Cherbourg – Caen – Le Havre – Rouen – Paris” “Dublin – Cork – Saint Nazaire – Nantes – Tours”
Amendment 17 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) The Union's trade policy must be consistent with its other external and internal policies and comply with the principle of consistency of development policies, for which the Treaties provide, in order to guarantee transparency, stability and the establishment of more equitable competitive conditions. An equitable trade policy based on solidarity which accords with the Sustainable Development Goals and serves to promote human rights can make an important contribution to the eradication of poverty.
Amendment 24 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The European Neighbourhood Policy, as reviewed in 201562 , aims at the stabilisation of neighbouring countries and strengthening resilience, particularly by boosting economic development, as the Union's main political priorities. In order to attain its objective, the reviewed European Neighbourhood Policy has been focusing on four priority areas: good governance, democracy, the rule of law and human rights, with a particular focus in engaging further with civil society; economic development; security; migration and mobility, including tackling the root causes of irregular migration and forced displacement. Differentiation and enhanced mutual ownership are the hallmark of the European Neighbourhood Policy, recognising different levels of engagement, and reflecting the interests of each country concerning the nature and focus of its partnership with the Union. _________________ 62Under the Neighbourhood Policy, the EU has engaged with several neighbourhood partner countries in the negotiation and conclusion of ambitious deep and comprehensive free trade agreements. These agreements have the purpose not only of improving access to the market and creating a favourable climate for investment but also of helping to attain the general aims of the neighbourhood policy, such as sustainable and inclusive economic and socical development which will benefit everybody. Civil society in each of the partner countries and in the Union, national parliaments and the European Parliament must be involved in the negotiation processes and in monitoring the implementation of those agreements. This Regulation should therefore support the negotiation of those agreements and the correct implementation of the agreements reached. _________________ 62 Joint communication to the European Joint communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, "Review of the European Neighbourhood policy", 18 November 2015.
Amendment 32 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of this Regulation is to uphold and promote the Union’s values and interests worldwide in order to pursue the objectives and principles of the Union’s external action, as laid down in Article 3(5), Articles 8 and 21 of the Treaty on European Union and Articles 207 and 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Amendment 48 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
In relations with partner countries, their track record in implementing commitments, in particular the Paris Agreement, international agreements, and contractual relations with the Union, including association agreements, partnership and cooperation agreements and trade agreements, shall be taken into account.
Amendment 55 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) any multilateral or bilateral trade agreement concluded, including DCFTAs (Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements) between the EU and its neighbourhood, as well as any trade preferences granted by the EU to a partner;
Amendment 477 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) The European Neighbourhood Policy, as reviewed in 201562, aims at62 aims at deepening democracy, promoting human rights, respect for the rule of law, the stabilisation of neighbouring countries and strengthening resilience, particularly by boosting economic development, as the Union'’s main political priorities. In order to attain its objective, the reviewed European Neighbourhood Policy has been focusing on four priority areas: good governance, democracy, the rule of law and human rights, with a particular focus in engaging further with civil society; socio-economic development; the fight against youth unemployment, particularly among women and young graduates; security; migration and mobility, including tackling the root causes of irregular migration and forced displacement. Differentiation and enhanced mutual ownership are the hallmark of the European Neighbourhood Policy, recognising different levels of engagement, and reflecting the interests of each country concerning the nature and focus of its partnership with the Union. Neighbourhood funding is a key lever in addressing common challenges, such as irregular migration and the fight against global warming, as well as in spreading prosperity, security and stability through economic development and better governance. The visibility of Union assistance in the neighbourhood area should be enhanced. Under the Neighbourhood Policy, the EU has engaged with several neighbourhood partner countries in the negotiation and conclusion of ambitious deep and comprehensive free trade agreements. These agreements have the purpose not only of improving access to the market and creating a favourable climate for investment but also of helping to achieve the general aims of the neighbourhood policy, such as sustainable and inclusive economic and social development which will benefit everybody. Civil society in each of the partner countries and in the Union, national parliaments and the European Parliament must be involved in the negotiation processes and in monitoring the implementation of those agreements. This Regulation should therefore support the negotiation of those agreements and the correct implementation of the agreements reached. _________________ 62 Joint communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, "'Review of the European Neighbourhood policy"', 18 November 2015.
Amendment 517 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
(28) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Regulation should contribute to mainstream climate action in the Union policies and to the achievement of an overall target of 25 50% of the Union budget expenditures supporting climate and environment objectives. Actions under this Regulation are expected to contribute 250% of its overall financial envelope to climate and environment related objectives. Relevant actions will be identified during the implementation of this Regulation, and the overall contribution from this Regulation should be part of relevant evaluations and review processes.
Amendment 572 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
(6a) 'civil society' shall mean any kind of individual or group which is independent of the state, including NGOs, universities, the private sector, the unions and human rights defenders as defined by the United Nations Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals;
Amendment 584 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of this Regulation is to uphold and promote the Union’s values and interests worldwide in order to pursue the objectives and principles of the Union’s external action, as laid down in Article 3(5), Articles 8 and 21 of the Treaty on European Union and Articles 207, 208 and 212 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Amendment 589 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) to reduce and, in the long term, eradicate poverty, particularly in least developed countries (LDCs); to achieve the international commitments and objectives that the Union has agreed to, in particular the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs and the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 596 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) at global level, to consolidate and support democracy, rule of law and human rights, support civil society organisations, further stability and peace and address other global challenges including migration and mobility, and to support sustainable economic and social development which is inclusive and beneficial to everyone;
Amendment 628 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) Asia and the Pacific;
Amendment 629 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) Pacific
Amendment 630 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) Americas and the Caribbean.
Amendment 631 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) Caribbean
Amendment 642 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Thematic programmes may cover all third countries as well as o. Overseas countries and territories as defined in Council Decision …/… (EU)shall have full access to thematic programmes, as laid down in Council Decision …/… (EU). Their effective participation must be ensured, with account taken of their specific characteristics and the particular challenges they must address.
Amendment 650 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Rapid response actions may cover all third countries as well as o. Overseas countries and territories as definedshall have full access to rapid response actions, as laid down in Council Decision …/… (EU).
Amendment 667 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 3
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 3
– Asia and the Pacific EUR 10 000 million, of which at least EUR 1 000 million for the Pacific,
Amendment 669 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 4
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 4
– Americas and the Caribbean EUR 4 000 million, of which EUR 450 million for the Caribbean,
Amendment 706 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. A rights-based approach encompassing all human rights, whether civil and political or economic, social and cultural shall be applied in order to integrate human rights principles, to support the right holders in claiming their rights with a focus on poorer and more vulnerable groups, including persons with disabilities, and to assist partner countries in implementing their international human rights obligations. This Regulation shall promote gender equality and, women’s empowerment.
Amendment 711 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
In relations with partner countries, their track record in implementing commitments, in particular the Paris Agreement, international agreements, and contractual relations with the Union, including association agreements, partnership and cooperation agreements and trade agreements, shall be taken into account.
Amendment 720 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6
Article 8 – paragraph 6
6. Programmes and actions under this Regulation shall horizontally mainstream climate change, environmental protection, human development, and gender equality and shall address interlinkages between Sustainable Development Goals, to promote integrated actions that can create co-benefits and meet multiple objectives in a coherent way. Programmes and actions must therefore comply with the objectives of 50 % co-benefits for climate and environment under the Rio markers defined by the OECD, of 20 % for human development and 85 % for the gender dimension under markers 1 and 2 defined by the OECD in terms of gender equality. These programmes and actions shall be based on an analysis of risks and vulnerabilities, integrate a resilience approach and be conflict sensitive. They shall be guided by the principle of leaving no one behind.
Amendment 739 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. In accordance with Article 41(2) of the Treaty on European Union, Union funding under this Regulation shall not be used to finance the procurement of arms or ammunition, or operations having military or defence implications.
Amendment 808 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. The countries most in need, in particular the Least Developed Countries, low income countries, countries in crisis, post-crisis, fragile and vulnerable situations, including small islands developing states, shallmust be given priority in the resource allocation process. This Regulation shall contribute to reaching the collective target of 0,20% of the Union’s Gross National Income to Least Developed Countries within the timeframe of the 2030 Agenda.
Amendment 822 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 7
Article 11 – paragraph 7
7. This Regulation shall contribute to actions established under Regulation (EU) No. …/… (Erasmus). An indicative minimum amount of EUR 2 000 000 000 000 from the geographical programmes should be allocated to actions dedicated to mobility, cooperation and political dialogue with the authorities, institutions and organisations of the partner countries A single programming document shall be drawn up from this Regulation for seven years, including funds from Regulation (EU) No …/… (IPA III). Regulation (EU) No. …/… (Erasmus) shall apply to the use of these funds.
Amendment 831 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(c a) any multilateral or bilateral trade agreement concluded, including DCFTAs (Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements) between the EU and its neighbourhood, as well as any trade preferences granted by the EU to a partner;
Amendment 846 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The amount referred to in Article 6(3) shall be used as a matter of priority in respect of the countries in the greatest need of it, inter alia:
Amendment 855 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 a (new)
Article 15 a (new)
Amendment 861 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) as a priority, the needs, using indicators such as population and level of development;
Amendment 871 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 a (new)
Article 16 a (new)
Article 16a Specific objectives for the European neighbourhood 1. In accordance with Articles 3 and 4, Union support under this Regulation in the Neighbourhood area shall have as objectives: (a) enhancing political cooperation and ownership of the European Neighbourhood Policy by the Union and its partner countries; (b) supporting the implementation of association agreements, or other existing and future agreements, including deep and comprehensive free trade agreements, and jointly agreed association agendas and partnership priorities or equivalent documents; (c) strengthening and consolidating democracy, state-building, good governance, rule of law and human rights as well as promoting a more effective way of implementing reforms agreed in mutual formats; (d) stabilising the neighbourhood in political, economic and security terms; (e) enhancing regional cooperation, in particular in the framework of the Eastern Partnership, the Union for the Mediterranean, and European Neighbourhood-wide collaboration as well as cross-border cooperation; (f) promoting confidence-building, good neighbourly relations and other measures contributing to security in all its forms and the prevention and settlement of conflicts, including protracted conflicts, and support to affected populations and reconstruction; (g) promoting a strengthened partnership with societies between the Union and the partner countries, including through people-to-people contacts and enhanced mobility; (h) intensifying cooperation on both regular and irregular migration; (i) achieving progressive integration into the Union internal market and enhanced sectoral and cross-sectoral cooperation, including through legislative approximation and regulatory convergence towards Union and other relevant international standards, and improved market access including through deep and comprehensive free trade areas, related institution building and investment; (j) supporting sustainable, inclusive and socially beneficial economic and social development for all by promoting job creation and employability, in particular for young people; (k) contributing to the implementation of the Paris Agreement by strengthening cooperation on energy security and promoting renewable energy, sustainable energy and energy efficiency objectives; (l) encouraging the establishment of thematic frameworks with the neighbouring countries of neighbourhood partner countries to address common challenges such as migration, energy, security and health.
Amendment 873 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – title
Article 17 – title
17 Indicatively 10 % of the financial envelope set out in Article 4(2)(a) to supplement the country financial allocations referred to in Article 12 shall be allocated to partner countries listed in Annex I in order to implement the performance-based approach. The performance-based allocations shall be decided on the basis of their progress towards democracy, human rights, rule of law, cooperation on migration, economic governance and reforms. The progress of partner countries shall be assessed annuallycentive-based approach ('more for more').
Amendment 879 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. Indicatively 10 % of the financial envelope set out in Article 4(2)(a) to supplement the country financial allocations referred to in Article 12 shall be allocated to partner countries listed in Annex I in order to implement the performance-based approach. The performance-based allocationincentive-based ('more for more') approach. Financial incentives shall be decided on the basis of their progress towards democracy, human rights, rule of law, cooperation on migration, economic governance and reforms. The progress of partner countries shall be assessed annually.
Amendment 887 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 2
Article 17 – paragraph 2
2. The performancincentive-based approach shall not apply to support to civil society, people-to-people contacts, including cooperation between local authorities, support for the improvement of human rights, or crisis-related support measures. In the event of serious or persistent degradation of democracy, human rights or rule of law, support to these actions may be increased.
Amendment 925 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. Financing under this Instrument shall be implemented by the Commission, as provided for by the Financial Regulation, either directly by the Commission itself, by Union delegations and by executive agencies, or indirectly through any of the entities listed in Article 62 (1) c) of the Financial Regulation(i), (iii), (iv), (v) and (vi) of the Financial Regulation where duly justified by specific expertise and comparative advantages through entities referred to in Article 62(1)(c)(ii).
Amendment 937 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Budget support as referred to in point (c) of paragraph 1, including through sector reform performance contracts, shall be based on country ownership, mutual accountability and shared commitments to universal values, democracy, human rights, gender equality, social inclusion, human development and the rule of law, and aims at strengthening partnerships between the Union and partner countries. It shall include reinforced policy dialogue, capacity development, and improved governance, complementing partners' efforts to collect more and spend better in order to support sustainable and inclusive socio-economic growth and jobdevelopment which benefits all, job creation, with particular attention to young people, reduction of inequalities and poverty eradication.
Amendment 950 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 23 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Blending operations shall be implemented wherever possible under the direction of a multilateral European financial institution or a bilateral European financial institution.
Amendment 963 #
2018/0243(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 12 a (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. This Regulation shall not support actions which, according to the environmental assessment provided for by Article 21(5), damage the environment or the climate. All actions must be fully compatible with the Paris Agreement, and EU funding of external action should contribute to the attainment of the long- term goals of the Paris Agreement.
Amendment 1110 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “Atlantic”
Annex I – part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “Atlantic”
Core network corridor "Atlantic" Alignment Gijón – León – Valladolid A Coruña – Vigo – Orense – León– Zaragoza – Pamplona/Logroño – Bilbao Tenerife/Gran Canaria – Huelva/Sanlúcar de Barrameda – Sevilla – Córdoba Algeciras – Bobadilla – Madrid Sines/Lisboa – Madrid – Valladolid Lisboa – Aveiro – Leixões/Porto – Douro river Aveiro – Valladolid – Vitoria-Gasteiz – Bergara – Bilbao/Bordeaux – Tours – Paris – Le Havre/Metz – Mannheim/Strasbourg Shannon Foynes – Dublin – Rosslare – Waterford – Cork – Brest – Roscoff – Cherbourg – Caen – Le Havre – Rouen – Paris Saint Nazaire – Nantes – Tours Pre- Cross- Evora – Merida Rail identified border sections Vitoria-Gasteiz – San Sebastián – Bayonne – Bordeaux Aveiro – Salamanca Douro river (Via Navegável do Douro) Inland waterways
Amendment 1144 #
2018/0228(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “North Sea- Mediterranean”
Annex I – Part III – point 1 – table – Core network corridor “North Sea- Mediterranean”
Amendment 4 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the need to substantially increaseincrease considerably appropriations for EU external action under the new multiannual financial framework (MFF) while preserving the EU’s values-based foreign policy; welcomnotes the modest real-term funding increase proposed by the Commission, which needs to be preserved in the interinstitutional negotiations;
Amendment 12 #
2018/0166R(APP)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls its position that the goals and objectives of the European Neighbourhood Instrument, the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights should be preserved independently due to their specific nature; repeats too its call for the existing balance in the allocation of funds between the Union's southern and eastern neighbourhoods to be maintained;
Amendment 26 #
2018/0122M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that a comprehensive and coherent diplomatic, economic, cultural and security approach is needed in the developing world where security and development go hand in hand, a vision shared by the EU and Japan;
Amendment 52 #
2018/0122M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Highlights the opportunities and momentum the SPA gives to developing cultural relations; suggests further investment to enhance citizen-to-citizen interaction, educational and cultural dialogue, and public diplomacy to promote mutual understanding; calls, in this regard, for the reinforcement and multiplication of, and the facilitation of access to, mobility programmes for students between Japan and the European Union under Erasmus+;
Amendment 65 #
2018/0122M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes Japan’s ratification of the Paris Climate Agreement in 2016; calls, in this regard, for the intensification of EU- Japan cooperation in order to make the EU and Japan leaders in global climate action; asks, more concretely, for the intensification of the cooperation in the field of sustainable energy, in particular through exchanges of good practices, mainly in the field of renewable energy, in order to ensure the implementation of the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 27 #
2018/0101(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) According to Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), special attention should be paid to the outermost regions (ORs) of the Union, as certain sectors of these regions are particularly vulnerable. Therefore several Agreements concluded by the Union with third countries or regions already contain special mechanisms for these ORs. Those mechanisms allow for the adoption of specific safeguard measures if a product is imported in such increased quantities and under such conditions as to cause or threaten to cause serious deterioration in the economic situation of any of those ORs. Additionally, in the event of an increase of imports that could eventually cause or threaten to cause serious deterioration in the economic situation of any of these regions, the Commission should also be able to introduce prior surveillance measures. When an Agreement concluded by the Union with a third country or region foresees special treatment for the ORs, these specific measures should apply in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation, in order to ensure them a proper and swift protection.
Amendment 30 #
2018/0101(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Certain agricultural products, including those from the outermost regions, are sensitive products, and particular attention should be paid to them in the context of EU trade.
Amendment 31 #
2018/0101(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 b (new)
Recital 12 b (new)
(12b) Specific safeguard provisions should be available in case the product in question is imported in such large quantities or under such conditions as to cause or potentially cause serious damage to the economic situation of any of the outermost regions as referred to in Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Amendment 35 #
2018/0101(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18 a (new)
Recital 18 a (new)
(18a) The stabilisation mechanism for bananas is one of the mechanisms for temporary withdrawal of tariff preferences in certain agreements between the European Union and certain third countries.
Amendment 46 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas it is crucial that the trade preferences and opportunities opened up by the agreement are accessible and that full use is made of them;
Amendment 67 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes in particular the ambitious level of tariff liberalisation, combined with measures to safeguard the most sensitive products through duty-free quotas, reduced duties or staging periods; points out that the EU tariff on automobiles will be phased out over seven years; calls on the Commission to keep an eye on trends in automobile trade flows over this period in order to predict any destabilisation of the European market and address the situation in these cases;
Amendment 80 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
5. Welcomes the fact that Japan will, notably, grant non-discriminatory access for EU suppliers to the procurement markets of 48 cities, remove the ‘operational safety clause’, which has in practise prevented EU rail suppliers to access the Japanese market, and maximise transparency in tendering for public contracts; calls on the Commission to monitor the implementation of this point closely to ensure that the commitments made in the areas of openness and access to public procurement are respected;
Amendment 232 #
2018/0091M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the EU delegation to Japan is involved in the whole process of implementing the agreement; points out that EU Delegations make it possible for and direct action to be taken for the proper implementation of trade provisions and help to ensure that issues and obstacles are detected quickly and dealt with effectively;
Amendment 2 #
2017/2636(RSP)
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission staff working document of 24 April 2017, entitled 'Sustainable garment value chains through EU development action',
Amendment 50 #
2017/2636(RSP)
Paragraph 9
9. Supports the Commission's examination of a possible EU-wide initiative on the garment sector-voluntary initiatives and strict codes of conduct shall be its key principles; notes the Commission staff working document of 24 April 2017, entitled 'Sustainable garment value chains through EU development action', and calls once again on the Commission not to confine itself to simply presenting a working document; stresses furthermore that coordination, sharing information and exchange of best practices may contribute to increasing efficiency of private and public value chain initiatives and achieve positive results on sustainable development;
Amendment 54 #
2017/2636(RSP)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Takes the view that the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact, in which the EU is a key player, could serve as a paradigm for the establishment of similar partnerships with third countries; calls on the EU to continue and step up its international cooperation with organisations such as the ILO, the OECD and the United Nations in the area of sustainable development and corporate social responsability;
Amendment 133 #
2017/2283(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Emphasises how important it is to ensure that the DCFTA is properly implemented and that its provisions are complied with; calls on the Commission to contact the other party without delay in the event of failure to comply with a provision, and to use the instruments it has at its disposal to overcome any problems;
Amendment 142 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Calls for the existing balance in the allocation of funds between the Union's southern and eastern neighbourhoods to be maintained;
Amendment 148 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Points out that the primary objective of the European Neighbourhood Policy is growth and employment, particularly for young graduates; calls on the Commission to step up funding under the next ENI programme for projects promoting the employability of young people in the countries in the EU's neighbourhood;
Amendment 245 #
2017/2280(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
Paragraph 41
41. Stresses that a single finstrument cannot exist without the inclusion of clear and dedicated envelopes forancial strategy would make it possible to coordinate the various financial instruments more effectively and thus do more to achieve the various goals, objectives and priorities of EU external action, including democracy, human rights, the rule of law, support to civil society, conflict resolution, fragile states, development policy, economic and social development, and support to countries in various stages of EU accession;
Amendment 2 #
2017/2278(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that public procurement markets are of major economic importance, given that procurement expenditure is estimated to account for 20 % of global GDP, andexpresses its concern about the lack of reciprocity in terms of the openness of public procurement markets between the European Union and its other trading partners, and stresses that improving access to public procurement markets in third countries can therefore be a major driver for growth in trade of goods and services, and a motor for economic growth and jobs in the EU;
Amendment 17 #
2017/2278(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that one of the six priority areas for the Commission’s action in the field of public procurement is the improvement of access to procurement markets; stresses that improving access to public procurement markets in third countries, including at the sub-national level, constitutes a strong offensive interest for the EU in trade negotiations on public procurement, given that many EU companies are highly competitive in various sectors; calls on the Commission to ensure compliance with and proper implementation of the provisions concerning public procurement markets contained in the EU’s free trade agreements; recalls that improved market access to third-country public procurement markets, and enhanced rules for transparent procurement procedures, should be key elements for any trade agreement to be concluded by the EU;
Amendment 27 #
2017/2278(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that any strategy to open up public procurement markets in third countries shouldmust take into account the specific needs of SMEs, as access to third- country public procurement markets can be particularly difficult for them;
Amendment 198 #
2017/2275(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, as part of their dialogue with third-country partners on human rights, to focus their efforts on judicial cooperation and on exchanging good practices so as to strengthen synergies in the global drive to combat early and forced marriage;
Amendment 36 #
2017/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on China to act on President Xi Jinping’s commitments to further open up the Chinese market to foreign investors, strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights and level the playing field by making China’s market more transparent and better regulated; emphasises how important it is to press ahead with talks to achieve full recognition for and protection of geographical indications;
Amendment 51 #
2017/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on China to make a fresh bid for GPA membership so as to give European companies access to its market on a basis that is equivalent to the access that China’s companies already enjoy in the EU;
Amendment 58 #
2017/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Supports the ongoing negotiations on a comprehensive EU-China Investment Agreement; calls for further reciprocity in market access; calls on the Commission to ensure that specific provisions are negotiated and established for SMEs;
Amendment 141 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, within the framework of bilateral agreements with partner countries, to develop environmental cooperation in order to foster sustainable development policies based on energy efficiency and renewable energy;
Amendment 181 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Stresses the importance of including adherence to the Paris Agreement and the precautionary principle as laid down in the EU Treaties in any trade and investment agreement and in Partnership and Cooperation Agreements;
Amendment 241 #
2017/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the EU to further intensify its relations with local and regional authorities in third countries to enhance thematic and sectoral cooperation between cities and regions both within and outside of the EU, and to strengthen sustainable development models at local level as well as energy efficiency policies in favour of renewables; notes the role EU delegations in third countries can play in this regard;
Amendment 58 #
2017/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that the EU-US relationship is the fundamental guarantor for global stability and has been the cornerstone of our efforts to ensure peace and stability for our societies since the end of the Second World War, and stronger multilateral economic cooperation and trade; believes that the ‘America first’ policy willundermines the relationship of trust that existed between the Union and the United States and also harms the interests of both the EU and the US;
Amendment 142 #
2017/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls for the reinforcement and multiplication of, and the facilitation of access to, mobility programmes for students between the United States and the European Union under Erasmus +;
Amendment 148 #
2017/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Insists that the EU and the US should continue playing key constructive roles by jointly addressing regional conflicts and global challenges; recalls the importance of multilateralism in tackling global issues and insists that these should be addressed in the relevant international forums; is therefore concerned that recent decisions of the US – disengagement from key international agreements, disenrollment from international forums and the fomenting of trade tensions – may diverge from these common values and put strain on the relationship; calls on the European Union to show unity, firmness and proportionality in its responses to such decisions;
Amendment 259 #
2017/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses that the EU is committed to strengthening the prosperity, stability, resilience and security of its neighbours first hand through non-military means, notably through the implementation of association agreements; calls on the Union and the United States, in this context, to strengthen their cooperation and better coordinate their actions, projects and positions in the Mediterranean countries of the European Union's southern neighbourhood;
Amendment 336 #
2017/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Recalls that the EU supports the resumption of a meaningful Middle East Peace Process towards a two-state solution and insists that any action that would undermine these efforts must be avoided; regrets the unilateral decision by President D. Trump to recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, a decision that constitutes a real obstacle to peacebuilding; underlines that the question of Jerusalem must be part of a final peace agreement between Israelis and Palestinians; stresses that the joint road map should the strengthened;
Amendment 370 #
2017/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Insists that migration issues should be addressed through cooperation, partnership and protection of human rights, but also by managing migration routes and pursuing a global approach at UN level; calls on the EU and the United States, therefore, to step up their joint efforts to adopt and promote the adoption by the UN Member States of the future United Nations global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration, as well as the future United Nations global compact on refugees;
Amendment 381 #
2017/2271(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. RegDeplorets the US’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement but praises the continued efforts of individuals, companies, cities and states within the US; recalls the urgency and the need for all US states, cities and US companies to make commitments and cooperate more with the European Union in favour of a real energy transition;
Amendment 237 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n
Paragraph 1 – point n
(n) welcomes the proposal for a regulation on the import of cultural goods; calls on the Commission to step up its cooperation with international organisations such as the United Nations, Unesco, Interpol, the World Customs Organisation and the International Council of Museums in order to strengthen efforts to combat the trafficking of cultural goods as a means of financing terrorism; calls on the Commission to bring in a traceability certificate for artworks and antiques entering the EU market and originating in territories or places controlled by jihadists; calls on the Member States to establish police units that are specialised in dealing with the trafficking of cultural goods, and to ensure coordination of those units across the Member States; calls on the Member States to make it mandatory for companies involved in art dealing to declare all suspicious transactions, imposing penalties – including criminal penalties, where necessary – for the financing of terrorism through negligence on the owners of companies dealing in art and antiques who become involved in the trafficking of such goods;
Amendment 260 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
(pa) calls on the Commission and Member States, as part of their dialogue with third-country partners about the fight against terrorism, to focus their efforts on police and judicial cooperation and on exchanging data and good practice so as to strengthen synergies in the global drive to combat the financing of terrorism;
Amendment 265 #
2017/2203(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point q a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point q a (new)
(qa) calls on the Commission and Member States to do more to encourage third-country partners to sign and ratify the 1999 International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, which sets out a number of principles and standards with a view to eradicating the financing of terrorism, and to implement the convention effectively;
Amendment 3 #
2017/2193(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to the study on the cumulative effects of future trade agreements on EU agriculture published by the Commission on 15 November 2016;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2193(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the European agricultural sector and certain agricultural products, such as beef, veal, sheepmeat, dairy products, cereals and sugar – including special sugars – are particularly sensitive issues in these negotiations;
Amendment 12 #
2017/2193(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas New Zealand is the world’s leading exporter of butter, the second largest exporter of powdered milk and is also a major player in the global export market for beef, veal and sheepmeat and other dairy products;
Amendment 56 #
2017/2193(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to anticipate and take account of the consequences of the UK leaving the European Union on these negotiations, particularly when preparing the exchange of offers and calculating quotas;
Amendment 144 #
2017/2193(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g
Paragraph 14 – point g
Amendment 151 #
2017/2193(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g a (new)
Paragraph 14 – point g a (new)
(ga) Monitoring measures and safeguard clauses that can be activated in an effective and timely manner in the event of market disturbance and difficulties affecting producers;
Amendment 154 #
2017/2193(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g b (new)
Paragraph 14 – point g b (new)
(gb) Specific, unambiguous provisions on the treatment accorded to overseas countries and territories (OCTs) and the outermost regions (ORs) so as to ensure that due account is paid to their particular interests in the negotiations;
Amendment 3 #
2017/2192(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to the study on the cumulative effects of future trade agreements on EU agriculture published by the Commission on 15 November 2016;
Amendment 5 #
2017/2192(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the European agricultural sector and certain agricultural products, such as beef, lamb, dairy products, cereals or sugar – including special sugars – are particularly sensitive issues in these negotiations;
Amendment 7 #
2017/2192(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas Australia is the world’s third largest exporter of both beef and sugar, and is a major player in the global export market for dairy products and cereals;
Amendment 48 #
2017/2192(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to anticipate and take account of the consequences of the UK leaving the European Union on these negotiations, in particular in preparing the exchange of offers and calculating quotas;
Amendment 134 #
2017/2192(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point f
Paragraph 14 – point f
(f) Enforceable measures covering the recognition and protection of intellectual property rights, including geographical indications (GIs) for agricultural and foodstuff products, and for wines and spirits, taking as a benchmark the EU- Australia agreement's provisions protecting the wine sector, while striving to improve the existing legal framework and to ensure a high level of protection for all geographical indications;
Amendment 147 #
2017/2192(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g
Paragraph 14 – point g
(g) A balanced outcome in the agriculture and fisheries chapters which gives due consideration to the interests of all European producers and consumers, for instance by introducing appropriate quotas in the most sensitive sectorexcluding the most sensitive products from the negotiations; considers that only then can it boost competitiveness and be beneficial to both consumers and producers;
Amendment 153 #
2017/2192(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g a (new)
Paragraph 14 – point g a (new)
(ga) Monitoring measures and safeguard clauses that can be activated in an effective and timely manner in the event of a market disturbance and difficulties affecting producers;
Amendment 156 #
2017/2192(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point g b (new)
Paragraph 14 – point g b (new)
(gb) Specific, unambiguous provisions on the treatment accorded to overseas countries and territories (OCTs) and the outermost regions (ORs) so as to ensure that due account is paid to their particular interests are represented in the negotiations;
Amendment 9 #
2017/2191(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for trade defence instruments to be updated to make them stronger, faster and more effective; stresses the importance of the Union devising a reliable new method of calculating anti-dumping duties and welcomes the interinstitutional agreement that has been reached, while recalling the importance of ensuring its effective implementation;
Amendment 20 #
2017/2191(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that EU trade policy and trade agreements can have a role to play to the fight against corruption;
Amendment 78 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas the EU is committed to promoting and developing international law and to strengthening the role of the United Nations on the international stage;
Amendment 142 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Highlights the need to further inter-parliamentary relations between the EU and its partner countries, in a framework of honest dialogue underpinned by mutual understanding and trust, with the aim of promoting human rights effectively;
Amendment 163 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Welcomes the adoption of the EU Gender Action Plan 2016-2020 which sets out a comprehensive list of measures to improve the situation of women in terms of equal rights and empowerment; emphasises the importance of ensuring its effective implementation; welcomes, in addition, the adoption of the Strategic Engagement for Gender Equality 2016-2019, which promotes gender equality and women’s rights worldwide; requests that the Commission, the EEAS and the VP/HR step up their fulfilment of the obligations and commitments in the area of gender equality and women’s rights, not least under the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), and encourage third countries to do likewise; believes that the EU should continue mainstreaming support for women within common security and defence policy (CSDP) operations, conflict prevention and post- conflict reconstruction; recalls that the 2016 Sakharov Prize was awarded to Nadia Murad and Lamiya Aji Bashar, survivors of sexual enslavement perpetrated by ISIS/Daesh; strongly condemns all forms of abuse and violence against women and girls in this connection;
Amendment 254 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Reiterates its full support for the ICC, the Rome Statute, the Office of the Prosecutor, the Prosecutor’s proprio motu powers, and the progress made in initiating new investigations as an essential means to fight impunity for atrocity crimes; welcomes the meeting of 6 July 2016 between EU and ICC representatives in Brussels in preparation for the 2nd EU-ICC round table meeting, enabling relevant staff at the ICC and the EU institutions to identify common areas of interest, exchange information on relevant activities and ensure better cooperation between both parties; notes, with profound regret, the recent announcements of withdrawals from the Rome Statute, which represent a challenge in terms of victims’ access to justice and which should be firmly condemned; considers that the Commission, the European External Action Service and the Member States should continue to encourage third countries to ratify and apply the Rome Statute; reiterates its call for the VP/HR to appoint an EUSR for International Humanitarian Law and International Justice with a mandate to promote, mainstream and represent the EU’s commitment to the fight against impunity and to the ICC across EU foreign policies;
Amendment 296 #
2017/2122(INI)
26. Recalls that corruption is a threat to the equal enjoyment of human rights and undermines democratic processes such as the rule of law and the fair administration of justice; takes the view that the EU should emphasise in all platforms for dialogue with third countries the importance of integrity, accountability and the proper management of public affairs, finances and property, as stipulated in the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC); recommends that the EU use its expertise to support third countries more consistently and systematically in their efforts to tackle corruption, by setting up and consolidating independent and effective anti-corruption institutions; calls, in particular, on the Commission to negotiate provisions on combating corruption in all future trade agreements that it negotiates with third countries;
Amendment 312 #
2017/2122(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
Amendment 35 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the need for the EU’s external policies to be consistent with each other and with other policies with an external dimension, and to pursue the objectives set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union;
Amendment 70 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the need for the EU to maintain the commitment it has made to its partners, especially in its neighbourhood, to support economic, social and political reform, to protect human rights and to help establish the rule of law, as the best means of strengthening the international order and ensuring the stability of its neighbourhood;
Amendment 100 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the need to intensify the fight against Islamist terrorism in the Southernstep up our cooperation with the countries in our neighbourhood and among the neighbours of our neighbours in order to intensify the fight against terrorism; urges the need for concerted diplomatic efforts on the part of the EU, the US and other international allies, to convince players in the region, such as Turkey, the Gulf states and Iran, of the need for a common strategy to address this global challenge; believes that these diplomatic efforts should be accompanied by the wide range of other tools and instruments at the EU’s disposal;
Amendment 194 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates the need for a strategic refocus on the Western Balkans, giving a fresh impetus to EU enlargement policy and strengthening the rule of law and the resilience of state institutions; is convinced that regional reconciliation and integration through the transatlantic institutional architecture is the best means to address the dangers stemming from destabilising foreign interference, organised crime, disinformation and hybrid threats;
Amendment 225 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Points out that the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) includes plans to involve third countries that are neighbours of the EU’s neighbourhood partner countries in the context of extended cooperation frameworks; urges, therefore, that thematic frameworks be set up to offer cooperation between the Union, the Southern neighbourhood partner countries and key regional players, especially in Africa, on regional issues such as security, energy and the management of migratory flows;
Amendment 298 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Emphasises that the EU is committed to promoting and developing international law and to strengthening the role of the United Nations on the international stage;
Amendment 320 #
2017/2121(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Highlights the need to further inter-parliamentary relations between the Union and its partner countries, in a framework of honest dialogue underpinned by mutual understanding and trust, with the aim of promoting human rights effectively;
Amendment 6 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas, according to the United Nations, 33 of the 497 least- developed countries are in Africa;
Amendment 40 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses that Aid for Trade represents a vital tool to develop structures and projects for trade, in particular in LDCs and considers that such an initiative should be further increased; furthermore asks the Commission to coordinate its implementation and maximize its effectiveness;
Amendment 45 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that the European neighbourhood policy (ENP) review provides opportunities for coordination of neighbourhood policy and policy on other African states to be improved through the creation of extended cooperation frameworks; urges, therefore, that these thematic frameworks be set up to offer greater cooperation between the European Union, the southern neighbourhood partner countries and third countries in Africa on regional issues such as security, energy, and even migration;
Amendment 46 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Urges the EU always to take account of the different levels of development among African countries and to suppherefore to adopt targeted and specific trade preferences ort measures which enhance production and processing capacity, particularly in agriculture;
Amendment 58 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the EU to support Africa’s ambitions of creating a genuine intra- African market and avoid taking steps which might hinder these ambitions;
Amendment 76 #
2017/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for transparency in trade agreements and for the full participation of the civil societies and parliaments of the countrieall relevant stakeholders concerned in future negotiations and in the implementation of agreements currently under negotiation.
Amendment 6 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
Citation 15
Amendment 21 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas electronic commerce is an engine for growth and productivity in the entire economy, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises;
Amendment 43 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas foreign companies currently benefit from far greater access to the European market than Europeans do in third countries; whereas many of our trade partners are increasingly closing their domestic markets and resorting to digital protectionism; whereas the EU should anchor its digital trade strategy on the principles of reciprocity, fair competition, smart regulation and transparency with the view to restoring consumers’ trust and to restoring a level playing field for businesses;
Amendment 46 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the building blocks that preserve the open internet inof the EU’s digital single market, including those principles that preserve the open Internet such as fair competition, net neutrality and intermediary liability protections, should be promoted in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)exemptions, and those rules that protect Internet users against data privacy breaches, spams and geo-blocking restrictions, should be promoted in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), to the benefit of European consumers and businesses alike; whereas the completion of a truly European Digital Single Market is of utmost importance for the EU to play its role as international standard-setter;
Amendment 48 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas several ground-breaking legislations, including but not limited to the opening of the telecommunications market to competition since 2009, the recognition of net neutrality since 2015, the abolition of roaming fees since 2017, and the entry into force of the General Data Protection Regulation from 2018 onwards, have propelled the EU into the vanguard;
Amendment 52 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas private companies are increasingly setting norms and standards in the digital economy; whereas they must go further and faster in developing technological solutions, which could help prevent, detect and remove illegal content online;
Amendment 56 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas the EU has a paramount interest in shaping the globalisation and digitalisation of our economies and of international trade, at the same time two of the main engines for growth for businesses and two of main causes for concern for citizens; whereas the economic opportunities and the societal challenges of new technologies (e.g. nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science) and of new applications (artificial intelligence, blockchain and robotics) must be respectively unleashed and mitigated;
Amendment 62 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas according to the OECD, up to 5% of goods imported into to the EU are counterfeited, resulting in substantial losses in jobs and tax revenues;
Amendment 63 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H c (new)
Recital H c (new)
Hc. whereas sensitive sectors such as audio-visual services, and fundamental rights such as the protection of personal data should not be subject to trade negotiations;
Amendment 65 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H d (new)
Recital H d (new)
Hd. whereas according to special Eurobarometer 431, nine out of ten Europeans think that it is important for them to have the same rights and protection over their personal information, regardless of the country in which the public authority or private company offering the service is based;
Amendment 71 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that European standards shall be fully-safeguarded in the trade agreements the Commission negotiates, and where possible commuted into international standards; stresses that global trade rules on e-commerce are an instrument for growth and a tool to project our values; rejects digital protectionism, mass surveillance and online censorship; supports freedom of expression and information, personal data protection and encryption;
Amendment 73 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that access to secure broadband internet connectivity and digital payment methods, effective consumer protection, in particular redress mechanisms for online cross-border sales, and predictable customs procedures, are essential elements in relation to enabling digital trade, sustainable development and inclusive growth; reiterates its demand to identify the challenges that consumers face when they buy goods and services on e-commerce websites located outside the EU, and to propose concrete measures if need be;
Amendment 77 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Stresses the importance in trade agreements to promote fair and effective competition, in particular between digital service providers such as online platforms and users such as SMEs, to promote consumer choice, to ensure non- discriminatory treatment of all market players and to avoid the creation of dominant positions that distort the markets;
Amendment 92 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to prioritise and speed up the adoption of mutual adequacy decisions, provided that third countries ensure, by reason of their domestic law or their international commitments, a level of protection "essentially equivalent" to that guaranteed within the EU; calls on the Commission to adopt, and to make public, updated and detailed binding procedures for reaching these decisions, in full respect for national supervisory authorities’ powers and for the European Parliament’s opinion;
Amendment 113 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Ccalls on the Commission to prohibitensure that cross-border data transfers are in compliance with the existing and future EU legal framework, in particular through adequacy decisions, and to incorporate in our trade agreements first and foremost a horizontal provision, which fully maintains the right of a Party to protect personal data and privacy, with the only condition that it must not be used with the intention to restrict data flows for reasons other than the protection of personal data, accompanied with a second provision, which prevents unjustified data localisation requirements in FTAs;
Amendment 123 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to put forward its position on cross-border data transfers, data protection carve-out and unjustified data localisation requirements in trade negotiations before the end of the yearterm, in close coordination with the European Parliament and in line with its position;
Amendment 128 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to combat discriminatory, illegitimate and protectionist measures by third countries, such as ‘buy local’ policies, local content requirements or forced technology transfers, to ensure that European companies can operate in a fair and predictable environment; calls on the Commission to condition in future FTAs several of its market access commitments on reciprocal commitments by the other Party under the same category, including public procurement, Mode 1 and Mode 4;
Amendment 135 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that the EU should continue to pursue its efforts at bilateral , plurilateral and multilateral level to ensure that third countries offer a level of openness towards foreign investments equivalent to that of the EU, and that they maintain a level playing field for EU operators; welcomes the EU’s proposal for a regulation establishing a framework for review of foreign direct investments into the Union and supports its objectives to better protect critical infrastructures and technologies;
Amendment 144 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Notes that the protection of trademarks, intellectual property (IP) andrights (IPR), including those related to copyright, geographical indications, trademarks, trade secrets and patents, is indispensable to encourage and reward artistic creation and industrial innovation, that investments in R&D isare a precondition tof the EU’s knowledge-based economy, and that international cooperation is key to combating the trade in counterfeited goods; stresses, however, that trade agreements are not the place to extend the level of protection for rights holders by providing for more extensive copyright enforcement powers all along the value chain; stresses; therefore encourages the Commission to push for the worldwide implementation of international standards, such as the WTO Agreement on TRIPS as well as the WIPO Internet Treaties; stresses the need to strike the right balance between the promotion of due diligence and the maintaining of an innovation-friendly approach; stresses that access to medicines in third countries should not be challenged on the basis of IP protection;
Amendment 148 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Exhorts the Commission to keep a close eye on ICANN’s gTLD Program, which expands domain names to thousands of generic names, and to guarantee, in line with its commitment to a free and open Internet, the protection of rights holders, in particular those related to geographical indications;
Amendment 149 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to use trade agreements to prevent parties from imposing foreign equity caps by, to laying down pro-competitive wholesale access rules for incumbent operators’ networks and by securing, to provide transparent and non-discriminatory rules and fees for licensing, and to secure genuine access to last- mile infrastructures in export markets for EU telecom providers; recalls that rule-based competition in the telecommunications sector leads to higher quality services and lower prices;
Amendment 156 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission to continue its efforts towards developing a set of binding multilateral disciplines on e- commerce in the WTO, and to continue focusing on concrete and realistic deliverables;
Amendment 158 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the Commission to urgently re-launch TiSA negotiations; shares the view that EU should seize the window of opportunity to take the lead to set state-of-the art global digital standards;
Amendment 163 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls on the Commission to use trade agreements to promote the interoperability of ICT-standards that benefit both consumers and producers, notably in the context of a secure Internet of things, 5G and cybersecurity;
Amendment 166 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the Commission to encourage signatories of trade agreements to bring pressure to bear on mobile providers toinclude, in the telecommunications chapter of its FTAs, provisions makeing both international roaming fees and the fees applied to international calls and messages transparent, fair, reasonable and consumer- oriented; calls on the Commission to support policies that promote cost-oriented retail prices for roaming services with a view to reducing prices;
Amendment 171 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Recognises that the principle of intermediary liability protecexemptions has been crucial in developing the digital economy and in guaranteeing freedom of speech; calls on the Commission to ensure in its trade negotiations that online intermediaries must never be made strictly liable for hosting unlawful third-party content, nor should they ever be required to monitor content proactively as part of an intermediary liability regimeuphold EU law in this regard in its trade negotiations;
Amendment 172 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Strongly supports the further mainstreaming of digital technologies and services in the EU’s development policy and among others the Digital4Development initiative; recognises the multiplier effect digital technologies can have in achieving Sustainable Development Goals; calls on the Commission to stimulate public-private partnerships to increase investments in digital infrastructure in the Global South; urges the Commission to make investments in broadband infrastructure in developing countries conditional upon respect for a free, open and secure internet; calls on the Commission to use trade agreements to improve digital rights; takes note with deep concern of the conclusion of the recent UN Global Broadband Progress report highlighting a growing digital divide between developed and developing nations;
Amendment 186 #
2017/2065(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Commits to update its eTrade strategy every 5 years;
Amendment 52 #
2017/2057(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point j
Paragraph 1 – point j
(j) on trade in services, to consider that the potential of the service sector is not fully accomplished in the current AA, and that a modernised AA should address unnecessary barriers to market access and provide national treatment via a positive list schedule; to consider that commitments should be taken building on the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and that rules should be updated as necessary to account for new developments; to exclude audiovisual services from the scope of the negotiations and the agreement;
Amendment 90 #
2017/2057(INI)
Proposal for a recommendation
Paragraph 1 – point y
Paragraph 1 – point y
(y) to ensure, with reference to the progress achieved by Chile in bilateral trade negotiations with Uruguay and Canada, that the parties include a specific chapterhorizontal provisions on trade and gender equality that specifically contains clear and measurable targets, beyond the adherence of the parties and their respect for international human rights, labour and social standards, foreseeing active measures aiming to enhance opportunities for women to benefit from the opportunities provided by the AA; to ensure, inter alia, that the parties commit to collect disaggregated data allowing for thorough ex ante and ex post analysis on the impact of the modernised AA on gender equality, to pursue an enhanced participation of women enterprises (particularly micro-enterprises and SMEs) in public procurement, building on the experience of the Chilean Ministry of Gender Equality which, in 2015, established a supporting program to strengthen women entrepreneurs’ participation as suppliers in the public procurement market of ‘Chile Compras’, to support the internationalisation of women enterprises and the participation of women in WTO Mode 4 opportunities; and to ensure that this chapter foresees the involvement of women’s organisations andre regularly consulted and that gender equality experts are included in the negotiating teams, as well as in the JCC (foreseeing the development of innovative means of consultation, such as electronic discussions) and that it guarantees periodical substantial discussions on gender and trade, if necessary, with the establishment of a specific consultative subcommittee;
Amendment 8 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the EU is faced with multiple challenges that affect global stability and that can only be tackled with long-term and holistic external actions; recalls the ambition of EU leaders as expressed in the Rome Declaration to strive towards a Union that is ‘big on big issues and small on small ones’; calls for the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) to make this a reality by substantialgreatly increasing external action appropriations (Heading 4), thereby making common foreign policy a core EU function;
Amendment 52 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Points out that the primary objective of European Neighbourhood Policy is growth and employment, particularly for young graduates; calls on the Commission to step up funding under the next ENI programme for projects promoting the employability of young people locally;
Amendment 55 #
2017/2052(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the importance of strengthened support for the rule of law, democracy and human rights as a cross- cutting issue in EU instruments in view of ongoing developments in the European Neighbourhood and beyond; emphasises also that this support must be accompanied by actions to promote inclusive economic growth that is beneficial to all, in particular young people and women.
