7 Amendments of Emilie TURUNEN related to 2011/2180(INI)
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Is critical to the one-size-fits all approach in the Bologna process; underlines the need to respect Member States different education systems and learning and teaching traditions, while making mobility possible for students and staff.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Highlights that the Bologna process should involve all stakeholders including staff and students at every stage of development, calls for a ongoing thorough analysis of the impact of the Bologna processes in order to guide future developments and allow decisions to be made in an evidence based approach
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Underlines the 2007 London communiqué whereby the social dimension of education was introduced as one of the goals of the Bologna Process; that this aims to ensure equitable access to education regardless of background; regrets that this goal has not seen sufficient progress, encourages the Commission to facilitate progress in this regard
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Highlights the uneven implementation of the Bologna process between countries and institutions, both between individual EU Member States and between EU Member States and non EU Member States that are Bologna signatories; emphasises that any scoreboard regarding the implementation of the Bologna process should examine the issue in depth; such analysis should include qualitative as well as quantitative assessment in order to guide future developments and allow decisions to be made in an evidence based approach;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Draws attention to the link between the Bologna process and the Professional Qualifications Directive 2005/36/EC; stresses the need for continuing and soft coordination by the Commission;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to support Member States in enhancing the transparency of European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) in order to increase transparency so that it can be used as a better comparative tool to facilitate the recognition of professional qualifications;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Underlines the need to respect Member State subsidiarity in terms of education policy and the different forms of education systems operating in the EU; criticises the one-size-fits-all approach adopted under the Bologna Process;