BETA

28 Amendments of Nicolae ŞTEFĂNUȚĂ related to 2020/2003(INI)

Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the publication of the 20th and 21st annual reports; deplores the late publication of information about exports during 2017 and 2018, albeit with delay; believes that the publication of both reports represent a step forward towards a common EU position in the field of arms export, in the framework of an ever more challenging international context marked by increasing volumes of export and decreasing levels of transparency; considers both reports as valuable complements to the UN reports on global and regional arms export transparency;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that ten Member States made full submissions to the 20th annual report, and eleven to the 21st; deplores the fact that two of the main exporting countries – Germany and the UK – did not make full submissions, thereby showing an increased implementation of common rules at a time of decreasing global transparency in the arms trade, especially among several major arms exporting countries; calls on Member States to provide submissions for future annual reports with a view to further strengthening the EU’s efforts to improve the transparency of the global arms trade;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Deplores the fact thatCalls on Member States to use very different information in order to generate data on the value of licences, which rendersharmonised and EU-level standardised data on the value of licences and other arms transfers, with a view to make the annual report considerably lessmore usable as a comparative data set and serves to diminish its transparency and accountability before citizens and parliaments; urges France, in particular, to refrain from submitting data on the value of licences at pre-contract stage and broad values for global licences, which undermines the comparability of the reportas a tool to increase its transparency and accountability;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 68 #
4. Notes that the countries of the Middle East and North Africa, a region of on-going sever al armed conflicts, and violations of international law and human rights remain the foremost regional destination for exports according to the last two annual reports; is concerned that this regional focus undermines the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and specific EU action aimed at regional peace and stability and promotion of international law respect for human rights; notes that in some cases, the arms exported to certain countries, for example to Saudi Arabia, UAE and members of the Saudi-led coalition, have been used in conflicts such as that in Yemen where 22 million people found themselves in need of humanitarian aid and protection; recalls that such exports clearly violate the Common Position;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the EU has been implementing a number of arms embargoes25 ; _________________ 25 https://www.sanctionsmap.eu/#/main?chec ked=, notes that whereas these embargoes could deprive a country of military resources, in some cases they are essential for regional peace and stability and notes that such embargoes ensure that the EU does not contribute to humanitarian crises, human rights abuses and atrocities;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes Member States’ renewed commitment to the legally binding Common Position as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1560 and stresses the importance of thoroughly assessing export licence applications for military technology and equipment according to the criteria stipulated therein;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Supports Council’s commitment to strengthening the control of export of military technology and equipment; notes the willingness of Member States to reinforce cooperation and promote convergence in this field, within the framework of the CFSP; in this regard, calls on Member States to develop, implement and uphold common standards of management of transfers of military technology and equipment;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1560 and the relevant conclusions of 16 September 2019 have the potential to ensure that EU citizens are furnished with better information about threflect a growing awareness among Member States of the need for even greater national and EU-wide strategic choices made by their governmentsnsparency and convergence in anthe area which directly affects their security and their countries’ adherence to values and normsof arms export and the need to strengthen public oversight in this sensitive national security domain;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls on EU Member States exporting arms to regions with ongoing conflicts to adhere to the greatest possible extent to CFSP principles, objectives and trade regimes;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Supports Council’s reaffirmation that military equipment and technology should be traded in a responsible and accountable way; welcomes Council’s renewed commitment to further promoting cooperation and convergence in Member States’ policies to prevent the export of military technology and equipment that might be used for internal repression or international aggression, or contribute to regional instability;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Supports the Council’s decision to introduce a clear reporting deadline for national submissions, as well as clear standards for the report’s format; welcomes the steps taken towards the online approach and encourages the further development of the latter;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes Council’s support for clear guidelines on information-sharing and exchange between Member States on their arms export policies; welcomes the steps taken towards the digital approach with the COARM Online System and encourages its further expansion;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. NotWelcomes that since the adoption of the legally binding Common Position in 2008, an increasing number of weapon systems produced in Europe are made up of components from multiple countries and involve bi- or multilateral cooperation for; underlines the positive role of technological, industrial and political reasoncooperation in promoting confidence building among Member States and third countries;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes an increase in the transfer of knowledge and technology, which allows third countries to undertake licensed production of European military technology; believes that this process can foster the harmonisation of public oversight and transparency standards in defence production and accelerate the creation of internationally recognised and respected rules on arms production and export;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that bilateral and