BETA

6 Amendments of Anna Maria CORAZZA BILDT related to 2010/2051(INI)

Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Holds the view that the integration of the WTO principles in the legal framework should not increase the number of recognised European standardisation organisations (ESOs) beyond the three existing ones, namely CEN, CENELEC, and the European Telecom Standards Institute (ETSI),
2010/09/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses, however, that these principles are not in themselves sufficient to ensure that small and medium-sized enterprises and societall stakeholders – in particular those representing health and safety, consumer and environmental interests – are adequately represented in the standardisation process; considers, therefore, that a vital element is the addition of the principle of "balanced representation", given that it is of the utmostit is importancet, whenever the public interest is concerned, to incorporatetake into account all stakeholder positions in a balanced manner, especially in the development of standards intended to support EU legislation and policies;
2010/09/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the important role of the "New Approach consultants" in verifying that harmonised standards comply with the corresponding EU legislation; draws attention to the fact that such consultants are currently selected by, and operate within, the ESOs, which places a significant administrative burden on these organisations and, at times, causes concern among stakeholders about the impartiality and independence of the process; calls on the Commission, therefore, to assess the need for a review of the existing procedures; believes, furthermore, that the Commission should identify a procedure for ensuring that mandated standards comply with other EU policies and legislation beyond the scope of the "New Approach"; considers that this should take place during the development of the standards in order to avoid delays and inefficiencies due to ex-post rejection;
2010/09/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that similar procedures, establishing a predetermined number of seats for the various stakeholder organisations, would constitute a significant improvement compared with the traditional process of standards development in support of EU policies and legislation; maintains that, despite the current difficulties in generalising the use of such a multi-stakeholder model, this approach should be explored by the ESOs without delay as an alternative for the drafting of standards in areas of public interest, in order to ensure a balanced decision-making process; proposes that the 98/34 Committee (or its successor) should decide, when considering a mandate, whether to use this alternative model if the standard in question makes it vital to secure broader stakeholder participation; stresses that such a model would not affect the national delegation principle, as the draft standard would continue to be examined by national mirror committees and adopted on a weighted vote by the national standards bodies (NSBs);deleted
2010/09/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 c (new)
22c. Calls on national standard bodies (NSBs) to follow the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) Code of Ethics in order to ensure that the impartiality of standards is not endangered from other activities, such as certification.
2010/09/15
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 d (new)
26d. Calls on Member States and the European Commission to promote education about the role of standards and the benefits of using them at all levels, in economic and technical schools for instance; invites NSBs to enhance their cooperation with trade associations in order to provide plausible information to SMEs on the benefits provided by standards;
2010/09/15
Committee: IMCO