7 Amendments of Jill EVANS related to 2016/2274(INI)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
a. Achieving climate, environmental and energy efficiency goals by creating a favourable environment for sustainable transport solutions, such as electric cars and alternative fueldeveloping and supporting sustainable transport, mobility and tourism solutions, such as door-to-door intermodal chain services;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
b. Improving safety by further supporting automation and boosting the efficiency of transport traffic management systems, such as the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and, intelligent transport systems (ITS), river information services (RIS), the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR) and the Clean Sky Initiative;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point c
Paragraph 1 – point c
c. Bringing about a competitive Single European Transport Area by promoting the integration and (interoperability, inter-modality and interconnectivity) of systems across all modes of transport;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point d
Paragraph 1 – point d
d. Increasing the attractiveness and barrier-free accessibility of transport, mobility and tourism services for all passengers and consumusers;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that ICT standardisation will be beneficial for the development of transport and tourism-related services; underlines that in certain cases, certification of existing sustainable services and products in these sectors offer cheap and reliable tools in favour of sustainable user and decision-maker behaviour; calls on the Commission to attach greater importance to this development when implementing its priority action plan for ICT standardisation, and to take swift action to promote the development of integrated and smart ticketing and information and new mobility concepts such as Mobility-as-a- Service;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets that differences between national standards, such as in the freight and logistics sector, remain a barrier to the internal market, and therefore calls on the Commission to mandate the drawing up of appropriate standards and, where necessary, to make them legally binding; points out, moreover, that standardisation and interoperability can significantly contribute to reducing the administrative burden and transport costs for all businesses (e.g. e-documents) and can facilitate the proper enforcement of EU legislation (e.g. digital tachographs, electronic toll systems);
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Encourages the Commission and the European Standardisation Organisations (ESOs) to further promote ‘open standards’in particular the inter-face architecture as a pillar of the Single European Transport Area architecture.