42 Amendments of Marita ULVSKOG related to 2013/0014(COD)
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation
–
–
The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) Simultaneous pursuit of the goals of railway safety and interoperability requires substantial technical work which must be led by a specialised body. That is why it was necessary, as part of the Second Railway Package in 2004, to createstrengthen within the existing institutional framework, and with respect for the balance of power in the Union, a European agencthe national authority responsible for railway safety and interoperability (hereinafter referred to as the Agency).
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
Recital 4
(4) The Fourth Railway Package proposes important changes to improve the functioning of the Single European railway area through amendments by way of recast to Directive 2004/49/EC and Directive 2008/57/EC, both directly linked to the tasks of the Agency. Those Directives, together with this Regulation, provide in particular for performing tasks related to issuing vehicle authorisations and safety certificates at the Union level. It implies a greater role of the AgencyMember State level.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
(5) The Agency should contribute to the creation and effective functioning of a Single European railway area without frontiers and guaranteeing a high level of safety while improving the competitive position of the railway sector. That should be attained by contributing, on technical matters, to the implementation of European Union legislation by enhancing the level of interoperability of railway systems and to developing a common approach to safety on the European railway system. The Agency should also perform the role of European authority responsible for issuing authorisations for placing on the market for railway vehicles and for types of vehicles, safety certificates for railway undertakings and authorisations for placing in service of trackside control- command and signalling sub-systems. Moreover, it. The Agency should monitor national railway rules and the performance of national authorities acting in the railway interoperability and safety fields.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
(6) In pursuing its objectives, the Agency should take full account of the process of enlargement of the Union and of the specific constraints relating to rail links with third countries. The Agency should have sole responsibility for the functions and powers assigned to it.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) The Agency, while performing its tasks, and particularly in relation to drafting recommendations, should take uptmost account of external railway expertise. This expertise should predominantly consist of professionals from the railway sector and the relevant national authorities. They should form competent and representative working parties of the Agency.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The Agency should provide independent and objective technical support, predominantly to the Commission. Directive …. [Railway Interoperability] provides the basis for drafting and revising Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs) while Directive … [Railway Safety] provides the basis for drafting and revising Common Safety Methods (CSMs) and Common Safety Targets (CSTs). The continuity of the work and the development of the TSIs, CSMs and CSTs over time require a permanent technical framework and a dedicated staff of a specialised body. To this end, the Agency should be responsible for providing the Commission with recommendations in relation to drafting and revising the TSIs, CSMs and CSTs. The national safety organisations and regulatory bodies should be equally able to request an independent technical opinion from the Agency.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Railway undertakings have been faced with various problems when applying for safety certificates to competent national authorities, ranging from protracting procedures and excessive costs to unfair treatment, especially of new entrants. The certificates issued in one Member State have not been unconditionally recognised in other Member States, with a detriment to the Single European rail area. In order to make the procedures for issuing safety certificates to railway undertakings more efficient and impartial, it is essential to migrate towards a single safety certificate valid throughout the Union and issued by the Agency. The revised Directive … [Railway Safety Directive] provides a basis for thisa national authority.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
(11) Currently Directive 2008/57/EC provides, in the case of rail vehicles, an authorisation of placing in service in each Member State, except in specific cases. The Task Force on vehicle authorisation set up by the Commission in 2011 discussed several cases where manufacturers and railway undertakings have suffered from excessive duration and cost of the authorisation process and proposed a number of improvements. As some problems are due to the complexity of the current vehicle authorisation process, it should be simplified. Each rail vehicle should only receive one authorisation and this authorisation for placing on the market for vehicles and for types of vehicles should be issued by the Agenca national authority. This would bring tangible benefits for the sector by reducing the costs and time of the procedure, and would diminish the risk of potential discrimination, especially of new companies wishing to enter a railway market. The revised Directive … [Railway Interoperability Directive] provides a basis for this.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) In order to further pursue the development of Single European rail area, in particular with relation to providing appropriate information to freight customers and passengers, and taking into account current involvement of the Agency, it is necessary tocould be give itn a strengthened role in the field of telematics applications. This would ensure their consistent development and swift deployment.