7 Amendments of Marita ULVSKOG related to 2018/2043(BUD)
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Expresses concern that , as a result of less restrictive environmental regulation and lower labour costs, firms operating in third countries may be more competitive than those operating in the Union;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Emphasises that the region of Hainaut’s unemployment rate is expected to rise by 6,1% and that job seekers in Charleroi are mostly low-skilled and that there is a high proportion of long-term unemployment;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Welcomes the decision to provide training courses designed to match the development priorities of Charleroi set out in the CATCH plan1a; __________________ 1a Plan Catalysts for Charleroi (CATCH), Accélérer la Croissance de l'Emploi dans la Région de Charleroi, Septembre 2017 http://www.catch-charleroi.be/
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 b (new)
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10 b. Is content to that the income support measures will account for 13,68% of the overall package of personalised measures, well below the maximum 35% set out in the Regulation; and that these actions are conditional on the active participation of the targeted beneficiaries in job-search or training activities;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. StressNotes that the Belgian authorities have confirmedprovided assurances that the eligibleproposed actions dowill not receive assistancefinancial support from other Union funds or financial instruments, that any double financing will be prevented and that they will be complementary with actions funded by the Structural Funds;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses that as of 15 March 2018, only 591 of the dismissed workers had found a job; insists, therefore, that an analysis be carried out at the end of the EGF intervention period in order to assess whether further reintegration aid should be deployed; regrets that the previous decision on the mobilisation of the EGF concerning this company (EGF/2014/011)1a led to a relatively low percentage of beneficiaries becoming reemployed; hopes that the current proposal will take account of this experience; ____________________ 1aDecision (EU) 2015/471 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (application EGF/2014/011 BE/Caterpillar, from Belgium) (OJ L 76, 20.3.2015, p. 58).
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14 a. Recalls that in line with Article 7 of the Regulation, the design of the coordinated package of personalised services should anticipate future labour market perspectives and required skills and should be compatible with the shift towards a resource-efficient and sustainable economy;