4 Amendments of Anna ROSBACH related to 2011/2217(DEC)
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Has taken careful note of the extensive and detailed correspondence between the different decision taking levels in the EEA, i.e. the Management Board and the Executive Director, and the CONT rapporteur both before and after the plenary decision tof postponinge the granting of thedecision to grant discharge;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes, in a general context, the agreement on the Joint Statement and the Common Approach of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on decentralised agencies; recalls that certain elements of importance to the discharge have been addressed and taken up; believes that the roadmap on the follow-up to the Common Approach will take due account of those issues;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that the discharge decision for the EEA cannotshould be based upon additional requirements, e.g. OECD guidelines, when the implementation of those requirements have neither been officially required by the EU legislator nor by specific arrangements within the Agency during the respective discharge procedureOECD guidelines to ensure high quality internationally recognised accounting, audit and financial disclosure standards; invites the European institutions to examine whether it is advisable to incorporate and to commit to additionalintroducing OECD guidelines within a possible commoncommon working framework for all European institutions and bodies;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. IRemains of the opinion that on the basis of the information available now the Executive Director of the European Environmental Agency canshould not be granted discharge in respect of implementation of the budget of the EEA for the financial year 2010.