BETA

75 Amendments of John PURVIS related to 2008/2148(INI)

Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the condition set out in Rule 39(2), that no proposal should be in preparation, is duly fulfilled, except in the case of the Commission's published review of Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the current financial crisis, which was triggered by US subprime mortgages, has spread worldwide due to the increasingly integrated and contagious nature of markets, indicating that existing financial market regulation and supervision could not cope with it and a significant reform is therefore welcome,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the crisis has led to a credit crunch entailing a higher price of credit for all market players; whereas longshort-term economic growth and employment are threatened by the resulting fragile financial markets,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas poorly regulated capital market intermediation and the shadow banking system have emerged as new sources of systemic risk; whereas the exponential growth in derivatives has increased risk and facilitated new methods of speculation,deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the possibility to transfer credit risk through "originate-to-distribute" model while providing a means origination and distribution model has weakened incentives to evaluate and monitor riskf additional competition among mortgage lenders and providing additional products and lower pricing to consumers, needs to be made more transparent,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas herding, inadequate risk management, irresponsible lending, excessive debt (leverage), andexcessive investment in illiquid and complex financial instruments pose significantcould pose risks to financial stabilityinstitutions,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas financial regulation and innovation,novative techniques which wasere designed to diminish risk at the micro level, hasand were regulation compliant in themselves, could lead in certain circumstances to risk concentration and has exacerbated risk at the macro level, thus amplifying systemic risk,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas regulatory arbitrage mustshould be prevented,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas transparency towardshe full confidence of the public, investors and supervisory authorities must be restored,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas current compensation schemes can reward excessive risk at the expense of-taking rather than prudence,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas conflicts of interest can arise from the business model used by some financial institutions, and credit rating agencies, and audit and law firms,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas failures bythe limitations of credit ratings agencies generated substantial negative externalities and market uncertaintre often poorly understood by recipients and inadequately defined by the agencies; and whereas credit rating agencies have offered unsatisfactory' procedures need reviewing, particularly the adequacy of selfregulatory solutions,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas self-regulatory solutions, proposed by the credit rating agencies are as yet untested and probably insufficient to meet the pivotal role they play in the financial system,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas market integration, desirable as it may be in many respects, does not necessarily enhance financial stability,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas the EU needs more cohernsistently and harmoniseffectively implemented regulation and supervision in order to mitigate the risk of future financial crises and to ensure a level playing field across borders and between regulated and unregulated market participants,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P
P. whereas a comprehensive reformview of current EU regulatory and supervisory arrangements is necessarunderway together with measurinitiatives to improve global supervisory cooperation; whereas such a reform should refer to covering the capital adequacy framework, transparency, and governance as key prerequisites for improved and effective regulatory and supervisory arrangements in a globally coordinated manner,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P a (new)
Pa. whereas supervisory cooperation needs to take into account the third country dimension of supervision of international groups as most, if not all, major financial groups in the EU have third country interests,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P b (new)
Pb. whereas following the ECOFIN Council conclusions of October 2007, December 2007 and June 2008, a major programme of work is already under way to make targeted improvements to the arrangements for EU supervisory cooperation; whereas extensive programmes of work are also in the EU and worldwide to understand the causes of market turmoil and to respond appropriately and therefore any new legislative proposals for fundamental reform of the EU supervisory configuration and associated issues may be inappropriate, and give rise to new uncertainty and risk,
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Requests the Commission to submit to Parliament, by 30 November 2008, on the basis of Article 44, Article 47(2), Article 55, Article 95, Article 105(6), Article 202, Article 211 or Article 308 of the EC Treaty, a legislative proposal or proposals on an EU supervisory configuration, credit rating agencies and other relevant issues, following the detailed recommendations below.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Requires the Commission to carry out a comprehensive impact assessment of such legislative proposal.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the financial implications of the requested proposal or proposals should be covered by EU budgetary allocations for the establishment of any EU supervisory authority.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.1 – point a
(a) imposensure appropriate capital requirements onfor all entities operating on financial markets;
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.1 – point c
(c) ensure that the rules are anti-cyclical as far as possible;
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.1 – point d
(d) reform the framework to improve risk management and not to rely excessivelyensure the adequacy of the risk management framework and in particular onf mathematical models;
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.1 – point e
(e) require higher capital chargeensure appropriate capital requirements for complex financial products and derivatives;
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.1 – point f
(f) requiensure disclosure of off-balance-sheet items, structured investment vehicles (SIVs) and any liquidity assistance facility, and require proper assessment of the risks that they pose, so that market participants are aware of the existence of these vehicles and how they operate.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.2 – point a