Amendment 34 #
2017/2050(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Supports the imminent launch of the EU-New Zealand free trade agreement negotiations, which must be conducted in a spirit of reciprocity and mutual benefit, taking into account the sensitivity of certain agricultural and other products;
Amendment 13 #
2017/2044(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the strategic importance of both the Southern and Eastern neighbourhood for the Union and demands that the proposed decrease of resources for the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) is avoided; points out that the primary objective of European Neighbourhood Policy is growth and employment, particularly for young graduates; calls on the Commission to respect and step up its ENI commitments to provide funding for projects promoting the employability of young people locally;
Amendment 3 #
2017/2028(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that corruption is inextricably linked to harm to human rights, equality, social justice, development and the environment; emphasises how corruption, with the severe disruption and obstruction it engenders, blights economies, societies and trade;
Amendment 7 #
2017/2028(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that certain EU trade policy measures, such as the inclusion in trade agreements of sustainable development chapters and the promotion of EU values, offer means of combating corruption; urges greater transparency in commercial transactions and public procurement procedures; stresses that one of the requirements of the GSP+ scheme is that international agreements on good governance, including the UN Convention against Corruption, be ratified and implemented;
Amendment 10 #
2017/2028(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Points out that trade policy contributes to the protection and promotion of the values for which the EU stands, as set out in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union, including democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights, fundamental rights and freedoms, and equality; stresses that consistency between the Union’s external and internal policies is vital, particularly in relation to combating corruption, given the existing body of relevant EU law;
Amendment 12 #
2017/2028(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Points out that corruption threatens countries’ economic development and their ability to open up to trade; emphasises that corruption impedes access to fair and equitable trade and to investment;
Amendment 14 #
2017/2028(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that trade agreements should be seen as a key mechanism for promoting anti-corruption measures and good governance, through commitments to international standards and benchmarks, better cooperation in this regard and a strengthening of anti-corruption resources; calls for such agreements to include commitments to multilateral anti- corruption conventions in all trade deals, especially to the UN Convention against Corruption, and for them to contain complementary cross-cutting provisions making for a comprehensive approach, in keeping with the multifaceted nature of the fight against corruption;
Amendment 30 #
2017/2028(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that passing legislation is in itself insufficient and that implementation is the key; points out that legislative reform needs to be accompanied by training of the judiciary, public access to information and transparency measures; calls for Member States to cooperate more in combating corruption;
Amendment 36 #
2017/2028(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets the lack of effective enforcement and monitoring of the implementation of anti-corruption provisions in current EU trade agreements; calls on the Commission to negotiate enforceable anti-corruption provisions in all future tradeCalls on the Commission to negotiate enforceable anti-corruption provisions in all future trade agreements and to ensure that they are monitored, given the absence of such provisions in trade agreements currently in force, and in line with its declared intentions in the Trade for All strategy; calls on the Member States, to that end, to support the inclusion of anti-corruption provisions in negotiating mandates, in line with the Commission’s proposals in draft mandates submitted to them; welcomes the presence of anti-corruption provisions in the negotiating mandate for the updating of the EU-Mexico agreements;
Amendment 44 #
2017/2028(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Insists that EU trade partners lose benefits granted by trade agreements where they fail to comply wiPoints out the importance of maintaining ongoing and regular dialogue with EU trade partners throughout the implementation of agreements in order to ensure that the agreements generally as well as the anti- corruption commitments or with international standardprovisions are monitored and implemented properly; notes the Commission’s proposal in its Trade for All strategy, to introduce mechanisms for consultation in cases of systemic corruption and failures of governance, and calls ion the field of anti-Commission to envisage suspending the benefits of an agreement in such cases of systemic corruption; calls on the Commission to set clear and relevant conditions and performance indicators allowing better assessment and demonstration of results; calls, furthermore, on the Commission to respond firmly, proportionally and quickly where the beneficiary government shows insufficient commitment to comply with what has been agreit is proven and obvious that anti- corruption provisions and international commitments are not being observed.;
Amendment 48 #
2017/2028(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the European Union to continue and intensify its international cooperation with third countries, particularly within international organisations such as the United Nations, the OECD and the WTO, in combating corruption.
Amendment 174 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission, the European External Action Service and the Member States, taking into account the body of EU law in the area of combating corruption, to take the lead internationally and to promote the fight against corruption among the EU’s partner countries;
Amendment 179 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the Commission to devise joint programming on human rights and corruption, in particular initiatives on improving transparency, fighting impunity and strengthening anti-corruption agencies; considers that these efforts should include supporting the capacity of NHRIs to act in corruption cases, including through investigative capacity to establish links between corruption and human rights violations, cooperation with anti-corruption agencies and referrals to prosecution or law enforcement agencies; calls, furthermore, on the EU and the Member States to step up their judicial cooperation programmes with third countries so as to promote the exchange of best practices and effective tools in the fight against corruption;
Amendment 248 #
2017/2028(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Notes with concern that electoral fraud and corruption linked to electoral processes and the functioning of elected representative bodies and assemblies seriously undermine trust in democratic institutions and weaken civil and political rights by preventing equal and fair representation; emphasises, in that regard, how important European and international election missions are in monitoring the proper conduct of elections in third countries;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
- having regard to the Joint Declaration on an India-EU Water Partnership of 30 March 2016;
Amendment 2 #
2017/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 b (new)
Citation 2 b (new)
- having regard to the Joint Declaration on a clean energy and climate partnership of 30 March 2016;
Amendment 19 #
2017/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the EU and India, as important economic partners, with the EU being India's most important trading partner, have been engaged since 2007 in negotiations for an ambitious free trade agreement;
Amendment 71 #
2017/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its support for the establishment of a comprehensive, complete, balanced and ambitious free trade agreement between the EU and India, which should be economically, socially and politically valuable for both sides;
Amendment 75 #
2017/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Takes positive note that the EU and India have re-engaged in discussion on the ways to proceed with negotiations on a Broad-based Trade and Investment Agreement (BTIA); urgescalls on both sides to proceed with the negotiations with a view to concluding the BTIA as soon as possible in a spirit of reciprocity and mutual benefit;
Amendment 85 #
2017/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the commitment of the European Investment Bank (EIB) to fostering long-term investment in India in infrastructure that is essential for economic, social and environmentally sustainable development; calls on the EIB to implement its commitment and strengthen its support for sustainable investment in India;
Amendment 86 #
2017/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Welcomes the adoption of a Joint Declaration between the EU and India on a clean energy and climate partnership at the 13th EU-India Summit in March 2016; calls, in this regard, for the intensification of EU-India cooperation in the field of energy, in particular through exchanges of good practice, mainly in the field of renewable energy, in order to ensure the implementation of the Paris Agreement and to promote clean energy production;
Amendment 87 #
2017/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Notes with interest the adoption of a Joint Declaration between the EU and India on a water partnership at the 13th EU-India Summit in March 2016; calls, therefore, on the Union to strengthen its cooperation with India and to intensify its support for Indian sustainable water management projects such as 'Clean Ganga';
Amendment 88 #
2017/2025(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 d (new)
Paragraph 9 d (new)
9d. Encourages the Union and India to cooperate more in the scientific and technological fields, in particular by creating links between European projects and Indian initiatives in the areas of cybersecurity, internet governance, research and innovation;
Amendment 1 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
Citation 2
– having regard to Articles 8, 10, 153(1), 153(2), 157 and 15207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Amendment 2 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission’s report of 13 September 2017 on the Implementation of the Trade Policy Strategy ‘Trade for All’;
Amendment 32 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas trade policies should aim to reduce socio-economic gaps between the Global North and the Global South in terms of development and wealth, andcan contribute to the development and wealth of women, to reduce gaps between women and men, and realisze women’s rights by ensuring decent work conditions for women and finally by contributing to sustainable and equitable economic development while expanding opportunities for women entrepreneurship, access to apprenticeships and work and employment;
Amendment 39 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. Whereas according to a 2017 study of the European Commission almost 12 million women in the EU have jobs that depend on the exports of goods and services to the rest of the world1a; __________________ 1a http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017 /june/tradoc_155632.pdf
Amendment 60 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the impacts of trade liberalisation on individuals depends also on their geographical localisation and the sector of their economic activities;
Amendment 69 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the current EU trade policy and its ‘Trade for All’ strategy lack a gender equality perspective, as well as any binding obligations to enforce core women’s rights conventions such as the CEDAWis based on three key principles: effectiveness, transparency and values; whereas in order to make trade policy benefit as many people as possible it should include a reference to a gender equality perspective;
Amendment 72 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. Whereas following the provisions included in the CEDAW, the EU should provide the basis for realizing equality between women and men through ensuring women's equal access to, and equal opportunities in, political, economical and public life as well as education, health and employment.
Amendment 82 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the only area of gender equality in which DG Trade has demonstrated an interest so far isDG Trade should make more quantitative gender-disaggregated research in order to focus on matters such as business, science, and technology in order to promotinge female entrepreneurship;
Amendment 87 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas, according to the International Trade Centre, 40% of the world’s SMEs are owned by women;
Amendment 89 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas a review of current EU multilateral and bilateral agreements shows that only 20 % of the agreements with non-European trading partners make reference to women’s rights, and thatstudy recently published by the Commission shows that a gender gap persists in terms of opportunities for access to jobs and that, in 2011, only 40 38% of these agreements include references that aim to promote gender equality; whereas references in these agreements to promoting women’s empowerment are voluntary and almost all relate to non-trading aspects of the agreementsjobs supported by exports to the rest of the world were occupied by women; whereas another study shows that promoting women’s equality could increase global GDP by USD 28 billion by 2025;
Amendment 96 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas there is a crucial need of recognising and better understanding gender specific impacts of trade liberalisation to deliver adequate policy responses.
Amendment 101 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas strong movements have evolved in several countries, criticising, in particular, provisions on investor-state dispute settlement / the investment court system (ISDS/ICS) and intellectual property rights (IPR), as well as non-tariff rules in TTIP, CETA and TiSA, that could lead to breaches of women’schapters on sustainable development should be included in any trade agreement negotiated by the EU, and whereas the purpose of such chapters is to ensure respect of and protection for human rights, labourthe rights, of the environmental protection, consumer rights and public services and good and workers’ rights; whereas the EU’s trade policy should not imply the lowering of any of the EU’s standards, and whereas public services should be excluded from trade negotiations;
Amendment 109 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas in the framework of the Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) and GSP+ systems, aim toing at ensureing the ratification and implementation of human and labour rights conventions in developing countries, it is crucial to monitor on a regular basis and to take actions when needed and pay particular attention to gender equality;
Amendment 116 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas civil society, particularly women’s rights organisations and trade unions, has the knowledge and potential to strengthen women’s economic empowerment, such as the promotion of women entrepreneurs, becoming informed on the issues faced by women in trade agreements, and collecting data that can broaden our understanding of equality in trade;
Amendment 120 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas events such as the International Forum on Women and Trade organised by the Commission on 29 June 2017 enable many economic stakeholders and representatives of civil society to exchange and launch initiatives on the impact of trade on gender equality;
Amendment 129 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas special attention must be given to the negative consequences of trade liberapublic services, existing or future services of general interest, and services of general economic interest should be excluded from the negotiations on, and scope of appliscation as regards basic public services and goods, such as water and sanitation, education and healthcareof, any trade agreement concluded by the EU (including, but not limited to, water, health, social services, social security systems, education, waste management and public transport);
Amendment 143 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that fair and inclusive international trade policies require a clearer framework aiming to enhance women’s livelihoods, strengthen gender equality, protect the environment, and promote social justice and international solidaritytrade can contribute to the development of sustainable growth and job creation; recalls that the EU’s trade policy contributes to the promotion and protection of human rights and the values of the European Union, including gender equality; notes that Article 8 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union stipulates that ‘in all its activities, the Union shall aim to eliminate inequalities, and to promote equality, between men and women’;
Amendment 152 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that the EU’s trade strategy entitled ‘Trade for All’ does not mention gender equality; calls on the Commission to take this dimension into account in the conduct of its trade policy and stresses that trade negotiations may make it possible to promote gender equality on the international scene and ensure that both women and men can benefit from the advantages of trade liberalisation and be protected from its negative effects;
Amendment 158 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses how few data are available on the impact of trade on gender equality; with that in mind, calls for more data to be gathered on this topic; stresses that collecting this type of information will make it possible to improve analysis of the situation, establish a methodology and improve the definition of the objectives and measures to be taken to ensure that women benefit more from trade;
Amendment 161 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Notes that the Report on the Implementation of the Trade Policy Strategy ‘Trade for All’ of 13 September 2017 mentions gender equality in trade and specifies that it is essential to improve our understanding of the impact of trade instruments on gender equality; further notes the view expressed in the report that addressing gender equality would help ensure that the benefits of trade reach everyone, and by the same token maximise the overall gains from trade opportunities; calls on the Commission to continue its work on this matter and supply information and data as soon as possible;
Amendment 164 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that all international trade policies must be based ontrade policy could make it possible to promote the relevant international standards and legal instruments on gender equality, such as the CEDAW, the Beijing Platform for Action and the sustainable development goals (SDGs);
Amendment 178 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Underlines the urgent need to adoptneed for a consideration for gender-sensitive bindingattention to human rights regulationand provide guidelines on an international level to regulate transnational companies (TNCs) and other companieTNCs; welcomes the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights;
Amendment 180 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on Commission and Member States for a combined policy intervention to promote greater gender equality in the distribution of the employment opportunities offered by exports such as education and vocational training policies;
Amendment 186 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. InsistRecalls that all international trade agreements must include safeguard clauses enabling the contracting parties to regulate and also reverse liberalisation in order to protect fundamental objectives such as gender equality, human rights, public health and environmental sustainabian ambitious sustainable development chapter with the aim of enhancing social and environmental standards, as well as respect for human rights, which also encompass gender equality;
Amendment 195 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the need to recognise the risks inherent in trade agreement mechanisms such as ISDS and ICS, which undermine the capacity of individual governments to change their laws to include measures to promote gender equalityRecalls the ongoing process led by the EU to develop a new system for settling disputes between investors and states; recalls that the European Parliament advocates the need to ensure, among other things, stronger labour and consumer rights and advancement in environmental policiesansparency and the right to regulation on the part of the states which will be responsible for carrying out this reform;
Amendment 202 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that IPR provisions in trade can have a significantn impact on women’s health which must be taken carefully; calls for this aspect to be taken into consideration;
Amendment 204 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for regular events and meetings to be held on gender equality in EU trade agreements with the participation of representatives of the institutions and economic and civil society stakeholders with a view to creating synergy on this issue, holding discussions and setting common objectives;
Amendment 209 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines that basic public services and goods, such as water and sanitation, education and healthcare (notably acPoints out that current and future public services, services of general interest and servicess to sexual and reproductive health and rights services),of general economic interest should be exemptcluded from the scopening up of public procu of application of the agreement and the trade liberalisation agenda, and that safeguards must be put in place to reinforce states’ capacities to provide bas(including, but not limited to, water, health, social services, social security systems, education, waste management and public transport); points out that EU, national and local authorities must retain the full right to introduce, adopt, maintain or repeal any measures with regard to the commissioning, organisation, funding and provision of public services for all;
Amendment 229 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for binding measures to combating exploitation and improve working and living conditions for women in the export- oriented industries, in particular the garment and textile manufacturing and agriculture sectors where trade liberalisation has contributed to precarious labour rights and gender wage gap, to follow the objective of improving the living conditions of women in these countries and sectors;
Amendment 244 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that the impact of growing agricultural exports ise need for a consideration for genderally less favourable to women than to men, as emerging trends indicate that small farmers, many of whom are women, are often not in a position to compete in overseas marke-sensitive attention to human rights and provide guidelines on an international level to TNCs; welcomes the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights;
Amendment 249 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Insists that binding instruments are needed in EU trade policy to ensure that deccertain elements of EU trade policy, such as the presence of a chapter on sustainable development work standards, women’s rights, human rights principles and environmental protection are at the core of all types of EU trade agreements and that EU trade policy is coherent with the Union’s overarching aims of GSP+ systems, and the monitoring thereof, help promote and uphold human rights, including gender equality, workers’ rights and environmental protection; recalls the overriding importance of consistency between EU trade policy and Union policy as a whole; stresses that EU trade policy contributes to the pursuit of many aims, including sustainable development, poverty reduction and the promotion of gender equality;
Amendment 256 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission to take gender equality into account when preparing and drafting impact assessments for the purpose of opening trade negotiations; stresses that taking this into account will provide a first glimpse of the benefits that could be gained from a future trade agreement and predict the impact of new trade relations on gender equality;
Amendment 264 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. CRecalls for all EU trade agreements to include binding clauses, in the form of a stand-alone article, that promote and protect women’s rights, gender equality and gender mainstreaming, based on the Beijing Platform for Action and the SDGs, with an appropriate body appointed or an explicit mechanism in place to monitor complianceits request, in respect of trade negotiations with Chile, for the inclusion of a specific chapter on trade, gender equality and the empowerment of women; emphasises that the proposal to include such a dedicated chapter in a trade agreement is now becoming reality for the first time; stresses the need to be informed of the content of this chapter and evaluate it with a view to subsequently taking decisions at a more general level; urges the EU to introduce cross-cutting measures in trade agreements in order to promote gender equality, exchange best practices and enable women to derive greater benefit from trade agreements;
Amendment 274 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. StressesPoints out that trading commitments in EU agreements should neverot overrule human rights, women’s rights or environmental concerns; stresses the importance of enforcing the provisions of agreements on these issues, including chapters on sustainable development;
Amendment 279 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Recalls the importance of SMEs in the EU’s economic structure; calls on the Commission to continue its efforts to support SMEs – particularly in public procurement, with a view to ensuring that micro enterprises and SMEs play a greater role – and to develop specific measures for SMEs owned by women;
Amendment 284 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Is convinced that the CEDAW is of great importance for all policy areas, including trade; invites the Commission, therefore, to take action in this contextthe necessary steps to enable the EU’'s accession to and ratification of the CEDAW Convention, and to include CEDAW as an instrument in trade agreementsand to incorporate the principle of equality of men and women in Member states' legal systems, abolishing all discriminatory laws and adopting appropriate ones prohibiting discrimination against women;
Amendment 290 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for the EU and the Member States to ensure that binding clauses on labour rights, based on the ILO Conventions, includingReiterates that trade agreements should contain far-reaching commitments on all core labour rights in line with fundamental Conventions of the ILO, and calls for the EU and the Member States to take into particular consideration ILO Conventions No 189 con Dcerning decent work for domestic Wworkers and No 156 on Workers with Family Responsibilities, are included in trade agreements, and that social clauses in trade agreements also apply to informal works it globally addresses the needs for workers to be covered by labour law; asks for social rights, non-discrimination and equal treatment to be taken into account in trade agreements;
Amendment 298 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Acknowledges thatStresses the importance of monitoring the implementation of the EU’s Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) and GSP+ systems need to be improved by linking economic incentives to the effective adoption and constant monitoring of core human, gender and labour rights conventions, particularly in respect of the implementation of core conventions; points out that among the GSP + conventions that are pending ratification and implementation are the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women of 1979 , Convention No 111, concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation, and Convention No 100, concerning Equal Remuneration for Men and Women Workers for Work of Equal Value; points out that the upholding and implementing such conventions helps further gender equality;
Amendment 312 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for EU legislation similar to UN binding due diligence obligations to ensure respect for human rights, including women’s rights, and adequate social and environmental standardsUrges the EU to foster international cooperation on gender equality in trade relations and encourages the WTO to take this dimension into account in its trade policy; stresses the importance of also addressing this issue in other international and multilateral organisations and forums, such as the UN, World Bank or OECD, with a view to ensuring that women derive greater benefits from international trade;
Amendment 331 #
2017/2015(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls on the Commission to evaluate, in order to create favourable conditions for the participation of women to the opportunities offered by the free trade agreements, the possibility to build up pre-apprenticeship training programs for providers, employers, workforce practitioners, and other industry stakeholders to network with their peers from across the EU and learn from a variety of successful program models;
Amendment 37 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Welcomes the launch in September by the European Union, in partnership with the United Nations, of the Spotlight initiative aimed at ending all forms of violence against women and girls; calls on the Union to maintain its commitment to the follow-up and effective implementation of this initiative;
Amendment 42 #
2017/2012(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for a dedicated budget line on gender equality to be established in order to address the level of political participation and representation of women in the EU’s neighbouring countries in a more prominent way; stresses that programmes should also set measurable targets to regularly track progress on gender equality in the Eastern and Southern Neighbourhood and hold partner governments to accountstrengthen cooperation with the governments of partner countries, with a view to achieving better results more rapidly;
Amendment 23 #
2017/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) It is important to provide legal certainty and to ensure EU wide coordination and cooperation by establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investment in the Union on grounds of security or public order. This is without prejudice to the sole responsibility of the Member States for the maintenance of national security and with due account for the provisions of Article 346 of the TFEU.
Amendment 104 #
2017/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3
Article 3 – paragraph 3
3. Projects or programmes of Union interest shall include in particular those projects and programmes which involve a substantial amount or a significant share of EU funding, or which are covered by Union legislation regarding critical infrastructure, critical technologies or critical inputs. An indicative and non- exhaustive list of projects or programmes of Union interest is included in Annex 1 and can be updated.
Amendment 132 #
2017/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
Article 4 – paragraph 2
In determining whether a foreign direct investment is likely to affect security or public order, Member States and the Commission may take into account whether the foreign investor is controlled by the government of a third country, including through significant funding, or whether the investment is part of a third country's economic or political programme or strategy.
Amendment 155 #
2017/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Article 8 – paragraph 1
Amendment 183 #
2017/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5
Article 9 – paragraph 5
5. The Member States where the foreign direct investment is planned or has been completed shall take utmost account of the Commission's opinion and shall provide an explanation to the Commission in case its opinion is not followed.
Amendment 199 #
2017/0224(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Each Member State shall appoint an institutional foreign direct investment screening contact point ('institutional FDI screening contact point') for the screening of foreign direct investment. The Commission and other Member States shall involve these FDI screening contact points on all issues related to implementation of this Regulation.
Amendment 1 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to the UN Convention on the Right of the Child;
Amendment 3 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
- Having regard to the European Parliament Resolution on the EU accession to the Istanbul Convention to prevent and combat violence against women and domestic violence of 12 September 2017;
Amendment 5 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
- having regard to Directive (EU) 2016/800 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings,
Amendment 7 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
Citation 12 a (new)
- Having regard to Directive 2011/92/EU on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children online and offline and to the European Parliament Resolution on the implementation of the Directive of 14 December 2017;
Amendment 12 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 a (new)
Citation 15 a (new)
- Having regard to the study by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) entitled ‘Child-friendly justice -Perspectives and experiences of children involved in judicial proceedings as victims, witnesses or parties in nine EU Member States’, published in February 2017,
Amendment 13 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 b (new)
Citation 15 b (new)
- Having regard to the FRA Fundamental Rights Report 2017, published June 2017
Amendment 36 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas there is still a systematic underreporting of incidences or perpetrators of domestic violence in the EU, particularly in cases involving minorities, LGBT persons, antisemitic offences, child sexual abuse and gender- based violence;
Amendment 57 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas the ratification and full implementation of the Istanbul Convention provides a coherent European legal framework to prevent and combat violence against women and to protect the victims;
Amendment 62 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I – indent 4
Recital I – indent 4
- ensuring equal accessibility for all victims to victim support services, particularly in the cases of child victims, LGBT victims and victims of hate crimes and honour- related crimes;
Amendment 85 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – indent 2
Paragraph 4 – indent 2
- the fact that clear information is often not provided in more than one language, making it de facto difficult for victims to seek protection abroad in another Member State;
Amendment 96 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Encouragescalls on the Member States to promote access to justice, as this contributes greatly to breaking the silence and increasing the victim’s sense of justice, decreases the possibility of impunity and allows the victim to begin the process of psychological recovery;
Amendment 114 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that one of the most important objectives of the Victims’ Rights Directive wais to improve the position of victims of crime across the EU and to place the victim at the centre of the criminal justice system;
Amendment 119 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls on the Member States to step up criminal procedure law measures guaranteeing the protection of child victims throughout the entirety of criminal proceedings and thereafter to ensure that they receive assistance and support, thereby avoiding that child victims are exposed to secondary victimisation;
Amendment 131 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Member States to pay particular attention to the individual assessment of minorschildren and of child victims of human trafficking, child sexual abuse and exploitation; recalls that child victims shall be always considered to have specific protection needs due to their vulnerability as foreseen in art.22 par 4 of the Directive;
Amendment 136 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Highlights the fact that individual assessments are crucial as they help the victim realise that he or she has certain rights, and the right to make decisions, in the proceedings they are involved in and, if a child, the right to have access to the specific procedural safeguards that would apply to them from the very beginning of the legal proceedings;
Amendment 143 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide training programmes and guidelines for law practitioners, police officers, prosecutors and judges to ensuring that they are better able to execute individual assessments without delay once a crime has taken place, to avoid further victimisation or secondary victimisation experienced by victims of crime and to empower victims, as a means of reducing post-traumatic stress; recalls that particular attention should be given to training professionals dealing with victims of child-related crimes, especially in cases of sexual abuse and sexual exploitation; stresses that such training should also be included in education programmes and that compulsory training should be available, on a regular basis, to all professionals involved in dealing with victims of crime, in order to develop a victim-oriented mind- set;
Amendment 162 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Reminds the Member States of the requirement to provide translation and interpretation services free of charge, noting that lack of information in other languages may constitutes an obstacle for the effective protection of the victim and a form of discrimination against the victim;
Amendment 166 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Urges the Commission and the Member States to engage actively in information campaigns to increase awareness about the rights of victims as established by EU law, including the specific needs of child victims;
Amendment 171 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the Member States to exchange best practices on establishing mechanisms to encourage and facilitate for victims to report the crimes they have suffered; Calls on the Member States to step up specific measures to protect more effectively child victims of child sexual abuse by also improving the role of national helplines, given that self- reporting of children is limited;
Amendment 177 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to counteract the judicial and practical flaws in the implementation of this directive by a proper interplay of the various EU victim- protection instruments, such as Directive 2011/99/EU of 31 December 2011 on the European Protection Order, Directive 2011/36/ EU of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, Directive 2011/93/EU of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and Directive 2014/42/EU of 3 April 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime; calls on the Member States to implement these important instruments, including the Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and girls, with coherence in order to ensure that victims in Europe fully enjoy their rights;
Amendment 183 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Member States to put in place measures to ensure that written and oral communications comply with simple language standards taking in consideration vulnerable groups such as children and people with disabilities, so that victims can be kept informed in an adequate and targeted manner before, during and after criminal proceedings;
Amendment 188 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Calls on the seven Member States that have not yet done so to consider stalking a criminal offense on the basis of the relevant provisions in the directive on the right to protection of privacy, the right to protection and, in particular, the right to avoid contact with the offender and as called for under art.34 of the Istanbul Convention to prevent and combat violence against women and girls;
Amendment 194 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Member States to guarantee assistance to victims from victim support services before, during and after criminal proceedings, including psychological support; deplores the fact that in some countries, governments rely heavily on NGOs to provide key support services to victims (‘volunteerism’)underlines the important role of civil society in victims support; considers nevertheless that governments shall not rely only on NGOs to provide key support services to victims (‘volunteerism’) and shall build capacity to develop victims support mechanisms, involving law enforcement authorities, health and social services and civil society;
Amendment 237 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35 a (new)
Paragraph 35 a (new)
35 a. Calls on all Member States and the EU to ratify and fully enforce the Council of Europe Istanbul Convention to prevent and combat violence against women and girls and protect victims;
Amendment 244 #
2016/2328(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36 a. Calls on the Commission to submit a legal act to support Member States in the prevention and suppression of all forms of violence against women and girls and of gender-based violence;
Amendment 37 #
2016/2324(INI)
3a. Recalls the importance to the Union of establishing an inclusive human rights dialogue with all partner States, with the participation of civil society organisations; calls on both the Union and Member States to step up their good governance programmes with third countries and to promote exchanges of good practices with regard to the inclusion and participation of civil society organisations in decision-making processes;
Amendment 110 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to suspend the accession talks with Turkey if the constitutional package is implemented unchanged;
Amendment 146 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes with concern that measures undertaken following the declaration of the state of emergency have targeted alleged members/supporters of the Gülen movement, dissent in general and political parties of the opposition in particular; strongly condemns the imprisonment of 13 MPs belonging to the People’s Democratic Party (HDP), including its co-chairs, and of 90 Kurdish municipal mayors; urges the Turkish Government to lift the state of emergency immediately; underlines that the reintroduction of the death penalty would violate Turkey’s international commitments and lead to an immediate end to the EU accession talks;
Amendment 166 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Condemns strongly the violations of freedom of expression and the serious infringements of media freedom, including the disproportionate bannings of media sites and social media; notes with concerncondemns the closure of around 170 media outlets -– including almost all Kurdish-language outlets -– and the jailing of more than 150 journalists; recalls that a free and pluralistic press is an essential component of any democracy and urges the Turkish government to release all journalists immediately;
Amendment 199 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on Turkey to protect the rights of the most vulnerable groups and of persons belonging to minorities; emphasises the importance of the principle of religious freedom and of respect for religious minorities; regrets that the LGBTI marches in Ankara and Istanbul were banned for the second consecutive year; is seriously concerned about gender-based violence, discrimination, hate speech against minorities, hate crime and violations of the human rights of LGBTI persons; calls on Turkey to harmonise its domestic legislation with the Council of Europe’s Istanbul Convention, which it ratified in 2014; welcomes the government’s national strategy and action plan for Roma and encourages the authorities to address key obstacles to the social inclusion of Roma;
Amendment 235 #
2016/2308(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Believes that strengthenupgrading trade relations could bring concrete benefits to citizens in Turkey and the EU, andin therefore supports light of the current failings of the Customs Union; notes, however, that the Commission’s proposal to start negotiations on the upgrading of the Customs Union should be made conditional on Turkey respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms; reiterates that the EU is Turkey’s main trading partner and that two thirds of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Turkey comes from EU Member States; considers the involvement of social partners in negotiations as crucial; calls on the Commission to include political benchmarksan enforceable clause on human rights and fundamental freedoms in the upgraded Customs Union, with a view to making it a key conditionality; also notes that the upgrading of the Customs Union remains a purely commercial issue and is in no way related to the accession negotiation process, which should be suspended;
Amendment 4 #
2016/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
Citation 17 a (new)
- having regard to the Commission staff working document of 24 April 2017 entitled ‘Sustainable garment value chains through EU development action’,
Amendment 50 #
2016/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas most, but not all, recently concluded EU trade and investment agreements contain trade and sustainable development (TSD) chapters; which require the parties to the agreement to give undertakings as regards the safeguarding of human rights, compliance with labour and environmental standards and corporate social responsibility;
Amendment 137 #
2016/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission to update its approach to corporate social responsibility with a view to strengthening labour and environmental standards and, in particular, insisting on the inclusion of CSR provisions in the trade and investment agreements negotiated by the EU;
Amendment 242 #
2016/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Deplores the fact that gender is not mentioned in the Trade for All strategy, and calls on the Commission to take this matter into account when conducting the mid-term assessment and revision of its strategy; calls on the Commission to ensure that gender perspective is included and mainstreamed in trade policy, the Aid for Trade strategy, and all future FTAs and impact assessments; calls on the Commission to collect gender- disaggregated data and take gender into account in GVC analysis; ntinue its talks and negotiations with a view to ensuring that the WTO takes gender equality into account in its trade policy; calls on the Commission to collect gender- disaggregated data and take gender into account in GVC analysis; welcomes the fact that the issue of gender equality is being addressed in the negotiations on updating the EU-Chile agreement and will be dealt with in the future updated agreement;
Amendment 258 #
2016/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Reiterates its call for the strengthening of import and supply chain controls to ensure that only child labour- free products enter the EU market; stresses the importance of including the objective of combating forced labour and child labour in EU trade agreements in the form of chapters on sustainable development, so that both parties are committed to achieving it; draws attention to the need for the EU to contribute at international level to the discussions with the ILO, the OECD, the United Nations and the WTO in order to make progress in combating forced labour and child labour;
Amendment 2 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to United Nations Security Council Resolution 2347 of 24 March 2017,
Amendment 166 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Calls on the Commission to strengthen the international dimension of Erasmus, Creative Europe and Horizon 2020 and to promote, particularly within the context of the European neighbourhood policy, participation in these programmes by the partner countries closest to the EU;
Amendment 210 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for the setting-up of an emergency response mechanism to the destruction of cultural heritage, building on the experience of the UN’s Blue Helmets for Culture task force initiative, in close and structured cooperation with UNESCO and with the technological support of Copernicus – the European Earth Observation Programme; in that regard, welcomes the adoption by the United Nations Security Council of Resolution 2347 for the protection of heritage, on 24 March 2017, which states that the destruction of cultural heritage may constitute a war crime;
Amendment 281 #
2016/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32a. Calls on the Commission to step up its cooperation with international organisations such as the United Nations, Unesco, Interpol, the World Customs Organisation and the International Council of Museums, in order to strengthen the fight against trafficking in cultural goods which can serve to finance criminal activities, including the financing of terrorist organisations;
Amendment 77 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Union to continue and step up post-conflict civilian missions and operations under the CSDP in order to bolster and support reconstruction in third countries, especially when these have been the scene of crimes against humanity; stresses that these missions help consolidate the reconciliation process, which is particularly important in States that have witnessed crimes against humanity and war crimes;
Amendment 106 #
2016/2239(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls, furthermore, on all ICC State Parties to step up their efforts to promote universal accession to the ICC; considers that the Commission and, the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the Member States should continue to encourage third countries to ratify and implement the Rome Statute and conduct an assessment of the EU’s achievements in this regard;
Amendment 1 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
Citation 2
– having regard to the Agreement adopted in Paris at the 21st Conference of the Parties of the UNFCCC of 12 December 2015 (the Paris Agreement), and to the vote in the European Parliament on the ratification of the Agreement on 4 October 2016,
Amendment 51 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas interest in the Arctic and its resources is increasing because of the changing environment of the area, and resource scarcity; whereas the Arctic is believed to hold 13% of the world’s undiscovered oil resources and 30% of its natural gas resources; whereas the region’s geopolitical importance is growing; whereas climate change effects and growing competition for access to the Arctic and natural resources, and increasing economic activities have brought (security) risks to the region, including challenges to human security, but also new opportunities; whereas as a result of climate change new navigation routes will open and new fishing grounds and natural resources will become available resulting in an increase in human activity in the region;
Amendment 65 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas a robust and healthy Arctic ecosystem inhabited by viable communities is strategically important for the political and economic stability of Europe; whereas the Arctic contains over half of the world’s wetlands and plays a key role in the purification of water; whereas it contributes to the achievement of the objective of good water status in the European Union under the Water Framework Directive; whereas the costs of inaction on preserving the Arctic ecosystem are increasing exponentially;
Amendment 69 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the Arctic sea ice has diminished significantly since 1981, the areas under permafrost are decreasing, causing the risk of incidental release of huge amounts of carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere, the snow cover continues to decrease and the melting glaciers are contributing to globally rising sea levels; whereas it has been noticed that the sea ice is disappearing at an even faster pace than the models predict, the volume of sea ice present during the summer having fallen by more than 40% in 35 years; whereas climate change is advancing at the fastest pace in the polar regions;
Amendment 78 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas three EU Member States (Denmark, Finland and Sweden) are full members of the eight-member AC, and seven others (France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom) are observers; whereas the EU is seeking to upgrade its status in the AC; whereas all G8 players are present, at various levels, within the AC, as well as the emerging Asian powers such as China, India and South Korea;
Amendment 88 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas some four million people live in the Arctic region, of which some ten percent are members of indigenous peoples; whereas the vulnerable Arctic environment, as well as the fundamental rights of indigenous people, require more stringent safeguards, especially when it comes to projects where intrusive extraction of natural resources takes place; whereas the increase in pollutants and heavy metals in the Arctic has negative repercussions in the food chain through their presence in fauna and flora, particularly fish, and constitutes an important health issue for local populations and for consumers of fishery products;
Amendment 95 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the EU should play a leading role in discussions and negotiations in international fora, in order to ensure that all parties concerned accept their responsibilities in terms of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases or pollutants, and to face the growing challenges of sustainable resource management;
Amendment 135 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines the importance of UNCLOS in providing a complementary multilateral legal framework for settling intra-Arctic sovereignty issues; notes that only very few unresolved issues of jurisdiction exist in the Arctic; seeks the promote the use of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in Hamburg for conflict resolution; considers respect for international law in the Arctic essential; advocates a strong role for the EU in promoting effective multilateral arrangements and a global rules-based order through the strengthening and consistent implementation of relevant international, regional and bilateral agreements, frameworks and arrangements; underlines that the EU should have a strong role in reaching an agreement to maintain the Arctic, which is not under any country’s jurisdiction, as an area of common heritage to be used exclusively for peaceful and scientific purposes; notes that this does not concern navigation and traditional livelihoods;
Amendment 230 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the need for the EU to engage with all Arctic partners in policy dialogue; suggests in this connection that the Arctic question be included in ongoing discussions conducted by the EU with its partners that are also AC members; calls for improved coordination between the EU, the AC, the Barents Euro- Arctic Council and other bodies involved in cooperation in the High North;
Amendment 279 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Notes that Arctic migration routes have formed which enter the European Union; emphasises that migration routes and increased transport should be considere, when an EU Arctic strategy is drafted, the need to consider migration routes and the importance of a low-emission mobility policy for the EU regions concerned, involving the development of cross-border transport links, such as the TEN-T trans-European transport network, and wthen drafting an EU Arctic strategy; promotion of a modal shift to low-emission means of transport, such as rail or electric vehicles;
Amendment 366 #
2016/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Considers parliamentary engagement and close interparliamentary cooperation on Arctic matters, in particular with national parliaments of relevant EU Member States and with the parliaments of EU partner countries that are also AC members, essential in the implementation of Arctic policies;
Amendment 38 #
2016/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the EEAS to provide Parliament regularly with detailed information on the situation in Uzbekistan, in particular with regard to the eradication of child and forced labour; decides to continue to monitor developments in Uzbekistan and to organise a regular dialogue with the ILO, the Commission, the EEAS and other stakeholders aimed at the total eradication of forced labour and child labour in Uzbekistan;
Amendment 43 #
2016/2226(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission to submit the EU Garment Initiative as soon as possible; notes that in 2013 the Commission launched the Sustainability Compact with Bangladesh, the ILO and the USA, and stresses that this type of initiative can serve as a basis for devising new actions, in partnership with third countries, in order to pursue the objectives of improving working conditions, health and safety at work in the garment sector in third countries;
Amendment 14 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Amendment 18 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 e (new)
Citation 5 e (new)
- having regard to the document published by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on 28 June 2016 entitled ‘Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe – A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy’ 1a, __________________ 1a https://eeas.europa.eu/top_stories/pdf/eug s_en_.pdf
Amendment 27 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 e (new)
Citation 16 e (new)
- having regard to the joint communication of the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 18 November 2015 entitled ‘Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy’1a, __________________ 1a http://eeas.europa.eu/enp/documents/2015 /151118_joint-communication_review-of- the-enp_en.pdf
Amendment 194 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses firmly that the European Union is committed, to a CFSP founded onhrough the CFSP and all its other external policies, to the advancement of democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for human dignity, the principles of equality and solidarity, and respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter and international law;
Amendment 224 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 d (new)
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Highlights the need to further inter-parliamentary relations between the Union and its partner countries, in a framework of honest dialogue underpinned by mutual understanding and trust, with the aim of promoting human rights effectively;
Amendment 303 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 c (new)
Paragraph 26 c (new)
26c. Stresses that migrant smuggling is linked to human trafficking and is a serious violation of human rights; points out that CSDP missions such as EUNAVFOR MED are an effective way of tackling migrant smuggling; calls on the EU to continue and step up operations of this kind;
Amendment 317 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Firmly reiterates that human rights agreed under UN conventions are universal, indivisible, inter-dependent and inter-related, and that respect for these rights must be enforced; recalls in this context that the EU is committed to promoting and developing international law and to strengthening the international role of the United Nations; stresses that it is important that the Member States ratify all international human rights instruments established by the UN, including those enshrined in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and, notably, the Optional Protocol establishing complaints and inquiry mechanisms, in conformity with Article 21 TEU;
Amendment 497 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 48 g (new)
Paragraph 48 g (new)
48g. Stresses that the GSP, GSP+ and EBA systems can play a key role in ensuring respect for the values defended by the EU such as democracy, the rule of law, human rights and fundamental rights and freedoms; insists on the importance of their effective implementation and monitoring; welcomes the publication of the Commission’s first biennial status report on the implementation of the GSP+ and the dialogue on this report with the European Parliament before its publication;
Amendment 505 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 50 c (new)
Paragraph 50 c (new)
50c. Notes the Commission’s legislative proposal of 28 September 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 for the control of exports of dual-use items and technologies, which seeks to strengthen this control in view of the fact that certain items and technologies can be misused to commit serious human rights violations;
Amendment 856 #
2016/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 110 e (new)
Paragraph 110 e (new)
110e. Recalls the need for the EU to maintain the commitment it has made to its partners, especially in its neighbourhood, to support economic, social and political reform, protect human rights and help establish the rule of law, as the best means of strengthening the international order and ensuring the stability of its neighbourhood; emphasises, in this regard, that the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy provided an opportunity to restate that the defence of universal values and the promotion of human rights are key objectives of the Union;
Amendment 5 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas at European level the textile and garment industry occupies 185 000 businesses, which employ 1.7 million people and generate a turnover of EUR 166 billion;
Amendment 17 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas all recently concluded EU free trade agreements iconclude ‘Trade andd by the EU must include ambitious sustainable development’ chapters;
Amendment 25 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Supports the Commission’s examination of a possible EU-wide initiative on the garment sectorDeplores the fact that the Commission has still not submitted the EU-wide initiative on the garment sector, and calls on it to launch it as soon as possible; notes, in addition, that the current multiplication of existing initiatives could result in an unpredictable environment for companies;
Amendment 29 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses therefore the need to draw up an overview of existing corporate social responsibility measures being implemented by European businesses, in order to be able to identify good practices more effectively and contribute to the creation of a common action framework at European level; recalls, with this in mind, that the private sector has also launched many initiatives to increase the responsibility displayed within the supply chain;
Amendment 31 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the need for a unified approach to the collection of data on social, environmental and labour performance, to be applied along the whole supply chain in order to increase the coherence of the assessment of corporate social responsibility, taking into account the diversity of the players in the sector; points out that the industry-driven Higg Index covers all key impact areas;
Amendment 37 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. CRecalls that 90% of the European textile and garment industry consists of SMEs, and calls on the Commission, therefore, to take into account the special needs of SMEs and base its approach on the scalability principle; recalls the need to establish technical assistance and specific financial support for SMEs in connection with the development of their duty of due diligence;
Amendment 42 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the traceability and transparency of the supply chain is the key to achieving sustained change; calls on the Commission, therefore, to increase the traceability and transparency of the supply chain in the garment industry in a realistic and balanced way which can be pursued while taking into account the diversity and specific characteristics of the players in the chain; recommends that trustworthy, clear and meaningful information on sustainability be made available to consumers;
Amendment 48 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that the negotiation by the European Union of free trade agreements containing an ambitious sustainable development chapter represents an opportunity for the European Union to help to improve respect for the rights of workers – particularly women – and contribute to the abolition of all forms of child labour and forced labour; stresses that the implementation of free trade agreements facilitates, in particular, the development of a dialogue between businesses and civil society regarding the supply chain in the garment industry, and can thus help to improve production conditions and the safety of workers;
Amendment 50 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Recalls that the establishment of schemes such as the GSP+, by means of the requirement to ratify and implement the 27 conventions, could help to improve the situation with regard to workers’ rights, promotion of gender equality and abolition of child labour and forced labour; with this in mind, stresses the need to monitor carefully the implementation of the GSP+ and respect for the conventions by the countries concerned;
Amendment 52 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Stresses that the Sustainability Pact launched after the Rana Plaza disaster is a worthwhile European initiative which could serve as a basis for the planning of fresh measures in partnership with third countries in order to pursue the aims of improving working conditions, health and safety at work in the garment industry;
Amendment 53 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4d. Calls on the Commission to continue and intensify its international cooperation with such organisations as the ILO, the OECD or the United Nations in order to promote greater responsibility on the part of players in the supply chain of the textile and garment industry;
Amendment 55 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the development of industrial relations and collective bargaining and the establishment of easy- to-access and effective grievances mechanisms, according to internationally agreed standards, are among the main guarantees for the proper respect of labour standards and human rights in supplier countries; encourages the European Union to develop and continue a dialogue with certain third countries in order to help improve the rights of workers and respect for human rights in those countries;
Amendment 65 #
2016/2140(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the gender aspect to be taken into account in the EU garment initiative, particularly to enable significant progress to be made with regard to wage equality.
