8 Amendments of Marita ULVSKOG related to 2018/2025(BUD)
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that the application relates to 646 workers made redundant at Goodyear, the majority of them being between 30 and 54 years old; points also to the fact that a significant percentage of the redundant workers are between 55 and 64 years old with skills specific to the manufacturing sector; further notes that around 300 of the redundant workers are unskilled and have a migratory background, which puts them at aEmphasises that Waghäusl district, where the Philippsburg plant is located, is facing structural changes and that a high proportion of the workers made redundant by Goodyear have a migratory background or are older people, groups that seem to be the most disadvantaged on the regional jobs market; in view of this, acknowledges the importance of active labour market measures co-funded by the EGF for improving the chances of reintegration in the labour market of these groups;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Notes that the income supports measures will account for the maximum 35% of the overall package of personalised measures set out in the EGF Regulation; and that those actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Acknowledges that the coordinated package of personalised services has been drawn up in consultation with Welcomes the consultations with stakeholders including representatives of the redundant workers, sociall parties concerned especially representatives of the workers made redundant, social partners and regional authoritiners and regional authorities as well as the works council, trade union and management that took place while drawing up the co- ordinated package of personalised services;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the decision of the public employment service to take into account both future labour market needs and the qualifications of the workers concerned when designing a qualification and skills strategy;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8b. Recalls that in accordance with Article 7 of the EGF Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy; welcomes the assurance that the measures organised being are in line with Germany’s sustainability strategy, and that the body setting up the two transfer companies holds a sustainability certification.
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. StressNotes that the German authorities have confirmedprovided assurances that the eligibleproposed actions dowill not receive assistancefinancial support from other Union funds or financial instruments, that any double financing will be prevented and that they will be complementary with actions funded by the Structural Funds;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Reiterates that assistanceAcknowledges Germany’s confirmation that a financial contribution from the EGF mustwill not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies,the enterprise concerned is required to take by virtue of national law or pursuant to collective agreements, or measures for restructuring companies or sectors;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Recalls its previous concerns that EGF funding be used to go beyond what the transfer company would normally do for the workers; calls on the Commission to provide detailed analysis to show that this EGF funding is not being used to replace Member State or company obligations;