17 Amendments of Victor NEGRESCU related to 2016/2273(INI)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the EU e-Justice Portal is an essential tool for access to information and to justice, and constitutes an important step in achieving the modernisation of EU public administration;
Amendment 3 #
B. whereas better access to information and the increased use of improved digital tools for company-law- related formalities throughout the lifecycle of companies wshould reduce the administrative burden for companies, particularly where the relevant electronic public services are available across bordersserve legal certainty;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas single access to these registers through the e-Justice Portal is not yet possible because of differences in the technical standards used by Member States; considers that further efforts are needed to achieve accessible, interoperable and user-friendly eGovernment tools available to the public in the EU;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas the use of open standards is fundamental in order to allow EU citizens to participate in governmental platforms, and in order not to force citizens to use vendor-specific programs in order to communicate with their government;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to raise awareness of the e-Justice Portal and its uses, and to make the e-Justice Portal a one-stop shop for relevant legal information and for access to justice in the Member States; particular attention should be paid to giving people with disabilities access to the e-Justice Portal;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Stresses the need to maintain a human dimension where services are upgraded to electronic format, in order to enable citizens to benefit from personalised guidance and solutions;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the introduction of e- CODEX, allowing direct communications between citizens and courts in all Member States, as a major step to facilitate cross- border access to public services; calls also for interconnected databases at European level to further facilitate interoperability between legal authorities within the EU;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Stresses the importance of cyber- security and calls for EU-wide e- Government solutions capable of securing the personal data of EU citizens;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to consider further ways to promote digital solutions for formalities throughout a company’s lifecycle, in particular for online registration processes, the electronic filing of company documents and, the provision of information for business registers and the reporting of corporate income tax; notes that in this field legislation may be the only way to create an appropriate legal framework for EU- wide digital solutions, while ensuring that the public interest principles, such as tax liability, are complied with;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to consider further ways to promote digital solutions for formalities throughout a company’s lifecycle, in particular for online registration processes, the electronic filing of company documents and the provision of information for business registers; notes that in this field legislation may be the only way to create an appropriate legal framework for EU- wide digital solutions;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Commission to support Member States when putting in place automated centralised mechanisms which allow the identification, in a timely manner, of any natural or legal persons holding or controlling land and buildings within their territory, in order to prevent the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing; considers that this information should be directly accessible, at national level, to Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) and competent authorities, and should be accessible and searchable through the centralised mechanisms by the FIUs of other Member States;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls for coordination at EU level of the purchasing and implementation of e-Government solutions in order further facilitate data exchanges;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4 c. Considers that, in order to enable the timely pan-European implementation of the Action Plan, Member States should introduce specialized training courses on e-Government services for civil servants and decision makers;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 d (new)
Paragraph 4 d (new)
4 d. Considers that the Member States should facilitate communication and educational campaigns, in order to give European citizens full use of the capacities offered by the new e- Government portals and services;
Amendment 34 #
5. Considers that work on the electronic interconnection of Member States’ business and insolvency registers should be stepped up, and stresses the importance of this interconnection for the internal market; information to be provided should follow a common European template or framework.
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member states to promote open standards when developing public digital solutions.