Amendment 2 #
2016/2100(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that fair competition in the area of trade, services and investment has a positive impact on the social and economic development of Member States and of the EU’s trade partners; emphasises, however, the sensitive nature of the agricultural sectors and the need to take clear, effective steps to help producers stay competitive on the international markets and safeguard a European production model based on respect for the environment and animals, food safety and quality and maintaining a balance between regions;
Amendment 4 #
2016/2100(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to work together with trade partners with a view to ensuring that their markets are more open to EU firms, particularly as regards energy, transport, telecommunications, public procurement and services, including services provided in the context of exercising regulated professions; points out, however, that the agricultural sector should not be used as a bargaining chip in the EU’s trade negotiations;
Amendment 12 #
2016/2100(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the fact that the WTO Ministerial Conference in Nairobi brought progress in the efforts to reduce export subsidies in order to guarantee undistorted competition on international agricultural markets; takes the view, nonetheless, that the European Union should make fewer unilateral concessions in multilateral negotiations in order to safeguard its competitiveness on international markets;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2100(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Points out that the most recent common agricultural policy reforms represented the EU’s contribution to the overhaul of the international trading system; takes the view that the EU, unlike its international competitors, does not exploit the full margin for manoeuvre available to it to support its domestic farming industry, in particular the blue box or the ‘de minimis’ clause in the amber box provided for under the WTO agreements;
Amendment 6 #
2016/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Customs Union is a basic pillar of the European Union, making it one of the largest trading blocks in the world, and whereas a fully functional Custom Union is essential for the credibility which the EU needs to guarantee its strength when negotiating trade agreements;
Amendment 46 #
2016/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises the importance of completing the work of harmonising controls at all points of entrance into the Customs Union, in particular on the basis of existing instruments;
Amendment 48 #
2016/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Points out that effective customs controls on goods entering the Union can help to improve consumer safety by countering the entry on to European territory of products which do not meet EU standards and combating all forms of unfair competition that European firms which comply with EU standards may face;
Amendment 49 #
2016/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that the opportunity given by the UCC and its rules on the interconnected IT systems and electronic exchanges should be used to access data on reliable and legal trade and make it available through channels other than customs declarations, for example through international mutual exchange programmes, such as AEO or SSTL, with the aim of facilitating exchanges;
Amendment 56 #
2016/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to developmake more use of the Authorised Economic Operators (AEO) programme further, ensuring its robustness, reliability and compliance with third countries’ customs rules, for example in trade agreement negotiations;
Amendment 57 #
2016/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission to coordinate and cooperate with customs and other border agencies on the ground in a better way, within the EU as well as with its trade partners on data sharing, in particular as regards recognition of custom controls and trusted trade partners; calls on the Commission to improve and step up cooperation among its directorates- general on customs matters, given the wide range of areas which have a bearing on customs;
Amendment 62 #
2016/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Invites the Commission to present a communication on better practises on custom control for the interim period, in order to bolster convergence between control bodies, highlight best practices and results, and analyse the counterfeiting trade flows at border points; encourages the Commission, further, to consider setting targets and developing performance indicators for customs authorities;
Amendment 90 #
2016/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Urges the Commission to work further with the Member States on aligning, where appropriate, policies as regards customs and VAT, with a view to ensuring synergies and opportunities, including in finding legal and practical solutions to challenges relating to small consignments, e- commerce and simplifications;
Amendment 101 #
2016/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to do more to develop and support joint training opportunities for customs agents in the Member States; emphasises that the harmonisation of training for customs agents in Europe will contribute to the effective implementation of the Union Customs Code;
Amendment 124 #
2016/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Requests the Commission to coordinate in a better way the defence of geographical indication on agri-food products within the Commission and also with the EUIPO Agency; reminds the Commission the importance of developing a policy on non agri-food geographical indications; points out that the introduction of a system for the protection of non-agricultural products by means of geographical indications which is coherent, simple, transparent and does not impose an administrative and financial burden represents an opportunity for SMEs and would strengthen the European Union’s position in international trade negotiations;
Amendment 125 #
2016/2075(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Requests the Commission to coordinate in a better way the defence of geographical indication on agri-food products within the Commission and also with the EUIPO Agency, a genuine value added on external markets; reminds the Commission the importance of developing an equally ambitious policy on non agri- food geographical indications;
Amendment 7 #
2016/2064(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that China is planning to contribute to the EFSI and that the Commission has said that it will not be given any quid pro quo, in particular as concerns governance; stresses that a contribution by China to the EFSI must not be linked or made subject to the question of granting market economy status;
Amendment 1 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the need to rebuildadapt and strengthen the EU-ACP relationship on fresh foundations as a fair partnership between equals, respecting countries’ heterogeneity and sovereignty; stresses that the partnership must have as its, taking account of the new challenges posed by and the new characteristics of the international environment, in particular globalisation and regionalisation; stresses that meeting the objectives of the United Nations SDGs, the meeting of basic needs and respect for human right should be at the heart of the partnership; stresses that the new SDG approach can help us to get past the donor-receiver paradigm in ACP-EU relations;
Amendment 14 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Draws attention to the vital importance of consistency between the Union’s external policies and of consistency between the objectives of its internal and external policies, in particular in the areas of trade, agriculture, the environment, energy, security and migration; adds that it is still important that the countries in the ACP group should take full ownership of the ACP-EU partnership and that the review should give the partnership fresh political impetus, over and above any technical or institutional adjustments required;
Amendment 23 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the negative effects ofat the association agreements on the economies of ACP countries; takes the view that the new partnership will need to be based on developing the countries’ productive capacities, completing the most advantageous regional integration processes, protecting traditional agriculture, and combating land grabbing, the privatisation of national natural resources and public services, and over-exploitationwith ACP countries contribute to regional integration processes, to achieving development objectives and to promoting human rights, the rule of law and good governance; calls, therefore, for human rights clauses to be incorporated into these agreements; stresses the importance of ensuring that there is greater transparency in the negotiations on these agreements and proper monitoring of their implementation, so that they can contribute effectively to meeting development objectives;
Amendment 27 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the post-Cotonou process should offer a framework within which to discuss trade issues with all the ACP countries; calls for a strengthening of trade cooperat and parties concerned; calls for trade cooperation to be strengthened and to take account of the specificities of the different ACP regions, with a values-driven approach and improved Policy Coherence for Development; believes that good governance, inclusive growth, job creation, the development of the private sector and regional integration must be central in a future economic partnership;
Amendment 35 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Is convinced that the review of the ACP-EU partnership should take account of the growing importance of regionalisation in order to avoid simply imposing a Union political framework; emphasises that it is crucial that the countries which make up the ACP group should play a full part, as a group and as regions, in the review process; emphasises, in that connection, the role of regional organisations, such as the African Union or the African regional economic communities;
Amendment 42 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b.Calls for the political dimension of the ACP-EU partnership to be strengthened, in particular with a view to carrying out joint actions and exerting greater influence in international forums;
Amendment 52 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Invites ACP countries to audit their debts with a view to their complete elimination, and invites them to claim reparations for the spoliation of natural resources by foreign multinationals, and for the wars that have been sparked; supports the United Nations working group on an international framework for sovereign debt restructuring; supports the United Nations working group on an international framework for sovereign debt restructuring; stresses that eradicating poverty requires the emergence of a dynamic private sector that will foster sustainable economic development; points out that, without respect for the rule of law and functioning political institutions, the private sector will not be able to achieve this goal;
Amendment 52 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that civil societylocal authority, civil society and private sector involvement is a must throughout the implementation of the EPAs and the post- Cotonou process; notes the importance of a renewed ACP- EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly and defends strong parliamentary oversight of the future framework; asks for results- oriented monitoring of ACP-EU cooperation, especially with regard to trade and sustainable development;
Amendment 65 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the universality of the human rights enshrined in international law,ACP-EU cooperation should be stepped up in areas of common interest such as security, conflict prevention including intern relational law on migrants and refugees, must be respected, along with the Geneva Convention; urge to reducing hunger and the effects of climate change, human rights, the rule of law and democracy; points countries to ratify the United Nations Convention on the protection of the rights of all migrant workers and members of their familiest in this connection that the possibilities for political dialogue within the framework of Articles 8 and 96 of the Cotonou agreement have not been fully exploited by either the EU or the ACP side; highlights the important role of the ACP- EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly in this context;
Amendment 84 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for the inclusion of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in the review of the ACP-EU cooperation framework as a single, universal set of development goals applicable to all; believes that the joint ACP-EU Council should give concrete recommendations on the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in the framework of the ACP-EU cooperation;
Amendment 85 #
2016/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 175 #
2016/2052(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that the launching of CSDP missions, such as EUNAVFOR MED, contributes to the achievement of a European Defence Union; calls on the EU to continue and step up missions of this kind;
Amendment 5 #
2016/2047(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Is concerned about the significant impact that the pledges made by the EU at the London conference on supporting Syria and in the context of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey will have on the external financing instruments and the humanitarian aid budget; while supporting those pledges, stresses that their fulfilment must not be to the detriment of other priority areas and long-term policies; calls in particular for an increase in the funding of the European Neighbourhood Instrument, which plays a vital role in supporting stability among Europe's Eastern and Southern neighbours; recalls that the ENP’s first objective is growth and employment, especially for young graduates; calls on the Commission to keep and enhance its financial commitments within the ENI framework, for projects that foster youth employment in the neighbourhood; considers it essential to maintain the EU’s pivotal role in supporting the Middle East Peace Process, the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA;
Amendment 19 #
2016/2047(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) should be allocated sufficient budgetary resources so that adequate trade-related technical support and assistance can be made available to our close partners, especiallyin particular those in the Eastern Partnership as well as the member states of the Union for the Mediterranean, which include the post-Arab-Spring countries;
Amendment 17 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the Joint Communication of the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 18 November 2015 entitled ‘Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy’,
Amendment 100 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls the need for the EU’s external policies to be consistent with each other and with other policies with an external dimension, and to pursue the objectives set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union;
Amendment 332 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Points to the commitment the EU has made to its partners in its neighbourhood, especially in the Mediterranean, to support social and political reform, protect human rights, help consolidate the rule of law and promote economic development, as the best means of strengthening the international order and ensuring the stability of its neighbourhood;
Amendment 351 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Emphasises that ensuring peace and stability on our continent, in our neighbourhood and in Africa must now be at the heart of Europe’s action; takes the view that it is necessary to tackle the root causes of instability and forced and irregular migration, namely poverty, the lack of economic opportunities, armed conflict, bad governance, climate change and mistaken trade policies; believes that security, economic and social development and trade are parts of the same comprehensive strategy; points out that the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP), put forward on 18 November 2015, includes plans to involve third countries that are neighbours of the EU’s neighbourhood partner countries in the context of extended cooperation frameworks; urges, therefore, that thematic frameworks be set up to offer cooperation between the Union, the Southern neighbourhood partner countries and key regional players, especially in Africa, on regional issues such as security, energy and the management of migratory flows; calls for European and international action (UN/G20) against illegal financial transfers out of Africa;
Amendment 411 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Highlights the importance of finding a sustainable solution to the conflict in Syria; supports the UN-led efforts to facilitate negotiations between all parties to the Syrian conflict on an inclusive political settlement; calls on the EU to use its leverage over key actors such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and Russia to ensure that they take a constructive position; emphasises that the use of sanctions should be considered in case some of the actors involved do not deliver on their commitments; calls on the High Representative/Vice President to come up with a European strategy for Syria as swiftly as possible;
Amendment 440 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Believes that the fight against human traffickers is only possible where there is a cooperation with countries on the other side of the Mediterranean and in Africa as a whole; stresses that migrant smuggling is a serious violation of human rights; points out that CSDP missions such as EUNAVFOR MED are an effective way of tackling migrant smuggling; calls on the EU to continue and step up operations of this kind;
Amendment 458 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Highlights the EU’s immense potential as a diplomatic superpower, which is based on the wide range of instruments at our disposal and our normative power as a champion of democracy, freedom and human rights; stresses in this context the central coordinating role of the High Representative/Vice President, the EEAS and the EU delegations in third countries;
Amendment 491 #
2016/2036(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Highlights the role of parliamentary diplomacy and the need for a strengthened role of parliaments in the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy, including through intensified cooperation between the European Parliament and national parliaments on matters of EU foreign and security policy; reiterates the need to further inter- parliamentary relations between the Union and its partner countries, in a framework of honest dialogue underpinned by mutual understanding and trust;
Amendment 13 #
2016/2031(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that external policies, including trade policy, must contribute to protecting and promoting the values upheld by the EU, as defined in Article 2 of the TEU, such as democracy, the rule of law, respect of human rights, fundamental rights and freedoms;
Amendment 20 #
2016/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas sectors that are currently excluded from the customs union, such as agriculture, services and public procurement, are important, and whereas the sensitive nature of certain products should be honoured and audiovisual and public services should be excluded;
Amendment 35 #
2016/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the modernisation of the Customs Union is a purely commercial issue and is in no way connected to the accession negotiations which the European Parliament called to be frozen in November 2016;
Amendment 37 #
2016/2031(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the growing geopolitical and economic challenges facing Turkey as a result of instability in its neighbourhood, terrorism and the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016; stresses that while the chaos and instability in the Middle East, the Russian annexation of Crimea and intervention in Ukraine, are adversely affecting Turkey’s foreign trade within its neighbourhood, an upgraded Customs Union must encourage Turkey to respect human rights, the rule of law and fundamental freedoms, can help Turkey to overcome the challenges it faces, and contribute to transforming Turkey into a pillar of stability and an engine of growth for its citizens, if the necessary reforms are made by the government;
Amendment 58 #
2016/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) the strengthening of trade relations between the EU and Turkey should be set against the background of the common will of the parties to share the set of values and principles laid down in the EU's founding treaties, including the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and to work together to implement them fully and comprehensively; what is more, as an EU external policy, the EU's trade policy must help to protect and promote the values on which the EU is founded, such as democracy, the rule of law, and respect for human rights, fundamental rights and freedoms;
Amendment 125 #
2016/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
(i) when major sectors such as agriculture, services and public procurement are included in the new framework for trade relations between the EU and Turkey, it is important that the new structure is defined on the basis of Articles 207 and 218 TFEU and, at the same time, that the sensitive nature of certain products is honoured and that audiovisual and public services are excluded from the framework;
Amendment 149 #
2016/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iv a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iv a (new)
(iva) the agricultural products in question should be identified, transitional periods and appropriate quotas should be laid down for the most sensitive products, and in some cases such products should be excluded;
Amendment 150 #
2016/2031(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iv b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point c – point iv b (new)
(ivb) takes the view that the recognition and protection of geographical indications must be included owing to their economic importance and their significance in terms of retaining know- how, particularly for SMEs;
Amendment 14 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to clarify the circumstances in which significant distortions affecting to a considerable extent free market forces may be deemed to exist. In particular, it is appropriate to clarify that thissuch a situation may be deemed to exist, inter alia,takes place when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials, energy or other factors of production, are not the result of free market forces because they are affected by government intervention. It is further appropriate to clarify that in considering whether or not such a situation exists regard may, due account must be hapaid, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country; sacrificing of fact and law an adequate corporate governance, state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives. I, the lack of a transparent and effective functioning company law and a bankruptcy regime that prevents the exercise of property laws, the failure to apply or comply with international accounting standards, foreign exchange transactions not carried out at market rates, wage rates not the result of free bargaining between labour and management; the absence of a transparent set of laws produces discriminatory effects with regard to joint- ventures and other foreign investments; failure to comply with international and multilateral commitments on social, environmental and fiscal standards by the exporting country and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives and any other circumstance the Commission considers appropriate in order to evaluate the existence of significant distortions. The existence of significant dis further appropriate to provide that the Commission services may issue a report describing the specific situation concerning these criteria in a certain country or a certain sector; that such report and the evidence on which it is based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector; and that interested parties should have ample opportunity to comment on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. tortions in the economy as a whole or in a sector or sectors of the economy of the exporting country should lead automatically to the use of undistorted international, third country or EU prices, costs or benchmarks for each factor of production in calculating the normal value. However, if an exporting producer from a country that does not meet those conditions clearly demonstrates that its costs of one or more individual factors of production are not distorted, those costs should be used in calculating its normal value. The Commission services should draft or update a comprehensive, in-depth report describing the specific situation concerning these criteria in a certain country or a certain sector. For those countries for which a substantial number of anti- dumping cases have been recorded, the report should be completed and adopted before the entry into force of this regulation. The EU’s industrial sector should be consulted during the process of drafting the report; the specific economic and commercial characteristics of SMEs, as well as the sectors they cover, shall be taken into account in drawing up the reports. All such reports and the evidence on which they are based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector; and that interested parties should have ample opportunity to comment on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used, and to provide information demonstrating the existence of a significant distortion. Particular attention shall be paid and support shall be provided to SMEs in these investigations. The European Parliament shall monitor the report drafting process. On the request of the European Parliament or on the Commission’s own initiative when the circumstances in a specific country or sector have changed, the Commission shall draft or update the requested report. In any event the European Commission shall update the report every two years.
Amendment 15 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to clarify the circumstances in which significant distortions affecting to a considerable extent free market forces may be deemed to exist. In particular, it is appropriate to clarify that this situation may be deemed to exist, inter alia, when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials, energy and other factors of production, are not the result of free market forces because they are affected by government intervention. It is further appropriate to clarify that in considering whether or not such a situation exists regard may, due account must be hapaid, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country; state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; overcapacity leading to overproduction, a deliberate policy of exchange rate manipulation leading to an undervaluation of the national currency, non-respect by the exporting country of international environmental, social or tax commitments of the exporting country leading to a distortion of competition, public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives, the lack of a transparent and effective functioning company law and a bankruptcy regime that prevents the exercise of property laws, wage rates not the result of free bargaining between labour and management, the absence of a transparent set of laws producing discriminatory effects with regard to joint- ventures and other foreign investments, and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives, as well as any other circumstances which the Commission considers appropriate for ascertaining the existence of significant distortions. The existence of significant distortions in the economy as a whole or in a sector of the economy of the exporting country shall lead automatically to the use of undistorted international, third country or EU prices, costs or benchmarks for each factor of production in calculating the normal value. However, if an exporting producer from a country that does not meet those conditions clearly demonstrates that its costs of one or more individual factors of production are not distorted, those costs should be used in calculating its normal value. It is further appropriate to provide that the Commission services may issue a reportdraw up a report, in collaboration with the EU’s industrial sector, describing the specific situation concerning these criteria in a certain country or a certain sector; that such report and the evidence on which it is based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector; and that interested parties should have ample opportunity to comment on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. . For those countries for which a substantial number of anti-dumping cases have been recorded, the report should be completed and adopted before the entry into force of this Regulation. The EU’s industrial sector should be consulted during the report drafting process. All such reports and the evidence on which they are based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector. Interested parties also should have ample opportunity to comment on the reports and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such reports or evidence is used. The European Parliament shall monitor the report drafting process. On the request of the European Parliament or in the event of a change of circumstances in a specific country or sector, the Commission shall draft the report, or if one already exists, update the report. In any event, the European Commission should carry out a review of the report every two years.
Amendment 36 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) It is further appropriate to recall that costs should normally be calculated on the basis of reliable records kept by the exporter or producer under investigation. However, where there are significant distortions in the exporting country with the consequence that costs reflected in the records of the party concerned are artificially low, such costs may be adjusted or established on any reasonable basis, including information from other representative markets or from international prices or benchmarks. In the light of experience gained in past proceedings, it is appropriate to further clarify that, for the purposes of applying the provisions introduced by this regulation, due account should be taken of all relevant evidence, including relevant assessment reports regarding the circumstances prevailing on the domestic market of the exporting producers and the evidence on which they are based, which has been placed on the file, and upon which interested parties have had an opportunity to comment.
Amendment 41 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) Absent any other specific transitional rules regulating the matter, it is appropriate to provide for the application of this Regulation to all decisions on the initiation of proceedings, and to all proceedings, including original investigations and review investigations, initiated, on or after the date on which this Regulation enters into force, subject to Article 11(9) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. Furthermore, by way of specific transitional rule, and having regard to the absence of any other specific transitional rule regulating the matter, it is appropriate to provide that, in the case of a transition from a normal value calculated pursuant to Articles 2(7)(a) or 2(7)(b) to a normal value calculated pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 6a of Article 2, the reasonable period of time provided for in the first sub-paragraph of Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 should be deemed to elapse on the date on which the first expiry review following such transition is initiated. With a view to reducing the risk of circumvention of the provisions of this Regulation, the same approach should apply with respect to reviews conducted pursuant to Article 11(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. It is also appropriate to recall that a transition from a normal value calculated pursuant to Articles 2(7)(a) or 2(7)(b) to a normal value calculated pursuant to paragraphs 1 to 6a of Article 2 would not in itself constitute sufficient evidence within the meaning of Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036. Such transitional rules, enabling the continued application of measures to defend against subsidised imports, should complete a lacuna that would otherwise risk to generate legal uncertainty, should provide a reasonable opportunity for interested parties to adapt themselves to the expiry of the old rules and the entry into force of the new rules, and should facilitate the efficient, orderly and equitable administration of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.
Amendment 52 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point a
(a) In case it is determined, when applying this provision or any other relevant provision of this Regulation, that it is not appropriate to use domestic prices and costs in the exporting country due to the existence of significant distortions in a given sector or the economy as a whole, the normal value shall be constructed on the basis of costs of production and sale reflecting undistorted prices or benchmarks. For this purpose, the sources that may be used include undistorted international prices, costs, or benchmarks, or corresponding costs of production and sale in an appropriate representative country with a similar level of economic development as the exporting countryproducer country in which the prices and production under review are the result of free market forces, provided the relevant cost data are readily available. The constructed normal value shall include a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and general costs and for profits. In the event that data are not available, or reliable or that the exporter or the authorities in the exporting country obstructs the investigation, the normal value calculated shall be increased by a reasonable surcharge as a punishment.
Amendment 59 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(a) In case it is determined, when applying this provision or any other relevant provision of this Regulation, that it is not appropriate to use domestic prices and costs in the exporting country due to the existence of significant distortions in the economy as a whole or in a given sector, the normal value shall be constructed on the basis of costs of production and sale reflecting undistorted prices or benchmarks. For this purpose, the sources that may be used include undistorted international prices, costs, or benchmarks, or corresponding costs of production and sale in an appropriate representative country with a similar level of economic development as the exporting country, provided the relevant cost data are readily available. The constructed normal value shall include a reasonable amount for administrative, selling and general costs and for profits.
Amendment 60 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point b
(b) Significant distortions forin respect of the product concerned within the meaning of point (a) may be deemed to exist, inter alia, when reported prices or costs, including the costs of raw materials, energy or other production factors are not the result of free market forces as they are affected by government intervention. In considering whether or not significant distortions exist regard may, due account must be hapaid, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country;, sacrificing of fact and law an adequate corporate governance, state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives. , the lack of a transparent and effective functioning company law and a bankruptcy regime that prevents the exercise of property laws, the failure to apply or comply with international accounting standards, foreign exchange transactions not carried out at market rates, wage rates not the result of free bargaining between labour and management; the absence of a transparent set of laws produces discriminatory effects with regard to joint- ventures and other foreign investments; failure to comply with international and multilateral commitments on social, environmental and fiscal standards by the exporting country and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives and any other circumstance the Commission considers appropriate in order to evaluate the existence of significant distortions. The existence of significant distortions in the economy as a whole or in a sector of the economy of the exporting country shall lead automatically to the use of undistorted international, third country or EU prices, costs or benchmarks for each factor of production in calculating the normal value. If an exporting producer from a country that does not meet those conditions clearly demonstrates that its costs of one or more individual factors of production are not distorted, those costs shall be used in calculating its normal value.
Amendment 61 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point b
(b) Significant distortions for the product concerned within the meaning of point (a) may be deemed to exist, inter alia, when reported sale prices or costs, including the costs and sale prices of raw materials and energy, are not the result of free market forces as they are affected by government intervention. In considering whether or not significant distortions exist regard may, due account must be hapaid, inter alia, to the potential impact of the following: the market in question is to a significant extent served by enterprises which operate under the ownership, control or policy supervision or guidance of the authorities of the exporting country; state presence in firms allowing the state to interfere with respect to prices or costs; public policies or measures discriminating in favour of domestic suppliers or otherwise influencing free market forces; and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives. , overcapacity leading to overproduction, a deliberate policy of exchange rate manipulation leading to an undervaluation of the national currency, non-respect by the exporting country of international environmental, social or tax commitments of the exporting country leading to a distortion of competition, the lack of a transparent and effective functioning company law and a bankruptcy regime that prevents the exercise of property laws, wage rates not the result of free bargaining between labour and management, the absence of a transparent set of laws producing discriminatory effects with regard to joint- ventures and other foreign investments, and access to finance granted by institutions implementing public policy objectives, as well as any other circumstances which the Commission considers appropriate for ascertaining the existence of significant distortions. The existence of significant distortions in the economy as a whole or in a sector or sectors of the economy of the exporting country shall lead automatically to the use of undistorted international, third country or EU prices, costs or benchmarks for each factor of production in calculating the normal value. If an exporting producer from a country that has been accused of not meeting those conditions is able to demonstrate clearly that its costs of one or more individual factors of production are not distorted, those costs shall be used in calculating its normal value.
Amendment 82 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point c
(c) When appropriate, tThe Commission services may issue ashall draft or update a comprehensive, in-depth report describing the specific situation concerning the criteria listed in point (b) in a certain country or a certain sector. Such report and the evidence on which it is based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector. Interested parties shall have ample opportunity to supplement, comment or rely on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. The determinations made shall take into account all of the relevant evidence on the fileFor those countries for which a substantial number of anti-dumping cases have been recorded, the report should be completed and adopted before the entry into force of this regulation. The EU’s industrial sector should be consulted during the process of drafting the report; the specific economic and commercial characteristics of SMEs, as well as the sectors they cover, shall be taken into account in drawing up the reports. Such report and the evidence on which it is based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector. Interested parties shall have ample opportunity to supplement, comment or rely on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used; they will thus be able to provide information demonstrating the existence of a significant distortion. Particular attention shall be paid and support shall be provided to SMEs in these investigations. The determinations made shall take into account all of the relevant evidence on the file. The European Parliament shall monitor the report drafting process. On the request of the European Parliament or on the Commission’s own initiative when the circumstances in a specific country or sector have changed, the Commission shall draft or update the requested report. In any event, the European Commission shall update the report every two years.
Amendment 87 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 6a – point c
(c) When appropriate, tThe Commission services mayshall issue a detailed report describing the specific situation concerning the criteria listed in point (b) in a certain country or a certain sector. For those countries for which a substantial number of anti- dumping cases have been opened, the report shall be completed and adopted before the entry into force of this Regulation. The Union industry shall be consulted during the report drafting process. Such report and the evidence on which it is based may be placed on the file of any investigation relating to that country or sector. Interested parties shall have ample opportunity to supplement, comment or rely on the report and the evidence on which it is based in each investigation in which such report or evidence is used. Particular attention must be given to SMEs in EU industry. The determinations made shall take into account all of the relevant evidence on the file. The European Parliament shall monitor the report drafting process. On the request of the European Parliament or in the case of a change of circumstances in a specific country or sector, the Commission shall draft the report, or if one already exists, update the report. In any event, the European Commission shall carry out a review of the report every two years.
Amendment 98 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point d
(d) The Union industry may rely on the report referred to in point (c) for the calculation of normal value when filing a complaint in accordance with Article 5 or a request for a review in accordance with Article 11. When the conclusions of the report show the existence of significant distortions, the report pursuant to the paragraph 6 (b) shall constitute sufficient evidence in order to justify the calculation of the normal value pursuant to the methodology referred to in subparagraph (a). In any event, no additional charge should be imposed on EU industry, and specific support must be provided for and made available to SMEs in view of the difficulties that they can face. The absence of a report shall not prevent the Commission from using any available information or data to establish the existence of significant distortions and use the methodology referred to in subparagraph (a) if the relevant requirements are met.
Amendment 99 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point d
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point d
(d) The Union industry may rely on the report referred to in point (c) for the calculation of normal value when filing a complaint in accordance with Article 5 or a request for a review in accordance with Article 11. When the conclusions of the report show the existence of significant distortions, the report pursuant to the paragraph 6 (b) shall constitute sufficient evidence in order to justify the calculation of the normal value pursuant to the methodology referred to in subparagraph (a). In any event, no additional burden should be imposed on EU industry, and in particular on SMEs, which must receive guidance when they require it. The absence of a report shall not prevent the Commission from using any available information or data to establish the existence of significant distortions and use the methodology referred to in subparagraph (a) if the relevant requirements are met.
Amendment 114 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point e
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point e
(e) The parties to the investigation shall be informed shortly after initiation about the relevant sources that the Commission intends to use for the purpose of point (a) and shall be given 10 days to comment. For this purpose, interested parties shall be given access to the filevalidation to access the file after they have registered on a register maintained by the Commission, including any evidence on which the investigating authority relies, without prejudice to Article 19.
Amendment 116 #
2016/0351(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/1036
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point e a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 6 a – point e a (new)
(ea) In order to prevent any occurrence of disloyal competition, the Commission must put in place an information exchange mechanism with the countries applying anti-dumping measures.
Amendment 52 #
2016/0308(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – table 1 – row 3
Annex I – table 1 – row 3
Amendment 54 #
2016/0308(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I- table 1- row 4
Annex I- table 1- row 4
Amendment 54 #
2016/0308(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – table 1 – row 4
Annex I – table 1 – row 4
Amendment 56 #
2016/0308(COD)
Amendment 58 #
Amendment 59 #
2016/0308(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – table 1 – row 2
Annex II – table 1 – row 2
Amendment 59 #
2016/0308(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – table 1 – row 2
Annex II – table 1 – row 2
Amendment 61 #
2016/0308(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – table 1 – row 3
Annex II – table 1 – row 3
Amendment 63 #
2016/0308(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – table 1 – row 4
Annex II – table 1 – row 4
Amendment 64 #
2016/0308(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – table 1 – row 4
Annex II – table 1 – row 4
Amendment 3 #
2016/0197(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. The Union shall make macro- financial assistance of a maximum amount of EUR 20350 million available to Jordan ("the Union’s macro-financial assistance"), with a view to supporting Jordan’s economic stabilisation and a substantive reform agenda. The assistance shall contribute to covering Jordan’s balance of payments needs as identified in the IMF programme.
