BETA

5 Amendments of Sari ESSAYAH related to 2010/2074(INI)

Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Urges the Committee to organise a second consultative round together with another round of quantitative impact studies once the proposals will have taken more concrete and comprehensive content;
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Underlines that the implementation timetable must be long enough to reflect the overall impact of the revised standards on the industry and its capacity for lending to the real economy without exincluding the possibility of grandfathering, phasing in orand, if necessary, calendar revision to ensure a smooth transition to the new standards;
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Is, however, concerned that a crude LR may penalise entities providing traditional low-risk banking services (such as corporate and real-estate financing) or economies where the corporate sector is financed predominantly through lending, therefore proposes a solution where the leverage ratio is part of the Pillar 2 framework;
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Notes that the possible negative interplay between different measures, especially with the proposed leverage ratio and liquidity rules, should be carefully considered and calls for a comprehensive impact analysis which examines the potential effects of the leverage ratio requirement on the financial institutions´ business models and on national financial sectors;
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Calls for different capital treatment for an OTC transaction and a transaction through a central counterparty (CCP), provided that the CCP meets high-level requirements to be defined in European legislation while taking into account standards agreed at international level, with due regard for the potential costs for the corporate sector of using derivatives to hedge its commercial activities, and calls for rigorous quantitative impact studies before amending the current quantitative requirements for counterparty credit risks;
2010/06/15
Committee: ECON