8 Amendments of Iosif MATULA related to 2012/2298(INI)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – introductory part
Paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Recalls the need for the EU to develop a genuine common transport policy, ensuring the pertinence of transport for all regions; calls on the Member States to ensure that the mix of models reflects moves towards more sustainable mobility; stresses the need to promote successful practices in the field of sustainable transport with a view to their increasingly broad implementation and use.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point a (new)
(a) Recommends that local authorities build on examples of good practice by developing sustainable urban mobility plans in close consultation with civil society;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that this strategy should be based on an integrative linear development model in which interregional connections and crossborder missing links are accorded the highest importance and innovative solutions for multimodal transport can reduce regional disparities and enhance territorial cohesion; is mindful of the fact that there are currently considerable differences between regions in the field of transport networks, and draws attention to the need for investment in sustainable transport technologies in the poorer and more isolated regions in order to ensure balanced development in line with the objective of cohesion;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that all European regions and their respective labour pools should take advantage of such a strategy, and stresses the need to take account of regional specificities and potential, especially when developing cleaner transport modes; calls on the authorities at subsidiary levels to create, alongside stakeholders, innovation partnerships in the field of sustainable mobility;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 – point a (new)
Paragraph 5 – point a (new)
(a) Encourages national and regional authorities to devise research and development strategies that are based on smart specialisation, with a view to ensuring a more efficient take-up of structural funding and enhancing synergies between private and public sector investment;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls, in this connection, that a strategy for innovative technology has to be thought out through territories’ characteristics, in which context a ‘one size fits all’ approach will not deliver; considers, for instance, that island, mountainous and sparsely populated regions have specific types of potential which call for appropriate and innovative mobility solutions; urges a stepping-up of cooperation between regions with similar development potentials with a view to enhancing the exchange of feasible good practices;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Encourages the Commission not to concentrate public transport services solely in in line with the rural-urban pareas, buttnership for sustainable development (RURBAN) and also to ensure mobility in all regions, especially the most deprived ones, in the interests of integrated territorial cohesion;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 – point a (new)
Paragraph 9 – point a (new)
(a) Recommends that the Commission develop initiatives to identify and reward sustainable urban development programmes, along the lines, for example, of the RegioStars awards;