4 Amendments of Algirdas SAUDARGAS related to 2016/0151(COD)
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 2– point b
Article 3 – paragraph 2– point b
(b) prejudices or presents a serious and grave risk of prejudice to public security or to public health, including the safeguarding of national security and defence; or.
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point c
Amendment 501 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 5
Article 3 – paragraph 5
5. Paragraphs 3 and 4 shall be without prejudice to the application of any procedure, remedy or sanction to the contraventions in question in the Member State which has jurisdiction over the media service provider concerned. In this case, Member State which has jurisdiction over the media service provider concerned, takes into account the notification of the notifying Member State about the compliance of media service provider concerned with the conditions laid down in points (a), (b) and/or (c) of Article 3(2).
Amendment 504 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 6
Article 3 – paragraph 6
6. Member States may, in urgent cases, derogate from the conditions laid down in points (b), (c) and (cd) of paragraph 3. Where this is the case, the measures shall be notified in the shortest possible time to the Commission and to the Member State which has jurisdiction over the media service provider, setting out the reasons for which the Member State considers that there is such urgency that derogating from those conditions is necessary.