BETA

10 Amendments of Jean-Paul DENANOT related to 2017/2022(BUD)

Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Highlights Parliament's role in building European political awareness and promoting the Union values;
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Welcomes the communication campaign as a helpful effort to explain the purpose of the Union and the Parliament to the citizens; underlines, however, that this campaign should be limited to explaining the role of the European Union and the Parliament;
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. ConsidersTakes note of the total amount proposed for the communication campaign for the 2019 elections to be too high, with EUR 25 million of expenditure in 2018 and EUR 8,33 million in 2019; notes that with a higher amount of financial commitments are required in 2018, nevertheless considers that the distribution of appropriations could be adjusted by lowering spending in 2018;
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Considers that the loss of 136 posts from the Parliament’s Secretariat in 2016, due to the annual staff reduction and increase of political group staff posts, may create difficulties for the provision of services by the Parliament’s administration; calls on the Secretary- General to provide more information regarding staff reduction measures last year, and to evaluate the consequences of budgetary decisions on the functioning of the institution;deleted
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Considers that interpretation and 32. translation are essential to the functioning of the House and acknowledges the quality and added value of services provided by the interpreters; re-iterates Parliament's position expressed in its abovementioned resolution of 14 April 2016 that the Secretary-General should make further rationalisation proposals, such as extending the use of translation and interpretation on demand, particularly for Intergroups of the European Parliament, as well as examining the potential efficiency gains from utilising latest language technologies, and assessing the impact of the revised framework for staff interpreters in improving resource- efficiency and productivity;
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
36. Considers that recent controversies surrounding the funding of European political parties and political foundations have exposed weaknesses in existing management and control systems;deleted
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
37. Believes that the entry into force of Regulations (EU) No 1141/201415 and (EU) No 1142/201416 will provide additional control mechanisms, such as the requirement to register with the Authority for European political parties and political foundations; considers however that there is further room for improvement to these measures; notes that parties and foundations will begin to apply for funding under the new rules in the budgetary year 2018; __________________ 15 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the statute and funding of European political parties and European political foundations (OJ L 317, 4.11.2014, p. 1). 16 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1142/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 as regards the financing of European political parties (OJ L 317, 4.11.2014, p. 28).
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38
38. Highlights that a number of issues have been identified with the current system of co-financing, in which contributions and grants from the Parliament’s budget for both parties and foundations cannot exceed 85% of eligible expenditure, with the remaining 15% to be covered by own resources; notes for instance that shortfalls in membership contributions and donations are often balanced by contributions-in-kind, despite difficulties in determining both their value and their necessity in realising the work programme of a party or foundation;
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
39. Believes that European political parties and foundations should become more reliant on own resources and reduce their dependency on the Parliament’s budget; considers that the 85% upper limit of contributions or grants should be progressively lowered; maintains that an increasing reliance on own resources would lower the risk to the Parliament’s budget in recovering amounts erroneously or fraudulently spent;deleted
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
43. Continues to question the added value of the LUX Prize, particularly given that the participants in a survey to determine the awareness and perception of the prize were largely limited to Members and film-makers;deleted
2017/03/16
Committee: BUDG