12 Amendments of Isabella LÖVIN related to 2012/2009(DEC)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – points -a to -ae (new)
Paragraph 1 – points -a to -ae (new)
(-a) found that the CFP does not have adequate rules for key issues related to overcapacity of the fishing fleet; (-ab) found that the Member States have not fulfilled their obligation under the CFP of putting in place effective measures to match fishing capacity to fishing opportunities, and the Commission's monitoring and supervision of the Member States did not prevent significant implementation problems; (-ac) found that the investments on board fishing vessels funded by the European Fisheries Fund (EFF) could increase the ability of individual vessels to catch fish; -ad) found that the Union fishing fleet register was not correctly updated with details of fishing vessels scrapped with public aid; (-ae) found that the reporting of efforts to reduce fishing overcapacity was inadequate.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point a
Paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point b
Paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – point c
Paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Takes the view that a multi-species fishing system should be combined with the notion ofRecommends that the Commission: (a) take the initiative to develop actions to effectively reduce overcapacity of the fishing fleet, to address the above weaknesses, including better defining fishing capacity, setting effective limits for fishing fleets capacity; (b) establish whether the scheme of public aid for on-board investments needs to be reconsidered in light of the dif-ficulties in avoiding investments which increase fishing effort. ability.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recommends that the Member States: (a) design and implement measures to adapt their fleet to fishing opportunities and ensure that the fleet register is correctly updated, and that reports on their efforts to balance fishing capacity with fishing opportunities provide the required infor-mation and are of suitable quality; (b) ensure that any measures to aid investments on board are strictly applied and do not increase fishing ability; (c) ensure that selection criteria for fishing vessel decommissioning schemes are designed to have a positive impact on the sustainability of the targeted fish stocks and avoid providing public aid for decommissioning in-active fishing vessels.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – point a
Paragraph 3 – point a
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – point b
Paragraph 3 – point b
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 – point c
Paragraph 3 – point c
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – point b
Paragraph 4 – point b
(b) stepping up self-regulation for fishermen byfishermen's participation in developing and implementing local fleet management plans, while pursuing regionalisationin line with the CFP objectives;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – point c
Paragraph 4 – point c