7 Amendments of Jeroen LENAERS related to 2015/2295(BUD)
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that the derogation from point (a) of Article 4(1) of the EGF Regulation in this case relates to a number of redundancies which is significantly lower than the threshold of 500 redundancies; accepts the argument of the Irish authorities for this derogation and welcomes that the application includes an equal number of NEETs to be supported by the measures;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out that PWAI could have been negatively affected by the lack of a provision of the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement (FTA) which would exempt repaired goods from customs duties on re- entry; draws attention to a similar provision in the US-Korea FTA, which results in preferential conditions for US companies which could also contribute to the market loss of PWAI as compared to US enterprises operating in the same sector;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Notes that since the redundancies of PWAI occurred later than those of Lufthansa Technik, which operated in the same sector, those workers could not have been involved in a sectoral application covering the dismissals in the two enterprises together; considers therefore that those redundancies can only be addressed in this separate application;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Welcomes the variety of training measures to be provided to the beneficiaries; notes that the enterprise and self-employment support measures will only be available to a limited number of beneficiaries;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Notes that the authorities estimate that 24,81 % of the costs will be used for time limited allowances, which remains much below the maximum allowed 35 % of all costs;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Recalls that, in line with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services supported by the EGF should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that trade policy decisions are examined from the aspect of their potential impact on the Union labour market;