5 Amendments of Jean-Paul DENANOT related to 2017/2039(INI)
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas ILO estimates the total needed investment to fully reach the targets of the Youth Guarantee scheme in the EU to 45 billion euros per year;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that in order to develop a European Framework for Quality and Effective Apprenticeship as a way to boost the fight against the youth unemployment, the structural funds could be deployed in a more targeted manner for the financing of Vocational Education and Training (VET) centres as well as any relevant action undertaken to support apprenticeships; and depending on the regional level of development, this support should be more saliently reflected in the investment priorities of the European Social Fund (for the apprentice’s work compensation and the social security coverage) as well as of the European Regional Development Fund as regards the provision of infrastructure and equipment for the VET centres.
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to ensure consistency in youth employment investments by mergingencouraging synergies between available sources and creating a single set ofholistic guide of the different existing rules resulting in a greater impact, synergies, effectiveness and simplification on the ground; recalls in this regard the priority to reduce the administrative burden for managing authorities in order to foster public investments and to avoid under-implementation resulting in funds redirected to Member-States as for the ESI funds;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to improve the planning of the post-2020 youth employment investments by applying the approach used in programming the ESI Funds, where funding is subject to comprehensive preliminary planning and indicative- oriented ex-ante conditionalities in order to guarantee the coherence of the different programmes;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls, moreover, on the Commission to redesign the current evaluation mechanism by focusing on outcome criteria and performance audits in an ameliorative, not sclerosive perspective.