Activities of Antonius MANDERS related to 2020/2017(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector
Amendments (7)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies are a tool to serve the people and that algorithmic systems can enable access to information, including listings of different kinds of cultural objects; notes the risks of intellectual property rights (IPR) infringement when blending AI and different technologies with a multiplicity of sources (documents, photos, films) and calls for the use of AI to ensure a high level of IPR protection within the current legislative framework, for example by alerting individuals and businesses if they are in danger of inadvertently infringing the rules or assisting IPR rightholders if the rules are actually infringed;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls on the European Commission to realise the full potential of artificial intelligence (AI) for the purposes of improving communication with citizens, through cultural and audiovisual online platforms for example, keeping them informed of what is happening at decision-making level, narrowing the gap between the EU and the grass roots and promoting social cohesion between EU citizens;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Calls on the European Commission, the Member States and the business community to actively and fully exploit the potential of AI in providing the facts and combating fake news, disinformation, xenophobia and racism on cultural and audiovisual online platforms, while at the same time avoiding censorship;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Notes that the independence of the creative process raises issues related to ownership of intellectual property rights; considers, in this connection, that it would not be appropriate to seek to impart legal personality to AI technologies;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Notes that AI can play an important role in promoting and protecting our European and national cultural diversity, especially when used by audiovisual online platforms in promoting content to customers;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that AI-improved image recognition software could vastly enhance the ability of educational facilities and relevant actors to provide and develop modern and, innovative and high-quality schooling methods and step up the digital literacy and e-skills of the entire population, while ensuring the use of quality sources and respecting the protection of IPRs;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that the interaction between AI and the creative industries is complex and requires an in-depth assessment; welcomes the ongoing study ‘Trends and Developments in Artificial Intelligence - Challenges to the IPR Framework’ and the ‘Study on Copyright and New technologies: copyright data management and Artificial Intelligence’; underlines the importance of clarifying the conditions of use of copyright-protected content as data input (images, music, films, databases etc.) and in theboth by humans using AI and for the independent AI-generated production of cultural and audiovisual outputs;