Amendment 20 #
2016/0170(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Recital 2
Amendment 35 #
2016/0170(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point j
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point j
Directive 2009/45/EC
Article 2 – point z a
Article 2 – point z a
Amendment 44 #
2016/0170(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)
Directive 2009/45/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point (a) – point (ii) a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point (a) – point (ii) a (new)
(iiia) vessels made of aluminium alloy;
Amendment 50 #
2016/0170(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point e – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point e – introductory part
(e) the following paragraphs 5 and 6 areis added:
Amendment 53 #
2016/0170(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point e
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point e
Directive 2009/45/EC
Article 6 – paragraph 6
Article 6 – paragraph 6
Amendment 8 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Recital G
G. whereas further deepening of trade and investment relationship requires considering the conclusion of the EU- Australia and the EU-New Zealand free trade agreements will deepen the trade and investment relationship with these countries;
Amendment 13 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the sensitive nature of certain sectors, and particularly the agricultural sector, must be duly taken into account in the future negotiations;
Amendment 22 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the full potential of the Union's bilateral and regional co-operation strategies may only be realised by concluding high-quality FTAs with both Australia and New Zealand in a spirit of reciprocity and mutual benefit while under no circumstances undermining or diverting resources and attention away from the ambition to achieve progress multilaterally;
Amendment 26 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that the negotiation of modern, ambitious, balanced and comprehensive FTAs with Australia and New Zealand is a logical step inpragmatic way of deepening the bilateral partnerships, further reinforcing already mature existing bilateral trade and investment relationships, and would help mitigate the diversionary effects of the recently concluded TPP;
Amendment 27 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that Australia and New Zealand each present specific economic and trade characteristics and challenges and that in view of this, the negotiations with each of them should be conducted separately;
Amendment 28 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the European Union to adapt its trade negotiations with Australia and New Zealand to the specific features of the economies of these two countries;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Considers that the European Union must give itself the legal means to negotiate with due care the opening and closing of its public procurement markets in the framework of trade talks with partner countries, and considers that putting in place a European instrument for reciprocity in public procurement markets is necessary in this regard;
Amendment 54 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that a balanced outcome in agriculture chapters that takes the interests of European producers, particularly those in the outermost regions, and sensitivities duly into account can boost competitiveness and will be beneficial to both consumers and producers; calls on the Commission to exclude the most sensitive sectors from the negotiations or to foresee transitional periods and appropriate quotas; calls for the inclusion of effective bilateral safeguard measures to prevent a surge in imports that would cause, or threaten to cause, serious injury to producers;
Amendment 55 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that a balanced outcome in agriculture chapters that takes sensitivities duly into account can boost competitiveness and will be beneficial to both consumers and producers; calls for the inclusion of effective bilateral safeguard measures to prevent a surge in imports that would cause, or threaten to cause, serious injury to producers, particularly those in the meat, dairy, sugar and textile sectors;
Amendment 61 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the importance ofat the negotiations must result in strong and enforceable provisions covering the protection of intellectual property rights and geographical indications (GIs);
Amendment 62 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the importance of strong and enforceable provisions covering the recognition and protection of intellectual property rights and geographical indications (GIs);
Amendment 70 #
2015/2932(RSP)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission to take account of the interests of the overseas countries and territories in the region during the negotiations on these free trade agreements;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
Citation 9 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 21 January 2016 on the mutual defence clause (Article 42(7) TEU),
Amendment 46 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas France’s activation of Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union in November 2015 demonstrated the potential of all the Treaty provisions relating to security and defence;
Amendment 242 #
2015/2343(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses that the launching of CSDP missions on the basis of Article 44 TEU contributes to the achievement of a European Defence Union; calls on the Union to make use of the full potential of Article 44 in order to continue and step up such missions, with a view to an operational security and defence policy;
Amendment 7 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
Citation 13 a (new)
– having regard to the joint communication of the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 18 November 2015 entitled ‘Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy’,
Amendment 112 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the fact that we are witnessing in today’s world an unprecedented level of human mobility, and stresses that one of the most urgent actions the international community must undertake is the strengthening of a common response to address the challenges and opportunities that this phenomenon represents; stresses that this response must be guided by the full protection of the rights and dignity of everyone forced by any circumstance to flee their homes in search of a better life; underlines that, though their treatment is governed by separate legal frameworks, refugees and migrants have the same universal human rights and fundamental freedoms, which need to be safeguarded regardless of their status; recalls that the EU must abide by its values and principles in all common policies and promote them in its external relations; highlights, in that regard, the need for the EU’s external policies to be consistent with each other and with other policies with an external dimension, and to pursue the objectives set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, particularly in relation to migration policy;
Amendment 338 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Points out that the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP), put forward on 18 November 2015, includes plans to involve third countries that are neighbours of the EU’s neighbourhood partner countries in the context of extended cooperation frameworks; urges, therefore, that thematic frameworks be set up to offer cooperation between the Union, the Southern neighbourhood partner countries and key regional players, especially in Africa, on regional issues such as security, energy and the management of refugees and migratory flows;
Amendment 405 #
2015/2342(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses concerns regardingTakes note of the quantitative approach in the new Partnership Framework and the related ‘migration compacts’, which see the ‘measurable increwill make it possible to asses in the number and rate of returns’ as one of the EU’s main goals, ass whether the EU’s return policy is being implemented properly, but recognises that an increase or reduction in the number of returns clearlywill also depends on the nature of migration flows and on the situations in the countries of origin; stresses that the short-term objectives of the compacts should focus on how best to address the challenges faced by third countries, including by developing legal migration channels, as a result of which the levels of irregular migration and death tolls in the Mediterranean will decrease;
Amendment 69 #
2015/2340(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underscores the critical distinction that needs to be made between the concepts of trafficking in human beings and migrant smuggling, whichPoints out that migrant smuggling is related to trafficking in human beings, even if the two concepts require different legal and practical responses and involve different state obligations;
Amendment 199 #
2015/2340(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Recalls that the rolling out on 7 October 2015 of the second phase of EUNAVFOR MED, also known as Operation Sophia, has made it possible to take concrete action against the trafficking of human beings as it authorises the boarding, search, seizure and diversion, on the high seas, of vessels suspected of being used for human smuggling or trafficking; recalls that, so far, 48 suspected smugglers and traffickers have been arrested and are being dealt with under the Italian justice system; calls on the EU to continue and step up its operations in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 3 #
2015/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
Citation 16 a (new)
- having regard to Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union,
Amendment 97 #
2015/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Deplores the fact that a number of states do not have laws protecting migrants even in asylum casesand refugees, particularly in connection with asylum applications, and recalls to mind that mass expulsions and ‘refoulement’ are prohibited;
Amendment 99 #
2015/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Union to participate actively in the debate on the term 'climate refugee', and the possible formulation of a definition with reference to international law;
Amendment 114 #
2015/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. DeplorWelcomes the recourse to lists of safe countries which causes a threat to hang over the examination of individual applications for international protection;
Amendment 124 #
2015/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls attention to the specific types of violence to which children, women and young female migrants are subjected;
Amendment 205 #
2015/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses that migrant smuggling is linked to human trafficking and is a serious violation of human rights; points out that missions such as EURONAVFOR MED are an effective way of tackling migrant smuggling; calls on the EU to continue and step up missions of this kind;
Amendment 240 #
2015/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. CRecalls on the European Union to establish guidelines, impact studies, and development and migration policy monitoring mechanisms in order to mainstream respect for human rights better into its external policy; the need for the EU’s external policies to be consistent with each other and with other policies that have an external dimension, in particular policies on business, respect for human rights, development, the environment and migration, and to pursue the objectives set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union; invites the European Union to establish guidelines, impact studies, and development and migration policy monitoring mechanisms;
Amendment 252 #
2015/2316(INI)
17. Regrets the failure to involve the European ParliamentUrges that the European Parliament should be more closely involved in the setting up of a cross-cutting approach to human rights in migration policies; regrets the lack of parliamentary oversightcalls for regular reports to be published ofn the outsideverall activities of the EU’s Frontex Agency;
Amendment 259 #
2015/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Stresses the importance of consulting civil society in allthe framework of the EU’s external policies relating to migration and calls for migrants to be involved in this;
Amendment 271 #
2015/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for Member States to honour their pledge to earmark 0.7 % of their gross national income (GNI) to development aid; calls for this aid never to be made conditional upon cooperation on migration matters;
Amendment 290 #
2015/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for safe legal access routes to be developed for migrantrefugees and asylum seekers, for resettlement programmes to be stepped up, humanitarian visas granted and visas, including airport transit visas, to be suspended for people fleeing conflict zones;
Amendment 303 #
2015/2316(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Encourages the EU to sign mobility partnerships with its closest partners, in order to clear the way for visa facilitation arrangements combined with readmission agreements;
Amendment 5 #
2015/2284(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to conduct thorough ex ante and ex post impact assessments of all trade agreements and stresses the importance of anticipating, in those impact assessments, the social consequences of the agreements. Sectors identified as vulnerable should be closely monitored and subject to appropriate specific measures. Social partners, enterprises and Member States with sectors at high risk should be duly informed and assisted in the process of application;
Amendment 15 #
2015/2284(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Member States to prepare, on the basis of these impact assessments and together with the social partners and enterprises, strategies to anticipate the projected labour market changes. Applications to the EGF should be based on these strategies. Welcomes the fact that access to the EGF has been expanded to new sectors;
Amendment 20 #
2015/2284(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to strengthenensure that the Information and Consultation Directive. Workers’ representatives and trade union is properly implemented. The social partners should be made aware in good time of all plans for restructuring or plant closure arising from the effects of tradeconomic and financial crisis or globalisation, so that negotiations for a suitable social plan can take place in fair conditions with equal access to information. In this way it should be ensured that companies assume their full responsibilitiesbetter support could be provided for job-seeking and retraining;
Amendment 25 #
2015/2284(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to lowerStresses the importance of ensuring that SMEs can also access the EGF. Points out that the threshold for EGF eligibility, which currently stands at 500 redundancies. This has the effect that in practice only large corporations -which are often globally profitable - are eligible. To make sure that , and stresses that the possibility of using the derogations in Article 4(2) of the current regulation must be maintained, as this allows employees of smaller companies in sectors that are directly hurt by the effects of globalisation arto be assisted, the threshold should be lowered to 100 redundancies and supported in their reintegration into the labour market;
Amendment 31 #
2015/2284(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Council and the Commission to unlock the modernisation of Trade Defence Instruments (TDIs). Updated and strengthen without weakening them and to make them quicker, more effective and more accessible to SMEs. Effective and reformed TDIs shwould be used to ensmake it possible to reduce the frequency of recourse thato the EGF is not unnecessarily used for redundancies brought on byn cases of social, environmental or price dumping by other countries;
Amendment 34 #
2015/2284(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission only to grant market economy status to trade partners where they meet the five criteria which it has set. Points out that any granting of market economy status to third countries could cause significant distortions in the European market and result in frequent use of the EGF. Calls on the Commission, in this regard, to establish a clear and effective strategy on issues relating to the granting of market economy status to third countries, in order to maintain the competitiveness of our enterprises and to pursue our objectives in tackling all forms of unfair competition;
Amendment 27 #
2015/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. EPoints out that EU trade policy helps to protect and promote the values upheld by the EU; emphasises that a potential renewal of trade ties between the EU and Iran must go hand in hand with substantial improvements in respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Iran, and that the EU must use its position as an economic bloc as leverage to improve the living conditions and wellbeing of the Iranian people;
Amendment 31 #
2015/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that some sectors of the Iranian economy are heavily controlled by the regime, potentially creating problems for EU companies in Iran, and that increased trade could strengthen the economic, military and political power of certain unelected individuals; emphasises that it is important for Iran to develop an environment conducive to international investment and that that must take place with due regard for the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF);
Amendment 44 #
2015/2274(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Emphasises also the importance for Iran to develop economic and trading relations with the actors in the region in order, with due regard for WTO rules, to form a cohesive economic and trading bloc; points out that the EU can provide its expertise and backing for developing and building up this regional dialogue;
Amendment 82 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls, likewise, for EU-Iran cooperation to help improve the status and rights of Iranian women, with the aim of eliminating any inequality or discrimination against them;
Amendment 87 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises that differences exist between the EU and Iran oniterates its condemnation of the use of the death penalty; notes with great concern the rise in the number of death sentences in Iran, in particular against juvenile offenders, and calls for a moratorium with a view to the abolition of capital punishment in Iran; invites Iran to sign and ratify the use of the death penalty; neverthelesscond optional protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR); believes cooperation on anti-narcotics programmes and on the question of juvenile executions, in line with Iran’s own commitments, couldmust provide a common agenda for addressing this question;
Amendment 252 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Points out that EU-Iran relations form part of the review of the European neighbourhood policy (ENP) put forward on 18 November 2015, which includes plans to involve third countries that are neighbours of the EU’s neighbourhood partner countries in the context of extended cooperation frameworks; urges, therefore, that thematic frameworks be set up to offer cooperation between the Union, the Southern neighbourhood partner countries and key regional players such as Iran on regional issues such as security, energy and the management of refugees;
Amendment 406 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Welcomes the fact that the adoption of the 2013 Islamic Penal Code and Iran’s ratification of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child prohibits child executions and allows all juvenile offenders sentenced to death prior to 2013 to seek retrial; calls on Iran to ensure this prohibition is fully implemented and that all relevant offenders are made aware of this right; calls on Iran to declare a moratorium on the death penalty, at leastparticularly for juvenile offenders;
Amendment 428 #
2015/2274(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on Iran to live up fully to its commitments under the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the International Covenant on Political and Civil Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights by ensuring the enjoyment by its citizens of individual rights without discrimination as to sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, or other status, as provided for in these instruments; points out that this includes, not least for women, a basic right to equality before the law, as well as the right of equal access to education, health care and professional opportunities;
Amendment 2 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to Article 8 of the Treaty on European Union;
Amendment 3 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 b (new)
Citation 1 b (new)
- having regard to the signature by Tunisia on 1 December 2015 of an Association Agreement for research and innovation under the Horizon 2020 programme;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 c (new)
Citation 1 c (new)
- having regard to the entry into force on 19 April 2016 of the Regulation on the introduction of emergency autonomous trade preferences for the Republic of Tunisia;
Amendment 12 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4a (new)
Citation 4a (new)
- having regard to the Joint Communication of the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 18 November 2015 entitled ‘Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy’;
Amendment 62 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Commends the good cooperation between Tunisia and its neighbours, as illustrated for example by the signing of a preferential trade agreement and the establishment of local transborders committees with Algeria aimed at fostering local development, and by the intertwining of Tunisia’s economy with Libya’s and by the solidarity of the Tunisian people with displaced Libyans; expresses the utmost concern regarding a possible foreign military intervention in Libyathe unstable situation in Libya, asks the High Representative to continue to call on all parties involved in Libya to work in a constructive manner with the Government of National Accord, the sole legitimate Libyan government recognised by the Libyan Political Agreement and Resolution 2259 of the UN Security Council of 23 December 2015;
Amendment 81 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the establishment of an EU-Tunisia JPC as a tool for developing a structured political dialogue on democracy, the rule of law and any topic of mutual interest, stresses that as part of the opening of trade agreements, the EU- Tunisia Joint Parliamentary Committee has an important role to play in effectively monitoring ongoing negotiations, and calls for the launching of specific initiatives of support to the PRA withand other Parliament committees, such as the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs;
Amendment 122 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for a stronger process of decentralisation and the empowerment of the regions by means of further local autonomies; supports partnerships with EU Member States encouraging decentralised approaches (e.g. training, capacity- building in that field), together with decentralised cooperation projects led by Member State authorities which contribute to the development of regional and local governance in Tunisia;
Amendment 149 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for an increase in EU aid to Tunisia through the ENI and for the coordination of international aid to Tunisia; encourages partnerships with other interested global and regional donor countries and organisations, and in particular, measures promoting investment in the manufacturing sector which would boost employment, particularly for young graduates; notes that the tourism sector has been dramatically impacted by the attacks in 2014which took place in 2014 and which the European Parliament strongly condemns and, considering the measures implemented since then by the Tunisian authorities, calls on the Member States to reassess the security situation as quickly as possible;
Amendment 163 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the crucial need to address unemployment, especially for young university graduates, and to launch deep reforms to promote growth and employment (e.g. facilitate currency restrictionsdeveloping training schemes suited to the needs of the labour market , access to microcredit, reform of the labour laws) and the diversification of the Tunisian economy; calls on all parties to maintain the spirit of good cooperation to focus on reforms with a view to the inclusive and sustainable economic development for all territories of the country;
Amendment 196 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Recommends the use of European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) funds to further assist SMEs; recommends that Tunisia join the EU’s COSME (Competitiveness of Enterprises and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises) programme as soon as possible; encourages private lending to SMEs by reforming the undercapitalised banking sector; welcomes the recent twinning programme for the Tunisian Central Bank aimed at supporting the modernisation of the banking sector; points out that SMEs are the motors of Tunisian economic growth and should be the primary targets for EU action in Tunisia;
Amendment 198 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Encourages the integration of the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) with pan-EU initiatives such as the Energy Union; encourages, at the same time, more North African regional cooperation on specific issues such as afforestation and water management, as well as greater socioeconomic integration, with increased trade, across North Africa; points out that the Union for the Mediterranean supports the development of specific projects in the region and should, in that regard, be involved in projects led by the EU in Tunisia;
Amendment 202 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Ccalls, in line with the objectives of the Union for the Mediterranean, for EU cooperation to focus more on the green economy and to increase the use of renewable energies, especially considering Tunisia’s high potential in the renewable energy sector; welcomes projects carried out by the Union for the Mediterranean such as the depollution of the Lake of Bizerte;
Amendment 249 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
Amendment 255 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Stresses the importance of the free movement of people, and supports enhancing mobility within the neighbourhood, in a secure and well managed environment, through visa facilitation and liberalisation, particularly for students, young people, artists and researcherEncourages the EU to sign mobility partnerships with its closest southern partners in an effort to clear the way for visa facilitation and liberalisation combined with readmission agreements; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to develop possibilities for circular migration schemes which would open up safe and legal routes for migrants; condemns trafficking in human beings, most of the victims of which are women, and stresses the importance of reinforcing cooperation with partner countries in order to combat it;
Amendment 259 #
2015/2273(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32a (new)
Paragraph 32a (new)
32a. Stresses that missions such as EURONAVFOR MED are a positive and effective way to tackle human trafficking; calls on the EU to continue to intensify operations of that type, and to involve partner countries such as Tunisia;
Amendment 1 #
2015/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
– having regard to Articles 3(5), 8, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 42 42(7) and 46 of the Treaty on European Union,
Amendment 6 #
2015/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
Citation 8 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 21 January 2016 on the mutual defence clause (Article 42(7) TEU),
Amendment 17 #
2015/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas many present and future challenges and threats to the EU are complex and will come from inside just as much as from outside the common borders; whereas a stronger political will for resolute common action on the part of the EU and its Member States is needed in order to respond effectively to these challenges, to safeguardpromote the EU’s values and societal model and to be a stronger global actor; whereas the EU Global Strategy on foreign and security policy must pave the way for this development;
Amendment 57 #
2015/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas since the adoption of the 2003 European Security Strategy the EU has set the goal of achieving an international order based on effective multilateralism and the rules of international law;
Amendment 64 #
2015/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1
Subheading 1
– Defend European states, and societies and promote European values
Amendment 157 #
2015/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Takes the view that the current activation of Article 42(7) TEU should serve as a catalyst for unleashing the potential of all the security- and defence- related Treaty provisions;
Amendment 217 #
2015/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Is of the opinion that in order to build stability and peace, the EU should keep up its enlargement commitments and continue cooperation with very closely associated countries within the context of the newly revised European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP); recalls that according to Article 49 TEU any European state may apply to become a member of the European Union, provided it adheres to the Copenhagen criteria and the principles of democracy and respect for fundamental freedoms and human and minority rights, and ensures the rule of law;
Amendment 229 #
2015/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Points to the commitment the EU has made to its partners, especially in its neighbourhood, to support social and political reform, protect human rights, help establish the rule of law and promote economic development, as the best means of strengthening the international order and ensuring the stability of its neighbourhood;
Amendment 334 #
2015/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Emphasises that enhancing cooperation with global and regional actors on global threats is necessary in order to achieve a global rules-based order; points out, in that connection, that the EU has undertaken to safeguard and develop international law and to strengthen the role of the United Nations; believes that pairing up on specific sectoral issues with interested regional actors allows European values to be shared and contributes to growth and development; notes that establishing closer relationships with non- state actors and civil society is also necessary and that the way the EU builds and defines partnerships needs to be reviewed;
Amendment 338 #
2015/2272(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Draws attention to the need for the Member States to step up their cooperation in the United Nations, and in particular with those Member States which have a seat on the Security Council, so that the Union speaks with one voice;
Amendment 9 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
Citation 13 a (new)
- having regard to Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
Amendment 123 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas data protection is not an economic burden, but a source of economic growth; whereas restoring trust in the digital world is crucial; whereas data flows are indispensable to trade in services;
Amendment 161 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
ii. to reiterate its support for a comprehensive and balanced agreement, which should unleash the untapped potential of a more integrated global services market, while fully guaranteeing compliance with the EU acquis; to shape and regulate globalisation and to create international standards, while fully preserving the right to regulate; to secure increased market access for European services suppliers in key sectors of interest, while accommodating specific carve-outs for sensitive sectors;
Amendment 162 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
ii. to reiterate its support for an ambitious comprehensive and balanced agreement, which should unleash the untapped potential of a more integrated global services market, while fully guaranteeing compliance with the EU acquis; to shape globalisation and to create international standards, while fully preserving the right to regulate; to secure increased market access for European services suppliers in key sectors of interest, while accommodating specific carve-outs for sensitive sectors;
Amendment 241 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
Paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
ii. to ensure reciprocity at all levels and without additional conditions being imposed; to condition any further commitments beyond the EU’s current level of openness on the other parties’ proportionate offers; to support the use of horizontal commitment- related provisions as a means to set a common level of ambitions, and to take note that such minimum requirements would set clear parameters for countries interested in participating;
Amendment 304 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point x
Paragraph 1 – point b – point x
x. to introduce an unequivocal ‘gold standard’ clause, which could be included in all trade agreements and would clarify that the public utilities clause applies to all modes of supply and to any services considered as public services and services of general interest by European, national or regional authorities;
Amendment 315 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xi
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xi
xi. to ensure, in line with Article 167(4) TFEU and with the UNESCO Convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions, that the parties preserve their right to adopt or maintain any measure with respect to the protection or promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity through the addition of a legally binding general clause applicable to the entire agreement; to explicitly exclude audiovisual services, media and publishing from the scope of the agreement, irrespective of the technology or distribution platform used;
Amendment 328 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
i. to ensure cross-border data flows in compliance with the universal right to privacy and with fundamental rights and freedoms;
Amendment 497 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g – point ii
Paragraph 1 – point g – point ii
ii. to promote good governance and foster good practices in administrative and legislative processes, by encouraging the wide take-up of measures that strengthen the independence of decision-makers, increase the transparency of decisions, and reduce red tape; to stress that consumer protection and safety must be at the centre of regulatory endeavours and that no European standard may be revised in such a way as to weaken it;
Amendment 501 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g – point ii a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point g – point ii a (new)
iia. to create a framework to bring together the various parties to the agreement to work together to combat fraud, swindling, abuses and illegal activities relating to services by means of exchanges of information and judicial cooperation so that the potential globalised services market does not fall victim to a lack of confidence among operators;
Amendment 547 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h – point ii
Paragraph 1 – point h – point ii
ii. to endeavour to includedefend the inclusion in the agreement of a regulatory chapter on government procurement with a view to maximising the participation of European companies in foreign tenders; to deplore the lack of transparency regarding non- European calls for tenders and to denounce the lack of reciprocity in this area, as illustrated by the preferential treatment granted to domestic companies in several countries; to encourage the ratification and implementation of the WTO Government Procurement Agreement and its 2011 revision; to call upon the Member States to reinvigorate discussions on the proposed international public procurement instrument;
Amendment 548 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h – point ii
Paragraph 1 – point h – point ii
ii. to endeavour to include a regulatory chapter on government procurement with a view to maximising the participation of European companies in foreign tenders; to deplore the lack of transparency regarding non-European calls for tenders and to denounce the lack of reciprocity in this area, as illustrated by the preferential treatment granted to domestic companies in several countries; to encourage the ratification and implementation of the WTO Government Procurement Agreement and its 2011 revision; to call upon the Member States and the Commission to reinvigorate discussions on the proposed international public procurement instrument;
Amendment 583 #
2015/2233(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point i – point iv
Paragraph 1 – point i – point iv
iv. to welcome the continuous engagement of the EU institutions with a wide range of stakeholders throughout the negotiation process and to call for this engagement to be intensified as the negotiations progress, so that the expectations of European civil society and stakeholders are adequately taken into account;
Amendment 4 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
Citation 3
Amendment 20 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 a (new)
Citation 21 a (new)
– having regard to the Joint Communication of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Commission to the European Council, the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 8 March 2011 on a partnership for democracy and shared prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean1, ______________ 1(COM(2011)0200)
Amendment 21 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 b (new)
Citation 21 b (new)
– having regard to the Joint Communication of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 25 May 2011 on a new response to a changing Neighbourhood1, ______________ 1(COM(2011)0303)
Amendment 34 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) stipulates that the EU’s commercial policy is to be based on the principles and objectives of the Union’s external action;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas increased coherence between EU internal and external policies, but also between the EU’s external policies, stands as an indispensable requirement for a successful EU human rights policy;
Amendment 93 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Reiterates the crucial importance of ensuring increased coherence between the EU’s internal and external policies, but also between the EU’s external policies, with regard to respect for human rights and democratic values; emphasises in this context that, while this report deals with the EU’s external policies for advancing human rights, Parliament also adopts an annual report on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union, drawn up by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs;
Amendment 109 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the adoption of the EU Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2014; considers that the Annual Report is an indispensable tool for scrutiny, communication and debate on the EU’s policy on human rights and, democracy and the rule of law in the world;
Amendment 144 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Acknowledges that human rights dialogues with third countries can be an efficient tool for bilateral engagement and cooperation in the promotion and protection of human rights; welcomes and supports, therefore, the establishment of human rights dialogues with a growing number of countries; welcomes the fact that a first human rights dialogue has been held with Myanmar/Burma;
Amendment 158 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Reiterates its call on the VP/HR and the EEAS to revise the EU Guidelines on International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in light of the tragic events in countries such as Syria, Libya and Iraq; recommends, in this context, that the EEAS support civil society organisations that promote respect for IHL by state and non-state actors; urges, moreover, that the EU actively use all instruments at its disposal to enhance compliance of state and non-state actors with IHL;
Amendment 186 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
Paragraph 41 a (new)
41a. Recalls that, following the Arab Spring of 2011, the European Union redefined its neighbourhood policy, especially towards the Southern Mediterranean and insisted on the role of civil society and on the principle of ‘more for more’ in order to develop more solid partnerships with its neighbours and to guide their reforms for enhancing the rule of law and their democratic transitions;
Amendment 235 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 51
Paragraph 51
51. Takes positive note of the counter- terrorism guidance document drafted by the EEAS and the Commission and endorsed by the Council with the aim of ensuring respect for human rights in the planning and implementation of counter- terrorism assistance projects with third countries; calls on the EEAS and the Commission to ensure effective implementation of the document, starting with its wide dissemination; supports, in this context, the international efforts to stop human rights violations being perpetrated by terrorist organisations such as ISIS/Da’esh;
Amendment 290 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 60
Paragraph 60
60. Recalls that freedom of thought, expression, conscience, religion and belief is a fundamental human right, as recognised in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
Amendment 301 #
2015/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 61
Paragraph 61
61. Calls on the EU and the Member States to step up their efforts to enhance respect for freedom of thought, expression, conscience, religion and belief and to promote inter- religious dialogue when engaging with third countries; fully supports the EU practice of taking the lead on thematic resolutions at the UNHRC and at the UNGA on freedom of religion and belief; requests concrete action towards the effective implementation of the EU Guidelines on the promotion and protection of freedom of religion or belief, including by ensuring systematic and consistent training of EU staff at Headquarters and in Delegations;
Amendment 58 #
2015/2226(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Calls on the Commission, in its trade negotiations with third countries, to take into account the impact that they may have on employment, particularly in rural areas;
Amendment 7 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that future trade agreements should take into account Parliament’s resolutions on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and on the Trade in Services Agreement, which remain valid for the future EU trade policy, in particular as far as the protectexclusion of public services from trade negotiations is concerned;
Amendment 27 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the GSP, GSP+ and EBA systems are tools which enable these values to be upheld and insists on the importance of their effective implementation and monitoring; awaits with interest the publication of the Commission's first biennial status report on the implementation of the GSP+ and calls on the Commission to ensure that Parliament is involved in this monitoring process;
Amendment 32 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that EU trade policy is an instrument of economic diplomacy and calls on the Commission to put forward proposals to establish trade tools which will make an effectivethat could also make a contribution to Europe's anti-terrorism policy;
Amendment 43 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises the need for trade which is sustainable and responsible; underlines the importance of implementing chapters on sustainable development in trade agreements which will enable tough social and environmental standards to be put in place; calls on the Commission to take greater account of these issues when carrying out ex-ante and ex-post evaluations of such agreements;
Amendment 47 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to ensure the proper implementation of trade agreements by increasing the involvement of Parliament and stakeholders; stresses the importance of placing greater emphasis on compliance with and implementation of the agreements by our partners;
Amendment 48 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas, in its trade policy and the trade negotiations it conducts, the European Union must take into account the sensitivity of certain sectors in terms of market opening, particularly the agricultural sector;
Amendment 54 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls that multilateral trade negotiations remain a priority for the EU, which is also conducting bilateral negotiations in an ambitious spirit of reciprocity and mutual benefit; also asks the Commission to develop specific trade strategies tailored to certain regions, particularly Asia, in the light of the recent conclusion of the Trans-Pacific Partnership;
Amendment 59 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Recalls the need for the EU to ensure stability in its neighbourhood and calls for greater economic integration between its eastern and Mediterranean neighbours, notably via fostering trade relations;
Amendment 61 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Points out that trade negotiations ought not lead to the watering down of European standards and must protect European citizens and safeguard our social choices and the right of states to regulate;
Amendment 69 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. StresseRecommends that the Domestic Advisory Groups, whose tasks include handling the infringements of social clauses ofwithin trade agreements must, ought to have sufficient financing and that they must consist ofensure a balanced representation of labour and business organisations from civil society;
Amendment 77 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises the needncourages the Member States to increase the staffing levels of, and the resources available to, Member States’their labour inspectorates to allow for effective monitoring of compliance with labour standards;
Amendment 95 #
2015/2105(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the need to increase efforts to unblock the reform of trade defence instruments.Emphasises that trade defence instruments make it possible to tackle all forms of unfair competition, including social dumping; as a result, calls on the Council and the Commission to unblock the reform of trade defence instruments, without weakening them, to make them speedier, more effective and more accessible for SMEs;
Amendment 105 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the CCP is to be conducted in the context of the principles and objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 TEU; recalls that the EU’s trade and investment policy must be consistent with other external policies and with other policies that have an external dimension; stresses that the EU has a legal obligation to respect human rights, and should foster the sustainable economic, social and environmental development of trading countries; points out that in some cases trade and investment agreements may have negative effects contrary to the EU’s external objectives as enshrined in the Treaties; is of the opinion that the EU has a responsibility to help tackle any negative impact caused by its CCP;
Amendment 196 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Commission to improve the quality of both ex-ante and ex- post assessments and emphasises in particular that such impact assessments should take account of sensitive sectors and of the potential effects of any trade agreements on the outermost regions and their local production, so that specific measures can be put in place for the operators and produce concerned and potentially affected; stresses the need to always submit a deep sustainability impact assessment, including on human, social and environmental rights, for any trade policy initiative; expresses its concern at the lack of interim and ex-post assessments and that the quality of the existing ones is very low, as demonstrated in the European Court of Auditors Special Report 02/2014; insists that high-quality interim and ex-post evaluations be carried out in respect of all trade agreements in order to allow policymakers, stakeholders and European taxpayers to assess whether trade agreements have achieved the intended results; asks the Commission to provide data on the impact of the trade agreements which have been concluded with special regard to SMEs and the creation of jobs;
Amendment 226 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission to focus in a balanced way on the conclusion of the ongoing trade negotiations in a spirit of reciprocity and mutual benefit, and to show the potential benefits of the concluded trade agreements before launching new FTA negotiations, while bearing in mind the sensitive nature of certain products and sectors; reminds the Commission to carry out a thorough, impartial and unprejudiced ex-ante evaluation of European interests before deciding on future FTA partners and negotiation mandates;
Amendment 237 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Calls on the Commission to assess in consultation with all sectors concerned the impact of the cumulative effects of the various sensitive-product quotas in order to protect key sectors of the EU economy by reassessing proposals in future free trade agreements;
Amendment 248 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines, particularly in the context of the current talks on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and the EU- Japan FTA, the high importance for all trade negotiations of focusing on core sensitive issues such as the recognition and protection of geographical indications (GIs) andccess to public procurement and exclusion of public services and audiovisual services from negotiations when negotiating FTAs;
Amendment 253 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines, in the context of the current talks on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and the EU- Japan FTA, the high importance of focusing on core sensitive issues such as the protection of geographical indications (GIs), sensitive products and public procurement when negotiating FTAs;
Amendment 268 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Calls on the Commission to start negotiations for an investment agreement with Taiwan in parallel with the one with China; underlines that, in the context of the migration challenges, special focus should be put on the post-Cotonou framework; asks for further impetus to be given to negotiating FTAs with both Australia and New Zealand all the while keeping in mind during said future negotiations that the agricultural sector is very sensitive, as noted in its resolution of 17 February 2016 on the opening of FTA negotiations with Australia and New Zealand;
Amendment 279 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28 a (new)
Paragraph 28 a (new)
28a. Calls on the Commission to assess the possibilities and impact of cumulation, in particular for those sensitive products affected by quotas or liberalisation under ongoing negotiations or trade agreements already concluded; reiterates that exclusions for the most sensitive products should be examined on a case by case basis, as should limited volume quotas or appropriate transitional periods;
Amendment 284 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Stresses that further trade liberalisation measures require the EU to be able to respond even more effectively to unfair trading practices and ensure a level playing field; underlines that TDIs must remain an indispensable component of the EU’s trade strategy and enable greater competitiveness by re-establishing where necessary the conditions for fair competition; recalls that the current EU trade defence legislation dates back to 1995; stresses that the Union’s trade defence system needs to be modernised urgently without being weakened; points out that EU trade defence law must be more effective, accessible for SMEs and adapted to today’s challenges and trade patterns, and also increase transparency and predictability; regrets that the TDI modernisation proposal is blocked in the Council; regrets that the Commission does not refer at all to the need for TDI modernisation in its ‘Trade for All’ communication; calls on the Council to boost its efforts regarding TDI modernisation urgently, especially at a time when China is firmly requesting recognition of MES, and asks the Commission to present a new proposal;
Amendment 288 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Stresses that further trade liberalisation measures require the EU to be able to respond even more effectively to unfair trading practices and ensure a level playing field; underlines that TDIs must remain an indispensable component of the EU’s trade strategy; recalls that the current EU trade defence legislation dates back to 1995; stresses that the Union’s trade defence system needs to be modernised urgently; points out that EU trade defence law must be more effective, adapted to today’s challenges and trade patterns, and also increase transparency and predictability; regrets that the TDI modernisation proposal is blocked in the Council; regrets that the Commission continues to apply the lesser duty rule and does not refer at all to the need for TDI modernisation in its ‘Trade for All’ communication; calls on the Council to boost its efforts regarding TDI modernisation urgently, especially at a time when China is firmly requesting recognition of MES, and asks the Commission to present a new proposal;
Amendment 318 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Points out that the Commission has undertaken to exclude public services from EU trade agreements and reiterates that public services shall not figure in trade negotiations;
Amendment 319 #
2015/2105(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 b (new)
Paragraph 34 b (new)
34b. Reiterates that all trade negotiations shall respect the cultural exemption and exclude audiovisual services; reiterates the importance of being able to preserve, protect or promote cultural and linguistic diversity, abiding fully by the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions;
Amendment 152 #
2015/2095(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Emphasises how important it is that the EU should also work to bring about international and multilateral cooperation on the issue of migration; considers, with that aim in view, that the United Nations must be fully involved in the efforts to find a global solution.
Amendment 11 #
2015/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement is a process and not a one-off transaction, and its activities should therefore, pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement, continue in practice to be subject to periodic analyses and evaluations; emphasises, in that connection, the importance of ensuring that the Agreement is properly implemented and that its provisions are observed;
Amendment 13 #
2015/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the fact that the Agreement has led to a significant growth in trade between the EU and Korea; urges the Commission and the Member States to publicise more effectively the direct impact of the Agreement on the public, firms and the European economy;
Amendment 21 #
2015/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the efforts of the Civil Society Forum and of the internal advisory groups set up in accordance with the provisions set out in the chapter on trade and sustainable development; recalls that both parties are obliged to uphold, promote and implement commitments on core labour rights in their laws and practices; emphasises the importance of continuing the dialogue between the Commission and Korea with a view to ensuring that Korea ratifies and observes the basic ILO conventions which it has not yet ratified;
Amendment 23 #
2015/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2 Calls for the swift ratification by Korea ofCommission to continue its work with Korea to enable that country to ratify all fundamental ILO conventions that it has not yet ratified;
Amendment 33 #
2015/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 – introductory part
Paragraph 7 – introductory part
7. Acknowledges that, while the Agreement meets the expectations of the parties, the following issues should be analysed and verified under the Agreement and as part of a dialogue with Korea designed to remedy existing problems:
Amendment 39 #
2015/2059(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 – point c
Paragraph 7 – point c
(c) intellectual property rights, such as: recognition and protection of geographic designations and commercial rights to the public performance of musical works, phonograms and performances protected by copyright or related rights; emphasises, in that connection, that there is an urgent need for all music industry actors to be able to benefit from the provisions of the Agreement and for those provisions to be implemented properly;
Amendment 39 #
2015/2059(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the importance of dialogue between the Commission, civil society, social partners and businesses with a view to pursuing the implementation of the commitments set out in the agreement.
Amendment 15 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the recognition of protection of non-agricultural GIs and traditional, high-quality know-how is both a defensive and offensive interest in the framework of the common commercial policy and it can be an effective tool in countering imitation and counterfeit products and in ensuring fair competition and consumer safety;
Amendment 19 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Believes that the extension of protection for EU geographical indications to non-agricultural products would be a way to stimulate European exports and gain market share while achieving international recognition of the products in question and developing their high-quality image and reputation through trade and trade negotiations;
Amendment 26 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Is of the opinion that an EU-level system of GI protection for non-agricultural products which is coherent, simple and bureaucratically and economically non- burdensome EU-level system of GI protection for non-agricultural productsso that SMEs in particular could access it would enable the EU to achieve similar protection for such European products outside the EU in the framework of international trade negotiations;
Amendment 31 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the protection of non- agricultural GIs at EU level would be a positive signal for the ongoing discussions on GIs at multilateral level, that it would strengthen the EU’s hand in calling for an increase in the standard level of protection applying to all products and that it is fully in line with the TRIPS Agreement;
Amendment 46 #
2015/2053(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to include a coherent and well prepared strategy on all GIs, which ensures that they are observed and recognised, in the upcoming communication on the EU’s trade and investment strategy.
Amendment 9 #
2015/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the Treaty on European Union (TEU) marked a new stage in the process of creating an ever closer union in which decisions are taken as openly and as closely as possible to the citizen (Article 1 TEU); notes that there is a considerable lack of trust among EU citizens in EU trade-policy making, and believes that a radical shift is needed in the way that information about trade negotiations is communicated to the public, in order to ensure their legitimacy; recalls that in accordance with Article 12 TEU on the role of national parliaments in the European Union, various instruments for cooperation between the European Parliament and national parliaments have been created to guarantee effective democratic scrutiny of EU legislation at all levels;
Amendment 27 #
2015/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the fact that the Committee on International Trade (INTA) and the Commission’s Directorate-General for Trade have been collaborating pro-actively to enhance cooperation, establish best practices and improve communication channels, and that this collaboration has been especially useful for monitoring trade negotiations through INTA Standing Rapporteurs and targeted monitoring groups; welcomes recent efforts by the Commission to increase the transparency of trade negotiations; believes, nevertheless, that the Council and the Commission can still improve their working methods to better cooperate with Parliament as regards access to documents, information and decision-making for all issues and negotiations related to CCP (such as information relating to negotiations – including their mixed or exclusive nature, scoping, mandates and evolution of negotiations – provisional application of trade agreements, activities and decisions taken by bodies created by trade and/or investment agreements, expert meetings, and delegated and implementing acts); notes with regret that after one year of negotiations between the Commission and Parliament on access to documents related to the TTIP negotiations, there is still no agreement about access to confidential documents;
Amendment 52 #
2015/2041(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Believes firmly that transparency, integrity and ethical behaviour, accountability and good governance should inspire and be mainstreamed into all EU administrative and political initiatives, and considers that further commitment and interinstitutional coordinated work towards higher standards of integrity should be sought, and that, for example, the Commission should not adopt guidelines which run counter to the position of Parliament and the Council;
Amendment 3 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
Citation 13 a (new)
– having regard to the Commission’s report of 28 January 2016 on the Generalised Scheme of Preferences covering the period 2014-2015,
Amendment 5 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls for the respect of the ILO’s eight core labour standards and the four ILO Priority Conventions for the industrialised countries to be systematically included in allin the framework of the bilateral EU trade agreements;
Amendment 18 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas EU trade policies could contribute positively to the harmonisation process in the direction of implementation and development of human rights (HR), social and environmental sustainability; whereas it must be ensured that trade and investment agreements not reduce their ability to meet their HR obligations, which must prevail over investors and profits interests; whereas there is public concern about the detrimental impact on the concrete enjoyment of HR and labour standards of non-tariff barrier reduction; whereas the new generation of trade agreements risks acting as a back-door deregulation instrumentcontribute to promoting and protecting the values the EU holds dear, including respect for human rights, as well as Europe’s trade interests; whereas one of the aims of EU trade policies is to eliminate non-tariff barriers, while guaranteeing that European standards cannot be compromised, safeguarding human rights and ensuring compliance with social and environmental rules;
Amendment 22 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the European Parliament’s contribution can be measured in terms of the effective implementation of its recommendations, so that a constant and systematic monitoring exercise is of paramount importance, inter alia in order to narrow the gap between commitments and the concrete impact of trade policies on HR and social sustainability; whereas the implementation of the agreements must be monitored periodically to ensure compliance with the objectives and commitments enshrined in trade agreements, particularly those on protecting human rights;
Amendment 30 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas women’s rights are a constitutive part of HR; whereas trade agreements and liberalisation affect women and men differently owing to structural gender inequalities; whereas sustainable and inclusive development, growth and trade agreements must pay due account of human rights, including from a gender perspectivegender equality falls within the scope of the chapters of trade agreements on sustainable development; whereas the specific impact of trade and investment agreements on women and men differs according to the structural organisation of national markets and policies;
Amendment 38 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas a regulatory framework on the way corporations comply with HR obligations with respect to social and environmental standards is still lackingthe EU’s new generation of trade investment and agreements comprise chapters on sustainable development that call on the parties to undertake to protect human rights, comply with social and environmental standards and ensure corporate social responsibility;
Amendment 51 #
2015/2038(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to include systematically in all free trade agreements negotiated with non-EU countries a series of high social standards that include the fullin line with the implementation of the ILO’s Decent Work Agenda in order to better promote jobs, to obtain recognition and respect for the rights of workers, to extend social protection and to promote social dialogue;
Amendment 53 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – introductory part
Paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Encourages the Commission to bring strong pressure to bear with a view to a reform of WTO governance leading toStresses how important it is for the EU to build cooperation at multilateral level and encourages the Commission to support a reform of the WTO leading to, in particular:
Amendment 56 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) effective cooperation and regular dialogue of the WTO with other UNUN human rights agencies, and in particular with the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the OECD and with the ILO,
Amendment 61 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a reform of WTO trade policy review mechanismsthe establishment of a committee for trade and decent work within the WTO, as requested in its recommendations of 2010, to include the impact on the social, environmental and HR dimension in the implementation of multilateral and plurilateral agreementsinternational trade policy;
Amendment 66 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to incorporate a gender- sensitive approach into all their policies, as well as into EU trade strategtake account of gender equality in its trade policy, guaranteeing inter alia effective compliance with the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW); calls on the Commission to draw up an in-depth, binding impact assessment of the EU trade strategy from the perspective of women, HR and gendertake aspects related to gender equality into account in its impact assessment of the EU trade strategy;
Amendment 72 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to step upcontinue its efforts towards policy coherence between EU trade, development and environmental policies in all the treaties in ways consistent with international commitments to HR, decent work, gender equality and environmental sustainability and social and environmental standards, while serving the EU’s trade interests and ensuring its competitiveness;
Amendment 86 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Commission and Council’s efforts to insert legally binding HR clauses into all the free trade and investment agreements (FTAs) in accordance with the common approach; regrets that HR clauses are not included in treaties such as those with Korea and Canada (CETA) or in the TTIP and Vietnam negotiationstresses that the Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Canada contains provisions to ensure respect for human rights; calls for the ongoing trade negotiations with the EU’s other partners, particularly those on TTIP, to ensure the inclusion of ambitious chapters on sustainable development in line with the EU’s new generation of agreements;
Amendment 96 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – introductory part
Paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Remains concerned about the too limited effects of traditional HRcalls the importance of respecting and implementing HR clauses in trade agreements; adds that these clauses in ensuringe that the EU fulfils its HR obligations and commitments; calls on the Commission and the Council to comprehensively rethink the protection and guarantees offered to HR in FTAs and IPAs and to propose a new model for a set of binding HR clauses, in particularmaintain such clauses in agreements it negotiates and to implement the following approaches through:
Amendment 98 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point a
Paragraph 5 – point a
Amendment 103 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point b
Paragraph 5 – point b
(b) introduction of mechanisms for mandatory periodic HR impact assessments, including through the establishment of an interinstitutional committeeperiodic, in-depth monitoring of the implementation of trade agreements, particularly with regard to human rights and social and environmental standards, such as by publishing regular reports;
Amendment 105 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point c
Paragraph 5 – point c
(c) a civil society monitoring mechanism that is dedicated to dealing withconsulting and involving civil society in the process of monitoring the implementation of trade and investment agreements, particularly with regard to compliance with social and environmental standards and respect for human rights; recalls in this connection the HR impact of the agreement, ortance of involving the public in efforts and negotiations to ensure transparency;
Amendment 108 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point d
Paragraph 5 – point d
(d) the possibility of introducing direct domestic complaint mechanisms enabling individuals and communities whose HR areiterates its request for sustainable development forums or advisory groups to be set up at the various stages of drafting, negotiating and implementing an agreement so as to ensure, affected by trade and investments to address the EUmong other things, consultation with the social partners and civil society representatives;
Amendment 116 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
Paragraph 6 – introductory part
6. Firmly demands thatAsks for all future EU trade agreements to have ambitious sustainable chapters (TSD) with:
Amendment 118 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point a
Paragraph 6 – point a
(a) a preliminary commitment by each of the parties to ratify and transpose into national lawprovisions ensuring that the chapters on sustainable development seek to apply and to implement the eight core and four priority ILO Conventions,ILO Conventions and their contents; these chapters must continue to seek to strengthen social and environmental standards and respect for human rights;
Amendment 127 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point b
Paragraph 6 – point b
(b) a general dispute settlement mechanism directly accessible to the social partners and civil society,able to ensure compliance with human rights and social and environmental standards;
Amendment 129 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point c
Paragraph 6 – point c
(c) more than a merely incentives-based approach: sanctions must cause an effective suspension of trade benefits in the form of countervailing duties. In addition to sanctions, a decision may require an action plan that could include legislative and/or regulatory reformthe introduction of deterrent measures to slow down the implementation of the agreement or reduce the scope of benefits in the event of serious, proven breaches of the provisions of the agreement’s chapter on sustainable development; stresses that the introduction of action plans with our partners could help remedy non- compliance with certain commitments made in trade and investment agreements;
Amendment 132 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Points out that EU trade policy can help to set high international standards in areas including human rights, as well as social and environmental standards; draws attention, in this connection, to the need for the EU to maintain a close and regular dialogue with the WTO, the ILO and the OECD;
Amendment 138 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets the lack ofCalls on the Commission to involvement of the EP in assessmore closely ing the compliance of FTAs with HR obligations, and calls on the Council to consult Parliament on any decisions to revise or even suspend the application of an agreement if this is necessaryprocess of monitoring the implementation of trade and investment agreements with regard to compliance with human rights and with social and environmental standards;
Amendment 141 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to carry out ex ante and ex post sustainability impact assessments for all trade agreements in accordance with the integrated guidelines, while notand asks it to involve Parliament at every stage ing their limited capacity to influence the concis process; calls on trade and investment agreement negotiators to take greate outcomes of the FTAs and IPAr account of the findings of such assessments during negotiations;
Amendment 145 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. RegretNotes the Commission decision to finalise the agreement with Vietnam before the conclusion of the human rights impact assessment (HRIA); calls on the Commission to conduct that assessment at the earliest opportunity;
Amendment 149 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Firmly demands that HRIAs andStresses that human rights impact studies complement the sustainability impact assessments (SIAs) become binding and begin at an early stagcarried out and that the fin order to inform negotiating positions even before they are formulatedding must be taken into account by negotiators;
Amendment 154 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recognises that universal access to common goods such as water and sanitation, education, healthcare and medicines is a key component of Member States’ucation is an important reflection of a country’s capacity to guarantee human and social rights;
Amendment 156 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Welcomes the entry into force of the new Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) (Regulation (EU) No 978/2012) on 1 January 2014; points out that the 14 GSP+ beneficiary countries are required to ratify the 27 core international conventions and to ensure that they are applied in accordance with the criteria laid down in those conventions; welcomes the publication of the first GSP monitoring report for the period 2014- 2015 and stresses that cooperation with Parliament on this issue must continue and that Parliament must be given regular progress reports on GSP+;
Amendment 163 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Draws attention to the commitment made by the Commission on 6 November 2015 to promote relevant objectives at global level with a view to putting an immediate and definitive end to the worst forms of child labour and to cracking down on all forms of forced or compulsory labour; reiterates the call it made on the Commission in 2010 to submit a balanced and realistic proposal for legislation combating forced labour, in particular where the most vulnerable social groups are involved;
Amendment 165 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 c (new)
Paragraph 11 c (new)
11c. Stresses the importance of including the objective of combating forced labour and child labour in EU trade agreements, in the chapters on sustainable development, so that the parties sign up to that objective; points to the need for the EU be involved in international discussions with the ILO, the OECD, the United Nations and the WTO, so that progress may be made in combating forced labour and child labour;
Amendment 169 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Acknowledges the Commission’s efforts to negotiate a plurilateral agreement on green goods and calls for those negotiations to produce an ambitious and balanced agreement; calls on the Commission to focus on a diversified strategy that can also address anti-dumping policies in the renewable energy sector, intellectual property regimes, tight financing programmes and the lack of national environmental policies that create the demand for such goods;
Amendment 175 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 183 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 195 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Regards as insufficient the efforts towardsCalls for the inclusion of CSR clauses in the TSD chapters and asks the Commission to step up its efforts towards achieving compliance by companies, throughout their supply chains, and full respect for ILO core labour standards and internationally recognised CSR standards;
Amendment 197 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on the Commission to update its strategy on CSR, with a view to tightening up social and environmental standards and, in particular, to making sure that CSR is taken into account in trade and investment agreements negotiated by the EU; calls on the Commission to step up discussions on CSR at international level, in particular with the ILO and the OECD;
Amendment 200 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Draws attention to the Sustainability Compact launched by the Commission together with Bangladesh, the ILO and the United States following the Rana Plaza disaster in 2013; stresses the importance of continuing to pursue the pact’s sustainability objectives in order to improve workers’ rights, as well as the need for more responsible management of supply chains at international level; calls on the Commission to pursue similar programmes and measures with other EU trade partners;
Amendment 205 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Believes it is crucial to ensure increased access to information on the conduct of enterprises; considers it fundamental to introduce a mandatory reporting system and due diligence for EU companies that outsource their production to third countriecontinue efforts to ensure transparency with regard to access to information on the conduct of enterprises, and points to the importance of companies meeting their due diligence obligations;
Amendment 212 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the EU and the Member States to promote binding measures to ensure that companies pay taxes where economic activities take place and value is created, and to promote compulsory country-by- country reporting by the private sector;
Amendment 217 #
2015/2038(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for the EU and the Member States to engage actively in the work of the UN’s Human Rights Council and of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) on an international treaty to hold transnational corporations accountable for HR abuses and violations ofthe drafting of high international standards for compliance with human rights and with social and environmental standards;
Amendment 3 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 20 April 2015 on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP),
Amendment 15 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the association agreements signed with certain partner countries are a means of promoting sustainable far- reaching reforms;
Amendment 61 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas since the introduction of the new approach in 2011, political developments in the neighbourhood have demonstrated that the EU needs to further rethink relations with its neighbours, taking into account the different external and internal realities; whereas the EU needs to address new challenges in itboth its internal realities and the changing situations in neighbouring countries; whereas new challenges are emerging for the EU’s neighbourhood, and the EU therefore needs to adjust itsthe strategyic compass of the ENP by examining itsthe interests that it shares with its neighbours, charting common goals and priorities, and assessing itsthe appropriate policy tools, and its incentives and available resources and their attractiveness to its partners; whereas the EU will be attractive to neighbouring countries in so far as it enables partner countries to become fully involved in setting priorities;
Amendment 114 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses the importance and timeliness of the review of the ENP; emphasises that the revised ENP should be able to provide a quick and adequate response to the situation on the ground, while also putting forward a long-term vision for developing relations with the neighbouring countries; calls for Parliament to be involved in the implementation of the new ENP and regularly briefed on its progress in partner countries;
Amendment 136 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes in the continued value of its initially stated objective of creating an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness, based on the founding values and principles of the Union, through a deep structural transformation in the neighbouring countries and a shared commitment to recognising and upholding those foundations; stresses therefore the need to go back to basics and bring this objective back to the top of the agenda;
Amendment 172 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the renewed policy must be more strategic, with a real political vision, and politically driven; maintains that the partnership with the Mediterranean countries is as crucially important as the Eastern Partnership; calls for special envoys to be appointed for the East and the South, with the task of politically coordinating the revised policy; notes that the appointment of such special envoys could make for balance between the two parts of the EU’s neighbourhood and in terms of the EU’s commitment to them;
Amendment 205 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that local ownership and inclusiveness should be key aspects of the new approach so as to ensure that the benefits of the ENP reach all levels of society throughout the country; maintains that the EU delegations have a major role to play in placing relations on such a footing and in implementing the ENP;
Amendment 229 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the EU to improve its coordination with other donors and international financial institutions and callsstresses the need for joint programming with its Member States; considers that better coordination with the Member States is necessary in order to achieve a common approach to the short- and medium-term goals of the EU’s cooperation with neighbouring countries;
Amendment 300 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Maintains that the revamped ENP has to strike a balance between the two parts of the neighbourhood, not least in terms of political and diplomatic engagement; notes that from that point of view the EU institutions and the Member States should all follow the same even- handed approach;
Amendment 311 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Considers support for democracy, the rule of law and, human rights, and fundamental freedoms to be central to the ENP; stresses that the EU should be willing to offer incentives and know-how to help overcome the political, economic, and social challenges and economic costs of undertaking democratic reforms;
Amendment 328 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines the continuous need to focus on strengthening and consolidating democracy, the rule of law, the independence of the justice system, respect for minoritiewomen’s rights, minority rights and diversity; highlights that capacity-building in national institutions, including their national assemblies, together with support for civil society, pro- democracy groups and political parties, will enhance political dialogue and pluralism;
Amendment 338 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Notes that political parties and political groups in the Parliaments of the EU Member States and the European Parliament can play a decisive role in supporting political parties favourable to democracy;
Amendment 364 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls for the ENP to be developed into a more tailor-made and flexible policy framework able to adapt to the diversity that exists; underlines that differentiation should take place not only between Eastern and Southern partners but also among the ENP countries themselves; notes that differentiation must not be pursued to the detriment of the aim of regional integration between the countries of the southern and eastern neighbourhoods;
Amendment 458 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses the need to actively promote and assist in the peaceful settlement of conflicts in the regioncountries in the EU’s neighbourhood, using different tools and instruments, on the basis of the added value they may provide – such measures include its EU Special Representatives, confidence-building programmes and CSDP missions;
Amendment 475 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Notes that, with regard to security, the ENP could also help to prevent conflicts and contribute to mediation; observes in this respect that the Union’s delegations play a key role in establishing early warning systems by building up finely meshed prevention networks with the various civil-society organisations;
Amendment 501 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Calls for the revised policy to strengthen the existing platforms for cooperation, namely the Union for the Mediterranean and the Eastern Partnership, to further support regional integration when the priorities identified by the partners are similar for a specific policy field and to bring partners closer towhile maintaining a balance among them, to further support regional integration; notes that the European Union can play a leading role in promoting political dialogue among the countries in its neighbourhood, and must encourage ther in terms of economic standards and legislationm to define specific regional integration projects whose implementation it can then support;
Amendment 511 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Underlines the importance of the role of multilateral assemblies, such as EuroNest and PA-UfM, as fora for political dialogue and a tool for fostering ownership of the Neighbourhood Policy, as well as of the Conference of Regional and Local Authorities for the Eastern Partnership (CORLEAP) and Euro-Mediterranean Regional and Local Assembly (ARLEM), which enable local and regional representatives to engage in dialogue with the European Union Institutions and to pursue economic, social and local and regional cooperation;
Amendment 557 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Calls for the EU to explore and identify, together with its partners, priorities for integration in different policy fields, such as economic development, infrastructure and regional development, the environment, trade, education and vocational training, competition policies, SMEs, migration, security, energy and energy efficiency, with the aim of creating an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness;
Amendment 562 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Considers that the trend of the externalisation of internal policiaim of achieving coherence in the internal and external policies of the European Union, and the close and growing links between certain internal and external issues, should be reflected in the new ENP;
Amendment 596 #
2015/2002(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Notes that high unemployment, particularly among young people, social exclusion and poverty, combined with the low political participation of women, are root causes of instability, and demands engagement beyond the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas (DCFTAs);
Amendment 9 #
2015/0112(COD)
Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 13 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) Ecuador, one of the main producers and suppliers of banana to the Union, along with Colombia, is acceding the Agreement. The current stabilisation mechanism for bananas should therefore be extended to Ecuador. However, the application of the current stabilisation mechanism for banana has proved to be inefficient. Indeed, experience shows that the mechanism lacks flexibility, hampering its effectiveness. For three consecutive years the defined import trigger volume for Peru was exceeded, but no measure was taken. For those reasons, changes need to be made to ensure that the applicable procedure is faster and simplified in order to improve the information flow among the Commission, the Member States and the European Parliament, in particular by including an early warning when 80% of the trigger volumes are exceeded and by establishing a price observatory.