(a) Securitisation: FRequire national regulation to monitor the implementation of industry-led initiatives to foster transparency, clarity, and data (quarterly)timely provision of data on complex financial products and the securitisation process.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.2 – point b
(b) Complex Financial Products (CFS): Require investors to evaluate and monitor risk of CFS. Consistent rating terminology that clearly differentiates rating for such products should be established and ratings should reflect the vulnerability of such products to downgradesInstitute a programme to enhance the ability of investors to evaluate and monitor risk of CFS.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.2 – point c – point i
(i) require rules on control to ensure that companies and financial institutions cannot artificially keep material special purpose vehicles or SIVs, etc. off their balance sheets;deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.2 – point c – point ii
(ii) requiensure rules on valuation and pricing standards ofor complex financial products are appropriate/sufficient.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.2 – point d
(d) Unregulated markets: RequireDetermine to what extent increased transparency of over-the-counter (OTC) markets and address major sources of systemic risk (i.e. counterparty concentration risk), e.g. by requiring OTC trades to be cleared in clearing housesis appropriate.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.3 – point a
(a) Securitisation: Require originators to assess and monitor risk and retain a significant portion of the debt or mortgage backed securities originated by them onEnsure that originators improve transparency to initial investors by clearly disclosing whether they intend to retain risk in a pool, or whether they intend to sell all risks to third parties, either immediately or in the future, so that investors in securitisation could make the decision at the outset as to whether the interests of the originator are aligned with their booksown.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.3 – point b
(b) Remuneration schemes: RequiEnsure financial institutions to disclose their remuneration policy, remuneration of individual directors, and remuneration packages for individuals other than directors and that all elements in compensation packages are expensed and remuneration of individual directors. Ensure that all transactions involving management can be clearly identified in the financial statements. RequiEnsure prudential supervisors to include in their assessment of risk management the influence of remuneration and bonus schemes to ensure that they contain balanced incentives and do not encourage extreme risk taking.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.3 – point c
(c) Corporate liability regime: Require aAmend the approach to liability regimes addressing fines and other penalties for failure to comply with financial services legislation. Ensure that executives in financial institutions in case of omission of duties or wrongful trading can be disqualified from working in the financial sector.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – point 1.3 – point d
(d) Credit rating agencies: MEnsure appropriate measures addressing e.g. conflicts of interests, quality assurance systems and oversight in a manner similar to those applicable to auditors. Ensure that credit rating agencies apply differentiated symbols for, and encourage further credit rating agency transparency on ratings methodologies, including information on how the ratings of complex debt products, mortgage related products and traditional debt. Ensure that full transparency is practised in ratings and that credit rating agencies do not turn sub-investments into investment grade securitiea particular structured product may be different from that for other products in terms of volatility or complexity, taking account of the need for investors to develop procedures to assess the credit of structured products without relying solely on ratings.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – point a
(a) Financial stability and systemic risks: Require the ECB to develop databases and forward-looking scenarios and policies on macro prudential supervision and financial stability. EU supervisors and central banks should provide non- public and confidential up-to-date micro prudential information to the ECB for it to fulfil this function and prevent systemic risk.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – point b
(b) Leveraged institutions: Expand the EU prudential and regulatory framework to reflect all sources of systemic risk, in particular by including leveraged entities carrying systemic risk into such a framework regardless of their legal form or seat.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – point c – point i – introductory part
(i) enhancing as necessary crisis prevention and management arrangements at EU level including:
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – point (c) – point (i) – indent 1
- facilitate monitoring and assessment of systemic financial risks at EU level;
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – point c – point i – indent 2
- set up an EU early-interventiona mechanism for dealing with weak and failing banks if the EU financial stability is threatened. Such a mechanism should be well-defined, clear, able to prompt action, and financed by the financial institutions;
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – point c – point i – indent 3
- facilitate the cross-border transfer of funds within a group in extreme situations;
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – point c – point i – indent 4
- discourage major financial groups from engaging in overly risky origination and distribution activities;
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – point c – point i – indent 5
- set clear and binding rules on cross- border crisis management and clarify state aid rules in cases of cross-border crisis;
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – point d
(d) Amend EU rules on deposit guarantees to introduce obligatory ex-ante schemes financed by contributions from financial institutions and administered independently of these institutions. The level of refund should be significantly increased andContinue to monitor the effectiveness of current EU rules on deposit guarantees. The level of refund will be made available to retail clients within a clearly defined and short timeframe.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – point f
(f) Require the setting up of a risk absorber that could be activated when financial stability is threatened.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – point g
(g) Introduce a small, special tax on financial transactions and give the Commission a mandate to strive for an international agreement committing all signatories to impose such a tax on financial transactions. Revenues should be used to finance the deposit and insurance guarantee schemes as well as risk absorbers.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.1 – point d
(d) RequiEnsure collection, exchange and access to relevant information amongst the members of the college and amongst all supervisors involved.
