19 Amendments of Helmut SCHOLZ related to 2016/0275(COD)
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to allow the ELM to respond to potential upcoming challenges and Union priorities, as well as to provide a strategic response addressing root causes of migration, the maximum ceiling for the EIB financing operations under the EU guarantee should be increased to EUR 32 300 000 000 by releasing the optional additional amount of EUR 3 000 000 000. Under the general mandate, the amount of EUR 1 42 500 000 000 should be earmarked for projects in the public sector directed to refugees and host communities in crisis affected areas.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) a maximum amount of EUR 30 000 000 000 under a general mandate, of which an amount of up to EUR 1 42 500 000 000 is earmarked for projects in the public sector directed to refugees and host communities;
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
‘To ensure that private sector investments have the greatest development impact, the EIB shall endeavour to strengthensure that the local private sector in beneficiary countries is strengthened through support to local investment as provided for in point (a) of paragraph 1. EIB financing operations supporting the general objectives set out in paragraph 1 shall endeavour to also enhance its support to investment projects run by SMEs from the recipient country and from the Union. In order to effectively monitor the use of funds for the benefit of the SMEs concerned, the EIB shall establish and maintain adequate contractual provisions imposing standard reporting obligations on both the financial intermediaries and the beneficiaries’;
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 8 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 8 – point b
(b) the public sector, including municipalities and public sector entities, in terms of infrastructure and services, and particularly for health care and with special facilities for children, for sanitation services and school education, to address significantly increased needs.’; ;
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – point B – point ii
Annex I – point B – point ii
(ii) Eastern Europe, Southern Caucasus and Russia: EUR 63 0084 000 000;
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – point C – point ii
Annex I – point C – point ii
(ii) Asia: EUR 12 0404 000 000;
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – point C a (new)
Annex I – point C a (new)
Ca. Sub-Saharan Africa: EUR 2 000 000 000
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex III – point C a (new)
Annex III – point C a (new)
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex III – point D – paragraph 1
Annex III – point D – paragraph 1
Southern Africa
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) In order to allow the ELM to respond to potential upcoming challenges and Union priorities, as well as to provide a strategic response addressing root causes of migration, the maximum ceiling for the EIB financing operations under the EU guarantee should be increased to EUR 32 300 000 000 by releasing the optional additional amount of EUR 3 000 000 000. Under the general mandate, the amount of EUR 1 42 500 000 000 should be earmarked for projects in the public sector directed to refugees and host communities in crisis affected areas.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex III – point D – paragraph 2
Annex III – point D – paragraph 2
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) a maximum amount of EUR 30 000 000 000 under a general mandate, of which an amount of up to EUR 1 42 500 000 000 is earmarked for projects in the public sector directed to refugees and host communities; (This amendment applies through the text)
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
To ensure that private sector investments have the greatest development impact, the EIB shall endeavour to strengthensure that the local private sector, including cooperatives and social enterprises, in beneficiary countries is strengthened through support to local investment as provided for in point (a) of paragraph 1. EIB financing operations supporting the general objectives set out in paragraph 1 shall endeavour to also enhance its support to investment projects run by SMEs from the recipient country and from the Union. In order to effectively monitor the use of funds for the benefit of the SMEs concerned, the EIB shall establish and maintain adequate contractual provisions imposing standard reporting obligations on both the financial intermediaries and the beneficiaries;
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2 – point b
Article 3 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2 – point b
(b) the public sector, including municipalities and public sector entities, in terms of infrastructure and services, in particular for health care with special facilities for children, for sanitation services and school education, to address significantly increased needs.;
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – point B – point ii
Annex I – point B – point ii
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point B – point ii
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point B – point ii
(ii) Eastern Europe, Southern Caucasus and Russia: EUR 63 0084 000 000;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – point C – point ii
Annex I – point C – point ii
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point C – point ii
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point C – point ii
(ii) Asia: EUR 12 0404 000 000;
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex I – point C a (new)
Annex I – point C a (new)
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point C a (new)
Annex I – paragraph 1 – point C a (new)
Ca. Sub-Saharan Africa: EUR 2 000 000 000
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex II – point D – paragraph 1
Annex II – point D – paragraph 1
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Annex II – point D – paragraph 1
Annex II – point D – paragraph 1
Southern Africa
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a decision
Annex III – point D – paragraph 1
Annex III – point D – paragraph 1
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Annex III – point D – paragraph 1
Annex III – point D – paragraph 1