[ParlTrack]

Shadow opinions (1)

2016/11/22
Committee: TRAN
Dossiers: 2012/2092(BUD)
Documents: PDF(135 KB) DOC(95 KB)

Amendments (4)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1

1. Stresses that EU transport policy is key to achieving the priority of sustainable ~~growth~~development of the Europe 2020 Strategy, including the 20-20-20 and safety targets, and facilitating the functioning of the EU internal market;

2012/07/26
Committee: TRAN

Isabelle DURANT

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3

3. Stresses that the TEN-T programme, through investment in high European added value infrastructures, is essential to raise the competitiveness of the EU as a whole, by creatmoving ~~the missing infrastructure and removing bottlenec~~bottlenecks and building as well as improving trans- border infrastructure, such as rail links, within the internal market; and highlights that ~~infrastructure projects also directly contribute to growth by stimulating employment during the building phase~~, in particular, the improving and upgrading of existing infrastructure projects contribute to more efficient investment by stimulating employment; underlines the role of the TEN-T programme for meeting the adaptation to the climate change goal, safety, environmental protection and biodiversity by ensuring the future sustainability of the EU transport networks; calls for adequate funding of the TEN-T Executive Agency to be able to cope with preparatory work for the implementation of the Connecting Europe Facility.;

2012/07/26
Committee: TRAN

Isabelle DURANT

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6

6. Underlines the importance of sufficient budgetary allocations to programmes to support the further development of the Single European Sky, Single European Railway Area, Integrated Maritime Policy, electronic ticketing, alternative fuels, renewable energies and urban mobility; reiterates its disappointment on the absence of a budgetary line on tourism and regrets the constant decrease in the ~~road~~ safety budgetary allocation;

2012/07/26
Committee: TRAN

Göran FÄRM, Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT, Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT, Ashley FOX, Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG, Bart STAES, Diane DODDS, Ulrike LUNACEK, Dan JØRGENSEN, Krzysztof LISEK, Judith A. MERKIES, Marisa MATIAS, Lara COMI, Isabelle DURANT, Oldřich VLASÁK, Nils TORVALDS, Jan MULDER, George LYON, Mário DAVID

Motion for a resolution
Paragraphs 77 a, b, c, d, e, f, g (new)

Working arrangements of the Parliament 77a. Believes that, like every directly elected parliament, the Parliament should have the right to decide on its own seat and working place arrangements; 77b. Declares therefore that the Parliament's seat and places of work for Members and officials should be decided upon by the Parliament itself; 77c. Urges the two arms of the budgetary authority (the Council and the Parliament), in order to make financial savings and promote a more sustainable climate- and environment friendly solution, to raise the issue of a single seat and Parliament's working places for Members and officials in the upcoming negotiations on the next MFF for 2014- 2020; 77d. Urges the Member States to revise the issue of the Parliament's seat and working places in the next revision of the Treaty by amending protocol 6; 77e. Calls in the meantime on the Council and the Parliament to start elaborating a road-map towards a single seat and a more efficient use of the Parliament's working places, taking into account specific up to date figures detailing the cost of each place of work and working conditions for staff, as well as economic, societal and environmental factors - to be presented in a report by 30 June 2013; 77f. Believes that, as the most viable place for Parliament's seat would be Brussels, co-located alongside Council, Commission and the EEAS, such a road- map should also include a reasonable solution for Strasbourg and Luxemburg so as to avoid, to the extent possible, any loss of jobs and income for citizens and local and regional authorities in those places of work; such a solution could preferably entail locating other institutions permanently to Strasbourg and Luxemburg that could make full use of the Parliament's buildings; 77g. Suggests that the agreement between the authorities in Luxembourg and the Parliament, on the number of staff to be present in Luxembourg, should be revised taking into account a revision of the Parliament's needs;

2012/10/08
Committee: BUDG

Activities of Isabelle DURANT related to 2012/2092(BUD)

Shadow opinions (1)

Amendments (4)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024