multilateral agreements may further reduce convergence at EU level and that the failure to regulate exports uniformly between the Member States and the lack of convergence and accountability in export decisions to third countries have a negative impact on human rights and international law and regional peace and stability, generate market distortions, and hinder industrial strategic planning, economies of scale and a level playing field;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. NotWelcomes that EU funds such as the Preparatory Action on Defence Research (PADR), the European Defence Industrial Development Programme (EDIDP) and the European Defence Fund (EDF), initiatives such as the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD) and the European Peace Facility (EPF), legislation such as the intra- Community transfers and defence procurement directives of 2009, and the creation of administrative capacities such as the Commission Directorate-General for Defence Industry and Space (DG DEFIS) are heralding an increasing Europeanisation of arms production and capability development as well as strengthening cooperation among Member States and enhancing common standards in the field of arms exports;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Believes that the strengthening of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base should be accompanied by closer cooperation and convergence in the control of exports of military technology and equipment, with the aim of improving the effectiveness of the CFSP and the CSDP in particular;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. UnderlinWelcomes the fact that the interinstitutional agreement on the establishment of the EDF authorises the Commission to assess whether the transfer of ownership or the granting of an exclusive licence of EDF-co-funded military technology contravenes the security and defence interests of the EU and its Member States or the objectives of the fund as set out in Article 3 of the proposed regulation; notes that this new legislation establishes a specific type of control function for the Commission with regard to a specific category of exports of military technology to third countrieis a clear commitment to a greater level of control and equips the Commission with additional powers of civilian oversight with regard to a specific category of exports of military technology to third countries, thereby further enhancing transparency and minimising the risk of a misuse of EU funds;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Welcomes the strengthening of EU defence cooperation in the framework of the CSDP, resulting in increased convergence of common rules and standards of transparency of arms exports and technology and fostering confidence- building among Member States and third country partners;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 – point a
a) to add the following additional categories in a revised reporting template, in line with internationally recognized standards, in order to implement the recent September 2019 Council conclusions: the exact type of weapon and the quantity exported, denomination of the munitions, the lot size and the specific end-user, revoked licences, and the value and duration of contracts regarding post-delivery services such as training and maintenance;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 – point b
b) to disaggregate data with regard to denial information so as to facilitate thecollect and present data in a way that would enable, if required, the necessary scrutiny of specific shipments or Member States;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 – point c
c) to clarifydevelop EU and internationally recognized definitions such as licensed value and actual exports so as to facilitate the comparability of data between Member States and at international level;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes the decision to transform the annual report into an interactive, reliable and searchable online database and expects it to be up and running before publication of the export data for 2019; calls on the EEAS to inform Parliament about the precise date on which this database will go online; urges COARM to choose a solution that enables data to be exported in a structured format;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 – point a
a) to systematically discuss individual licence requests within COARM, where the receiving destination or recipient has been identified as a risk by one or several Member States or the EEAS; calls on Member States to provide a realistic justification if they decide to grant exports to such destinations;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Believes that the EU institutions should organise peer reviews with a view to encouraginge authorities to share best practices on the collection and processing of data, fostering a better understanding of different national approaches, identifying differencnational peculiarities as regards the interpretation of the eight criteria, and discussing ways and means to improve harmonisation and convergence among Member States;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Strongly believes that a much higher level of convergence as regards the strict application of the criteria will strengthen human rights, international law and the CFSP, will contribute to the promotion of peace and stability and bolster the EU’s strategic security interests and strategic autonomy;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses that effective end-use controls are crucial for acould result in a more responsible export policy and forcould lowering the risk of diversion in particular; calls on the Council, the Member States, the EEAS and the Commission to set up a large-scalcomprehensive training and capacity-building programme for national and EU officials on arms export controls; stresses the need to use and adequate amount of EU funding to ensure that sufficientthe necessary staff resources are available at national and EU levels and at delegations and embassies in importing countries for the purposes of implementing viable end-use controls of all aspects of the global arms trade; calls on the EEAS and COARM to report on iTrace any identified diversion of EU- origin goods as part of the annual report;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Considers that regular consultations with national parliaments, arms export control authorities, industry associations and civil society are central toneeded to enhance meaningful transparency; calls on COARM to enhance dialogue with civil society and industries, as well as consultations with Parliament and arms export control authorities; encourages civil society and academia to exercise independent scrutiny of the arms trade and calls on the Member States and the EEAS to support such activities, including by financial means;
2020/05/06
Committee: AFET