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Given the importance of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) for the smooth development of the Single European railway area and its safety, and taking into account its fragmented development to date, it is necessary to strengthen its s overall coordination at the Union level. Therefore the Agency, as the most competent Union bodytogether with national authorities, should be given a more prominent role in this field to ensure consistent development of the ERTMS, to contribute to ensuring that ERTMS equipment complies with the specifications in force and to ensure that ERTMS-related European research programmes are coordinated with the development of ERTMS technical specifications. Moreover, in order to make the procedures for issuing authorisations for placing in service of trackside control- command and signalling sub-systems more efficient and impartial, it is essential to migrate towards a single authorisation valid in the Union and issued by the Agency. The revised Directive … [Railway Interoperability Directive] provides a basis for this.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) The EU wishes to prioritise long, cross-border rail corridors where international operators may use the same locomotives with the same drivers for journeys across several countries. The current lack of standardised power and signalling safety systems and the limited capacity of the rail network means that there is a need for more rapid development and interoperability of ERTMS, for example, together with national systems.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
(20) The interoperability of the Trans- European network should be enhanced and the new investment projects chosen for support by the Union should be in line with the objective of interoperability set in Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the Trans-European transport network. The Agency is the right institution to contribute to these objectives.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) Rolling stock maintenance is an important part of the safety system. There has been no genuine European market for the maintenance of rail equipment owing to the lack of a system for certification of maintenance workshops. This situation has been adding to the costs for the sector and results in journeys without loads. A European certification system for maintenance workshops should therefore gradually be developed and updated, with the Agency being the most appropriate body to propose adequate solutions to the Commission.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) The vocational qualifications required for train drivers are a major factor in both safety and interoperability in the Union. They are also a precondition for the free movement of workers in the railway industry. This question should be tackled with respect to the existing framework for social dialogue. The Agency should provide the technical support necessary in order to take account of this aspect at Union level.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
Recital 27
(27) Railway interoperability and safety legislation, implementation guides or recommendations of the Agency, may sometimes pose interpretation and other problems to the stakeholders. Proper and uniform understanding of those acts is a precondition for effective implementation of the railway acquis and the functioning of the railway market. Therefore, the Agency should actively engage in training and explanatory activities in that regard.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) In order to properly determine the level of fees and charges which the Agency isnational authorities are entitled to levy, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of articles dealing with issuing and renewal of authorisations for placing in service of trackside control- command and signalling subsystems, authorisations for placing on the market for vehicles and for types of vehicles, and safety certificates. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and Council.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 38
Recital 38
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39
Recital 39
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) issue guidelines and other non-binding documents facilitating application of railway interoperability and safety legislation pursuant to Articles 11, 15 and 24.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
The Agency shall set up a limited number of working parties for drawing up recommendations, in particular related to technical specifications for interoperability (TSIs), common safety targets (CSTs) and commonand safety methods (CSMs).
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3
Article 11 – paragraph 3
3. The Agency may issue guidelines and other non-binding documents to facilitate the implementation of railway safety legislation.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12
Article 12
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. The Agency may issue guidelines and other non-binding documents to facilitate the implementation of railway interoperability legislation.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Article 17 – paragraph 1
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
Article 32 – paragraph 3
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point c
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point d
Article 33 – paragraph 2 – point d
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 37 – paragraph 1
Article 37 – paragraph 1
1. The Agencynational authorities shall, at the Commission’s request, assist the Commission with the implementation of Union legislation aimed at enhancing the level of interoperability of railway systems and at developing a commonimproving the approach to safety on the European railway system.
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 1
Article 39 – paragraph 1
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 58 – paragraph 2 – point c
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 3 – point a
Article 73 – paragraph 3 – point a
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 73 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 73 – paragraph 3 – point b