Activities of Raffaele FITTO related to 2022/2032(INI)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU: the 8th Cohesion Report
Amendments (11)
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that according to the 8th Cohesion Report one of the most positive conclusions is the fact of notable progress of the convergence process between the eastern and western parts of the EU; brings attention, however, that from the perspective of a Member State, disparities in socio-economic development between individual regions and within the regions themselves continue to deepen; in this context, believes that cohesion policy is one of the key tools to counter the further widening of these differences;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Believes it essential to ensure that real added value is obtained from cohesion policy; stresses the importance of making sure that funding initiatives do not replace but supplement investment by Member States, thereby guaranteeing full compliance with the principle of additionality;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises the current complex macro-economic circumstances and is of the opinion that programming many instruments simultaneously is necessary and will be a particular challenge for Member States and its competent authorities, along with regional and local actors - amongst others, REACT-EU instrument relating to the 2014-2020 programming period, the National Recovery Plan and programming documents for the 2021-2027 perspective; in this context, effective and timely implementation of all of them is extremely important, taking into account the administrative burden, as well as finding appropriate demarcation mechanisms and complementarity between the intervention provided for in these instruments;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. WelcomNotes the Commission’s introduction of the JTF to support regions facing challenges in their transition towards carbon neutrality; calls on the Commission to draw lessons from the implementation of the JTF; asks for a JTF II, which should be fully integrated into the CPR, to be established in the post- 2027 programming period, while applying shared management and partnership principles; believes that regions with high CO² per capita, as well as industries in transition, should have access to this fund; calls for this new JTF to differentiate between climregrets, however, thate mitigation and adaptation; stressany Member States that a certain proportion of funding should be allocated to the transition, in a socially just way, and to the reduction of the EU’s carbon footprintve not yet launched the fund planning or implementation phases;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – point b
Paragraph 6 – point b
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that the potential that exists at local level could be better mobilised by strengthening and facilitating community- led local development (CLLD); takes the view that CLLD should be mandatory for Member States;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that the potential that exists at local level could be better mobilised by strengthening and facilitating community- led local development (CLLD); takes the view that CLLD should be mandatory for Member States;
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Calls on the European Commission to take decisions without delay, both by high authorities at political level and by officials at technical level, in order to avoid any potential delay in mobilizing and implementing cohesion policy funds;