BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps

6 Amendments of Dominique VLASTO related to 2011/0398(COD)

Amendment 70 #
Christine DE VEYRAC, Dominique VLASTO, Jim HIGGINS, Michel DANTIN
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) Use of noise abatement operational procedures must not take precedence over the need to ensure flight safety. The competent authorities should therefore ensure that operational restriction measures do not impair the upholding of appropriate safety measures.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 90 #
Michel DANTIN, Dominique VLASTO, Christine DE VEYRAC
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
This Regulation shall apply to movements of aircraft engaged in civil aviation.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 93 #
Michel DANTIN, Dominique VLASTO, Christine DE VEYRAC
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
It shall not apply to movements of aircraft engaged in military, customs, police, or similar services.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 169 #
Michel DANTIN, Dominique VLASTO, Christine DE VEYRAC
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d
(d) not as a first resort, operating restrictionsoperating restrictions, only after considering the beneficial effect in terms of noise abatement of points (a), (b) and (c) of this article.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 251 #
Michel DANTIN, Dominique VLASTO, Christine DE VEYRAC
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Where the operating restriction concerns the withdrawal of marginally compliant aircraft from an airport, no new services shall be allowed with marginally compliant aircraft at that airport six months after the notification. The competent authorities shall decide on the annual rate for removing marginally compliant aircraft from the fleet of affected operators at that airport, taking due account of the age of the aircraft and the composition of the total fleet. Without prejudice to paragraph 3 of Article 4, this rate shall not be more than 20% of that operator’s fleet ofat that airport. This annual rate may not exceed 20% of movements and must apply uniformly to every operator concerned on the basis of the number of movements of its marginally compliant aircraft serving thatat a given airport.
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 263 #
Dominique VLASTO, Christine DE VEYRAC
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10
Article 10 Right of scrutiny 1. At the request of a Member State or on its own initiative, and without prejudice to a pending appeal procedure, the Commission may scrutinise the decision on an operating restriction, prior to its implementation. Where the Commission finds that the decision does not respect the requirements set out in this Regulation, or is otherwise contrary to Union law, it may suspend the decision. 2. The competent authorities shall provide the Commission with information demonstrating compliance with this Regulation. 3. The Commission shall decide in accordance with the advisory procedure laid down in Article 13(2), in particular taking into account the criteria in Annex II, whether the competent authority concerned may proceed with the introduction of the operating restriction. The Commission shall communicate its decision to the Council and the Member State concerned. 4. Where the Commission has not adopted a decision within a period of six months after it has received the information referred to in paragraph 2, the competent authority may apply the envisaged decision on an operating restriction.deleted
2012/09/28
Committee: TRAN
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation