BETA

Activities of Bart STAES related to 2011/2226(DEC)

Shadow reports (2)

SECOND REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2010 PDF (179 KB) DOC (94 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: CONT
Dossiers: 2011/2226(DEC)
Documents: PDF(179 KB) DOC(94 KB)
REPORT on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Food Safety Authority for the financial year 2010 PDF (208 KB) DOC (150 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: CONT
Dossiers: 2011/2226(DEC)
Documents: PDF(208 KB) DOC(150 KB)

Amendments (12)

Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that the current Chair of the Management Board failed, in 2010, to declare her membership of the board of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI); notes that ILSI is financed by firms in the food, chemical and pharmaceutical sectors; asks the Authority to take measures to prohibit its experts and staff from being ILSI members;
2012/01/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
1. ...Calls on the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority dischargeto inform the discharge authority by the 30 June 2012 of the measures taken and of the improvements made in all the areas of concern and decides to postpone the discharge to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority in respect of the implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 2010;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Observes that the European Economic and Social Committee published an opinion on GMOs in the EU on 6 December 2011, which reiterates the Environment Council's demands from December 2008 concluding that improvements are deemed necessary in relation to the Authority's assessments of environmental risk; asks for a greater role to be given for external expertise from Member States and independent scientists, and for the publishing of experimental data supplied by the applicants;
2012/01/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 1
Paragraph 1
1. ...Postpones its decision on granting the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 2010;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Observes that the European Ombudsman, on 7 December 2011, concluded that the Authority had not carried out as thorough an assessment of a potential conflict of interest arising from the move of a Head of Unit of the Authority to a biotechnology company as it should have done, and called on the Authority to improve the way it applies its rules and procedures to avoid future 'revolving door' cases involving staff members;
2012/01/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Regrets the omissions from declarations of interests and of breaches of Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union in several areas (notably GMOs and sweeteners) which have recurred since 2008; considers that such incidents seriously undermine the Authority's credibility ;
2012/01/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Urges the Authority to take practical steps to counter the problems it encounters, which shall include: - explaining how the Authority will assess the severity of the potential conflicts of interest identified ; - drafting proposals to tackle the problem of the 'revolving door' system, which allows senior experts to move to the private sector to take up a post in the area they were 'controlling' as a civil servant and similar moves from the private sector to the Authority; considers that it should draw up guidelines, pursuant to Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, to be implemented by the Authority's staff ; - implementing penalties for deliberate omissions from declarations of interests.
2012/01/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. ICalls ofn the opinion, on the basis of the data available, that discharge can be grantedAgency, therefore, to inform the discharge authority by June 2012 of the measures taken and the improvements made in respect of all these areas of concern and considers that discharge to the Executive Director of the European Food Safety Authority in respect of the implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 2010 should be postponed until the abovementioned problems have been resolved.
2012/01/10
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 a (new)
Postpones the discharge to the agency awaiting substantial replies and actions on the critical remarks and requests made
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Considers that, while a dialogue with industry on product assessment methodologies is legitimate and necessary, this dialogue should not undermine the independence of the Authority nor the integrity of risk assessment procedures; asks therefore the Authority to consider as a conflict of interest the current or recent past participation of its Management Board, panel and working group members or staff to International Life Science Institute (ILSI) activities such as taskforces, scientific committees or chairs for conferences;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Considers that product assessment should not be based solely on industry's data, but should duly take into account independent scientific literature published in peer reviewed journals; stresses that extra caution should be paid to industry influence in the elaboration of guidelines and assessment methodologies, which should not favour industry-sponsored studies on speculative grounds and which should be elaborated in an open, transparent and balanced manner;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Welcomes that the Authority has adopted a new definition of conflicts of interests, based on the OECD definition, but warns that further improvements are necessary to strengthen the Authority's policy on independence; stresses in particular that the criteria that define a conflict of interests should be clarified and widened, and include current and recent past activities;
2012/03/07
Committee: CONT