5 Amendments of Emilie TURUNEN related to 2012/2067(INI)
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that consumers have a right to effective and equal protection regardless of their mode of transport; calls for onmore single regulation comprising alltegration of the provisions and principles of passenger rights in the different transport modes, in order to reduce fragmentation and reconcile inconsistencies across the different areas of passengers‘ rights; underlines that such integration should in no way lead to a reduction of existing passengers' rights in any transport mode, and should on the contrary tend to align these rights on the highest standards ; considers in particular that the definitions of delays and cancellation should not create any distortion between the rights applicable in the different transport modes
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Insists that passengers should be better protected when using different successive transport modes during one single travel and have one integrated ticket, and that in such circumstances they should benefit from the highest rights applicable in one of these transport modes ;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the development of EU-wide tools to ensure optimised multimodality in efficient and, smooth and interoperable cross- border public transport services, in order to vouchsafe both the free movement of people and the competitiveness of such services vis-à-vis the use of private vehicles; considers that cross-border passengers should be given the possibility to buy one single ticket when travelling across more than two countries.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that passengers with limitreduced mobility or with disabilities must be given equal travel opportunities and unrestricted access and assistance to services, barrier-free access to the infrastructures, the vehicles, the assistance to services and to all the information they need.
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Is concerned about the difficulties for passengers, in particular when travelling across the borders, to benefit from the enforcement of their rights against companies failing to comply with them ; considers in this regard that independent national enforcement bodies should have the task to mediate between passengers and companies in order for the passengers to obtain enforcement of their rights without having to bear judicial costs ; underlines that cooperation between these national enforcement bodies would be much needed in order to address the difficulties encountered by cross-border passengers seeking to obtain enforcement of their rights