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.1 – point e– introductory part
(e) The colleges will decide and vote on the basis of a qualified majority voting (QMV) system based taking into account:deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.1 – point e – points i to iii
(i) the relative proportion of the groups’ assets in the different college members’ Member State; (ii) the relative proportion of the group's assets to a Member State’s GDP and/or size of the financial market concerned; (iii) the relative size of the deposits placed in the different Member States.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 - point 3.2
Point 3.2.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – title
3.3. Configuration of EU supervision: supervisory committeesdeleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point a
(a) By Autumn 2008 a regulation shall require transforming the existing Lamfalussy Level 3 committees into a configuration of EU supervision and giving the Lamfalussy Level 3 committees the status of supervisory agencies with an executive board (similar to the Eurosystem) and appropriate staffing and resources.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point b
(b) In addition to the advisory tasks the supervisory agencies shall be given the task (and the tools and resources) to ensure supervisory convergence and a level playing field in the implementation and enforcement of EU legislation.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point c
(c) An independent permanent chair as well as between one and five part-time vice-chairs (recruited from the boards of the composing authorities but with an independent mandate) should be appointed for a five year term by the Commission after consultation of the Parliament and the Council.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point d
(d) The supervisory agencies should present an annual work plan. Parliament, the Council and the Commission should approve the annual work plans and reports.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point e
(e) It shall be possible to decide on the basis of a QMV system that takes into account the relative size of the financial sector and the GDP of the Member State; this procedure should be used both for decisions on supervisory convergence issues and for the advice to the Commission on legislation and regulation.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point f – introductory part
(f) The supervisory committees should:deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point f – point i
(i) develop procedures for data provision in cross border situations;deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point f – point ii
(ii) issue recommendations on specific supervisory practice issues;deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point f – point iii
(iii) issue guidelines to streamline the supervisory practices of the colleges;deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point f – point iv
(iv) design common reporting standards and data provision requirements for cross-border groups, preferably in a multi purpose format such as XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language):deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point f – point v
(v) represent the EU in international sector bodies of supervisors like the International Organization of Securities Commissions.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point g
(g) The regulation should also provide for a presidium for the configuration of EU supervision consisting of five persons. It should be composed of the chairs of the three supervisory agencies. An independent chair should be appointed for a five-year term by the Commission after consultation of Parliament and Council. The chair of the CCMC should act as the vice chair.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point h – introductory part
(h) The presidium should act as the day- to-day executive of the configuration of EU supervision and have as its main tasks to:deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point h – point i
(i) coordinate between the agencies and sectors;deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point h – point ii
(ii) provide for common data and statistics;deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 290 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.3 – point h – point iii
(iii) cooperate with the European System of Central Banks and the ECB for the purpose of coordinating financial stability issues.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 294 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.4 – title
3.4. EU financial stability oversight bodydeleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 298 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.4 – point a
(a) By Autumn 2008 a regulation shall require establishing an EU financial stability oversight body that is able to collect and analyse micro and macro prudential information with the central banks. This must be linked to monetary and macro-economic information. The oversight body should also act as a rapid reaction force in crisis situations with a systemic impact for the EU.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 303 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.4 – point b
(b) The oversight body should be composed of the chairs of the three Lamfalussy Level 3 supervisory committees, the chair of the presidium, the chair of the CCMC, a representative of the European System of Central Banks (which is composed of all EU central banks) and a representative of the Eurosystem and the (Vice)President of the ECB charged with prudential supervision. The ECB ((Vice)-President) could chair the oversight body and the chair of the presidium of the configuration of EU supervision could be vice-chair.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 309 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.4 – point c – introductory part
(c) The main tasks should be to:deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 313 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.4 – point c – points i to iv
(i) establish a proper system of supervisory data collection and exchange; (ii) analyse and elaborate these data; (iii) develop procedures for provision and collection of confidential data; (iv) provide early warning signals about dynamics that can endanger the stability of the financial system;deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 317 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.4 – point c – point v
(v) act as rapid reaction force in case of a threat to financial stability;deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 322 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.4 – point c – point vi
(vi ) represent the EU in international bodies of supervisors such as the Financial Stability Forum and to be the counterpart for supervisors in other parts of the world.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 326 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – point 3.4 – point d
(d) The oversight body should be located within the ECB and its budget and staff should be provided by the ECB.deleted
2008/07/14
Committee: ECON