Amendment 15 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 b (new)
Recital 4 b (new)
(4b) The stabilisation mechanism for bananas will cease, together with the possibility to suspend swiftly for a short period the preferential customs duties in the case of increased imports, a necessary safety-net, without which the particularly vulnerable EU banana sector will not be able to face harsh competition by low-cost third-country banana producers. Therefore, compensation should be provided to EU banana producers.
Amendment 16 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 c (new)
Recital 4 c (new)
(4c) The outermost regions´ socio- economic situation remains very fragile, and some of them are particularly dependent on the banana sector, which suffers from a lack of competitiveness and from the difficulties in reacting to the evolution of the market conditions. The tariff concessions granted to third countries can have a significant impact on the banana market, in which production is concentrated in the European Union's outermost regions, where production alternatives are rare. In the last revision of the POSEI, the Union agreed financial aid to Union producers aiming to offset the impact of the tariff concessions granted to Peru and Colombia. It is, therefore, necessary to grant compensation to Union producers in order to alleviate the negative consequences that the accession of Ecuador to the Agreement will have on them when the POSEI is revised.
Amendment 18 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 19/2013
Article 15 – paragraph 1a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 1a (new)
4a. In Article 15 the following paragraph is inserted: 1a. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament and the Council of the trend in banana imports from Colombia, Ecuador and Peru and their impact on the Union market and Union producers. When import volumes reach 80% of the triggering threshold for the stabilisation mechanism outlined in the annex to this Regulation, for one or more of the States Parties to the Agreement, the Commission shall formally alert the European Parliament and the Council by a written procedure.
Amendment 22 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 19/2013
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
4b. In Article 15, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: "2. A separate annual trigger import volume is set for imports of products referred to in paragraph 1, as indicated in the second and third, third and fourth columns of the table in the Annex. Once the trigger volume for either Colombia, Ecuador or Peru is met during the corresponding calendar year, the Commission shall, in accordance with the urgency procedure referred to in Article 14(4), adopt an implementing act by which it may either temporarily suspend the preferential customs duty applied to products of the corresponding origin during that same year for a period of time not exceeding three months, and not going beyond the end of the calendar year or determine that such suspension is not appropriate. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R0019&from=EN)” Or. fr
Amendment 23 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 19/2013
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 27 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 c (new)
Regulation (EU) No 19/2013
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
4c. In Article 15, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: "3. When deciding whether measures should be applied pursuant to paragraph 2, the Commission shall take into consideration the impact of the imports concerned on the situation of the Union market for bananas. That examination shall include factors such as: effect of the imports concerned on the Union price level, development of imports from other sources, overall stability of the Union market. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R0019&from=EN)The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a written report setting out a detailed analysis of the results which prompted it to apply or not to apply measures. This report must be forwarded at the latest 14 days after the Commission has taken the decision to end the emergency procedure.” Or. fr
Amendment 29 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 d (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 d (new)
Regulation (EU) No 19/2013
Article 15 – paragraph 3a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 3a (new)
4d. In Article 15 the following paragraph is inserted: "3a. The Commission shall develop accurate statistical tools which take account of trends in the volume and price of imports, including over short periods, and of the situation of producers in each of the outermost regions, so that a more detailed assessment of imports and the situation on the Union market can be drawn up."
Amendment 34 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 1 a (new)
Article 2 – point 1 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 20/2013
Article 15 – paragraph 1a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 1a (new)
1a. In Article 15 the following paragraph is inserted: 1a. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament and the Council of the trend in banana imports from Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama and their impact on the Union market and Union producers. When import volumes reach 80% of the triggering threshold for the stabilisation mechanism outlined in the annex to this Regulation, for one or more of the States Parties to the Agreement, the Commission shall formally alert the European Parliament and the Council by a written procedure.
Amendment 37 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 1 b (new)
Article 2 – point 1 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 20/2013
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 41 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 1 b (new)
Article 2 – point 1 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 20/2013
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
1b. In Article 15, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: " 3. When deciding whether measures should be applied pursuant to paragraph 2, the Commission shall take into consideration the impact of the imports concerned on the situation of the Union market for bananas. That examination shall include factors such as: effect of the imports concerned on the Union price level, development of imports from other sources, overall stability of the Union market." (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R0019&from=EN) The Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a written report setting out a detailed analysis of the results which prompted it to apply or not to apply measures. This report must be forwarded at the latest 14 days after the Commission has taken the decision to end the emergency procedure.' Or. fr
Amendment 43 #
2015/0112(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point1 c (new)
Article 2 – point1 c (new)
Regulation (EU) No 20/2013
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new)
1c. In Article 15 the following paragraph is inserted: "3a. The Commission shall develop accurate statistical tools which take account of trends in the volume and price of imports, including over short periods, and of the situation of producers in each of the outermost regions, so that a more detailed assessment of imports and the situation on the Union market can be drawn up." "
Amendment 435 #
2014/2248(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines the fact that, until the Treaties cease to apply to the United Kingdom, it will continue to participate in all decision-making of the Union throughout its institutions, with the exception of the negotiations and the agreement concerning its own withdrawal; considers that intermediate arrangements will need to be made concerning the UK’s participation in European decision-making, as it will be politically difficult to allow a Member State in the process of leaving to influence decisions affecting– particularly European Parliament votes – affecting the future of the Union of which it will soon cease to be a member;
Amendment 448 #
2014/2248(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Calls for the headquarters of the European Medicines Agency, currently in London, to be moved to another Member State;
Amendment 449 #
2014/2248(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Calls for the establishment of an ‘observer’ status applicable to all United Kingdom representatives, whether elected or unelected, at the EU institutions; the status would enable the representatives to participate in debates until the United Kingdom leaves the European Union without taking part in decisions, including votes in the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union; proposes that the European Parliament’s Committee on Constitutional Affairs is given a mandate to set out the arrangements for this ‘observer’ status on behalf of all the institutions;
Amendment 821 #
2014/2248(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 a (new)
Paragraph 34 a (new)
34a. Points out that the excessive number and redundancy of emergency resolutions, but also of some subjects which address only the subsidiarity of Members States in the European Parliament’s reports, weaken their political and diplomatic impact;
Amendment 892 #
2014/2248(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
Amendment 897 #
2014/2248(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Reiterates its call for a singlPoints out that the seat ofor the European Parliament; proposes that Parliament and the Council each decide the location of their own seat after having obtained the consent of the other; further proposes that the s is in Strasbourg and that its places of work can only be changed by meatns of all the other EU institutions,n agmencies and bodies be determined by Parliadment andto the Council on a proposal by the European executive, acting in accordance with a special legislative procedureTreaty on European Union;
Amendment 908 #
2014/2248(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39 a (new)
Paragraph 39 a (new)
39a. Calls, in the light of the decentralised European Union institutions and the need for citizens to see and feel close to the European Parliament, for the permanent recognition as part of treaty revisions of the fact that the European Parliament has officially and historically had its headquarters in Strasbourg;
Amendment 1 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to Directive 2014/89/EU of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning,
Amendment 23 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas there is a great deal of ignorance about the seas and oceans, their resources and biodiversity, and the ways in which these interact with human activities – whether taking place or still to be developed – and whereas inadequate knowledge on those points severely inhibits sustainable use of the resources concerned and poses an obstacle to innovation;
Amendment 33 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas investments in marine and maritime research and innovation will strengthen the position of the EU as a global leader in the field of maritime policy;
Amendment 63 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls for the development of a unified European maritime industrial strategy which should bring together EU initiatives on all maritime-related sectors;
Amendment 73 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls on the Commission to launch a comprehensive study on the importance and weight of the blue economy for the European Union;
Amendment 84 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for clear-cut objectives and time- frames to be laid down with a view to making data – whether relating to the sea- floor or to the water column and living resources – more accessible and, more fully interoperable and harmonised for information about seas and oceans to be supplied to the public;
Amendment 94 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for an EU initiative to encourage private companies of the maritime sector to share economically insensitive data for research purposes;
Amendment 106 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Points out that the Member States and regional authorities have a key role to play in developing the blue economy and urges the Commission to support and encourage all forms of cooperation between Member States and regional authorities, for example joint programming initiatives;
Amendment 119 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Considers the shortage of qualified professionals in various fields of study and activity – including, though not confined to, researchers, engineers, and technicians, to be a huge hurdle that could prevent the blue economy from fully realising its potential; maintains that this shortcoming is closely bound up with the growing disengagement and disinvestment by Member States in the spheres of science and education and with the decline in ththerefore urges Member States and regional authorities to invest in an ambitious social dimension of blue pgrofessional status and social standwth and maritime literacy ing of several of the professions concerned, and therefore calls for thesrder to promote training and access for young people two trends to be reversed without delaymaritime professions;
Amendment 136 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for an appropriate financial framework to be established in order to stimulate the development of the blue economy and job creation, combining and, coordinating and facilitating the access to the financial instruments available – structural and investment funding (EMFF, ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund), the research framework programme, and so forth; points out that the instruments should be better geared to the needs of individual stakeholders – public institutions, businesses, especially SMEs, non- governmental organisations, etc. – and the opportunities being offered widely publicised;
Amendment 149 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Stresses the importance of maritime spatial planning for the sustainable and coordinated development of maritime activities;
Amendment 151 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Considers that the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning directive in a timely manner will foster investment in the blue economy as it provides the necessary certainty;
Amendment 153 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Stresses in this context the importance of land-sea interactions and Integrated Coastal Zone Management;
Amendment 163 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Considers that environmentally healthy coastal and maritime areas are key for sustainable human activities; calls therefore for the full implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework directive;
Amendment 165 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 b (new)
Paragraph 14 b (new)
14b. Considers that the governance of Integrated Maritime Policy should be strengthened at EU and sea-basin levels;
Amendment 223 #
2014/2240(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 b (new)
Paragraph 22 b (new)
22b. Believes that a maritime safety "Erika IV" package should be launched to prevent further major maritime disasters; considers that this package should recognise the ecological damage to marine waters in the European legislation;
Amendment 2 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to the Deauville Partnership launched by the G8 at the Deauville Heads of State or Government Summit on 21 May 2011;
Amendment 10 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 a (new)
Citation 20 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2015 on recent attacks and abductions by Da’esh in the Middle East, notably of Assyrians8 a , __________________ 8a P8_TA(2015)0071
Amendment 18 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21
Citation 21
– whereas the conflict in Syria, the conflict in Iraq, the crisis in Yemen and the situation in Libya are a major potential source of destabilisation in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA); having regard to the junction between the Sahel and Middle Eastern fronts in the fight against terrorism; having regard to the disastrous consequences of such a situation for the security of the whole region and of Europe; having regard to the number of civilian victims and the acts of terror committed against them and to the severe violations of human rights and humanitarian law committed by ISIS, particularly against ethnic and religious minorities; having regard to the serious humanitarian crisis caused by these conflicts, causing massive population displacements and creating enormous difficulties for refugees and their host communities; having regard to the difficulties in discerning a political approach and establishing a legitimate and reliable basis for inclusive dialogue with the various parties concerned; having regard to the resulting long-term damage to political and economic development, durable infrastructures and demographic cohesion in the region;
Amendment 190 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the crucial importance of promoting improved cooperation between the EU Member States and the MENA countries in combating terrorism; calls for closer cooperation with the Europol and Interpol countries, providing them with assistance in developing the necessary anti- terrorist structures and resources; highlights the 5+5 dialogue, which supplements the action of the Union for the Mediterranean and enables 10 Western Mediterranean countries to work on, in particular, security cooperation and issues relating to regional security and stability in the Mediterranean;
Amendment 231 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Strongly condemns the attack on the Bardo Museum in Tunis on 18 March 2015, for which Islamic State has claimed responsibility; stresses the importance for the European Union and for Tunisia of pursuing and strengthening their security cooperation, in particular by establishing joint security programmes in the region and in Tunisia; points out that the global response to terrorism is not limited to security matters, and that economic and social development, education, culture and support for the democratic transition are also part of that response;
Amendment 241 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Expresses its deep concern at the situation in Libya; stresses the need to maintain its territorial integrity and national unity; stresses that the Libyan crisis can only be resolved by means of dialogue that is as inclusive as possible; reiterates its support for the United Nations Support Mission in Libya and for the United Nations Special Representative in Libya, Bernardino Léon, and his mediation efforts; remains concerned by the huge influx of Libyan refugees into Tunisia, which is putting great pressure on the country’s stability, and welcomes their reception by Tunisia, which now has more than a million Libyan refugees who have fled the violence; calls, in this regard, for financial and technical aid to be provided to the Tunisian Government;
Amendment 356 #
2014/2229(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Encourages the European Union to pursue discussions on the launch of negotiations on full and deep free trade agreements with certain countries in the region, in accordance with the commitments made by the European Union following the Deauville Partnership; reiterates that the development of trade relations forms part of the EUʼs external policy and contributes to achieving the goals of peace, prosperity and stability;
Amendment 31 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13 a (new)
Citation 13 a (new)
- having regard to the recommendations of 6 January 2015 of the European Ombudsman on increased transparency in TTIP
Amendment 47 #
2014/2228(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 d (new)
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Notes nevertheless that the sensitive fields of defence and security must not be included in the negotiations related to the liberalisation of public procurements, especially since it risks to create unequal competition conditions for the European defence industry and would go against the objectives set by the Head of States and Governments during the 2013 Defence Council to promote the establishment of a European security and defence market and of a European defence technological and industrial base (EDTIB); insists on the fact that such sensitive fields have never been included in the past in similar negotiations;
Amendment 142 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the wellbeing of ordinary citizens, workers and consumers has to be the benchmark for a trade agreement; whereas TTIP should be a model for a good trade agreement responding to these requirements in order to provide a basis for future negotiations with our partner countries;
Amendment 183 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas President Juncker has clearly declared that he wishes the commercial agreement with the United States to be reasonable and balanced, and whereas he reiterated in his Political Guidelines that – while the EU and the US can go a significant step further in recognising each other’s product standards and working towards transatlantic standards – the EU will not sacrifice its safety, health, social and data protection standards or our cultural diversity, recalling that the safety of the food we eat and the protection of Europeans’ personal data are non- negotiable;
Amendment 201 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas President Juncker has also clearly stated in his Political Guidelines that he will not accept that the jurisdiction of courts in the Member States is limited by special regimes for investor disputes; whereas now that the results of the public consultation on investment protection and ISDS in the TTIP are available, a reflection process – taking account of critical and constructive contributions – is needed within and between the three European institutions, and also with the representatives of civil society and companies, on the best way to achieve investment protection and, equal treatment of investors and the right to regulate States;
Amendment 242 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point i
Paragraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) to ensure that TTIP negotiations lead to a deep, comprehensive, ambitious, balanced and high-standard trade and investment agreement in a spirit of reciprocity and mutual benefit that would promote sustainable growth, support the creation of high-quality jobs for European workers, directly benefit European consumers, increase international competitiveness, and open up new opportunities for EU companies, in particular SMEs; the content of the agreement is more important than the speed of the negotiations;
Amendment 259 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) to emphasise that while the TTIP negotiations consist of negotiations on three main areas – ambitiously improving reciprocal market access (for goods, services, investment and public procurement at all levels of government), reducing NTBs and enhancing the compatibility of regulatory regimes, and developing common rules to address shared global trade challenges and opportunities – all these areas are equally important to be included in a comprehensive package; TTIP should be ambitious and binding on all levels of government on both sides of the Atlantic, the agreement should lead to lasting genuine market openness on a reciprocal basis and trade facilitation on the ground, and should pay particular attention to structural means of achieving greater transatlantic cooperation while upholding regulatory standards and the level of consumer protection and preventing social and environmental dumping;
Amendment 297 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new)
(iva) considers that the notion of reciprocity must guide the European negotiators, in order to uphold, calmly but firmly, the offensive interests of the European Union in the actions to combat inequalities in respect of access to public and private markets and of treatment, in order that both parties are playing the globalisation game by the same rules;
Amendment 308 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point i
Paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) to ensure that the market access offers in the different areas are equally ambitious and reflect both parties’ expectations, as market access for industrial goods, agricultural products, services and public procurement is equally important in all cases and a balance is needed between the different proposals for these areas; to ensure also that the sensitive nature of certain products and sectors, particularly agricultural products, is taken into account; to examine and analyse whether it would be appropriate to exclude from the negotiations products judged to be sensitive, for which there is excessive divergence in standards and the conditions for fair competition cannot be ensured.
Amendment 323 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
Paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) to aim at the elimination of all duty tariffs, while respecting sensitive products on both sides; to agree in particular that appropriate transitional periods and tariff quotas should be negotiated and implemented for agricultural products;
Amendment 341 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
Paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) to keep in mind that there are important offensive interests for the EUas the EU is the world’s greatest trading power, it has an interest in taking the offensive throughout the negotiations and in particular in the services sector, for instance in the areas of engineering, telecommunications and transport services;
Amendment 403 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vi
Paragraph 1 – point b – point vi
(vi) to ensure an adequate carve-out of sensitive services such as public services and public utilities (including water, health systems, social security systems and education) and services of general interest as defined in protocol 26 of the TFEU, allowing national and local authorities enough room for manoeuvre to legislate in the public interest; a joint declaration reflecting negotiators’ clear commitment to exclude these sectors from the negotiations would be very helpful in this regard;
Amendment 473 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point x
Paragraph 1 – point b – point x
(x) to keep in mind that the agreement should respect, protect and not risk prejudicing the Union’s cultural and linguistic diversity, including in the audiovisual and cultural services sector, which is explicitly excluded from the negotiation by the mandate given to the Commission, and that existing and future provisions and policies in support of the cultural sector, in particular in the digital world, are kept out of the scope of the negotiations; ensure that the rights of Member States and the Union to maintain and develop their cultural and audiovisual policies are guaranteed;
Amendment 476 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point x
Paragraph 1 – point b – point x
(x) to keep in mind, as is clearly set out in the negotiating mandate, that the agreement should not risk prejudicing the Union’s cultural and linguistic diversity, including in the audiovisual and cultural services sector, and that existing and future provisions and policies in support of the cultural sector, in particular in the digital world, are kept out of the scope of the negotiationsuch as the digitisation of European cultural heritage in the digital world, or the system for fixing book prices in publishing are kept out of the scope of the negotiation; adds that these provisions should be the subject of articles in the legal body of the agreement and should not be mentioned only in the preamble or in an annex;
Amendment 490 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xi
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xi
(xi) to ensure that account is taken of the discrepancies in the openness of public procurement markets on both sides of the Atlantic andshould be eliminated in order to achieve access to public procurement markets based on reciprocity, given in particular the huge interest on the part of European companies in obtaining access to public contracts in the US both at federal and federated state level, for example for construction services, road and rail traffic infrastructure and goods and services while respecting sustainability criteria for procurement on both sides, inter alia the new EU procurement and concession package entering into force in 2016
Amendment 518 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xiii a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xiii a (new)
(xiiia) to ensure a carve-out for the sensitive areas of defence and security from negotiations on access to public contracts, given the risk of creating conditions of unequal competition for the European defence industry, which would run counter to the objectives set by heads of State and Government at the 2013 ‘Defence’ Council
Amendment 526 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xiv
Paragraph 1 – point b – point xiv
(xiv) to ensure that the negotiations on rules of origin aim at reconciling the EU and US approaches; given the conclusion of the negotiations for the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between EU and Canada and the potential upgrade of the EU-Mexico free trade agreement, the possibility and scope of cumulation will need to be considered, so as to minimise them;
Amendment 551 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
Paragraph 1 – point c – point i
(i) to ensure that the regulatory cooperation chapter promotes an effective, pro- competitive economic environment through the facilitation of trade and investment while developing and securing the highest levels of protection of human and animal health and safety, consumer, labour and environmental legislation, the highest sanitary and phytosanitary standards and of the cultural diversity that exists within the EU; negotiators on both sides need to identify and to be very clear about which regulatory measures and standards are fundamental and cannot be compromised, which ones can be the subject of a common approach, which are the areas where mutual recognition based on a common high standard and a strong system of market surveillance is desirable and which are those where simply an improved exchange of information is possible, based on the experience of one and a half years of ongoing talks;
Amendment 571 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
Paragraph 1 – point c – point ii
(ii) to base negotiations on SPS and TBT measures on the key principles of the multilateral SPS and TBT agreements and to protect European sanitary and phytosanitary standards and procedures; to aim in the first place at increasing transparency and openness, strengthening dialogue between regulators and strengthening cooperation in international standards-setting bodies; to recognise, in negotiations on SPS and TBT measures, the right of both parties to manage risk in accordance with the level either deems appropriate in order to protect human, animal or plant life or health; to respect and uphold the sensitivities and fundamental values of either side, such as the EU’s precautionary principle;
Amendment 612 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c – point v
Paragraph 1 – point c – point v
(v) to fully respect the established regulatory systems on both sides of the Atlantic, as well as the European Parliament’s role within the EU’s decision- making process and its democratic scrutiny over EU regulatory processes when creating the framework for future cooperation while at the same time being vigilant about a balanced involvement of stakeholders within the consultations included in the development of a regulatory proposal; proposes as such that the updates made to correct certain aspects concerning the limits of the partnership be placed, if necessary, under democratic and parliamentary scrutiny;
Amendment 650 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point iv
Paragraph 1 – point d – point iv
(iv) to ensure that labour and environmental standards are made enforceable, by building on the goodall experience of the EU-Korea free trade agreement and good and effective practices in the US’s free trade agreementjudged to be good by the European institutions, Member States and national legislationparliaments;
Amendment 721 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xi
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xi
(xi) to ensure that TTIP includes a specific chapter on SME’s and aims at creating new opportunities in the US for European SMEs, for instance by eliminating double certification requirements, by establishing a web-based information system about the different regulations, by introducing ‘fast- track’ procedures at the border or by eliminating specific tariff peaks that continue to exist; it should establish mechanisms for both sides to work together to facilitate SMEs’ participation in transatlantic trade, through the implementation of technical assistance, for instance through, a common SME ‘one-stop shop’;
Amendment 764 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv
(xiv) to ensure that foreign investors are protected and treated in a non- discriminatory fashion and have a fair opportunity to seek and achieve redress of grievances, which can be achieved without the inclus; ensure that a disputes resolution mechanism is established in order to ensure that the conditions of an ISDS mechanism; such a mechanism is not necessary in TTIP given the EU’s and the US’ developed legal systems; a state-to- state dispute settlement system and the uthe agreement on investment are respected, but only on the condition that the mechanism guarantees the right of states to regulate, fulfils requirements for transparency, includes clear and precise definitions of legal concepts such as ‘indirect expropriation’ and ‘fair and equitable treatment’, an appeals mechanism, respect for rules on ethics and prevention of conflicts of interest, prevents abusive recourse to the courts, is accessible to SMEs and does not affect rights of recourse tof national courts are the most appropriate tools to address investment disputes; to ensure that the establishment of the dispute resolution mechanism forms part of medium-term thinking on the establishment of an international organisation responsible for such questions in relation to investment;
Amendment 783 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xiv a (new)
(xiva) calls for the establishment of an early warning system with regular consultation with chambers of commerce and business in order to resolve any potential disputes in the first instance by prevention and mediation;
Amendment 805 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xv a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xv a (new)
(xva) to ensure that European Geographical Indications, which offer a guarantee of origin, traceability and European know-how, are protected and will not be open to challenge; to ensure that fraudulent and misleading use of European Geographical Indications is prohibited;
Amendment 819 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xvi b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point d – point xvi b (new)
(xvib) to ensure that European and North American companies comply with their fiscal duties when exercising their rights under the Treaty, in particular by realigning the rules on taxation of economic substance and by ensuring transparency of capital movements and sharing of financial information in line with the OECD’s Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, as presented to the G20 Finance meeting on 21 September 2014;
Amendment 846 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iii
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iii
(iii) to promote an even closer engagement with the Member States with the aim of forging their active involvement in better communicating the scope and the possible benefits of the agreement for European citizens and in order to ensure a broad, fact-based public debate on TTIP in Europe with the aim of exploring the genuine concerns surrounding the agreement; ;suggests that Member States should draw on the support available from European networks such as Europe Direct to organise events and targeted public consultation meetings.
Amendment 861 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iv a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point e – point iv a (new)
(iva) suggests that members of the European and national parliaments should participate in future rounds of negotiation as non-speaking observers, so that they can better report back, particularly on negotiating methods, without creating a risk to the continuing discussion;
Amendment 870 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) to further develop the dialogue between the representative assemblies of the two parties by means of more regular contact between the members of the European Parliament and the US Congress, particularly in order to face up to the interests and concerns of citizens on both sides of the Atlantic;
Amendment 872 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) asks that every effort should be made by the European Union, both during the negotiations and in relation to the implementation and monitoring of TTIP to make this type of agreement a model of reciprocity and respect for the agreed rules;
Amendment 874 #
2014/2228(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f b (new)
(fb) to increase the involvement of national parliaments in monitoring the negotiations, recognising that under Article 207 of the TFEU, their approval is required for the ratification of mixed agreements;
Amendment 338 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Insists on the need to substantially revise the EU´s policy towards its southern neighbourhood, and to develop a comprehensive strategy focusing the EU’s instruments and scarce budgetary resources on support for the building of functioning and inclusive states capable of delivering security for their citizens, confronting religious extremism and enhancing the rule of law, which is a key precondition for investment and economic development; recalls and endorses the 5+5 dialogue which supplements the action of the Union for the Mediterranean and enables ten countries from the Western Mediterranean to work, in particular, on security cooperation and issues related to regional security and stability in the Mediterranean; points to the unused potential of cross- border trade within the region; insists on close cooperation on managing migration flows, while respecting human rights;
Amendment 366 #
2014/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Urges the EU leadership to develop, in close coordination with the US and involving major powers (e.g. Russia and China), a strategy encouraging regional actors (including Turkey, Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, Gulf Cooperation Council governments, Iran, the Arab League and Kurdish forces) to unite in order to put an end to proxy wars and halt financial support to fundamentalists, and to develop a solution for peace and stability in the region; supports the engagement of all parties involved in the Middle East peace process in finding a comprehensive, constructive and sustainable solution to the Middle East conflict; emphasises the need to preserve the territorial integrity and national unity of Libya and, urges the HR/VP to provide impetus for a stronger engagement of regional actors on mediation and conflict resolution; , reiterates its support for the efforts of the UN Secretary General’s Special Representative, Bernardino León, to establish dialogue between the parties to the conflict, and welcomes the cycle of talks held in Geneva under UN auspices;
Amendment 6 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
– having regard to Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union,
Amendment 8 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
Amendment 16 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15 c (new)
Citation 15 c (new)
– having regard to the Joint Communication by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Commission to the European Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 8 March 2011 entitled ‘A Partnership for Democracy and Shared Prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean’ (COM(2011)0200),
Amendment 17 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
Citation 17 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 17 June 2010 on implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment8a, __________________ 8a OJ C 236 E, 12.8.2011, p. 107.
Amendment 19 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 22 a (new)
Citation 22 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 14 February 2006 on the human rights and democracy clause in European Union agreements9a, __________________ 9a OJ C 290 E, 29.11.2006, p. 107.s
Amendment 20 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 25 a (new)
Citation 25 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2014 on the EU and the global development framework after 20153a, __________________ 3a Texts adopted, P8_TA- PROV(2014)0059.
Amendment 31 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas Article 207 TFEU stipulates that the EU’s commercial policy is to be based on the principles and objectives of the Union’s external action;
Amendment 113 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recognises the importance of the mandate given to the first ever EU Special Representative (EUSR) for Human Rights and of the work done so far; encourages the EUSR to continue to enhance the EU’s visibility and engagement with multilateral and regional human rights mechanisms (the UN, the Council of Europe, the OECD, the OSCE, ASEAN, the African Union, the OIC), to promote key EU thematic priorities, including those reflected in the recently adopted EU human rights guidelines, to work for the empowerment of civil society throughout the world, and to contribute to the mainstreaming, coherence, consistency and effectiveness of EU human rights policy;
Amendment 161 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Recalls that, following the Arab Spring, the European Union redefined its neighbourhood policy towards the South Mediterranean and insisted on the role of civil society and on the principle of ‘more for more’ in order to develop more solid partnerships with its neighbours and to guide their reforms and democratic transitions;
Amendment 233 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Urges the VP/HR and the EEAS, in the light of the increasing number of recent reports of the widespread practice of torture and abuse around the world, to step up the EU’s efforts in the fight against torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment; welcomes the Commission's proposal for a regulation of 14 January 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005 concerning trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and responding to its resolution of 17 June 2010; stresses that this revision will make it possible to reaffirm the role of trade as a tool to spread the European Union's values and to defend human rights on the international stage;
Amendment 258 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 a (new)
Paragraph 41 a (new)
41a. Points out that trade policy contributes to achieving the overall objectives of the EU and that under Article 207 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (TFEU), EU trade policy has to be conducted ‘in the context of the principles and objectives of the Union’s external action’; points out, moreover, that under Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union, the Union must contribute to ‘peace, security, the sustainable development of the Earth, solidarity and mutual respect among peoples, free and fair trade, eradication of poverty and the protection of human rights, in particular the rights of the child, as well as to the strict observance and the development of international law, including respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter’ ;
Amendment 259 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 b (new)
Paragraph 41 b (new)
41b. Calls on the Commission to take into account, when drawing up its future trade strategy, the important role of trade and international agreements in the promotion of human rights internationally;
Amendment 260 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 c (new)
Paragraph 41 c (new)
41c. Stresses the need to continue multilateral cooperation and dialogue on human rights, between the EU and, in particular, the World Trade Organisation and the United Nations, in order to secure a multilateral trade framework which contributes to respect for human rights ;
Amendment 261 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 d (new)
Paragraph 41 d (new)
41d. Points out that the Generalised System of Preferences was designed in such a way as to ensure that beneficiary countries respect the principles of international human rights conventions and core labour standards and includes a special scheme of supplementary tariff preferences to promote the ratification and effective implementation of core international conventions on human and labour rights, environmental protection and good governance; reiterates that failure to comply with the conditions can lead to the trading arrangement being suspended; stresses the importance of regular monitoring and assessment of the implementation of international conventions by countries benefiting from GSP+;
Amendment 262 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41 e (new)
Paragraph 41 e (new)
41e. Welcomes the entry into force on 1 January 2014 of the revised GSP; points out that GSP+ has been kept in the Generalised System of Preferences and that it requires countries requesting to benefit from it to commit to cooperating fully and completely with international organisations as regards compliance with international conventions relating to human and workers’ rights;
Amendment 299 #
2014/2216(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
Paragraph 49
49. Commends the Commission on its publication in June 2013 of the ICT (information and communication technologies) Sector Guide on Implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; remains concerned, however, at the trade in products and services aimed at denial of internet access or enabling mass surveillance and monitoring of internet traffic and mobile communications, or at intruding on private conversations; calls, therefore, for the adoption of general export control guidelines in this sector, based on the experience of similar actions taken by the EU in individual cases; draws attention to the Commission Communication of 24 April 2014 entitled ‘Review of export control policy: ensuring security and competitiveness in a changing world’ [COM(2014)244], which, amongst other things, acknowledges the problems encountered in the export of certain types of ICT;
Amendment 35 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
Recital 1
(1) Natural mineral resources in conflict- affected or high risk areas − although holding great potential for development – can be a cause of dispute where their revenues are fuelling the outbreak or continuation of violent conflict, undermining national endeavours towards development, good governance and the rule of law. In these areas, breaking the nexus between conflict and illegal exploitation of minerals is critical to peace and stability.
Amendment 91 #
2014/0059(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Union companies have expressed their interest through the public consultation in the responsible sourcing of minerals and reported on current industry schemes designed to pursue their corporate social responsibility objectives, customer requests, or the security of their supplies. However, Union companies have also reported countless difficulties in the exercise of supply chain due diligence because of lengthy and complex global supply chains involving a high number of operators that are often insufficiently aware or ethically unconcerned. The cost and administrative consequences of responsible sourcing and their potential impact on competitiveness notably on SMEs should be monitored by the Commission. ; and the Commission shall provide SMEs with technical and financial assistance and shall facilitate the exchange of information in order to implement this Regulation.
Amendment 21 #
2013/2740(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that WTO Members have recognised that as many countries do not have the human, institutional and infrastructural capacity to participate effectively in international trade, the multilateral system needs to be accompanied by improvements in trade capacity which is an essential complement to the Doha Development Agenda; considers, however, that help with accession to the WTO for countries which are not yet members remains the priority;
Amendment 26 #
2013/2740(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises in this context the important role played by the Aid for Trade Initiative and regrets that for the first time since its launch in 2005 the amount of the commitments were reduced in 2011 due to the financial crisis, which resulted in less support to large projects in economic infrastructure with commitments in the transport and energy sector falling; points out that technical assistance to trade and multilateral initiatives such as the WTO’s generalised tariff preference systems can compensate for this reduction in commitments; calls on the members of the WTO, and especially the developed and major emerging countries, to make greater use of these;
Amendment 31 #
2013/2740(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recognises the importance of the agricultural sector to developing countries and notes the proposals made by the G33 group of countries on the issue of food security; believes that the EU should support measures which restore food stocks for developing countries in the wake of the harmful speculation and price volatility in recent years; recalls that in this regard the EU should ensure coherence between the various EU policies which come under its external action as enshrined notably in Articles 207 and5 to 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, namely development policy, the CAP and the common commercial policy, taking account of the needs and concerns of both EU Member States and those of developing countries;
Amendment 28 #
2013/2739(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that the already strong trade links between the European Union and the SMCs through the Association Agreements need to be furthered strengthened exploiting the possibilities and opportunities offered by these Agreements; in particular is of the opinion that economic diversification is key and given that the services sector is becoming increasingly significant for the SMCs, supports offering the SMCs more integration into the EU's internal market for services; considers, likewise, that SMEs are a key tool for supporting this diversification;
Amendment 60 #
2013/2739(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Is concerned over the recent deterioration ofinstability of the Tunisian democratic process; recalls that stable democratic transition is a precondition for economic development and social reforms and, ultimately, for attracting international investment and generating sustainable growth;
Amendment 67 #
2013/2739(RSP)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Regrets the disappointing export performance of Jordan in recent years; Welcomes the fact that the EU decided to grant loans of up to €180 million to Jordan in support of Jordan's economic adjustment and reform programme; calls on Ministers to explore ways of achieving further progress in this area at the Union for the Mediterranean Trade Ministerial taking place in November;
Amendment 108 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 8
Subheading 8
Human rights conditionality in trade preferences and external agreementsin the EU's trade policy
Amendment 109 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Supports the EU's practice of including legally binding human rights clauses in the EU’s international agreements, and considers that these clauses should also be included in all sectoralbe systematically included in trade agreements;
Amendment 126 #
2013/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. WRecalls that the revised GSP scheme will come into force on 1 January 2014; welcomes the continuation of the GSP+ scheme whereby countries can enjoy additional preferential tariffs as incentives foronce they have ratificationed and implementation ofed the 27 core human rights, labour and environment conventions; stresses that GSP+ preferences must only be granted to countries that have ratified and effectively implemented the conventions; recalls also the possibility of temporal withdrawal of GSP+ preferences for countries in violation of human rights; calls therefore on the European Commission, when conducting the monitoring exercise, to open genuine channels of communication and carry out broad consultations with a wide range of partners, including the European Parliament and local civil society and social actorrecalls the possibility of suspending GSP, GSP+ and Everything But Arms (EBA) preferences in the event of serious human rights violations; calls on the European Commission to make the assessments for GSP+ eligibility publicly available, in order to increase transparency and accountability;
Amendment 2 #
2013/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union,
Amendment 6 #
2013/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the aims of the SPA currently under negotiation would update theinclude revitalising relationship between the EU and Canada and considerably contributeing to the improvement of outheir cooperation; whereas it codifiethe agreement confirms the status of the EU and Canada as strategic partners;
Amendment 12 #
2013/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the SPA, beyond improving the institutional structure of relations, in combination with the CETA, would provide Europe’s and Canada’s citizens with tangible benefits and opportunities; whereas the opening of markets and regulatory cooperation is expected to generate important economic gains and have positive effects on employment for both Canada and the EU and, in light of broadening the transatlantic partnership and given the existing NAFTA- framework, may lead to the creation of a transatlantic market, a win-win situation for all actors involved;
Amendment 23 #
2013/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to make all necessary progress in order to swiftly conclude the agreementa new, updated SPA;
Amendment 26 #
2013/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to insist that all contractual relationships with third countries, both industrialised and developing, should include clearly worded conditionality and politicalEU agreements with third countries should, without exception and irrespective of their level of development, include binding clauses on human rights and democracy, without exception; to adopt and appropriate safeguards to ensure that the suspension mechanism cannot be abused;
Amendment 34 #
2013/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
Paragraph 1 – point d
(d) to encourage, if possible, all parties involved to initial and sign the SPA and the CETAconclude the negotiations on the SPA and the CETA and then initial and sign them at the same time in order to underline their compliementary nature;
Amendment 40 #
2013/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) to ensure that the agreement contains a solid commitment to inter-parliamentary cooperation that recognises the important role of the European Parliament and theand Canadian Pparliaments in EU-Canada relations, especially through the long- established inter-parliamentary delegation, and to closer civil-society cooperation;
Amendment 24 #
2013/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas establishing democracy, peace and good governance is a crucial challenge for the Sahel states, whereas these states must embark on the process of promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms, eradicating discrimination against women and minorities and promoting education and ethnic reconciliation;
Amendment 36 #
2013/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas Tuareg resentments in northern Mali were exploited by extremist groups who in early 2012 allied with, and subsequently displaced, the secular National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA) in their rebellion; whereas these groups, in particular Ansar Dine, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) and the Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa (MUJAO), further benefited from the instability arising from the subsequent coup in Bamako; whereas the systematic violations of human rights in the north, combined with the impending existential threat to the Malian state itself, precipitated the armed intervenational interventions to help shore up democracy, restore the rule of law and improve the situation of by French forces to halt the atrocities and human rights violations committed by the terrorist groups, restore democracy and the authority of the Malian state and re-establish respect for human rights;
Amendment 160 #
2013/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Welcomes the peaceful settlement of the border dispute between Niger and Burkina Faso brought by those two countries before the International Court of Justice, which handed down its ruling on 16 April 2013, and calls on the Sahel countries to follow this example;
Amendment 161 #
2013/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Urges the governments of the Sahel countries to respect the independence and the impartiality of the courts, since these are essential guarantees of democracy and the rule of law; calls on the Sahel countries to continue their efforts to improve judicial training; and calls on the EU to support NGO projects aimed at raising human rights awareness among judicial practitioners;
Amendment 162 #
2013/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Calls on the Sahel countries to cooperate with the ICC so as to enable it to conduct investigations freely and with complete impartiality; calls on states parties to execute international arrest warrants issued by the ICC and enforce its decisions with all due dispatch; proposes that the UN should help the Sahel countries to set up impartial and independent judicial bodies to try international crimes, following the example of the Special Court for Sierra Leone;
Amendment 215 #
2013/2020(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Points out that the European Union endorses the principles underpinning the Kimberley Process, implements the FLEGT programmes and endeavours wherever possible to encourage compliance with basic international standards in the areas of social protection, employment and the environment and corporate social responsibility (CSR); calls on the European Union and the Sahel States to consider introducing a gold traceability process along the lines of the Kimberley Process for diamonds; emphasises the need for European firms which have subsidiaries in the countries of the region to satisfy themselves that these basic standards and international guidelines on CSR are being complied with; points out that the European Union is shortly to introduce the principle of country-by-country reporting;
Amendment 10 #
2013/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 28 a (new)
Citation 28 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2010 on human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements1,
Amendment 301 #
2013/2006(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 b (new)
Paragraph 32 b (new)
Amendment 16 #
2013/0128(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) EU macro-financial assistance to Jordan must be in keeping with the general principles underpinning EU external action and support the fundamental rights and values that the EU promotes through its external action, such as democracy, the rule of law, good governance and human rights.
