10 Amendments of Timothy KIRKHOPE related to 2011/2025(INI)
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas it is of utmost importance that a series of key elements be taken into account when legislative solutions are considered, namely effective protection, given under all circumstances and independent of political preferences within a certain timeframebut the most exceptional circumstances as specified in the Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters; whereas the framework must be stable over a long period, and limitations on the exercise of the right, where and if needed, must be exceptional, duly justified, proportionate, and never affect the essential elements of the right itself9 ,
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas a strong European and international data protection regime is the necessary foundation for the ever increasing flow of personal data across borders, and whereas current differences in data protection legislation and enforcement are affecting the global economy and the single European market, as well as the effectiveness of law enforcement data exchange and national security,
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that the standards and principles set out in Directive 95/46/EC represent an ideal starting point and should be further elaborated, extended and enforced, as part of a modern data protection lawframework;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers it imperative to extend the application of general data protection rules to the areas of police and judicial cooperation, including in the context of data processing at domestic level, while also allowing, as and where necessary, for restricted and harmonisedcommon standards on limitations on certain data protection rights of the individual;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 – indent 1
Paragraph 4 – indent 1
– full harmonisaticomprehensive and effective common stand legal certaintyards for the applicable laws, providing a uniform and high level of protection of individuals in all circumstances,
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines, furthermore, the importance of improving means and awareness of exercising the rights of access, rectification, erasure and blocking of data, and of clarifying the ‘right to be forgotten’;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the Commission communication’s focus on awareness- raising campaigns aimed both at the general public and more specifically at young people and the vulnerable;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes, in this context, the further examination of the possibility of making the appointment of data protection officers mandatory, since the experience of those EU Member States having already appointed a data protection officer shows that this concept has proven to be successful; points out, however, that this aspect must be carefully assessed with regard to small and micro-enterprises and must avoid incurring excessive costs or burden upon them;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Also welcomes, in this context, the efforts being made to simplify and harmonstandardise the current notification system;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Is in favour of further clarifying, strengthening and harmonisingtightening coordination on the status and powers of national data protection authorities, and of exploring ways to ensure more consistent application of EU data protection rules across the internal market;