6 Amendments of Michel TEYCHENNÉ related to 2008/2240(INI)
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas, as far as greening transport is concerned, the Commission has put forward a number of suggestions aimed at combating climate change, but, when it comes to taking the necessary action, it has produced no more than a communication on the internalisation of external costs for all modes of transport, a communication on rail noise abatement, and one specific legislative proposal revising the tolls applicable to heavy goods vehicles,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – introductory part
Paragraph 5 – introductory part
5. Regretcognises that the Commission has failed to produced a plan to green transport, that is to say, everymodel for the assessment of external costs for all modes of transport sector, and has instead:
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point a
Paragraph 5 – point a
a) adopting a piecemeal approach, submitted guidelines for estimating the external costs of transport and for their internalisation in individual sectors,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point b
Paragraph 5 – point b
b) again opting for a partial solution, confined its specific proposals to higherproposed the authorisation of road tolls for heavy goods vehicles, and even thesewhich would apply only in Member States that so wished, and,
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point c
Paragraph 5 – point c
c) as regards rail noise abatement, merely listed a range of options and future measurproposed taxing the external costs caused by train noise via noise- differentiated infrastructure charges;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes with dismay that the Commission communication did not make any substantive statements regardingclarified the methods for the calculation of external costs for the different modes of transport, but merely referred to ausing the ‘Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector’, which, given the disparate nature of its contributions, is more likely to cause confusion than to shed light on unanswered question and the technical annexes that shed light on a number of points;