Amendment 17 #
2013/0128(COD)
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9 b (new)
Recital 9 b (new)
(9b) In order to ensure the coherence of the steps taken, the Commission and the EEAS should consult each other before implementing any macro-financial assistance operations.
Amendment 38 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Following the review, certain provisions of the Regulations should be amended in order to improve transparency and predictability, provide for effective measures to fight against retaliation, improve effectiveness and enforcement and optimise review practice. In addition, certain practices that in recent years have been applied in the context of anti- dumping and anti-subsidy investigations should be included in the Regulations.
Amendment 39 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Following the review, certain provisions of the Regulations should be amended in order to improve transparency and predictability, provide for effective measures to fight against retaliation, improve effectiveness and enforcement and optimise review practice, and to facilitate access to the instruments for SMEs. To this end, the function of the Export Helpdesk should be adapted. In addition, certain practices that in recent years have been applied in the context of anti- dumping and anti-subsidy investigations should be included in the Regulations.
Amendment 71 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
Amendment 75 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
Amendment 77 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
Amendment 86 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article -1 (new)
Article -1 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 1 – paragraph 4b
Article 1 – paragraph 4b
The following Article is added: ‘Article -1 For the purpose of this Regulation, it shall be understood that a raw material is the input of a given product which has a significant impact on its cost of production.’
Amendment 87 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph -1 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph -1 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 1 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. A raw material shall be considered to be subject to structural distortion when its price is not solely the result of a normal operation of market forces reflecting supply and demand. Such distortions are the outcome of interference from third countries, which includes, inter alia, export taxes, export restrictions and dual pricing schemes.
Amendment 108 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 c (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 c (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 6 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 6 a (new)
1c. In Article 6, a new paragraph 6a is added : 6a. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts to ensure the possible access to information to all interested parties by allowing for an information system whereby interested parties are notified when new non-confidential information is added to the investigation file.
Amendment 109 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 d (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 d (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 6 – paragraph 9
Article 6 – paragraph 9
1d. Article 6, paragraph 9 shall be replaced by the following: For proceedings initiated pursuant to Article 5(9), an investigation shall be concluded within one year, in accordance with the findings made pursuant to Article 8 for undertakings or the findings made pursuant to Article 9 for definitive action.
Amendment 112 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 6
Article 6
2. In Article 6, the following paragraph 10 is added:s are added: The Commission shall facilitate access to the instrument for all industry sectors concerned through its Export Helpdesk service and by taking account of the specific needs of SMEs. In this regard, it shall, in particular, raise users’ awareness of the instrument, provide information and explanations on cases and guidance on additional opportunities for liaising with the Hearing Officer and national customs authorities. The Commission shall safeguard the effective exercise of the procedural rights of the interested parties and shall ensure that proceedings are handled impartially, objectively and within a reasonable time frame. It shall inform the parties that they have the option of appealing to the Hearing Officer of the Directorate- General for Trade of the Commission.
Amendment 122 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point 1 (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point 1 (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 6 – paragraph 10
Article 6 – paragraph 10
Upon request, SMEs may obtain questionnaires translated into their own language. In this regard, the Commission shall duly inform them of this option when initiating its investigation.
Amendment 130 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Amendment 131 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a – introductory part
(a) Article 7(1) is replaced by the following: 1. Provisional duties may be imposed if proceedings have been initiated in accordance with Article 5, if a notice has been given to that effect and interested parties have been given adequate opportunities to submit information and make comments in accordance with Article 5(10), if a provisional affirmative determination has been made of dumping and consequent injury to the CommunityUnion industry, and if the CommunityUnion interest calls for intervention to prevent such injury. The provisional duties shall be imposed no earlier than 60 days fromwithin seven months of the initiation of the proceedings but, or no later than nine months from the initiation of the proceedingsin exceptional circumstances for which evidence is provided and of which the interested parties shall be informed.
Amendment 133 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Amendment 189 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 11 – paragraph 2
Article 11 – paragraph 2
5a. In Article 11, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘2. A definitive anti-dumping measure shall expire five years from its imposition or five years from the date of the conclusion of the most recent review which has covered both dumping and injury, unless it is determined in a review that the expiry would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Such an expiry review shall be initiated on the initiative of the Commission, or upon request made by or on behalf of Community producers, and the measure shall remain in force pending the outcome of such review. An expiry review shall be initiated where the request contains sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Such likelihood may, for example, be indicated by evidence of continued dumping and injury or evidence that the removal of injury is partly or solely due to the existence of measures or evidence that the circumstances of the exporters, or market conditions, are such that they would indicate the likelihood of further injurious dumping. Such likelihood may also be indicated by continuing interference by other countries. In carrying out investigations under this paragraph, the exporters, importers, the representatives of the exporting country and the Community producers shall be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request, and conclusions shall be reached with due account taken of all relevant and duly documented evidence presented in relation to the question as to whether the expiry of measures would be likely, or unlikely, to lead to the continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. A notice of impending expiry shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union at an appropriate time in the final year of the period of application of the measures as defined in this paragraph. Thereafter, the Community producers shall, no later than three months before the end of the five-year period, be entitled to lodge a review request in accordance with the second subparagraph. A notice announcing the actual expiry of measures pursuant to this paragraph shall also be published.’
Amendment 200 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 14 – paragraph 6
Article 14 – paragraph 6
6a. In Article 14, paragraph 6 is replaced by the following: ‘6. Member States shall report to the Commission every month, on the import trade in products subject to investigation and to measures, and on the amount of duties collected pursuant to this Regulation. The Commission may, upon receiving a specific reasoned request from an interested party, and after receiving the opinion of the Advisory Committee, decide to provide them with information concerning the volume and import values of these products.’
Amendment 209 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 19 a
Article 19 a
Amendment 223 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
Article 22 a (new)
Article 22 a (new)
9a. The following article is inserted: ‘Article 22a Report 1. The Commission shall, with due regard to the protection of confidential information within the meaning of Article 19, present an annual report on the application and implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall include information about the application of provisional and definitive measures, the termination of investigations without measures, reinvestigations, reviews and verification visits, and the activities of the various bodies responsible for monitoring the implementation of this Regulation and fulfilment of the obligations arising therefrom. The report shall also cover the use of trade defence instruments by third countries targeting the Union, information on the recovery of the Union industry concerned by the measures imposed and appeals against various measures imposed. It shall include the activities of the Hearing Officer of DG Trade and those of the Export Helpdesk in relation to the application of this Regulation. 2. The European Parliament may, within one month of the Commission's presentation of the report, invite the Commission to an ad hoc meeting of its responsible committee to present and explain any issues related to the implementation of this Regulation.’
Amendment 245 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – introductory part
Regulation (EC) No 597/2009
Article 11 – new paragraphs
Article 11 – new paragraphs
2. In Article 11, the following paragraphs are added: ‘The Commission shall facilitate access to the instrument for all industry sectors concerned, with regard to anti-dumping affairs, through its Export Helpdesk service in particular. This service shall raise users’ awareness of the instrument, provide information and explanations on cases, and guidance on additional opportunities for liaising with the Hearing Officer and national customs authorities. After the initiation of an investigation, it shall identify and inform those sectors that are likely to be affected by the initiation of proceedings and shall provide them with the relevant deadlines for registering as an interested party. It shall inform the sectors concerned about the possibilities and conditions under which they may request a review of the measures and a refund of the anti-dumping duties paid. The Commission shall safeguard the effective exercise of the procedural rights of the interested parties and shall ensure that proceedings are handled impartially, objectively and within a reasonable time period. It shall inform the parties that they have the option of appealing to the Hearing Officer of the Commission Directorate-General for Trade.’
Amendment 256 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 b (new)
Regulation (EC) No 597/2009
Article 11 – paragraph 11 (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 11 (new)
2b. Upon request, SMEs may obtain questionnaires translated into their own language. In this regard, the Commission shall duly inform them of this option when initiating its investigation.
Amendment 259 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 c (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 c (new)
Regulation (EC) No 597/2009
Article 11 – paragraph 9
Article 11 – paragraph 9
2c. In Article 11 (9) shall be replaced by the following: 9. For proceedings initiated pursuant to Article 10(11), an investigation shall, whenever possible, be concluded within one year. In any event, such investigations shall in all cases be concluded within 13 months of their initiation, in accordance with the findings made pursuant to Article 13 for undertakings or the findings made pursuant to Article 15 for definitive action.
Amendment 262 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 597/2009
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 271 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b
Regulation (EC) No 597/2009
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 280 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 597/2009
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
(ba) In Article 12(1), the second sub- paragraph is replaced by the following: ‘The provisional duties shall be imposed no earlier than 60 days fromwithin seven months of the initiation of the proceedings but, or no later than nine months from the initiation of the proceedings.in exceptional circumstances for which evidence is provided and of which the interested parties shall be informed.’
Amendment 310 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 7 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 597/2009
Article 24 – paragraph 6
Article 24 – paragraph 6
7a. Article 24(6) shall be replaced by the following: ‘6. Member States shall report to the Commission every month, on the import trade in products subject to investigation and to measures, and on the amount of duties collected pursuant to this Regulation. The Commission may, upon receiving a specific reasoned request from an interested party, and after consulting the Advisory Committee, take decide to inform the interested parties about the volume and import values of these products.’
Amendment 318 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
Regulation (EC) No 597/2009
Article 29b
Article 29b
Amendment 332 #
2013/0103(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new)
Regulation (EC) No 597/2009
Article 33 a (new)
Article 33 a (new)
10a. The following article is inserted: ‘Article 33a Report 1. The Commission shall, with due regard to the protection of confidential information within the meaning of Article 19, present an annual report on the application and implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall include information about the application of provisional and definitive measures, the termination of investigations without measures, reinvestigations, reviews and verification visits, and the activities of the various bodies responsible for monitoring the implementation of this Regulation and fulfilment of the obligations arising therefrom. The report shall also cover the use of trade defence instruments by third countries targeting the Union, information on the recovery of the Union industry concerned by the measures imposed and appeals against various measures imposed. It shall include the activities of the Hearing Officer of DG Trade and those of the Export Helpdesk in relation to the application of this Regulation. 2. The European Parliament may, within one month of the Commission's presentation of the report, invite the Commission to an ad hoc meeting of its responsible committee to present and explain any issues related to the implementation of this Regulation.
Amendment 28 #
2012/2308(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph B a (new)
Paragraph B a (new)
Ba. whereas there were historical reasons for the decision to hold part-sessions in Strasbourg, in particular the symbolic significance of that city and the need to have a multi-centre European Union;
Amendment 38 #
2012/2308(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph C
Paragraph C
C. whereas since 2006 attempts by the Petitions Committee to consider this issue on a parliamentary level have repeatedly been obstructed despiled to the holding of a number of debates which have demonstrated the widespread interesthigh level of interest which all MEPs have in theis issue amongst MEPs;
Amendment 62 #
2012/2308(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the decision by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs to draw up a report on the location of the seats of the European Union’s institutions;
Amendment 78 #
2012/2308(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 86 #
2012/2308(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Agrees with the principle that the European Parliament would be more effective, cost-efficient and respectful of the environment if it were located in a singlTakes note of the petitions submitted requesting that the European Parliament no longer meet in more than one place;, and notes that the continuation of the monthly migration between Brussels and Strasbourg has become a symbolic negative issue amongst most EU citizens which is detrimental to Parliament’s reputationof the arguments put forward in that respect;
Amendment 113 #
2012/2308(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Respects the historic reasons for the location of its plenary sessions in Strasbourg and the Treaty requirements that necessitate the two-seat system; nevertheless insists that such an arrangement cannot continue in perpetuity and that Parliament itself must be able to state a preference for its future;
Amendment 125 #
2012/2308(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Points out, too, that Parliament’s Strasbourg seat, which achieved a 57% reduction in CO2 emissions between 2006 and 2010, is leading the way on respect for the environment and that, as data compiled by Parliament’s Secretariat shows, its detractors have substantially overestimated its annual costs;
Amendment 143 #
2012/2308(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 152 #
2012/2308(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for Parliament to express its view as to whetherEmphasises that only the cEurrent arrangement should continue; and if an appropriate majority vote is recorded, recommends that Parliament propose Treaty changes under Article 48opean Council has a remit to determine Parliament’s seat; sees the location of Parliament’s seat as part of the broader question of determining the seats of all the EU institutions.
Amendment 21 #
2012/2287(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas in a global, complex and increasingly multipolar world, the EU and the US, in spite of fiscal consolidation, should play key roles in the world's politics and economy and in the shaping of the international environment, and face together regional conflicts and global challenges on a multilateral basis; whereas, to that end, they should also secure the involvement of Canada, with which they already have a strong political and economic relationship, as well as new key powers, including the EU's two Latin American strategic partners, Brazil and Mexico;
Amendment 35 #
2012/2287(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas both the United States and the European Union are seeking to boost their presence in South-East Asia, the former through its involvement in negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and the latter through negotiations on bilateral agreements with various countries in the region;
Amendment 48 #
2012/2287(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. WelcomNotes the fact that the agenda will include the launching of negotiations for a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP); stresses that this agreement will reinvigorconsolidate the EU-US relationship and that its global impact will go beyond its bilateral implications;
Amendment 116 #
2012/2287(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines that the eventual conclusion of the TTIP willcould create the prospect ofscope for a wide economic space that would include North America, the EU and many Latin American countries with which the partners have negotiated economic agreements;
Amendment 126 #
2012/2287(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Draws attention to the particularly important role that maritime security must play in the Atlantic space; welcomes the efforts made by the partners, in close coordination with ECOWAS and ECCAS, to fight piracy and promote maritime security in the Gulf of Guinea and the Gulf of Aden;
Amendment 202 #
2012/2287(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and, the Commission, the US Government and the US Congress.
Amendment 26 #
2012/2259(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that trade has an important role in making sure that renewable energy is sustainable; recalls that imported bioenergy and agrofuels shall be in compliance with EU's sustainability criteria, and encourages the Commission to introduce indirect land use as an additional criterion; recommends that trade agreements should contain provisions to address the issues of deforestation and forest degradation and encourages the Commission to continue negotiating VPAs on illegal logging with relevant third countries;
Amendment 30 #
2012/2259(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Welcomes the pillar on international cooperation; recognises the potential that notably the Southern-Mediterranean countries represent in terms of production of renewable energy; believes that the EU's proposed DCFTAs could be a useful means to integrate the countries of this region into the EU's energy market and to invest into their technological development in a way that is beneficial to the sustainability of their economies;
Amendment 1 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
– having regard to Articles 207 and 208 of the Treaty onf the Functioning of the European Union and Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union,
Amendment 4 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 bis (new)
Citation 4 bis (new)
– having regard to the Commission communication ‘A new response to a changing Neighbourhood’ (COM(2011) 303),
Amendment 5 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
Citation 6 a (new)
having regard to the Commission communication ‘Towards a comprehensive European international investment policy’ (COM(2010)343),
Amendment 6 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 b (new)
Citation 6 b (new)
– having regard to the communication ‘A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility’ (COM(2011)681),
Amendment 7 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 bis (new)
Citation 7 bis (new)
– having regard to the communication ‘Trade and Development: Assisting Developing Countries to Benefit from Trade’, COM(2002)513,
Amendment 8 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 bis (new)
Citation 9 bis (new)
– having regard to its resolutions of 25 November 2010 on 'Human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements', 'International trade policy in the context of climate change imperatives' and 'Corporate social responsibility in international trade agreements',
Amendment 13 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A bis (new)
Recital A bis (new)
A bis. a/A new (before the current A) Whereas Articles 207 and 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union are clearly interlinked; whereas Article 207 states that the EU's commercial policy shall be based on the priciples and objectives of the Union's external action, and whereas Article 208 requires that the Union's policies which are likely to affect developing countries shall take account of the objectives of development cooperation;
Amendment 18 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas trade and investment can be a means of achieving those objectives by stimulating the sustainable growth of developing countries (DCs) and the least developed countries (LDCs), enabling the transfer of technologies and skills and helping to create jobs and increase competitiveness and productivity;
Amendment 23 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas trade and investment cannot in themselves have a decisive impact on growth or on the structural weaknesses (shortfalls in human capital, governance and infrastructure, heavy reliance on exports of raw materials, poor export diversification, high trade costs, etc.) from which DCs and, a fortiori, LDCs suffer and which hamper their full access to world trade;
Amendment 26 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the EU’'s trade and investment policy in respect of developing countries should be supplemented by technical and financial assistance coupled with parallel national measuresshould support the development objectives set by the authorities of the beneficiary countries and be backed up by technical and financial assistance;
Amendment 32 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas the EU and its Member States are the largest donors of aid for trade, with EUR 10.7 billion committed in 20110, namely almost a third of the total amount of ODA; whereas the economic and financial crisis has raised the issue of reducing the funding earmarked for public- sector development assistance, and in particular aid for trade, and that of the effectiveness of its use;
Amendment 36 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Supports the Commission’s aim of enhancing synergies between trade and development policies; recommends that it award priority, in these policies, to measures aimed at creating jobs, facilitating trade, improving the trade and investment climate, resistance to economic shocks, fiscal governance and diversification of trade and investment flows, and promoting sustainable development; calls on the EU to display greater consistency in the implementation of its trade, agricultural, environmental, energy and development policies;
Amendment 82 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point 2 – indent 4
Paragraph 5 – point 2 – indent 4
– strengthening social and safety standards and promoting transparency and sustainability, particularly in the mining and forestry management sectors;
Amendment 91 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point 3 – indent 3
Paragraph 5 – point 3 – indent 3
– promoting services that facilitate trade and investment, and particularly environment-friendly tourism, logistics and investment;
Amendment 105 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Supports the Commission's proposal concerning theto differentiation of EUe its aid for trade and theo focusing of its efforts on those countries in most in need of this, and particular, especially the lessast developed countries (LDCs) and low-in; recomme countries; calls onnds the Commission, nevertheless, not to take revenue (gross national product) as its sole criterion, but also to take into account a country’s general level of development and its needs, capacities and internal development inequalities, in addition to the standard indicators (gross national product, human capital and vulnerability to economic shocks); urges the Commission to take into account the principles of the Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF) for the LDCs;
Amendment 109 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Takes the view that while transfers of funds and micro-finance remain relevant tools, they alone cannot meet all funding requirements; Calls on all donors to seek out and promote innovative forms of financing and partnership; Supports the introduction of South-South and triangular partnerships; recommends making more widespread use of inter-regional funding schemes such as have been implemented in connection with the EU-Africa Infrastructure Trust Fund;
Amendment 111 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the adoption of the Communication ‘Improving EU support to developing countries in mobilising Financing for Development’; calls on the Commission to implement its proposals swiftly, with a view to mobilising additional sustainable, predictable and effective financing; welcomes the guidelines set out in the OECD’s Policy Framework for Investment User’s Toolkit; welcomes the results of the Busan Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation and the Istanbul Principles for CSO Development Effectiveness;
Amendment 126 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the reform of the rules of origin and the forthcoming entry into force of the reformed generalised system of preferences (GSP); hopes that the Commission will come forward with a report on the consequences for beneficiary countries of the change in that system, and particularly for those countries for which preferences have been withdrawn, in accordance with the provisions of Article 40 of the new rules;
Amendment 129 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Welcomes the conclusprovisional application of a first economic partnership agreement (EPA) with an African country and calls on the Commission to harness this momentum to relaunch the negotiations on EPAs not yet concluded; points to the importance of establishing a firm legal and commercial framework for promoting investment in ACP countries; calls on the Commission to take into account the European Parliament’s recommendations concerning preference erosion and the flexibility and scope of tariff dismantling, and to award special attention to implementing the EPAs;
Amendment 135 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that the EU has developed effective tools in the field of development assistance through trade and investment, with these including the GSP and EPAs; urges the Commission, nonetheless, to combine all the existing instruments in a genuine overarching strategy that also comprises measures in the fields of technical assistance for trade, capacity building and trade-related adjustment, also in relation to standardisation;
Amendment 138 #
2012/2225(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Emphasises that, given the size of their share of international trade, European companies, their subsidiaries and subcontractors play a key role in the promotion and dissemination of social and labour standards worldwide; considers that European companies which relocate their production to countries with less stringent social obligations should be held liable for any damage and negative externalities affecting local populations;
Amendment 1 #
2012/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
– having regard to Articles 207 and 208 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European union, and Article 3 of the Treaty of the European Union,
Amendment 1 #
2012/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 a
Paragraph -1 a
-1a. Supports the Commission's proposal to differentiate its aid for trade and to focus its efforts on the countries most in need, especially the least developed countries (LDCs) and low-income countries;
Amendment 7 #
2012/2224(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas Articles 207 and 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union are clearly interlinked; whereas Article 207 states that the EU's commercial policy shall be based on the principles and objectives of the Union's external action, and whereas Article 208 requires that the Union's policies which are likely to affect developing countries shall take account of the objectives of development cooperation;
Amendment 10 #
2012/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Encourages developing countries to incorporate the goal of economic and sustainable development into all their national policies, strategies and initiatives; asks the Commission to work on building up governments' capacity to incorporate issues linked to sustainable economic development into their national trade strategies and programmes;
Amendment 13 #
2012/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls the importance of investment aimed at creating, developing and strengthening key port, transport, energy and telecommunications infrastructure, and in particular cross border infrastructure;
Amendment 22 #
2012/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that the European Union's trade and investment development aid tools, in particular the revised Generalised Scheme of Preferences and the economic partnership agreements, are effective; stresses nonetheless that trade aid cannot be reduced to these instruments alone and urges the Commission to increase the share of its total aid budget that is allocated to technical assistance; calls on the EU to display greater consistency in the implementation of its trade, agricultural, environmental, energy and development policies;
Amendment 23 #
2012/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that the European Union'U’s trade and investment development aid tools, in particular the revised Generalised Scheme of Preferences and the economic partnership agreements, are effective; stresses nonetheless that trade aid cannot be reduced to these instruments alone and urges the Commission to increase the share of its total aid budget that is allocated to technical assistance, including the field of standardisation;
Amendment 35 #
2012/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Urges all donors to coordinate their actions more and to adjust them in line with current funds; recalls that the BRICS countries are now both aid beneficiaries and donors; calls on them to cooperate with the European Union so their experience can be shared and their actions optimised, and to accept more responsibilities vis-à- vis the less developed countries and within the donor community; expresses concern at the proliferation of tied aid practices and urges the developed countries and the major emerging countries not to resort to such practices;
Amendment 37 #
2012/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Emphasises that, given the size of their share of international trade, European companies, their subsidiaries and subcontractors play a key role in the promotion and dissemination of social and labour standards worldwide; considers that European companies which relocate their production to countries with less stringent social obligations should be held liable, including before European courts, for any damage and negative externalities affecting local populations;
Amendment 41 #
2012/2224(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Asks the Commission and all donors to seek out innovative types of development funding and partnerships and to promote them; believes that a portion of the proceeds from the tax on financial transactions should be allocated to development aid; supports the establishment of south- south and three-way partnerships; recommends making more widespread use of interregional funding schemes such as the EU-Africa Infrastructure Trust Fund.
Amendment 51 #
2012/2149(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of continuing with the strengthening of transatlantic economic relations but without threatening EU policies, including in fields such as environmental standards, cultural diversity, social rights, public services or geographical indications, among others; emphasises that while the specific interests and sensitivities of both partners must be safeguarded in a balanced way, there are many areas where progress would be greatly beneficial, in particular as regards the removal of trade barriers, the introduction of measures to ensure better market access and appropriate investment conditions, the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR), the opening up of public procurement markets to ensure full reciprocity regarding the clarification, simplification and harmonisation of origin rules, and the convergence on mutual recognition of regulatory standards; considers that such an intensification of economic relations would also allow for greater alignment of EU and US approaches towards addressing global economic challenges;
Amendment 77 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Urges the VP/HR, the EEAS, the Council and the Commission, for the sake of efficiency, to ensure coherence between the various existing or planned EU benchmarking, monitoring and evaluation activities and methodologies regarding human rights and democracy situations in third countries, including, inter alia: the human rights and democracy sections in the enlargement and neighbourhood policy progress reports; the assessment of the ‘more for more’ human rights and democracy principles set out for the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Southern Mediterranean; the planned inclusion of human rights in impact assessments carried out for legislative and non-legislative proposals and for trade agreements, including human rights monitoring mechanisms in Partnership, partnership and association and Ccooperation Aagreements and Association Agreements, both regional and bilateral; the Commission plan to introduce human rights assessment in the deployment of EU aid modalities (in particular regarding budget support); the strengthened implementation of the monitoring mechanism to scrutinise implementation ofrespect for human rights conventions in the GSP+ countries; the aim of systematising the follow-up use of EU Election Observation Mission reports; and the EU Council’s emphasis on benchmarking as well as on continued and systematic consideration of aspects relating to human rights, gender and children affected by armed conflict in the lessons- learned documents of the CSDP missions;
Amendment 151 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Commends, in this context, the actions of the European Union and several Member States which took the lead in preventing further violence against civilians in Libya during the course of 2011, but regrets the lack of a concerted response at EU level; ; welcomes the efforts made by the European Union and the international community to this effect in Syria in 2011 and regrets that those efforts did not translate into an improvement in the situation on the ground;
Amendment 192 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
Paragraph 38
38. Welcomes the strengthened consultative role of the European Parliament’s Election Coordination Group (ECG), exercised for the first time in 2011, in the identification and planning of EU Election Observation Missions; expects Parliament’s democracy support activities to be further enhanced by the creation of an administrative directorate for democracy support under the political supervision of an creation of the Democracy Support Directorate within the European Parliament and the broadening of the mandate of its Election Coordination Group (ECG), which has now become the Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DSECG); expects Parliament’s democracy support activities to be further enhanced, not least via its Office for the Promotion of Parliamenltargedy Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DSECG)and its Election Observation Unit;
Amendment 250 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53
Paragraph 53
53. Is concerned by reports of certain EU companies cooperating with authoritarian regimes in providing them with free unlimited access to their networks and databases under the excuse of following the local law, as was the case with Swedish-Finnish company TeliaSonera in several former Soviet countries; is convinced that the protection of human rights should never compromised in European companies’ efforts to expand their markets abroadEuropean companies and their subsidiaries and subcontractors play a key role in the promotion and dissemination of social standards worldwide, and they should therefore act in accordance with European values and basic international social and environmental standards;
Amendment 257 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54
Paragraph 54
54. Emphasises the development of a strong and vibrant civil society as a key factor allowing for democratic progress and improved protection of human rights; notstresses that civil society was instrumental in bringing aboutthe mobilisation of civil society was at the root of the historic changes of the Arab Spring;
Amendment 259 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 55
Paragraph 55
55. Acknowledges EU efforts to step up support to civil society organisations; values particularly the ability of the European Union to engage directly with civil society through the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), the Civil Society Facility and the European Endowment for Democracy (EED); regrets, however, that EU does not have a stronger systematic policy to persuade partner countries to abolish undue legal and administrative restrictions that limit the universal rights of assembly and association; calls for such policy guidelines be developed;
Amendment 335 #
2012/2145(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 77 a (new)
Paragraph 77 a (new)
77a. Emphasises the crucial role played by women in the political life of the Southern Neighbourhood; welcomes election results that have resulted in a considerable increase in the number of women in political fora;
Amendment 115 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas nowhere in the world is China’s explosive growth more visible than in Africa, as illustrated by the impressive rise of China’s mutual trade volume by 80% to USD 166.3 billion between 2009 and 2011, according to Chinese statistics, as well as that of Chinese foreign direct investment in Africa, which rose by 58.9% in 2011 to USD 1.7 billion;
Amendment 120 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Joins with the public commitment made by the EU and China during their High- Level Strategic Dialogue of 9-10 July 2012 in Beijing to set a good example of international cooperation in the 21st century through their Strategic Partnership; supports and encourages the almost sixty sectoral dialogues between the EU and China with the conviction that an enhanced and highly developed partnership will be mutually beneficial to both the EU and China; wishes, however, to see a strengthening of these dialogues in the fields of the environment, security, energy and in particular the fight against counterfeit products, in view of its impact on public health and safety;
Amendment 281 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 c (new)
Paragraph 13 c (new)
13c. Welcomes the EU-China dialogue initiated in July 2012 on the Common Security and Defence Policy; proposes that this dialogue should be extended to include the entire Asia-Pacific region;
Amendment 302 #
2012/2137(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls on China, a member of the UN Security Council, to adopt a firm and constructive diplomatic position on the Syrian crisis and to consider the impact of this crisis on security, peace and stability, not only at regional, but also at international level;
Amendment 1 #
2012/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the Communication of 27 January 2012 from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee entitled ‘Trade, growth and development - Tailoring trade and investment policy for those countries most in need’ (COM(2012)0022),
Amendment 15 #
2012/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the financial and economic crisis has become intertwined with numerous other crises, such as the food, energy, environmental and social crises;
Amendment 23 #
2012/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the EU’s collective ODA decreased from EUR 53.5 billion in 2010 to EUR 53.1 billion in 2011, bringing the EU ODA level to 0.42% of GNI, down from the 2010 outcome of 0.44% of GNI; whereas the EU and its Member States nevertheless remain the world’s leading providers of ODA;
Amendment 26 #
2012/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the objective of the trade agreements signed by the EU with partner countries is, inter alia, to promote and expand trade and investment, and to improve market access, with a view to increasing economic growth and integration, reducing poverty, creating new employment opportunities, improving working conditions and raising living standards, and thereby ultimately contributing to the fulfilment of human rights;
Amendment 53 #
2012/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Y
Recital Y
Y. whereas remittances are an important, microfinance and foreign direct investment are means of alleviating the shock of the crisis on the economies of developing countries;
Amendment 57 #
2012/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital BA
Recital BA
BA. whereas the agricultural sector provides employment and livelihood for more than 70% of the labour force in developing countries; whereas the share of ODA allocated to agriculture is falling all the time and currently accounts for only 5 % of the total; whereas, in resource- poor low-income countries, growth in the agricultural sector is five times more effective in reducing poverty than growth in other sectors (eleven times in sub- Saharan Africa);
Amendment 84 #
2012/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Encourages developing countries to take advantage of trade preferences afforded by the EU within the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP+) framework in order to boost their economy, diversify their exports and improve their competitiveness; recalls their obligation, under the GSP+ arrangements, to ratify and implement the 27 core international human rights conventions;
Amendment 86 #
2012/2136(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Calls forWelcomes the introduction of a specific enforcement mechanism to monitor implementation of human rights clauses in ‘new generation’ bilateral and internatregional EU agreements signed by the EU; welcomes efforts to improve analysis of the human rights situation in third countries when launching or concluding trade and/or investment agreements;
Amendment 7 #
2012/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that each of the 27 Member States must accelerate the revision of their national action plans on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and the development of national plans implementing UN Guiding Principles, which should be finalised at the latest by December 2013; calls on the EU to facilitate learning from the experience of those EU States which are currently undergoing this process; encourages the Member States to draw inspiration from the guidelines contained in the ISO 26000 standard, the OECD Guidelines, the most recent version of the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines and guidance developed by the European Group of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs);
Amendment 18 #
2012/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. UWelcomes the adoption by the ILO on 14 June 2012 of Recommendation No 202 concerning national floors for social protection; undertakes to place the ‘human rights and business’ issue on the agendas of forthcoming EU meetings with third countries, especially with privileged relations partners, and requests that, if necessary, translations of the UN Guiding Principles be carried out using the EP’s or other EU institutions’ capacity;
Amendment 27 #
2012/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Reiterates its calls on the EU and the Member States to improve the enforcement of existing laws integrating ‘business and human rights’ concerns, and to develop further solutions aiming at a ‘level playing field’ for domestic and third countries’ business enterprises in order to combat social dumping;
Amendment 30 #
2012/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for human rights due diligence standards at EU level, addressing, among other issues, potentially high human rights impact and risk areas such as global and local supply chains, conflict minerals, and outsourcing; welcomes the programmes already set up by the EU, in particular the FLEGT programme in forestry, and supports private initiatives such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI);
Amendment 35 #
2012/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Requests that where the EU or Member States are partners of business (e.g. in public procurement, state-owned enterprises, joint ventures, ‘blending’, export credit guarantees, large scale projects in third countries), consistency with the UN Guiding Principles should be a priority, reflected in specific contractual clauses, and with consequences for companies blatantly violating human rights; recommends that the envisaged ‘EU Platform for External Cooperation and Development’ establish such modalities;
Amendment 39 #
2012/2098(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. AEmphasises that, given the size of their share of international trade, European companies, their subsidiaries and subcontractors play a key role in the promotion and dissemination of social and labour standards worldwide; considers that European companies which relocate their production to countries with less stringent social obligations should be held liable, including before European courts, for any damage and negative externalities affecting local populations; acknowledges that grievances against EU companies operating abroad are often more usefully solved in situ; commends the OECD National Contact Points as state- based non- legal mechanisms that can mediate over a broad range of business and human rights disputes; calls, however, for a greater effort by companies in developing grievance mechanisms aligned with the effectiveness criteria stated in the Guiding Principles;
Amendment 7 #
2012/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that each of the 27 Member States must accelerate the revision of their national action plans on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and the development of national plans implementing UN Guiding Principles, which should be finalised at the latest by December 2013; calls on the EU to facilitate learning from the experience of those EU States which are currently undergoing this process; encourages the Member States to draw inspiration from the guidelines contained in the ISO 26000 standard, the OECD Guidelines, the most recent version of the Global Reporting Initiative guidelines and guidance developed by the European Group of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs);
Amendment 18 #
2012/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. UWelcomes the adoption by the ILO on 14 June 2012 of Recommendation No 202 concerning national floors for social protection; undertakes to place the ‘human rights and business’ issue on the agendas of forthcoming EU meetings with third countries, especially with privileged relations partners, and requests, if necessary, that translations of the UN Guiding Principles be carried out using the EP’s or other EU institutions’ capacity;
Amendment 27 #
2012/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Reiterates its calls on the EU and the Member States to improve the enforcement of existing laws integrating ‘business and human rights’ concerns, and to develop further solutions aiming at a ‘level playing field’ for domestic and third countries’ business enterprises in order to combat social dumping;
Amendment 30 #
2012/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for human rights due diligence standards at EU level, addressing, among other issues, potentially high human rights impact and risk areas such as global and local supply chains, conflict minerals, and outsourcing; welcomes the programmes already set up by the EU, in particular the FLEGT programme in forestry, and supports private initiatives such as the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI);
Amendment 35 #
2012/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Requests that where the EU or Member States are partners of business (e.g. in public procurement, state-owned enterprises, joint ventures, ‘blending’, export credit guarantees, large scale projects in third countries), consistency with the UN Guiding Principles should be a priority, reflected in specific contractual clauses, and with consequences for companies blatantly violating human rights; recommends that the envisaged ‘EU Platform for External Cooperation and Development’ establish such modalities;
Amendment 39 #
2012/2097(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. AEmphasises that, given the size of their share of international trade, European companies, their subsidiaries and subcontractors play a key role in the promotion and dissemination of social and labour standards worldwide; considers that European companies which relocate their production to countries with less stringent social obligations should be held liable, including before European courts, for any damage and negative externalities affecting local populations; acknowledges that grievances against EU companies operating abroad are often more usefully solved in situ; commends the OECD National Contact Points as state- based non- legal mechanisms that can mediate over a broad range of business and human rights disputes; calls, however, for a greater effort by companies in developing grievance mechanisms aligned with the effectiveness criteria stated in the Guiding Principles;
Amendment 19 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the cumulative effect of these policies has resulted in a piecemeal approach whereby the principle of coherence and consistency between the different areas of EU external action and between these and other policies has not been duly integrarespected; whereas these different instruments have consequently become stand-alone elements and do not serve either the legal obligation to monitor the implementation of human rights clauses or the associated policy goal;
Amendment 33 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas technological change, increasing levels of education throughout many regions of the world, the advent of certain developing countries as regional powers, the creation of new multilateral forums such as the G-20 and the emergence of an interconnected global civil society all point to the need to strengthen the consistency and coherence of current instruments uander int boost their coopernational law and in the context of global governance in order to ensure respect for human rights, and put an end to impunity for human rights violations and improve the prospects for democracy across the world;
Amendment 34 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas free access to the Internet and telecommunications encourages free and democratic debate, may be a means of giving rapid warning of human rights violations, and should therefore be a priority in the EU’s external action in support of democracy and the defence of human rights;
Amendment 55 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. ConsiderEmphasises that the inclusion of countries in North Africa and the Middle East in the Council of Europe Neighbourhood Policy will provides complementary tools for an approximation of theirwith which to approximate legislative frameworks and encourage best practices in the area of human rights; notes that the recently agreed EU-Council of Europe joint programme for strengthening democratic reforms in the Southern neighbourhood is an example of the Council of Europe’s complementary expertise on constitutional, legal and institutional reformswelcomes the European Union’s support for these countries which makes it easier for civil society organisations to obtain aid;
Amendment 71 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 91 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Regrets once again the fact that Parliament is not involved in the decision- making process for initiating consultation or suspending an agreement; strongly insists, therefore, on being a joint decision-maker in this respect and on being involved in the implementation of the requested enforcement mechanism for the clause; is of the opinion that the EU institutions, including Parliament, should have specific procedures allowing for the questioning of agreements on the basis of a fact-based assessment of the human rights situation and its evolution in the countries concerned and the implementation of the requested enforcement mechanism for the clause;
Amendment 97 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Believes that the EU is addressing its obligations under the Lisbon Treaty and the Charter by preparing human rights impact assessments prior to the launch of negotiations on all bilateral or multilateral agreements with third countries; notes that this systematic practice is the only way to ensure consistency between primary law, EU external action and the third party’s own obligations under international conventions, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR); calls for these impact assessments to encompass the full range of human rights, understood as an indivisible whole; notes that they must be conducted in an independent, transparent and participatory manner, involving potentially affected communities; calls on the Commission and the EEAS to develop a robust methodology which enshrines the principles of equality and non- discrimination so as to avoid any negative impact on certain populations and which provides for mutually agreed preventive or remedial measures in the event of any negative impact, before negotiations are finalisedbegin;
Amendment 100 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Draws particular attention to the need to carry out impact assessments of those projects whose implementation carries a serious risk of violating the Charter's provisions, such as projects relating to the judiciary, border control agencies and police and security forces in countries governed by repressive regimes;
Amendment 110 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Recalls the policy lessons learned from the Arab Spring, including the need to reversbalance previous policies focused mainly on relations with authorities and to establish an effective partnership between the EU and the governments and civil societies of partner countries; stresses the importance of creating programmes anasks the Commission and the EEAS to build supporting projects that allow for contact between civil societies in the EU and in third countries; calls on the Commiss the capacity of civil societies to participate in decision-making processes at local, regional, national and the EEAS to use the model of aninternational level (for instance via the pioneering institutionalised civil society consultation mechanism set out in the EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement as a starting-point for the development of even more inclusive mechanisms for all agreements; understands the core of the EU’s new approach as strengthening societies by means of active domestic accountability so as to support their capacity to take part in public decision-making and democratic governance processes; believes that this domestic accountability); believes that this objective should become a central pillar of the external financial instruments currently under review;
Amendment 113 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23 a. Welcomes new inititaives like the European Endowment for Democracy (EED) and the Civil Society Facility (CSF) which render EU aid more accessible, especially to civil society organizations and which can catalyses a more strategic and political EU approach to democratisation through providing context-specific, flexible and timely assistance aimed at facilitating democratic transition in partner countries;
Amendment 117 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses that these events have demonstrated wilful bWelcomes the EU’s willindgness on the part of the EUto take a new approach to the realities of Arab Spring societies, including the situation of young people in those countries, which suggests the need to create exchange programmes or open up European programmes to Arab Spring youth, and for civil-society- based reflection on the causes and consequences of the lack of awareness in relatfaced with mass unemployment and a lack of prospects in their countries; insists that ongoing projects and exchange programmes need to be stepped up, particularly those initiated under the Union tofor these societies; points out that such Mediterranean; calls for reflectxion could be enhanced byon the establishment of a Euro-Arab Youth Convention;
Amendment 127 #
2012/2062(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. InsisPoints thato the High Representative and the Commission implement with conviction the renewed European Neighbourhood Policy by applying with equal attention the ‘more for more’ and ‘less for less’ principles; believes that countries clearly assessed as not making progreimplementation of the renewed European Neighbourhood Policy; welcomes the efforts made by the High Representative and the Commiss ion deep democracy should see the Union’s support reduced in line with the aims of this policy; is concerned about the perpetuation of past attitudes whereby excessive political reward is given for steps taken by partner governments which do not contribute to the direct achievement of the objectivesto see the ‘more for more’ principle applied fairly in line with the aims of this policy; insists nevertheless that the criteria used to assess progress by partner countries need to be clearly stipulated;
Amendment 1 #
2012/0309(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The imposition of the visa requirement on the nationals of Dominica, Grenada, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, the United Arab Emirates and Vanuatu is no longer justified. These countries do not present any risk of illegal immigration or a threat to public policy for the Union in accordance with the criteria set out in recital 5 of Regulation (EC) N° 539/2001. Consequently, nationals of those countries should be exempt from the visa requirement for stays of no more than three months in all and references to those countries should be transferred to Annex II.
Amendment 3 #
2012/0309(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) Exemption from the visa requirement for nationals of Dominica, Grenada, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, the United Arab Emirates and Vanuatu should not come into force until bilateral agreements on visa waiver between the Union and the countries concerned have been concluded in order to ensure full reciprocity.
Amendment 5 #
2012/0309(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
Article 1 – point 1 – point a
(a) in point 1, the references to Dominica, Grenada, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, the United Arab Emirates and Vanuatu are deleted and a reference to South-Sudan is inserted;
Amendment 8 #
2012/0309(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – point 2 – point a – two last references
Article 1 – point 2 – point a – two last references
"Tuvalu*", "United Arab Emirates*" and "Vanuatu*"
Amendment 24 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (hereinafter the 'Fund') should strengthen social cohesion by contributing to the reduction of poverty in the Union by supporting national schemes that provide non-financial assistance to the most deprived persons to alleviate food deprivation, homelessness and material deprivation ofand material deprivation, particularly among the homeless and children.
Amendment 37 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Citizens have the right to know how the Union’s financial resources are invested and to what effects. For the purpose of ensuring wide dissemination of information about the achievements of the Fund and to ensure accessibility and transparency of funding opportunities, detailed rules about information and communication, especially in relation to the responsibilities of the Member States and the beneficiaries, should be set out in such a way that the dignity of the end recipients is not undermined.
Amendment 41 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) Uniform and, equitable and simple rules on the eligibility period, operations and expenditures for the Fund should be applied across the Union. The conditions of eligibility should reflect the specific nature of the Fund’s objectives and target populations, notably through simple and adequate conditions of eligibility of the operations as well as forms of support and rules and conditions of reimbursement.
