10 Amendments of Elena Oana ANTONESCU related to 2011/2012(INI)
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission Communication demonstrating that stepping up to a 30% target isthere are technically feasible and economically affordable options to move beyond 20% target;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that EU reaffirms its conditional offer to move to a 30% reduction by 2020 compared to 1990, as part of a global and comprehensive agreement for the period beyond 2012 and provided that other developed countries commit themselves to comparable emission reductions and that more advanced developing countries contribute adequately according to their responsibilities and respective capabilities.
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes that the European Council has recognised that further reductions in the range of 80-95% by 2050 as compared to 1990 are necessary; points out that a linear trajectory between 2009 and 2050 would result in a 2020 target in the range of 34-38% as compared to 1990;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Reiterates that cumulative emissions are decisive for the climate system; notes that even with a pathway of 30% reductions in 2020, 55% in 2030, 75% in 2040 and 90% in 2050 the EU would still be responsible for approximately double its GHG emissions per capita share of the global 2°C compatible carbon budget, and that delaying emissions reductions increases the cumulative share significantly;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Concurs with the Commission analysis thatof moving to a 30% reduction target with cost-efficient effort sharing between ETS and non-ETS, and a 25% domestic effort (the rest with offsets), would correspond to an ETS cap reduction of 1.4 billion allowances;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Notes that one of the options of implementing the change in the ETS throughcould be cancelling allowances assigned for auctioning; considers however that all sectors should contribute;
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Considers that a move to a 3beyond 20% climate target for 2020 would restore the incentives for innovation lost by the easing of the 20% target;
Amendment 310 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Concludes that stepping up to a 3moving beyond 20% target has more benefits than costs for EU citizens and a domestic achievement of the reduction targets would bring the highest overall benefit;
Amendment 324 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Notes that energy-intensiveETS sectors are likely to end up with a very considerable number of unused freely allocated allowances at the end of the second ETS period in 2012, which can then be carried over to 2013- 2020 phase, putting them into a comparatively better position for international competition compared with 2008;