Amendment 46 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17 a (new)
Recital 17 a (new)
(17a) In order to ensure broad support within society for the most deprived persons and to tackle food waste, Member States should remove obstacles to the donation of food or basic consumer goods by firms to food banks, civil society organisations and other stakeholders.
Amendment 56 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Union budget commitments should be effected annually. In order to ensure effective programme management, it is necessary to lay down simple common rules for interim payment requests, the payment of the annual balance and the final balance.
Amendment 62 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 41 a (new)
Recital 41 a (new)
(41a) In order to ensure that delays in the implementation of this Regulation at the beginning of 2014 do not lead to a sudden drop-off in food aid, the Commission should take the transitional measures necessary to guarantee that persons dependent on food aid are not at risk of food poverty.
Amendment 63 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation establishes the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (hereinafter ‘the Fund’) for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 and determines the objectives of the Fund, the scope of its support, the financial resources available and the criteria for their allocation and lays down the rules necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the Fundat the Fund is effective and easy to implement.
Amendment 66 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 2
Article 2 – point 2
(2) '‘partner organisations'’ means public bodies or non-for-profit organisations that deliver the food orand possibly other essential goods directly or through other partner organisations to the most deprived persons, and whose operations have been selected by the managing authority in accordance with Article 29(3)(b);
Amendment 67 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 6
Article 2 – point 6
(6) '‘beneficiary'’ means a public or private bodynot-for-profit organisation or a public or private body, excluding commercial enterprises, responsible for initiating or initiating and implementing operations;
Amendment 74 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3
Article 3
The Fund shall promote social cohesion in the Union by contributing to achieving the poverty reduction target of at least 20 million of the number of persons at risk of poverty and social exclusion in accordance with the Europe 2020 strategy. The Fund shall contribute to achieving the specific objective of alleviating the worst forms of poverty in the Union, and first and foremost food insecurity, by providing non- financial assistance to the most deprived persons. This objective shall be measured by the number of persons receiving assistance from the Fund.
Amendment 78 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. The Fund shall support national schemes whereby food products and basic consumer goods for the personal use of the most deprived persons, in particular homeless persons or of children, are distributed to the most deprived persons through partner organisations selected by Member States.
Amendment 106 #
2012/0295(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
Article 6 – paragraph 1
1. The global resources available for budgetary commitment from the Fund for the period 2014-2020 shall be EUR 23 500 000 000 at 2011 prices, in accordance with the annual breakdown set out in Annex II.
Amendment 71 #
2012/0060(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) Directive 20104/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council16 contains only a few provisions concerning the external dimension of the public procurement policy of the Union, in particular Articles 85 and 86 . These provisions have a limited scope and should be replacedOnce this Regulation has been adopted, the Commission should assess whether there is a need to keep Articles 85 and 86 of Directive 2014/25/EU in the light of this Regulation coming into force and the consequences thereof. _________________ 16 Directive 2014/25/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, of February 2014 on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 243).
Amendment 177 #
2012/0060(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Amendment 265 #
2012/0060(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Amendment 3 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 7 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the DCFTA negotiations with Ukraine were completed in October 2011; whereas the DCFTA will only enter into force after the conclusion of the EU- Ukraine Association Agreement, which is currently blocked due to the EU’s discontent with Ukraine’s internal political developmentsworrying developments in the state of rights and freedoms in Ukraine;
Amendment 10 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas in 2011 Armenia made significant progress towards fulfthe DCFTA negotiations with Armenia were endorsed by the Councill ing the key recommendations, and DCFTA negotiations could therefore start in the foreseeable future February 2012 and the first rounds of negotiations could take place in the first half of 2012;
Amendment 18 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas Belarus has so far participated only in a limited way in the different platforms of the Eastern Partnership; whereas deepening relations between Belarus and the EU would greatly contribute to the fulfilment of the ultimate goal of the Eastern Partnership, which is strengthened democracy, progress, stability and prosperity in the EU’s Eastern neighbourhood;
Amendment 31 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recognises the short-term sacrificeignificant short-term and medium-term efforts that need to be made by the Eastern Partners in order to enhance their trade relations with the EU; emphasises that the support and involvement of civil society in promoting the long-term benefits is key for the success of the reform process;
Amendment 51 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines that a DCFTA is not assistance given to the Eastern Partners, it is a trade deal bringing about reciprocal advantages and obligations for both parties; stresses that DCFTAs would not only bring economic benefits for the Eastern Partners but can also accelerate institutional reforms, modernisation and development;
Amendment 71 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. CommendWelcomes Armenia for acceding to’s decision to rejoin the WTO Plurilateral Agreements on Public Procurement in SeptDecember 2011; is convinced that this step will beis beneficial for Armenia’s image as a reliable trading partner;
Amendment 89 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. WelcomNotes the maintenance of relative macroeconomic stability in Belarus, especially continuing production by big industrial units as well as the good performance of the food industry;
Amendment 104 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Is convinced that, in addition to real democratisation, deep institutional and structural reforms need to be carried out in order to start building a functioning, transparent and open market economy;
Amendment 124 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 57
Paragraph 57
57. Welcomes the conclusion of the negotiations on the DCFTA between the EU and Ukraine, as the first ever free trade agreement between the EU and an Eastern Partner; considers that this ground- breaking agreement and the experience gained during its negotiation will undoubtedly serve as a useful example in future DCFTA negotiations;
Amendment 135 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 61
Paragraph 61
61. Points out however that the application of the DCFTA will also bring about structural and political reforms; questionsupports in this regard the current EU position, which makes the political reforms a precondition for the conclusion of the Association Agreement and consequently the DCFTA; calls on the Commission to examine the possibilities of initialling and implementing the DCFTA regardless of the conclusion of the Association Agreement, i.e. as an ad interim agreement;
Amendment 141 #
2011/2306(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 68
Paragraph 68
68. Expresses its hope that Ukraine will find enough political will and courage to create political and regulatory conditions for full and timely implementation of the DCFTA, which would be of great benefit to its population;
Amendment 4 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
Citation 10 a (new)
– having regard to the Foreign Affairs Council Conclusions on the European Neighbourhood Policy adopted on June 20th, 2011 at its 3101st meeting,
Amendment 5 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard to the Foreign Affairs Council Conclusions on the European Endowment for Democracy adopted on December 1st 2011, at its 3130th meeting,
Amendment 6 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 12 a (new)
Citation 12 a (new)
– having regard to the letter of support to the establishment of the EED to EP President Jerzy Buzek and HR/VP Catherine Ashton dated November 25, 2011,
Amendment 11 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the European Parliament welcomed the initiative of establishment of the European Endowment for Democracy in the report by Véronique De Keyser, on behalf of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, on EU external policies in favour of democratisation (2011/2032(INI));
Amendment 12 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas the establishment of the EED was supported in the letter to EP President Jerzy Buzek and HR/VP Catherine Ashton by several high profile human rights defenders including Sakharov Prize laureates Aung San Suu Kyi and Alaksandr Milinkievic;
Amendment 15 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the events of the ‘Arab Spring’ demonstrated the need for a more informed and strategic engagement on the part of the EU with countries striving for democratic reforms, based on a new approach designed to restore credibility; whereas setting up the European Endowment for Democracy could be one of the most tangible responses of the EU to the challenges of democratisation in our neighbourhood and beyond;
Amendment 29 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the Foreign Affairs Council has endorsed the initiative of creating an European Endowment for Democracy (EED); whereas work is proceeding swiftly towards its establishment and there is urgent need to reach agreement on the detailed operational questions;
Amendment 49 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(ba) gain valuable experiences by a initial, although not exclusive, focus on the European Neighbourhood;
Amendment 51 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
Paragraph 1 – point b b (new)
(bb) enable the EED to develop effective ways to deal with pre-transition, transition, and post transition countries;
Amendment 55 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
Paragraph 1 – point d
(d) ensure that the EED plays a role which complements and does not overlap with or curtail the activities of existing funding instruments, particularly the EIDHR; where appropriate, the EED should launch projects which can later be continued by the EIDHR, creating an interface with the EIDHR so as to or geographic instruments, creating a programming interface that will ensure coherence and sustainability in the longer term;
Amendment 63 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
Paragraph 1 – point e
(e) enable the EED to act in the early stages ofree stages: pre-transition, transition and post transition, to kick-start projects which thus far could not be supported by the EU owing to bureaucratic restrictions; and model the EED in such a way that it is less risk-averse while respecting the financial regulations and legal restrictions of its donors;
Amendment 71 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
Paragraph 1 – point f
(f) address, in the early stages of funding in a specific country, a wide group of potential beneficiaries, including key political players (emerging political actors, fledgling political parties, grassroots movements and non-registered NGOs, trade unions), watchdogs, whistleblowers, individual dissidents, politically involved artists, media outlets and think tanks, etc., in order to enable the EED to support a wide variety of actors striving for democratic reforms; provide support to the above-mentioned in a pluralist manner, while at the same time avoiding any direct political party funding;
Amendment 79 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) To ensure that enough focus is placed, at all stages of operation of the EED, to the engagement of women and youth, as well as to innovative ways to use and render available social media;
Amendment 83 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) enable the EED to award grants directly to the intended beneficiaries and re-grant financial resources through non-profit entities, such as foundations and NGOs; particularly at the beginning, re-granting will be an effective mechanism to enable the EED to work with partners on the ground that have the requisite knowledge and local infrastructure and enjoy the trust of local people; re-granting would also limit the administrative burden of the EED and potential risks;
Amendment 98 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
Paragraph 1 – point j
(j) ensure that the EED has robust links and consults regularly with beneficiary groups, but without having regional offices, relying instead on local organisations or independent experts and practitioners;
Amendment 104 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
(ka) respect responsibilities towards individual donors and common accounting standards when public funds are channelled via an administratively flexible structure;
Amendment 113 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m
Paragraph 1 – point m
(m) endow the European Parliament with a broad political oversight role over EED activities, inter alia by ensuring that Parliament is kept informed through the presentation of the EED’s annual reportsthe full democratic right of budgetary control for the entire EED budget and assure that the implementation of measures by the EED is thoroughly and independently monitored and evaluated;
Amendment 120 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point m a (new)
(ma) allow for sufficient space of the European Parliament to share its creative power and transnational experience from European Member States in support to democratisation processes beyond Europe's borders;
Amendment 130 #
2011/2245(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o
Paragraph 1 – point o
(o) review after one year of activities the impact and performance of the EED and its complementary and added-value to EU instruments and their new set-up in the forthcoming financial period;
Amendment 1 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2
Citation 2
– having regard to the Commission Communications of 11 March 2003 on Wider Europe - Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours (COM(2003)0104), of 12 May 2004 on European Neighbourhood Policy - Strategy Paper (COM(2004)0373), of 4 December 2006 on Strengthening the ENP (COM(2006)0726), of 5 December 2007 on A Strong European Neighbourhood Policy (COM(2007)0774), of 3 December 2008 on Eastern Partnership (COM(2008)0823), of 20 May 2008 on The Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean (COM(2008)0319) and, of 12 May 2010 on Taking Stock of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) (COM(2010)0207) and of 24 May 2011 on ‘A dialogue for migration, mobility and security with the southern Mediterranean countries’ (COM(2011) 292),
Amendment 2 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
Citation 5
– having regard to the Foreign Affairs Council conclusions on ENP of 26 July 2010 and 20 June 2011, and to the Foreign Affairs Council (Trade) conclusions of 26 September 2011,
Amendment 5 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7
Citation 7
– having regard to the Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit of 7 May 2009 and that of the Warsaw Summit of 30 September 2011,
Amendment 8 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14 a (new)
Citation 14 a (new)
– having regard to Council Decision 2011/424/CFSP of 18 July 2011 appointing a European Union Special Representative for the Southern Mediterranean region2 and Council Decision 2011/518/CFSP of 25 August 2011 appointing the European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia3, __________________ 2 OJ L 188, 19.7.2011. 3 OJ L 211, 27.8.2011.
Amendment 10 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
Citation 16
– having regard to its resolutions of 19 January 2006 on the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP)2, of 15 November 2007 on strengthening the ENP3, of 6 July 2006 on the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI)4, of 5 June 2008 on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP5, of 19 February 2009 on the review of the ENPI6, of 19 February 2009 on the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean7, of 17 January 2008 on a Black Sea Regional Policy Approach8, of 20 January 2011 on an EU Strategy for the Black Sea9, of 20 May 2010 on the Union for the Mediterranean10, of 20 May 2010 on the Need for an EU Strategy for the South Caucasus11, of 9 September 2010 on the situation of the Jordan River, with special regard to the Lower Jordan River area12,of 3 February 2011 on the situation in Tunisia13, of 17 February 2011 on the situation in Egypt14, of 10 March 2011 on the Southern Neighbourhood, and Libya in particular, including humanitarian aspects15 and, of 7 July 2011 on Syria, Yemen and Bahrain in the context of the situation in the Arab World and North Africa, and of 15 September 2011 on the situation in Libya16 and the situation in Syria17, __________________ 16 Text adopted, P7_TA(2011)0386. 17 Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2011)0387.
Amendment 12 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
Citation 16 a (new)
– having regard to its Written Declaration of 4 April 2011 on the establishment of Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus and Leonardo da Vinci programmes,
Amendment 29 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas it is in the highest interest of the EU to be economadopt a mutually beneficially, ambitious and politically focused in its, responsible and flexible strategy based on support tofor democratic transitions,
Amendment 68 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that differentiation based on performance and achievements should be predicated on clearly defined criteria and assessable and regularly monitored benchmarks;
Amendment 74 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Although the EU does not seek to impose a model or a ready-made recipe for political reforms, uUnderlines that the ENP is based on shared values and the commitment to democracy, human rights, the rule of law and good governance;
Amendment 89 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. WelcomNotes the proposal for a European Endowment for Democracy, which is a timely response to the clamour for democracy by the populations of our neighbouring countries; underlines that it should be based on the principles of transparency and flexibility and should complement already-existing EU Instruments and the exemplary work of longstanding European political or non- political foundations; stresses that its scope and organisation should be clearly defined and that its structures and procedures should be light and straightforward; calls for a truly political steering committee to be established with the participation of the European Parliament, which should also be involved in the ex-post control mechanismsstresses that the Endowment should not hinder or duplicate the action already being taken by these foundations, or as part of existing European programmes, such as the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights; calls for a truly political steering committee to be established with the participation of the European Parliament, which should also be involved in the ex-post control mechanisms; proposes that the Endowment should support the establishment of a European programme to extend invitations to prominent individuals within the neighbourhood who are working to promote democracy;
Amendment 102 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the importance of building a partnership with societies and, in that context, takes note of the proposal forestablishment of a Civil Society Facility (CSF) as a way to target resources more effectively and efficiently towards civil society;
Amendment 113 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EEAS and the Commission, under their new ‘more for more’ performance-based approach, to continue to encourage all types of political reform, taking into account the needs and level of economic growth and social development of each partner country; calls on them to provide a clear methodology and detailed benchmarks to assess the democracy record of these ENP countries and to deliver regular sufficiently detailed reports, which should be the basis for the allocation of funds under the new performance- based approach ‘more for more’; asks for these reports to be presented annually to its Committee on Foreign Affairs; insists on the need to systematically include civil- society organisations at all stages of the review process;
Amendment 140 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Considers that human rights situations should be continuously monitored and that an annual assessment of the situation could be included in the annex to the annual progress report of each partner country with a clear mechanism to reconsider and progressively limit bilateral cooperation if human rights violations are confirmed;Does not affect English version
Amendment 159 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Strongly supports the promotion of sub-regional cooperation and stresses the importance of developing complementary partner-to- partner bilateral and multilateral economic cooperation, which would bring tangible benefits for citizens and improve the political climate in the region;
Amendment 171 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Underlines the opportunity that negotiations on association agreements provide to boost reforms; stresses that all the components should be linked in order for the EU to deepen its relationship in a holistic and coherent manner; believes that they should therefore include concrete conditions, timetables and performance benchmarks which should be regularly monitored;
Amendment 186 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Welcomes the reference to Article 49 of the TEU and believes that all partner countries of the Eastern Partnership (EaP) have a legitimate right to strive for EU membership; believes that the conclusion of association agreements does not exclude this perspectiveBelieves that the conclusion of association agreements does not affect the EU accession prospects of the Eastern Partnership countries but can, on the contrary, be an important step towards further European integration;
Amendment 204 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Reaffirms that, for the Southern partnership, the aim should be mutually beneficial and ambitious trade arrangements which can lead to DCFTAs, which will surely represent the first step towards a big ‘Euro-Mediterranean Economic Space’, which will also help to solve the economic problems of our neighboring partners in the South; and facilitate South-South integration; calls on the Commission and the Council to facilitate the implementation of the six packages of measures outlined in the Commission document of 30 March 2011 concerning the monitoring of trade and investment initiatives for the benefit of partners on the southern shore of the Mediterranean, namely: stepping up trade and the liberalisation of goods, continuing to work towards the conclusion of agreements on conformity assessment and acceptance of industrial products (ACAAs), liberalising services and establishment, ensuring that the Convention on pan- Euro-Mediterranean rules of origin enters into force rapidly, developing a Euro-Mediterranean mechanism to facilitate trade and investment, putting in place a large and comprehensive free trade area;
Amendment 212 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Notes thatBelieves that sharing a common area means sharing responsibilities fairly, and calls for closer cooperation, in particular with regard to all policies and issues entailing a cross-border dimension; calls, therefore, for the regional and cross- border dimensions of sectoral cooperation shouldto be strengthened;
Amendment 225 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Recalls that the EU should improve the management of migration, inter alia by providing better conditions for the establishment of legal migrants in the EU; considers that the EU needs to favour legal labour migration by concluding mobility partnerships which take account of the demographic, sociological and occupational balance on both sides;
Amendment 237 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Underlines the importance of paying particular attention to the younger generatio people, in particular young women; stresses that the EU should increase cooperation in the field of education, immediately broadening and increasing scholarship programmes and mobility of students and of teachers and lecturers by promoting university and high-school exchanges and public-private partnerships in the field of research; stresses the strong need for a structuredneed to strengthen the information policy towards the citizens of the ENP partners concerning the possibility of participation in EU programmes, inter alia by translating key information into their own languages;
Amendment 245 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. Calls on the Commission to take over Parliament’s proposal, produced in the wake of the Arab Spring, to establish a Euro-Mediterranean Leonardo da Vinci programme aimed at encouraging the mobility of young people wishing to acquire vocational training abroad, the object being to help combat the youth unemployment endemic to the southern Mediterranean;
Amendment 272 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Recalls the importance of cofinancing specific tangible regional projects to contribute to a shared process of development and integration; in this regard, welcomes the opportunity offered by the establishmentreactivation of the UfM to strengthen complementarity between bilateral policies and regional policies, in order to achieve more effectively the goals of Euro-Mediterranean cooperation, based on the mutual recognition of common values and on the establishment of an area of peace, security, and prosperity; proposes that the projects be aimed first and foremost at young people, specifically in four priority areas, namely the development of sustainable energy sources, civil cooperation, mobility (through the Mediterranean Office for Youth), and the development of SMEs; calls for an increase in ENP funding to enable the UfM to function on a permanent basis; calls for Libya to join the UfM as quickly as possible;
Amendment 300 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Welcomes the work that international organisations, particularly the OSCE and UN agencies, carry out on the ground in conflict and post-conflict situations and in promoting sustainable development throughout the neighbourhood, notably the long-standing commitment of UNRWA to Palestinian refugees;
Amendment 305 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Stresses that the European Parliament plays an important role, through its parliamentary delegations and its delegations to parliamentary assemblies, in strengthening political dialogue and promoting fully-fledgedndamental freedoms, democratic reforms and the rule of law in its neighbouring partner countries and underlines that these contacts could also be a way to assess the fulfilment of the forthcoming criteria;
Amendment 311 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Welcomes the proposal for the new European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) and the increase of funding for the ENP, as requested in its previous resolutions; considers that the distribution of funds should be flexible and adequate for both regions, with an approach that is driven by performance-driven and objective needs and not geographically driven; hopes, however, that the interpretation of this new ‘more for more’ approach will be such as to ensure that the most fragile democratic reforms can continue to be encouraged; notes that more flexibility and simplification should respect the right of democratic scrutiny and be accompanied by increased supervision of the spending;
Amendment 335 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 a (new)
Paragraph 33 a (new)
33a. Welcomes the decision of the G8 member countries to increase loan facilities for Southern partnership countries which have embarked on a democratic transition; considers that the commitments entered into in the ‘Deauville Partnership’ on 27 May 2011 are likely to encourage financial mobilisation in support of democracy and development in the EU’s partner countries;
Amendment 341 #
2011/2157(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Welcomes the work carried out by the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and underlines the importance of and the need for more synergies with other national and international financial institutions also active in these countries; supports the modification of the EBRD’s statutes in order for the Southern neighbourhood partners also to be eligible for its assistance;
Amendment 1 #
2011/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3
Citation 3
– having regard to its earlier resolutions, in particular resolution of 13 October 2005 on prospects for trade relations between the EU and China, the resolution of 1 June 2006 on EU-US transatlantic economic relations, the resolution of 28 September 2006 on the EU’s economic and trade relations with India, the resolution of 12 October 2006 on economic and trade relations between the EU and Mercosur with a view to the conclusion of an Interregional Association Agreement, the resolution of 22 May 2007 on Global Europe – external aspects of competitiveness, the resolution of 19 June 2007 on EU economic and trade relations with Russia, the resolution of 19 February 2008 on the EU’s Strategy to deliver market access for European companies, the resolution of 24 April 2008 on ‘Towards a reform of the World Trade Organisation’, the resolution of 5 February 2009 on Trade and economic relations with China, the resolution of 26 March 2009 on an EU- India Free Trade Agreement, the resolution of 21 October 2010 on the European Union’s trade relations with Latin America, the resolution of 17 February 2011 on the Free Trade Agreement between the EU and the Republic of Korea, the resolution of 6 April 2011 on European international investment policy, the legislative resolution of 10 May 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countries, the resolution of 11 May 2011 on the state of play in the EU-India Free Trade Agreement negotiations, the resolution of 11 May 2011 on EU-Japan Trade relations, the resolution of 8 June 2011 on EU- Canada trade relations, andthe resolution of 13 September 2011 on an effective raw materials strategy for Europe20, the resolution of XX September 2011 on the New Trade Policy for Europe under the Europe 2020 Strategy, __________________ and the resolution of XX XXXX 2011 on modernisation of public procurement21, __________________ 20 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2011)0364. 21 Texts adopted, P7_TA- PROV(2011)XXXX.
Amendment 11 #
2011/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the difficulties of EuropeaEuropean manufacturers have difficulty penetrating the Japanese market, particularly in the automotive, aviation manufacturers od aeronautics sectors and especially in relation to public procurement; whereas, in Japan'’s car market are also, these difficulties are chiefly due to the slow pace of adoption by Japan of the relevant international standards, considering that Japan has adopted only 40 out of the 126 UN-ECE Regulations under the 1958 Agreement and that the slow pace of adoption by Japan restricts the benefits of the mutual recognition provisions of the 1958 UN- ECE Agreement; whereas Japan's test cycle to measure emissions and fuel efficiency of light vehicles makes European ones less likely to qualify for the Japanese environmental performance- based tax incentive, the EU-Japan Regulatory Reform Dialogue (RRD), launched in 1994, has not yet led to any significant progress on harmonisation or mutual recognition of regulations;
Amendment 16 #
2011/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) ought to be an effective tool for ensuring transparency and combating speculation on commodity markets;
Amendment 18 #
2011/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas Brazil and Argentina regularly adopt tariff and non-tariff measures that affect European companies unfavourably although they are both involved, as members of Mercosur, in negotiating a free trade agreement with the EU; whereas, moreover, deficiencies in Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) protection and enforcement and the considerable registration backlog in patent and trademark applications affecting various goods, including additional discriminatory requirements for pharmaceuticals, have beenare reported by EU companies at entry to the Brazilian market,; and considering that the delay in the ratification by Brazil of the Madrid Protocol and the non-accession to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) Internet Treaties are both affecting the effective protection of IPR in the country, and considering that sanctions are not deterrent enough to combat IP infringements;
Amendment 20 #
2011/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas under EU law European and foreign companies can tender for European public contracts without discrimination, and whereas the Union’s partners should do their utmost to grant European companies reciprocal authorisation to tender for public contracts in third countries on fair and equitable terms;
Amendment 23 #
2011/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that removing or reducing NTBs and other unjustified regulatory obstacles should be the keya regulatory priority of the new EU trade policy under the Europe 2020 Strategy;
Amendment 35 #
2011/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that insistence on reciprocity of market access for industrialised and emerging countries should be an integral part of EU trade strategy, on a par with the removal or lowering of NTBs;
Amendment 47 #
2011/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that the Commission should duly explore the possibility of developing and establishing an early warning mechanism to detect NTBs and strengthen its existing analytical tools for a qualitative evaluation thereof; proposes that this mechanism should work via the Commission delegations based in third countries, in cooperation with the bodies already set up by Member States;
Amendment 48 #
2011/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that the Commission should duly explore the possibility of developing and establishing an early warning mechanism to detect unjustified NTBs and strengthen its existing analytical tools for a qualitative evaluation thereof;
Amendment 54 #
2011/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Believes that one of the keys to lowering NTBs to trade and investment is reform of the Government Procurement Agreement in the WTO, with due regard to the multifunctional nature of procurement policies; calls on the major emerging economies to participate in this process and to sign and ratify the future agreement without delay;
Amendment 58 #
2011/2115(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Encourages EU businesses and exporters to make use of the existing channels, including the TBR complaints or the complaints register in the Market Access Database, to report material injuries resulting from all kinds of unjustified trade barriers;
Amendment 1 #
2011/2113(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph A a (new)
Paragraph A a (new)
Aa. whereas it is in the highest interest of the European Union to aim high regarding economic cooperation and to adopt a strategy that is mutually beneficial, responsible and flexible, based on support for democratic transition and the defence of human rights;
Amendment 13 #
2011/2113(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Urges the Commission to adopt a strategy that strengthens its role as an investor by developing specific guidelines for responsible investment, with a view to reducing social inequalities and territorial gaps and promoting the diversification of local economies, and; urges it, in this context, to take account of the investment programmes already deployed in the region (in particular programmes by national agencies in Member States, the Deauville Partnership, the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development), in order to ensure their coherence and to optimise the efficiency of its own strategy; stresses that combating corruption at all levels should be a top priority for the EU in the development of trade and financial relations with its Southern partners;
Amendment 4 #
2011/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates that customs are of vital importance to international trade and to the competitiveness of the European Union as they a play a unique role in combating the illegal entrymport, export and illegal transit of goods and counterfeiting;
Amendment 10 #
2011/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes there is a need for modernisation measures such as simpler customs legislation and interoperable computerised customs systems which will help facilitate commercial practices; expresses the wish for the work in progress on updating the Customs Code to stress the central role of eliminating customs declarations in order to facilitate trade;
Amendment 18 #
2011/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need for consistency in the management of the EU’s external borders; reiterates its call on the Commission and the Member States to step up harmonisation of customs control systems on the one hand, and sanctions on the other hand, in order to ensure the uniform enforcement of EU rules and respect for consumers;
Amendment 22 #
2011/2083(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the activation of the cooperation agreement on the mutual recognition of AEO between the European Union and Japan; encourages the Commission to be fully attentive to the role of Parliament when negotiating similar agreements with other major partners, such as the USA, Canada, China and Russia, and to include this element in the negotiations on bilateral trade agreements; emphasises the value of stepping up customs cooperation with Russia and the Eastern Partnership and Mediterranean Partnership countries in order to facilitate trade and combat fraud.
Amendment 14 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the importance of trade in raw materials for economic growth and calls for an integrated raw materials diplomacy to be developed by the EU, based on its industrial policy agenda and in line with its development and environment policy; also calls on the Commission to create synergies between all the European policies and stakeholders concerned, for example by setting up national strategic metals committees which bring together the public authorities, the companies – including SMEs – operating in this sector and civil society;
Amendment 17 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission, therefore, to produce a study on Europe’s imports of raw materials which, though not listed as critical (for example lithium, hafnium and nickel) are nevertheless of strategic importance in terms of meeting Europe’s industrial needs and producing consumer goods with high added value; the study should also assess our industries’ dependence on these raw materials and measures to secure their supply, as well as the environmental cost of extracting them and the alternatives which might be envisaged;
Amendment 21 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to ensure access to raw materials and rare earths through fair trade and investment agreements and strategic trade partnerships that will allow developing countries to diversify and industrialise their economies; calls on the Commission in this context to incorporate compliance with ILO standards and international environmental standards into trade agreements;
Amendment 37 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to draw up rules on the social responsibility of European undertakings involved in the mining of raw materials in source countries; calls for these rules to include the principle of supply chain due diligence set out in the 2010 OECD Due Diligence Guidance;
Amendment 47 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. CIs concerned about the continuing trade in, and use of, minerals from conflict zones, whose production gives rise to unacceptable violence and illegal activities; calls on the Commission, the EEAS, the Council and the Member States to take this situation into account in the context of their relations with third countries; calls on the Commission to further develop raw materials traceability systems and to introduce a binding certification scheme for raw materials and trading chains (Certified Trading Chains), so that trade can be guaranteed to be fair; calls on the Commission to cooperate with the relevant international institutions (UN, OECD, ILO) with a view to identifying, and endeavouring to harmonise, the best certification practices;
Amendment 54 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures to ensure there is transparency on commodity markets and to act against commodities speculation; considers, in particular, that the possibilities of recycling, substitutability and the efficient use of resources should be explored with that end in view, and that the Commission should promote and initiate R&D projects in those fields;
Amendment 69 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Deplores the attitude of third countries, particularly China, which use their position as dominant suppliers to distort the world raw materials market; encourages the Commission to seek solutions at bilateral level and, where appropriate, hold consultations with the countries in question or indeed resort to trade defence instruments; supports the recent effort of the EC to call for a WTO panel; hopes that the WTO will send a strong signal to members not to abuse alleged development or environmental policies as justifications for export restrictions; encourages the EC to resort to TDIs when necessary;
Amendment 73 #
2011/2056(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that substantial quantities of recyclable waste and waste that contains raw materials which should be identified and recycled are still being exported from the EU; calls on the Commission to take all possible steps to put a stop to illegal exports and to incorporate EU-equivalent recycling standards into international agreements; calls on the Member States to significantly reinforce export control regimes.
Amendment 4 #
2011/2048(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. calls for the States Parties to the Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) to conclude the reform of that agreement as rapidly as possible to encourage greater fairness and transparency at international level by combating corruption more effectively while respecting the multi-functional nature of procurement policies; calls on those States to keep their reservations – be they territorial or sector-specific – within reasonable bounds when ratifying the future agreement; calls on non-member countries, especially those with which the EU does not have, or is not negotiating, a free trade agreement, to participate in the current revision process and afterwards to ratify the future agreement;
Amendment 10 #
2011/2048(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. stresses that in a context of increased international competition, European undertakings stand out through their capacity for innovation, the high technology they develop and the quality of the social and environmental standards they apply; calls for the Commission to encourage the recognition within the GPA of criteria in addition to price in the award of public procurement contracts; calls on the Commission to apply additional criteria of that kind when negotiating free trade agreements with non-GPA countries, taking into account the level of development of the other parties concerned when selecting and defining those criteria; considers that better rules on public procurement would make for the creation of more high- quality jobs, support for European industrial policy and the promotion of sustainable environmental and social development;
Amendment 31 #
2011/2048(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. considers that the European market cannot, on a unilateral basis, be open to third-country operators and calls for the Commission to establish an effective toolinstrument on the one hand to introduce greater reciprocity vis-à-vis States – members of the GPA or otherwise – which do not provide equivalent access to European operators and, secondly, to guarantee fair competition and a level playing field worldwide.
Amendment 75 #
2011/0412(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Furthermore, whilst democracy and human rights objectives must be increasingly mainstreamed in all external assistance financing instruments, Union assistance under this Regulation will have a specific complementary and additional role by virtue of its global nature and its independence of action from the consent of third country governments and other public authorities. This will allow for cooperation with civil society on sensitive human rights and democracy issues possible, providing the flexibility and adaptability necessary to respond to changing circumstances and the needs of recipients. It should also provide Union capacity to articulate and support specific objectives and measures at international level which are neither geographically linked nor crisis related and which may require a transnational approach or involve operations both within the Union and in a range of third countries. Moreover, it will provide the necessary framework for operations, such as support for independent European Union election observation missions requiring policy coherence, a unified management system and common operating standards.
Amendment 88 #
2011/0412(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
(16) European Union Election Observation Missions contribute significantly and successfully to democratic processes in third countries. However, the promotion of democracy extends far beyond the electoral process alone. Expenditure forU assistance provided under this Regulation should be fairly distributed between election observation missions shouland otherefore not take up a disproportionate amount of the total funding available under this Regulation measures for the promotion of democracy.
Amendment 55 #
2011/0406(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The Union also aims to ensure coherence with other areas of its external action and to use the resources available efficiently so as to optimise their impact. This should be ensured when formulating the Union's development cooperation policy and its strategic planning programming and implementation of measures
Amendment 63 #
2011/0406(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) promoting democracy, the rule of law, good governance and respect for human rights and international conventions and the principles of international law regarding social and environmental standards.
Amendment 69 #
2011/0406(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 4
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. Particular attention shall be given to strengthening the rule of law, improving access to justice and supporting civil society, trade and sustainable development, access to ICTs, health and food security, as well as promoting dialogue, participation and reconciliation, and institution-building. at national, regional and local level.
Amendment 74 #
2011/0406(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 10
Article 3 – paragraph 10
10. The Commission shall seek regular consultations and exchanges of information with civil societyall parties concerned (governments and agencies of recipient countries, civil society, EU delegations, international, national or private organisations) in order to formulate and implement jointly the commercial aspect of their development strategies. It shall render an account of the result of these consultations to the European Parliament.
Amendment 88 #
2011/0406(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex IV – part A – point I – point g
Annex IV – part A – point I – point g
(g) Natural resources, particularly raw materials; and
Amendment 91 #
2011/0405(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) A number of major developments have taken place since the European Neighbourhood Policy was launched and the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument was set up. These include a deepening of the relationship with the partners, the launch of regional initiatives and democratic transition processes in the region, in particular in the countries on the southern shores of the Mediterranean following the events of the Spring of 2011. This triggered a new European Neighbourhood Policy vision set out in 2011 as a result of a comprehensive Strategic Review of the Policy. It outlines key objectives for Union cooperation with Neighbourhood countries and provides for greater support to partners committed to building democratic societies and undertaking reforms, in line with the ‘more for more’ and ‘mutual accountability’ principles.
Amendment 92 #
2011/0405(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) In order to be able to fulfil the objectives of the European Neighbourhood Policy, it is essential to ensure that the breakdown of the available funds between the southern and eastern strands of the policy is based on the size of the population of each regional bloc.
Amendment 112 #
2011/0405(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) In view of the changes under way in the southern neighbourhood, an integrated Euro-Mediterranean policy is needed in order to ensure economic and social convergence between the two sides of the Mediterranean.
Amendment 119 #
2011/0405(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The Joint EU – Africa Strategy is of major relevance, in particular in security terms, for relations with the Mediterranean neighbours from North Africa which border onto the Sahel strip.
Amendment 136 #
2011/0405(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) The Union is committed to promote in relations with its partners worldwide decent work and corporate social responsibility, as well as ratification and effective implementation of the internationally recognised labour standards and multilateral environment agreements, in relations with its partners worldwide.
Amendment 177 #
2011/0405(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) creating conditions for well managed mobility of people andwith a view to the promotion of people-to-people contacts, including by means of academic partnerships (students, researchers, university teaching staff) and professional partnerships (parliaments, government bodies including customs services, and businesses);
Amendment 4 #
2011/0307(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In order to provide for enhanced transparency of payments made to governments, issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and which have activities in the extractive or logging of primary forest industries should disclose in a separate report on an annual basis payments made to governments in the countries in which they operate. The report should includis disclosure should be annexed to the annual financial statements and mention, by country and project the types of payments comparable to those disclosed under the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) an. This disclosure should provide civil society and investors with information to hold governments of resource-rich countries to account foron the management by the governments concerned of their receipts from the exploitation of natural resources. The initiative is also complementary to the EU FLEGT Action Plan (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade) and the Timber Regulation which require traders of timber products to exercise due diligence in order to prevent illegal wood from entering into the EU market. The detailed requirements are defined in Chapter 9 of Directive 2011/../EU of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Amendment 5 #
2011/0307(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2004/109/CE
Article 6
Article 6
Member States shall require issuers active in the extractive or logging of primary forest industries, as defined in […] to prepare, on an annual basis and in accordance with Chapter 9 of Directive 2011/../EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (*), a reportdisclosure on a country-by-country and project-by-project basis on payments made to governments on , where a project means annual basis. The report shall be contract, licence, lease or other legal agreement under which an undertaking operates, which gives rise to specific revenue liabilities. This disclosure shall be annexed to the annual financial statements and made public at the latest six months after the end of each financial year and shall remain publicly available for at least five years. Payments to governments shall be reported at consolidated level.
Amendment 6 #
2011/0307(COD)
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 a (new)
Article 2 a (new)
Amendment 31 #
2011/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Citation 1
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(2) and Article 349 thereof,
Amendment 34 #
2011/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) The Commission undertakes to make diligent and effective use of the Stabilisation Mechanism for Bananas in order to avoid any damage to producers in the Union and, after January 2020, to maintain – if necessary – a system which, in the event of serious market disruption, will make it possible to preserve production sectors in the Union and particularly in the outermost regions.
Amendment 46 #
2011/0263(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Two years before the end of the application period referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall assess the impact of the application of the Stabilisation Mechanism, forward its assessment to the European Parliament and the Council, and consider the possibility of extending the application of the provisions of this article.
Amendment 25 #
2011/0262(COD)
Draft legislative resolution
Citation 1
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(2) and Article 349 thereof,
Amendment 29 #
2011/0262(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) The Commission should undertake to use the Stabilisation Mechanism for Bananas diligently and effectively to avoid damaging EU producers and, after January 2020, to maintain, if necessary, a mechanism enabling – in case of serious market disturbances – Union production pathways to be protected, especially those in the outermost regions.
Amendment 39 #
2011/0262(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Two years before the end of the period of application referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission shall carry out an impact study concerning the application of the Stabilisation Mechanism, which it shall forward to the European Parliament and the Council, and shall consider the possibility of extending the application of the provisions of this article.
Amendment 57 #
2011/0117(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) it has been classified by the World Bank as a high-income or an upper-middle income country, or it has accounted for a share of world merchandise exports above 1%, during three consecutive years immediately preceding the update of the list of beneficiary countries;
Amendment 1 #
2010/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10
Citation 10
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled ‘A Single Market for Intellectual Property Rights’ of 24 May 2011, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights3, the Commission report of 14 July 2011 on EU customs enforcement of intellectual property rights and the European Parliament resolution of 18 December 2008 on the impact of counterfeiting on international trade3, __________________ 3 COM(2011) 285.
Amendment 2 #
2010/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
Citation 11 a (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 13 December 2011 on trade and investment barriers 6, __________________ 6 Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2011)0565.
Amendment 3 #
2010/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 13
Citation 13
Amendment 5 #
2010/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 14
Citation 14
– having regard to its resolution of 24 April 2008 on ‘Towards a reform of the World Trade Organization’5, and its resolution of 14 September 2011 on the state of play of the negotiations on the Doha Development Agenda6, __________________ 6 Texts Adopted, P7_TA- PROV(2011)0380.
Amendment 7 #
2010/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
Citation 15
Amendment 8 #
2010/2301(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
– having regard to the Chinese Government’s White Paper of 23 December 2010 on China-Africa economic and trade cooperation,
Amendment 36 #
2010/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas European businesses struggle to access the Chinese market because of interventionist industrial policies, inadequate protection of intellectual property, a system of rules which is ambiguous in terms of both the substance of the rules and their application, plus other non-tariff and technical barriers to trade;
Amendment 69 #
2010/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Is concerned at the lack of predictability and publicity in connection with the technical rules and standards applicable to products, particularly in relation to certification, creating significant trade barriers for businesses exporting to China;
Amendment 78 #
2010/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Is concerned about the problems foreigEuropean businesses encounter in accessing Chinese public procurement whereas access to European public procurement is guaranteed; regrets that China has not acceded to the plurilateral Agreement on Government Procurement (AGP) even though it committed to do so in its protocol on accession to the WTO; calls onfor the Commission to make haste in developingdraw up a new proposal quickly in accordance with the AGP provisions agreed on 15 December 2011, covering in particular state, national, regional and local enterprises and services; calls on the Commission to submit in early 2012 a European instrument to ensure better access for European businesses to foreign public procurement markets and to encourage the EU’s trading partners, such as China, to open up their public procurement markets and eliminate protectionist measures;
Amendment 152 #
2010/2301(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Emphasises China’s growing influence in the theatre of international trade and trade at regional level, given that China is the main trading partner of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) ; calls on the EU therefore to remain vigilant concerning the economic, social and environmental impact of increasing Chinese investment in developing countries, particularly in Africa and in the rest of Asia;
Amendment 1 #
2010/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Recalls that the EU has set itself the objective not only of becoming a Pole of Excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility but also of promoting CSR in its external policies;
Amendment 2 #
2010/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 a (new)
Paragraph -1 a (new)
-1a. Considers that failure to comply with basic international social standards constitutes a form of social and environmental dumping to the detriment of European enterprises and workers;
Amendment 3 #
2010/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers it necessary to enhance the role of the relevant international institutions (particularly the ILO and WTO, WTO, OECD and United Nations) and seek their cooperation in the development, implementation and promotion of basic international social standards and corresponding penalties;
Amendment 6 #
2010/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to systematically include a chapter on sustainable development containing a legally binding CSR clause in the free trade and investment agreements it negotiates with third countries, specifically covering compliance with the ILO’s eight core conventions and four priority conventions;
Amendment 7 #
2010/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Proposes that this CSR clause should cover compliance with the ILO’s eight core conventions and four priority conventions and also provide incentives to enterprises to enter into CSR commitments and an obligation of diligence for enterprises and groups of enterprises, i.e. an obligation to take proactive measures to identify and prevent any violation of human rights and environmental rights, corruption or tax evasion, including in their subsidiaries and supply chains, i.e. their sphere of influence;
Amendment 10 #
2010/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls also on the Commission, during the negotiations, to adapt the level of its requirements to the degree of development of each partner country; proposes in this context that the Commission draw up a list of additional standards which should be introduced gradually and flexibly, taking account of the economic, social and environmental situation of the partner concerned;
Amendment 14 #
2010/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that the implementation of these basic standards by partner countries should be subject to continuous monitoring, and that effective and transparent procedures should be in place to penalise non-enforcement or infringements in the territory of the partner country and in the Member States;
Amendment 17 #
2010/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Considers that these standards should be applied in full and that neither free zones nor host country agreements can be used to escape them;
Amendment 20 #
2010/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that, given the size of their share of international trade, European companies and their subsidiaries and subcontractors play a key role in the promotion and dissemination of social and labour standards worldwide, and they should therefore act in accordance with European values and internationally recognised standards; considers that it would be normal if it were possible for European enterprises which relocate their production to countries with less stringent social obligations to be held liable, including before European courts, for any damage and negative externalities affecting local populations;
Amendment 24 #
2010/2205(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Wants the Commission, in its future communication on the internationalisation of SMEs’ activities, to propose measures that help support and promote their initiatives in the field of CSR that respect the ‘think small first' principle and take account of their specific circumstances.
Amendment 35 #
Amendment 56 #
2010/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Reiterates that the multilateral trading system, embodied in the WTO, remains by far the best framework for achieving free and fair trade on a global basis; considers, however, that the WTO system, in particular the Dispute Settlement Body, should be reformed in order to increase its effectiveness, and that the EU should develop proposals to strengthen the WTO and to extend its rulemaking capacity to new areas of trade policy (e.g. prohibition of export taxes);
Amendment 73 #
2010/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Reiterates that all new FTAs concluded by the EU should be WTO-compatible, comprehensive, ambitious, including with regard to sustainable development, lead to real reciprocal market access and go beyond both existing multilateral commitments and those expected to result from a successful conclusion of the DDA; welcomes the progress made in some negotiations; at the same time regrets that most of the negotiations have not been concluded yet; asks the Commission to analyse what could be done or changed in order to conclude outstanding FTA negotiations better and faster; asks the Commission to analyse the possibility of including WTO dispute settlement mechanisms in bilateral Free Trade Agreements; asks the Commission to reduce the spaghetti-bowl effect, e.g. by negotiating multilateral rules of origin;
Amendment 118 #
2010/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Reiterates that the pursuit of further trade liberalisation makes it all the more necessary for the EU to preserve its ability to protect itself against unfair trading practices; regards Trade Defence Instruments (TDI) therefore as an indispensable component of the EU’s strategy; welcomes all efforts to streamline and speed up its TDI procedures and accessibility for Union industry, especially SMEs;
Amendment 157 #
2010/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Asks that the Commission work towards positive reciprocal access in that important economic sector, bearing in mind that the clear priority in reciprocal access is not to close our markets, but to open up foreign public procurement markets; agrees that the introduction of deliberately targeted restrictions against selected non-GPA-countries on access to parts of the EU procurement market may be needed to encourage positive reciprocity;
Amendment 171 #
2010/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Notes that outside Europe, with regard to external policy, Parliament supports the Commission in its goal to promote - inter alia - sustainable development, international labour standards and decent work, for example by negotiating EPAs, which combine European and ACP interests, by fostering development by promoting regional integration, creating opportunities for trade and investment and improving economic governance, reminding all stakeholders that other regions of the globe have shown how trade can contribute to welfare; asks the Commission for an integrated approach on trade, foreign, development, social and environmental policies;
Amendment 194 #
2010/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Commission to pursue a consistent trade policy concerning raw materials with the aim of thepreventing and elimination ofng unfair trade practices such as export restrictions, export taxes and so- called dual pricing mechanisms at multilateral and bilateral level;
Amendment 208 #
2010/2152(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
Paragraph 38
38. Stresses that counterfeiting and piracy result in job losses and undermine innovation, and stresses that adequate IPR protection and effective enforcement are the bedrock of a global economy; regards the appropriate protection of IPRs, including trademarks and geographical indications, by our main trading partners as an indispensable requirement for preserving and improving the EU’s competitiveness, and welcomes the Commission’s commitment to strengthening IPR provisions in international trade agreements and the enforcement of existing commitments;
Amendment 11 #
2010/2110(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the agreement on trade in bananas, which settles twenty years of WTO disputes and constitutes an important step towards the consolidation of a rule- based multilateral trading system; notes that the agreement on trade in bananas makes a decisive contribution to the resolution of issues relating to tropical products and preferences in WTO negotiations; believes that this agreement fur, however, that the interests of Community producers and their consolidates the EU’s position on agriculture in the Doha round; calls upon the EU to build upon this important breakthrough to push WTO negotiations forwarACP partners should be taken into account in the next trade negotiations so that these sectors, which provide numerous jobs, are not weakened;
Amendment 15 #
2010/2110(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the outermost regions are an integral part of EU territory and all international trade agreements are applied to them; stresses that their fragile economies are mainly based on agriculture, and their production covers the same areas of production as the Latin- American partners in particular and is therefore jeopardised by lower customs tariffs; points out that Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union allows for adjustment of Community policies to the geographic and economic realities of these regions; therefore calls on the Commission to take the specific constraints of the outermost regions into account in the framework of its negotiations so that their development is not undermined;
Amendment 138 #
2010/0310M(NLE)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Calls for its Democracy Support and Election Coordination Group (DEG) to include Iraq in its list of priority countries for 2019 and to engage in capacity- building programmes for the Iraqi Parliament; calls on the Commission to support these programmes;
Amendment 23 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1
Article 1
This Regulation lays down rules governing export authorisation, and import and transit measures for firearms, their parts and essential componenparts and ammunition, for the purpose of implementing Article 10 of the United Nations Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime (hereinafter referred to as" "the UN Firearms Protocol"). (This amendment applies throughout the text. Adopting it will necessitate corresponding changes throughout.)
Amendment 24 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 1 – introductory part
Article 2 – point 1 – introductory part
1. ‘firearm’ means any portable barrelled weapon that expels, is designed to expel or may be converted to expel a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of a combustible propellant.
Amendment 25 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 2 – point 1 – subparagraph 2
An object is considered as capable of being converted to expel a shot, bullet or projectile by the action of a combustible propellant if:
Amendment 26 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 1 – subparagraph 2 – indent 2
Article 2 – point 1 – subparagraph 2 – indent 2
– as a result of its construction or the material from which it is made, it can be so converted, using readily available tools;
Amendment 27 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 2 – introductory part
Article 2 – point 2 – introductory part
2. ‘parts and essential componenparts’ means any element or replacement element specifically designed for a firearm and essential to its operation, including a barrel, frame or receiver, slide or cylinder, bolt or breech block, and any device designed or adapted to diminish the sound caused by firing a firearm.;
Amendment 28 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 2 – subparagraph 2
Article 2 – point 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 29 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 3
Article 2 – point 3
3. ‘ammunition’ means the complete round or the components thereof, includ, as used in a firearm, comprising cartridge cases, primers, propellant powder, bullets or projectiles that are used in a firearm, provided that those components are themselves subject to authorisation in the relevant Member Stateand projectiles;
Amendment 30 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point 13
Article 2 – point 13
13. ‘multiple export authorisation’ means an authorisation granted at his request to one specific exporter for multiple shipments to the samone or more end users or consignee in as and/or in one or more specific third countryies and covering one or more firearms, their parts and componenessential parts and ammunition;
Amendment 42 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the importing third country has issued the relevant import authorisation if national legislation in force so provides and,
Amendment 46 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. If no objections to the transit are received within twenty workingcalendar days from the day of the written request for no objection to the transitnotification submitted by the exporter, the consulted third country of transit shall be regarded as having no objection and as having given its tacit consent to the transit
Amendment 53 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Article 5 – paragraph 5
5. The period of validity of an export or a multiple export authorisation shall be decided by the Member States, but shall not be less than twelve months, whilst the period of validity of a multiple export authorisation shall not be less than twelventy-four months.
Amendment 55 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
Amendment 58 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 a (new)
Article 7 a (new)
5a. An export authorisation shall not be required for the temporary export of firearms, their essential parts and ammunition for verifiable lawful purposes such as trade fairs, exhibitions, repairs or evaluations, provided that the exporter provides proof of legal ownership of the firearms and is exporting them under the outward processing procedure or Customs’ temporary export procedure.
Amendment 59 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. The simplified procedures set out in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 shall apply for the temporary export of firearms, their essential parts and ammunition for verifiable lawful purposes, which include hunting, sport shooting, evaluation, exhibitions and repair.
Amendment 62 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. When leaving or returning to the customs territory of the Union through a point of crossing of the external border of the Member State of their residence, for the temporary export of one or more firearms, their essential parts and ammunition, during a journey to a third country, hunters and sport shooters may produce the European firearms pass pursuant to Articles 1 and 12 of Directive 91/477/EEC, a national firearms licence, a national hunting permit, or other valid national document issued by the competent authority of the Member State of their residence.
Amendment 64 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 68 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 79 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3
Article 19 – paragraph 3
3. Every fiveten years the Commission shall review the implementation of this Regulation and present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on its application, which may include proposals for its amendment. Member States shall provide the Commission with all appropriate information for the preparation of the report.
Amendment 81 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
This Regulation shall enter into force on the hundred and twentieth dayfirst day of the thirty-seventh month following thate day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Amendment 83 #
2010/0147(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex
Annex
ANNEX1 List of firearms, their parts and essential components and ammunition as referred to in Article 2(1) and 4(1): Combined Nomenclature Code and Description 1 Based on the Combined Nomenclature of goods as laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff. Code CN Description A: Firearms 9302 00 00 Revolvers and pistols, other than those of heading 9303 or 9304 9303 Other firearms including sporting shotguns and rifles. 9303 20 00 Other sporting, hunting or target-shooting shotguns, including combination shotgun-rifles: 9303 20 10 – Single-barrelled, smooth bore 9303 20 95 - Other 9303 30 00 Other sporting, hunting or target-shooting rifles. 9303 90 00 Other. 9304 00 00 Other arms (for example, spring, air or gas guns and pistols). B: Parts and essential components 9305 Parts and accessories of articles of headings 9302 to 9304: 9305 10 00 – Of revolvers or pistols – Of shotguns or rifles of heading 9303: 9305 21 00 – – Shotgun barrels 9305 29 00 – – Other 9305 99 00 – Other C: Ammunition 9306 Cartridges and other ammunition and projecC: Ammunition as defined in Articles and parts thereof, including shots – Shotgun cartridges and parts thereof: 9306 21 00 – – Cartridges 9306 29 – – Other 9306 29 40 – – – Cases 9306 29 70 – – – Other 9306 30 – Other cartridges and parts thereof: 2(3), classified under 9306 21 00 – – Shotgun cartridges 9306 30 10 – – For revolvers and pistols of heading 9302 – – – Other 9306 30 91 − − − − Centrefire cartridges 9306 30 93 − − − − Rimfire cartridges 9306 30 97 – – – – Other 9306 90 – Other: 9306 90 90 – – Other
Amendment 87 #
2010/0032(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
1. Following the initiation of the proceeding, the Commission shall commence an investigation. The investigation period as set in Article 4(3) shall start on the day of the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the notice as set in Article 3(3).
Amendment 90 #
2010/0032(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. The Commission shall implement definitive bilateral safeguard measures within 200 days after the publication of the notice in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Amendment 16 #
2009/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital Ga (new)
Recital Ga (new)
Ga. whereas it is important to preserve the level of social and environmental standards in force in the European Union, and ensure that they are respected by foreign undertakings operating in the single European market.
Amendment 18 #
2009/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas the generalised system of preferences aims to promote respect for international labour standards through supplementary tariff preferences, andis conditioned in the respect of the principles of international human rights conventions and core labour standards by beneficiary countries, and includes a special scheme of supplementary tariff preferences to promote the ratification and effective implementation of core international conventions on human and labour rights, environmental protection and good governance; whereas failure to comply with these conditions can lead to the trading arrangement being suspended,
Amendment 32 #
2009/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the workexistence of the WTO Committee on Trade and Environment, which ishould be an essential forum for pursuing integration and strengthening the link between environment and trade; expresses the hope that the Committee’s role and its work will develop in order to address in a positive manner the most important trade and environment challenges facing the international community;
Amendment 43 #
2009/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Firmly supports the practice of including human rights clauses in the EU’s international agreements but points out that major challenges persist with regard to monitoring and implementing these clauses; reiterates the fact that these clauses must also be included in all trade and sectoral agreements, with a clear and precise consultation mechanism modelled on Article 96 of the Cotonou Agreement; in this respect welcomes the inclusion of such a clause in the free tMulti-Party Trade aAgreement with Colombiabetween the European Union, Colombia and Peru;
Amendment 61 #
2009/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Considers that the 27 conventions for which ratification and effective implementation is requested so that they can benefit from GSP+ represent a unique mixture of conventions on human rights, labour law, sustainable developenvironment and good governance standards; underlines that to date, GSP+ has had a positive and visible impact with regard to ratification of these conventions, but less so with regard to their implementation, and therefore hopes to place more emphasis on accompanying measures to improve implementation capacity;
Amendment 63 #
2009/2219(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Encourages the Commission, during the process of reviewing the GSP+ system, to adjust the criteria for application of this system to ensure that it really benefits the least developed countriescountries most in need, and to establish points of comparison, mechanisms and transparent criteria for granting and withdrawing preferences under this system; calls for full participation by the European Parliament throughout this process;
Amendment 3 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
Citation 11 a (new)
- having regard to the recommendations adopted by the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (EMPA) at its sixth plenary session, held in Amman on 17 March 2010,
Amendment 3 #
2009/2215(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 1 a (new)
Point 1 a (new)
1a. Reiterates the importance of a Euromed free trade area, which will significantly contribute to peace, prosperity and security in the entire region, and therefore supports those measures and efforts which seek to remove barriers and obstacles; points out, however, that negotiations on the free trade area should be conducted on a concerted, gradual basis in the context of a rational, predictable partnership reflecting the socioeconomic realities of the countries on the southern shore of the Mediterranean,
Amendment 17 #
2009/2215(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 5
Point 5
5. Stresses the vital need to develop South- South trade, which accounts for just 6% of world trade, and thus to take action to extend the Agadir Agreement; emphasises that the UfM must make it easier to respond to requests for technical and financial assistance with a view to promoting South-South economic integration,
Amendment 22 #
2009/2215(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 6
Point 6
6. Hopes for an improvement in the economic and legal environment in the region, an essential guarantee for future investment, in particular a regards foreign direct investment (FDI), which remains very weak; calls, further, for greater harmonisation, given that the ability to attract investment varies greatly from one country to another,
Amendment 25 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM) is a means of boosting the regional and multilateral dimension of Euro-Mediterranean relations, opening up fresh prospects for the establishment of an area of peace, security and prosperity for 800 million people, and offers the ideal framework for addressing the social and economic challenges, promoting regional integration and guaranteeing the co- development of the partner states,
Amendment 27 #
2009/2215(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 6 a (new)
Point 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses the importance of the role of and dialogue between businesses on both shores of the Mediterranean in boosting trade and investment,
Amendment 29 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the ncomplementarity between bilateral cooperation policies under the European Neighbourhood pPolicy conducted with the Mediterranean countries has its limitations and, by placing the emphasis on bilateral relations, is proving imbalanced and unable the one hand, and policies with a regional dimension under the UfM on the other, should be strengthened in order to contribute to a shared process of significant reform in the region,
Amendment 59 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
J. whereas Mediterranean regions are directly affected by transnational issues such as water management, pollution, access to energy and security of supply, road and maritime networks and migration flows, and whereas local and regional authorities play a key role in facilitating the development of sustainable spatial planning policies and the implementation of practical projects,
Amendment 79 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Remains concerned by the absence of a clear definition of the EU’s Mediterranean policy or of a long-term strategic vision for the development and stabilisation of the region, despite the creation of the UfM; calls for the Euro- Mediterranean integration process to become a political priority for the EU once more;
Amendment 111 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 - point 2
Paragraph 4 - point 2
- developing communications to ensure the visibility of the UfM’s activities, informing citizens on the UfM’s major projects and progress, in particular via a comprehensive website; clarifying the criteria for approving, funding and implementing major projects;
Amendment 145 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 - point 3
Paragraph 6 - point 3
- welcomes the steps taken by financial institutions at national, European (EIB- FEMIP, EBRD) and international (World Bank) level which are already active in the region, emphasises the need to identify synergies in connection with major projects, and proposes that a Euro- Mediterranean investment and development bank be set up to consolidate the North-South parity basis on which the UfM operates;
Amendment 146 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 - point 3 a (new)
Paragraph 6 - point 3 a (new)
- emphasises the role of the European Investment Bank (EIB), which is coordinating three of the six priority projects (de-pollution of the Mediterranean, the Solar Plan and the maritime and land highways); notes that the EIB’s role in the UfM funding mechanisms must be promoted, strengthened and adapted;
Amendment 147 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 - point 3 b (new)
Paragraph 6 - point 3 b (new)
- underlines the need for effective financial instruments to strengthen investment and cooperation in the Euro- Mediterranean region;
Amendment 148 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 - point 3 c (new)
Paragraph 6 - point 3 c (new)
- awaits the conclusions of the group of experts on the Facility for Euro- Mediterranean Investment and Partnership (FEMIP) in order to draw inferences from the progress and limits of this mechanism; calls for the most effective mechanism to be identified in order to support the UfM’s major projects, among which are the possibility of creating, for example, a Euro- Mediterranean investment and development bank;
Amendment 162 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 - point 2 a (new)
Paragraph 7 - point 2 a (new)
- reforms intended to improve and simplify the performance of contracts, which, due to red tape, takes on average more than two years;
Amendment 163 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 - point 2 b (new)
Paragraph 7 - point 2 b (new)
- access to credit, which remains excessively limited for SMEs, due to the guarantees required by banks and the inadequate provision of credit options suitable for small enterprises;
Amendment 182 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Emphasises the strategic importance of issues such as agriculture, food security, water and rural development in Mediterranean countries, and calls for cooperation in the farming sector to be made a political priority; encourages the UfM member countries to work on harmonising their positions in the context of WTO negotiations and to move towards greater convergence among Euro- Mediterranean agricultural policies, taking into consideration the requirements of sustainable development and the maintenance of jobs in the agricultural and related sectors;
Amendment 186 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the partner states, as part of the UfM’s major transport projects, to improve infrastructure in order to encourage a sustainable transport policy, taking into consideration the requirements of sustainable development, greenhouse gas reductions, energy efficiency and intermodality; emphasises that such efforts must be carried out in connection with environmental, industrial, public health and land planning policy; emphasises the need to develop maritime highway projects in order to encourage modal shifts and create safe, clean and sustainable commercial shipping routes;
Amendment 191 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Emphasises the urgency of developing stronger cooperation in the field of civil protection in the Mediterranean region to combat natural disasters, particularly earthquakes, floods and forest fires; encourages the creation of a Euro-Mediterranean forest fires institute;
Amendment 197 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Is keen to see new projects in the cultural field put on the UfM’s agenda in the very near future; suggests that priority be given to setting upencourages the initiatives intended to promote mutual understanding and dialogue between cultures and supports the Anna Lindh Foundation, the Bibliotheca Alexandrina and the Arab World Institute; calls for the implementation of a Euro- Mediterranean junior Erasmus programme called ‘Averroës’, as a way of stepping up exchanges between secondary school pupils in UfM member countriesstrategy for cultural affairs and especially for higher visibility of the audiovisual programme established by the UfM through the Permanent Conference of the Mediterranean Audiovisual Operators (COPEAM); supports the EuroMed-News project aimed at informing the populations of the Mediterranean countries about EU-supported actions in the region;
Amendment 203 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Welcomes the choice of Marseille- Provence as European Capital of Culture in 2013: the project has a strong Euro- Mediterranean dimension intended to bring together the peoples on both sides of the Mediterranean; emphasises that the purpose of this highly symbolic cultural project is to drive concrete, innovative action to improve the dialogue between the cultures of Europe and the Mediterranean;
Amendment 207 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 b (new)
Paragraph 11 b (new)
11b. Welcomes the formation of the Euro- Mediterranean University EMUNI into a network; emphasises the importance of devoting a significant proportion of the UfM’s activities to education, school and university exchanges and research as ways of bringing the peoples on both sides of the Mediterranean closer together; therefore requests: - the setting up of a Euro-Mediterranean junior Erasmus programme called ‘Averroës’, as a way of stepping up exchanges between secondary school pupils in UfM member countries; - that adequate funding be devoted to strengthening academic exchange programmes such as ‘Erasmus Mundus’ and providing better information on existing exchange programmes that students are unaware of; - the development of a fully-functioning Mediterranean knowledge triangle – that is, greater coordination between training, research and innovation, and the creation of a genuine Euro-Mediterranean higher education, science and research area; - more structured cooperation in the field of higher education and research; - that the recognition of qualifications, the introduction of joint qualifications and common graduate schools be promoted; - improved mobility for researchers and efforts to fight the brain drain by improving universities’ attractiveness and quality; - that emphasis be placed on dialogue between universities and enterprises and on public-private partnerships in the field of research;
Amendment 212 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Recalls that the purpose of the EMPA is to become the legitimate democratic parliamentary assembly of the UfM, and it must therefore be closely involved in defining the areas of work and in monitoring the projects undertaken; states its wish to give full power and visibility to this assembly;
Amendment 214 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the recent establishment of the Euro-Mediterranean Regional and Local Assembly (ARLEM) and calls for efforts to ensure proper coordination between the ARLEM’s activities and those of the EMPA, in particular through joint meetings or reciprocal invitations for members of their respective bureaux to attend working meetings; emphasises the need for these assemblies that bring together elected representatives from both sides of the Mediterranean and promote the exchange of best democratic practice;
Amendment 218 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls for civil society, the social partners and the numerous professional and socio-professional networks developed as part of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership to be consulted regularly and involved in the UfM’s activities and projects; particularly in: - encouragesing the establishment of a Mediterranean business leaders’ forum andprofessional networks aimed at developing sustainable business relations, investments and business partnerships between both sides of the Mediterranean, such as the Invest in Med Programme; - improving cooperation between the enterprise confederations of all the partner countries through the Union of Mediterranean Confederations of Enterprises, BUSINESSMED, especially in order to adopt and spread good economic and social practices for enabling improved convergence and integration between the enterprises of the Union for the Mediterranean; - extending the industrial cooperation group for implementing the Euro- Mediterranean Charter for Enterprise to include representatives of SMEs so that it can become the tool which will enable the removal of obstacles to growth and to the development of SMEs; - debating the need to establish a Euro- Mediterranean economic and social council;
Amendment 226 #
2009/2215(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the President of the Council of the European Union, the President of the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the co-presidency and the secretariat of the UfM, and the governments and parliaments of the partner states.
Amendment 23 #
2009/2175(INI)
Draft opinion
Point 5b (new)
Point 5b (new)
5b. Calls on the Commission to secure the inclusion in the renegotiated WTO Government Procurement Agreement (GPA) of a clause enabling the European Union to give preference to SMEs when awarding public contracts, along the lines of those already applied by other States parties to this agreement;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2231(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that ownership by the population will guarantee a strong partnership and the success of this initiative; considers that, for that to happen, political aspirations must be translated into specific, more easily comprehensible projects closer to the citizens; also considers that the UFM must incorporate local and regional authorities and the private sector into the operation of its mechanisms for the consultation and active participation of civil society (associations, social partners, etc.);
Amendment 2 #
2008/2231(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Hopes that the UFM’s projects will be specific and unifying, and that they will reflect the needs of people in the region; stresses that they must contribute to balanced and sustainable development in the region and must foster regional and sub-regional inter-connections with a view to promoting integration and cohesion;
Amendment 3 #
2008/2231(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Recalls the first initiatives proposed at the Paris Summit for the Mediterranean on 13 July 2008: de-pollution of the Mediterranean, maritime and land highways, civil protection, the Mediterranean Solar Plan, higher education and research, and the Mediterranean Business Development Initiative;
Amendment 4 #
2008/2231(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Notes that at present only one of the six proposed projects focuses on economic and commercial issues; regrets that the Paris Declaration contains very few references to the economic and commercial aspects of the partnership, such as direct foreign investments, employment, the informal economy and poverty reduction;
Amendment 7 #
2008/2231(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Stresses that the Union must boost its support for the Mediterranean partners’ programmes aimed at facilitating the creation of a favourable climate whereby investments can be increased and economic cooperation and trade enhanced by means of technical and financial assistance mechanisms for the facilitation of trade;
Amendment 9 #
2008/2231(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 c (new)
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8c. Stresses the importance of the informal sector and the mass economy in the countries of the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean; considers that, in the interests of the development of the region, support must be given to progressively integrating these activities into the formal economy;
Amendment 10 #
2008/2231(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 d (new)
Paragraph 8 d (new)
8d. Notes that, since the 2004 and 2007 enlargements, trade between the Union’s new Member States and its Mediterranean partners has been constantly increasing; calls for this trend to be taken into account and supported in the context of the partnership;
Amendment 11 #
2008/2231(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Amendment 12 #
2008/2231(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12b. Also stresses the need to give the UFM a genuine parliamentary dimension, based on the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (EMPA), which must be regarded as the UFM’s legitimate parliamentary expression and which, as a consultative body, should have the right to submit proposals and evaluations.
Amendment 25 #
2008/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Takes the view that the institutional arrangements proposed for the BP:UfM, and especially the co-presidency, biennial summit, joint permanent committee, senior officials’ meetings and creation of a joint secretariat, help to even out responsibilities within the partnership; looks forward, in thishopes that Parliament will be regularly updated on the stage reached in projects; welcomes in that respect, to the decisions of the first meeting of the foreign affairs ministers of the BP:UfM member countries, scheduled for 3 November 2008 adopted by the Ministerial Conference of 3 November 2008, which duly took note of the EMPA recommendation adopted in Jordan on 13 October 2008; supports the decision to bring a strong parliamentary dimension to the UfM, thereby reinforcing its democratic legitimacy, by building on the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (EMPA), which should be further consolidated and its work better articulated with that of the other institutions of the Partnership;
Amendment 27 #
2008/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 31 #
2008/2231(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the recognition of EMPA as the legitimate parliamentary expression of the BP:UfM; calls for EMPA’s role to be strengthened by entitling igranting it legal personality and the right to propose and assess economic and regional integration strategies and projects, and allowing it to make recommendations to the meetings of foreign affairs ministers;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation (new)
Citation (new)
– having regard to the GAERC conclusions of 12 February 2007 concerning the WTO's GPA and SMEs,
Amendment 9 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas internationalisation generates growth and competitiveness, helping businesses expand and thus increasing employment, and SMEs create 80% of new jobs in the EU,
Amendment 11 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas European SMEs should take advantage of trade liberalisation; whereas SMEs stop developing when they operate in markets that are limited in size or growth; whereas SMEs that do not internationalise are exposed to competition without benefiting from new import-export markets,
Amendment 12 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas SMEs engaged in international trade have a role to play in reshaping the European economic landscape to become the next-generation large enterprises that the European Union needs to achieve the figure of 3% of GDP on R&D,
Amendment 13 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas the low number of SMEs involved in international trade can be explained by a number of reasons such as the high costs of tariff and non-tariff barriers, access to information and administrative formalities, and by shortfalls in human and financial resources at all levels of the company,
Amendment 14 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas SMEs, by definition, do not have the same resources, the same geographical coverage or the same experience in the international market as a large enterprise, and whereas the slightest obstacle to trade is disproportionately costly for them and dissuades them from internationalisation,
Amendment 15 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas EU SMEs have a key interest in markets that are closest geographically and culturally, i.e. in regions bordering the Union such as the Mediterranean and the Western Balkans,
Amendment 16 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas competitiveness also depends on the ability to guarantee SMEs adequate protection against unfair trading practices; whereas manufacturing production in Europe is an important sector for economic growth and employment,
Amendment 25 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Supports, in particular, the adoption of a firm stance in the negotiations on trade facilitation procedures, in order to lower the costs of customs procedures which can account for up to 15% of the value of the goods traded, via transparent and simplified procedures, harmonised international standards, effective recording of the origin of goods, and updated customs controls;
Amendment 30 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Considers that SMEs are in need of reciprocal trade liberalisation and, given these needs, feels that the Commission should come up with an explicit response to the export difficulties facing European SMEs, explaining which national or European instruments the Union could use to help SMEs improve their performance in global markets;
Amendment 43 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Considers that the Commission, whilst adopting a neutral position in the anti- dumping and anti-subsidy investigations, should provide more specific and qualified assistance to industrial sectors complaining of breaches of WTO rules;
Amendment 45 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Stresses that the TDI system must continue to be a quasi-judicial procedure, based on objective and factual considerations, while any assessment which jeopardises legal certainty and may lead to the politicisation of the system, should be strictly avoided;
Amendment 48 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the Commission to react quickly and in an appropriate manner to third countries that make arbitrary use of trade defence instruments, particularly when these measures affect Community SMEs;
Amendment 49 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Draws attention to the significant increase in recent years in infringements of intellectual property rights affecting European SMEs, and to the fact that counterfeiting does not just affect large industrial companies but also SMEs that have managed to create high quality competitive products and suffer severe consequences from counterfeiting that in some cases can threaten their very existence;
Amendment 57 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Appreciates that the Commission and the Member States are seeking to improve customs control systems, the exchange of information between authorities and cooperation between rightholders and customs bodies, criminal penalties against counterfeiting and piracy, and measures to combat electronic piracy;
Amendment 66 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Supports the creation, in the key Indian and Chinese markets, of European Business Centres, which work together with national Chambers of Commerce and business representatives to help SMEs find partners with the skills to enter these local markets;
Amendment 67 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Considers that the success of the market access strategy also requires solidarity in terms of information and greater powers of influence for national chambers of commerce outside the EU; supports the bilateral programmes promoting specific access for SMEs to third-country markets, given the success of AL INVEST (Latin America), MEDINVEST (Mediterranean) and PROINVEST (Africa);
Amendment 71 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Encourages the strengthening of all SME innovation and start-up policies; supports the creation of European centres of competitiveness open to SMEs that may reach the critical mass required to survive in the face of international competition; also supports the updating of programmes giving SMEs access to international development finance; points out that the single European patent and the European Company Statute should be adopted as quickly as possible to promote the transition to extra-Community trade;
Amendment 88 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 a (new)
Paragraph 24 a (new)
24a. Considers that informed and effective action needs to be taken by the EU to secure equal rights for European companies, and particularly SMEs;
Amendment 91 #
2008/2205(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25a. Considers that public procurement should be a key chapter of all bilateral and regional trade negotiations undertaken by the EU, with a view to opening up public procurement markets on a balanced basis;
Amendment 34 #
2008/2204(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Suggests that illegal behaviour such as counterfeiting, piracy, fraud, breach of transaction security and violation of citizens' private space should not be attributed to the nature of the medium where it operates on a basis of strict compliance with the rules in force in order to benefit from a regime of managed responsibility, but has to be considered as aspects of illegal commercial activities which pre-existed in the physical world and have found new channels for discrimination;
Amendment 48 #
2008/2171(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Asks the Commission, as a follow-up to the 2005 Memorandum of Understanding on textiles, to continue to discuss developments in the EU -China textile trade dialogue and in the High Level Economic and Trade Dialogue Mechanism (HLM); underlines that a double- monitoring mechanism for Chinescalls on the Commission to follow closely the textiles imports is preferable to quotas, however this should not lead to an ongoing barrier to free tradeoriginating in China, including through the effective implementation of a double-monitoring mechanism;
Amendment 67 #
2008/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Acknowledges that India's standards regime is still evolving; calls on the Bureau of Indian Standards and the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) to raise its standards in line with international standards and to increase transparency by improving its testing and certification procedures; calls on the Commission to provide adequate support to strengthen capacity and qualified human resources within Indian regulatory bodies;
Amendment 124 #
2008/2135(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Regrets the Indian Patent Amendment Act does not contain any provisions on data exclusivityprotection; notes that lack of data protection and exclusivity are of major concern for EU pharmaceutical companies in Indiais of major concern for EU pharmaceutical companies in India; calls on the Commission to hold discussions on the subject in order to respond to this concern, whilst asking European pharmaceutical undertakings to develop public-private partnerships to respond to public health needs; welcomes India's commitment to increase the share of its public spending for health and encourages this trend with a view to ensuring adequate access to effective healthcare services, particularly in rural areas;
Amendment 1 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation (new)
Citation (new)
- having regard to the Commission communication to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on 'An Industrial Property Rights Strategy for Europe' of 16 July 2008 (COM(2008)0465),
Amendment 15 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (nouveau)
Recital I a (nouveau)
Ia. whereas more repressive action should be taken against counterfeiters of products that have a direct impact on public health,
Amendment 24 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
Recital L a (new)
La. whereas, as regards products having direct impact on public health, internet and parallel trade distribution networks contribute greatly to the spread of counterfeit products that are dangerous to public health,
Amendment 38 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to propose and support the drafting of a protocol on counterfeiting, additional to the Palermo International Convention on organised crime;
Amendment 40 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that in several emerging economies, the production of counterfeit and pirated goods has reached alarming levels; whilst welcoming the cooperation initiatives hitherto implemented, is of the view that special measures are required in order to strengthen coordination between customs, judicial and police authorities with the countries concerned and to encourage the harmonisation of the laws of these countries with those of the European Union;
Amendment 42 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Encourages the Commission and the Member States to strengthen their cooperation with Euro-Mediterranean partner countries within the Euromed Market programme and promote in the Euro-Mediterranean region a common approach to legislation, procedures and implementation with regard to customs cooperation and action to combat counterfeiting and piracy in order to facilitate trade between Euro- Mediterranean partner countries;
Amendment 53 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make all appropriate efforts to achieve a swift and satisfactory conclusion to the ACTA agreement; takes the view that not only is the entry into force of the agreement an essential international benchmark, but that it can ensure that counterfeiting is suppressed more effectively and provide an important tool for putting pressure on non-signatory third countries; supports the establishment of a task force to examine the implementation of the agreement, by promoting this subject in dialogue between the European Union and third countries and as part of cooperation measures with those countries;
Amendment 56 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission to negotiate with third countries the establishment of task forces to combat counterfeiting and of ambitious, exemplary and deterrent criminal sanctions against counterfeiting, in particular in discussions on free-trade agreements;
Amendment 60 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the growing interest shown by a number of WTO member countries in the ACTA and hopes that the agreement can be signed also by China, India and other emerging countries, the economies of which are more directly concerned by counterfeiting;
Amendment 75 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Points out that the GSP regulation also provides for the possibility of temporarily suspending preferences for those partners which implement unfair trading practices; takes the view that in the event of particularly serious casesviolations of intellectual property, such as cases constituting a serious threat to safety and public health, the use of such a deterrent should be taken into due consideration by the Commission;
Amendment 83 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Notes the worrying spread of counterfeiting and piracy, in particular, in a globalised economy, and its serious implications for the competitiveness of the European Union and its businesses, creators and consumers; calls therefore on the Member States to provide consumers with sufficient information on the dangers of counterfeiting and piracy, in particular the considerable health and safety risks which counterfeit products, including medicines, pose to consumers;
Amendment 86 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Stresses the need for improved coordination within the Commission between departments dealing with the suppression of counterfeiting and for better dissemination of the Community initiatives the Commission adopts in this regard, given that the fragmentation of sanction arrangements is detrimental to the internal market and weakens the European Union in its trade negotiations; stresses also that the private and public sectors should extend their cooperation to ensure that measures to combat counterfeiting are more active, dynamic and effective;
Amendment 87 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses the need to develop appropriate ongoing training courses for customs staff, magistrates and other professionals concerned and to encourage the Member States to set up specialised anti-counterfeiting teams;
Amendment 96 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Considers that the establishment of a single European authorityalls on the Commission to set up a European Counterfeiting Monitoring Centre operating with the support of the Commission's services and responsible for coordinating the fight against counterfeiting and piracy cannot be postponed; such an authority should be able to ensure better organisation of the various players at European level and create synergies with the private sector and the authorities of the Member States responsible for combating counterfeiting; takes the view that this authorityMonitoring Centre needs to be established in order to increase the authoritativeness of the EU position internationally and the effectiveness of its anti-counterfeiting action;
Amendment 97 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Recommends further improvement and better coordination of customs procedures in the European Union in order substantially to restrict access of counterfeit and pirated products to the single market; takes the view that a more effective suppression of counterfeiting should take due consideration of the prominent role that the Internet has acquired in marketing and promoting counterfeit and pirated products; calls also on the Commission to submit a proposal to Parliament and the Council to provide the European Union and its Member states with EU-level qualitative and statistical data on counterfeiting, in particular via the Internet;
Amendment 101 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Considers that, for traceability purposes, steps should be taken to encourage measures taken by industry to use modern technologies to distinguish more effectively between original products and counterfeit products, and calls on the Commission to take the necessary steps to promote and establish such constructive steps on a permanent basis;
Amendment 103 #
2008/2133(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls on the Commission to promote measures that are complementary to legislative standards and, in particular, to establish a European awareness-raising day on the dangers of counterfeiting aimed at changing people's attitudes to counterfeiting and piracy;
Amendment 26 #
2007/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Reiterates the need to establish at European Union level a plan to combat counterfeiting and piracy, and stresses the need for enhanced cooperation on this subject within the Commission, in other words between the departments responsible for intellectual property rules, trade policy and customs policy, with the Member States' customs authorities and between those authorities;
Amendment 27 #
2007/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12 b. Stresses the need to standardise the law of evidence or establish common minimum rules and ensure uniform implementation by the 27 Member States of Community customs regulations (and in particular Regulation (EC)1383/2003);
Amendment 28 #
2007/2256(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 c (new)
Paragraph 12 c (new)
12 c. Welcomes the compromise reached by Member States and the Commission on a negotiating mandate for the Anti- Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), which is an important element of the Union's global trade strategy and will provide a high-level international framework for strengthening the enforcement of intellectual property rights and protecting producers against industrial theft and consumers against the health and safety risks associated with many counterfeit products;
Amendment 2 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
1a. having regard to its resolution of 15 November 2007 on the European interest: succeeding in the age of globalisation1,,
Amendment 4 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 b (new)
Citation 2 b (new)
2b. having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2006 on the annual report from the Commission to the European Parliament on third country anti- dumping, anti-subsidy and safeguard action against the Community (2004)1,
Amendment 18 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas in the framework of the Doha Development Agenda, the WTO rules on trade defence are subject to multilateral negotiations which have not yet been resumed; whereas, the vast majority of WTO member states do not intend to introduce new trade defence rules which would lead to more free and fair trade without protectionism
Amendment 19 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
Cb. whereas the EU has already one of the most liberal TDI regimes in comparison to its trading partners; whereas unilateral reform could have tremendous effects on the competitiveness of European companies,
Amendment 20 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital C c (new)
Recital C c (new)
Cc. whereas the European Parliament has already stated its opposition to a unilateral dismantling of the TDIs and its preference to maintain the existing level of stringency,
Amendment 22 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas, in TDI investigations, a balance has too often failed to be attained among taking timely action when unfair trade is injuring EU industry, the need to maintain the quality and thoroughness of Commission investigations and the maintenance of transparency and opportunity for all interested parties to contribute,
Amendment 30 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas, European competitiveness depends on the ability to shelter European companies from uncompetitive and unfair trade practice, whereas European production and manufacturing play a crucial role in the creation of economic growth and employment,
Amendment 31 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
Amendment 36 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas, in a globalised world, EU companies need a reinforced mechanism to combat unfair commercial practices, allowing them to create jobs and stimulate growth in the EU,
Amendment 42 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Stresses the importance of enhancing the competitiveness of EU industries by eliminating unfair trade practices in international trade; underlines the importance of effective TDIs;
Amendment 44 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 a (new)
Paragraph -1 a (new)
Amendment 45 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 51 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that, in the absence of internationally recognised rules on competition, the current European TDI system is the best response to ensure a level playing field for all actors and to avoid distorting effects in international trade;
Amendment 52 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recalls that negotiations are currently taking place on multilateral disciplines concerning TDIs within the framework of the DDA ; welcomes those negotiations but regrets US opposition to reforms of the WTO’s framework for TDIs; Notes that the worldwide increase in the use of TDIs, particularly by advanced industrial countrie and, calls for new and more stringent rules at WTO level so as to ensure free and fair world trade is maintained;
Amendment 53 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Warns of the danger of unilaterally weakening the EU to such an extent that it is unable to counteract unfair trading practices in an international context marked by the proliferation of such practices and the intensive, and often abusive, use of trade defence measures by third countries against imports from the EU;
Amendment 57 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the belief in the benefits of an open trading system, based on free and fair competition, offsetting its potentially disruptive impact, and contributing decisively to the stimulation of growth and the creation of jobs; takes the view that the EU should continue to promote increased global liberalisation and free and fair trade and resist any protectionist temptation;
Amendment 59 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines that the EU already has a TDI regime with higher standards, resulting in more stringent application, than other trading partners especially with regard to the initiation, course and subsequent outcome of these investigations;
Amendment 62 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 67 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises that TDIs are not intended to serve the general economic interests of the EU, but to protect the interests of producers and employees against impairment caused by dumping or illegal subsidies;
Amendment 75 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Believes that the current EU TDI system already takes due account of the rightful and legitimate interests of all European stakeholders, as was stated by the majority of governments and stakeholders during the public consultation on the above-mentioned Green Paper;
Amendment 76 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 80 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Urges the Commission to demand a strict application of the existing WTO rules on dumping and subsidies to the emerging economies such as China; asks the Commission to engage in bilateral talks on free and fair competition with these countries;
Amendment 85 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 86 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 89 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Believes that the EU TDI system should address all increasing unfair trading actions that hamper the ordinary course of trade, such as fraud, circumvention and dual pricing, which greatly affect fair competition in international markets;
Amendment 100 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 103 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Believes that the current application by the Commission lacks clarity with regard to the initiation of investigations; stresses the need to concentrate the investigations in this phase on gathering evidence of dumping and injury;
Amendment 107 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls for the creation of a special TDI-helpdesk for SMEs for advice on the preparation of complaints; asks further to provide a simplified questionnaire for SMEs; asks the Commission to grant open access to Eurostat and access to information collected on site by EU representations in third countries concerned;
Amendment 117 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on Commission and the Member States to take into account the long-term impact of TDI measures on consumers, by assessing their consequences in terms of price level, quality, availability and choice as well as sustainable competition in the markets;
Amendment 126 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Believes that there is no reason to reconsider the current definition of "Community industry" to take greater account of the interests of those companies which have moved or subcontracted part of their production outside the Union in so far as those companies are not affected by the duties unless they engage in dumping or receive subsidies;
Amendment 129 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Considers that anti-dumping procedures should always give priority to the need to restore a level playing field, as the effects of unfair competition in the long run are against the interests of all participants in the Community market;
Amendment 130 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 b (new)
Paragraph 17 b (new)
17b. Considers therefore that the analysis of the impact on other interests can only justify the non-imposition of anti- dumping measures in exceptional cases, where it is obvious that defence measures will not be able to improve the situation of Community producers, and in any event cannot justify a downward adjustment in the level or duration of the duties imposed;
Amendment 137 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Endorses the creation of the Hearing Officer within the Commission’s DG Trade to assist interested parties; calls on the Hearing Officer to submit, following an independent analysis, to the European Parliament periodic reports in particular on the handling of cases by the Commission, including the conformity of the administrative practices with the basic regulations, and on the synthesis of its activities; stresses that for the sake of transparency and ensuring a meaningful role for the Hearing Officer, his/her reports following individual interventions should be made known to interested parties and the Antidumping Committee;
Amendment 140 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the Commission to increase the transparency and predictability of the procedure of TDI investigations in the EU, to accelerate and simplify procedures, as well as to facilitate the accessibility of TDIs for SMEs, as they constitute the majority of the European industrial sector;
Amendment 153 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 a (new)
Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Stresses that the EU current de minimis thresholds that apply to dumping and injury should not be set at a higher level; states that for the dumping de minimis threshold, even low levels of dumping can have very significant effects in the market, in particular on price sensitive and seasonal products;
Amendment 156 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Takes the view that AD and countervailing duty measures applied by the Commission should take the alternative form of quotas or tariff-quotas when this is deemed appropriate and that a phase-in or phase-out system similar to the one implemented in the footwear case is put into operation in new cases involving products suitable for final consumpform of tariffs in order to comply with the relevant WTO regulations;
Amendment 159 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
Amendment 173 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Underlines that the legal certainty and the legal framework within which TDI investigations are conducted, are fundamental, taking into account that the standard court procedure takes too long to properly address possible flaws in TDI investigations; underlines the need to ensure that interested parties have recourse to expedited judicial review;
Amendment 194 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Calls on the Commission to enhance the competitiveness of producer industries in the Union by eliminating all competitive distortions which occur in international trade so as to ensure workable international competition;
Amendment 197 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37 a (new)
Paragraph 37 a (new)
37a. Urges the Commission not to change its administrative practice before a revision of the basic legislation has taken place;
Amendment 202 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Urges the Member States to uphold a European common approach and solidarity on this issue which would enable a better use of TDIs in the Community in favour of European industry and its workers when they are confronted with unfair competition;
Amendment 205 #
2007/2198(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Calls on the Commission to pursue with coherence and determination the objective of modernising TDIs and making them more suitable to face new globalisation challenges while refraining from any protectionist behaviourstrengthening and modernising TDIs; Urges the Commission to consider the outcome of ongoing WTO negotiations and the consensus among Member States before reforming the European regulation on TDIs;